OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£250
Avg. price in US: ~$250
VRAM: 8 GB
Memory bus width: 128 bit
Thermal Design Power (TDP): 132 W

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

5.7

Good

5.3

Good

9.6

Exceptional

3.0
Gaming
Score components:
45.0%
2.1
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
2.1
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.0
Video editing
Score components:
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
2.1
Floating-point performance
15.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3.0
1080p
Score components:
55.0%
2.1
Floating-point performance
25.0%
2.8
VRAM
10.0%
2.1
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.7
1440p
Score components:
50.0%
2.1
Floating-point performance
30.0%
2.8
VRAM
15.0%
2.1
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.7
4K
Score components:
40.0%
2.1
Floating-point performance
35.0%
2.8
VRAM
20.0%
2.1
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
8.8
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices in UK

£?

Best rankings

#98 in Best Budget Graphic Cards
#218 in Best 8 GB Graphic Cards
#226 in Best AMD Radeon Graphic Cards
#801 in Best Graphic Cards For 1440p Gaming
#812 in Best Graphic Cards For Gaming
#880 in Best Graphic Cards

Verdict

The XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core is a compact dual-slot graphics card featuring 8GB of GDDR6 memory, 1792 stream processors, and a boost clock up to 2491 MHz. Built on the AMD RDNA 2 architecture, it utilizes a 128-bit memory interface and 32MB of Infinity Cache to deliver high-frame-rate 1080p gaming performance with excellent power efficiency. Main pros include its sleek dual-fan thermal design for quiet operation and its small form factor ideal for mini-ITX builds. However, it is limited by a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface which can hinder performance on older Gen3 platforms and offers modest 1440p capabilities.

Technical Specifications of XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core

Overall score

5.7

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.

Performance

4.5

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.

When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?

3DMark Port Royal score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.

When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

?

PassMark (G3D) result

What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark

When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests

When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?

Floating-point performance

What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.

When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Memory

2.7

Show more

Hide

VRAM

What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card

When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

Memory type

What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)

When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

GDDR6

GDDR version

What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

Memory bus width

What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

Maximum memory bandwidth

What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory

When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Platform & Features

8.5

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported

When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

PCIe lanes

What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication

When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

DirectX version

What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version

When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

Vulkan version

What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version

When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

?

OpenGL version

What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version

When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity & Media

8.9

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously

When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

Max digital resolution

What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution

When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort outputs

What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs

When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort version

What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported

When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort link rates

What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections

When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.5

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)

When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

Power consumption while under peak load

What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.

When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

Recommended PSU wattage

What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply

When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

Board power limit

What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board

When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

?

PCIe power spec

What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed

When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Design

7.2

Show more

Hide

Size

What it is: Physical size of the GPU card

When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?

Length

What it is: Physical length of the GPU card

When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

Height

What it is: Physical height of the GPU card

When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

Slot width

What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card

When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

?

Weight

What it is: Total weight of the graphics card

When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core vs the average graphics card

Why is XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

38.6% lower TDP
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (132 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.
Importance: MEDIUM
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (132 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.132 W vs 215 W
Includes dual BIOS
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
What it is: Includes dual BIOS for redundancy or overclocking profiles
When it matters: When you want a safer recovery path after tweaking fan curves or overclock settings, or you need separate quiet and performance profiles.
Importance: LOW
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
44.37 mm shorter card length
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.
What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.
Importance: LOW
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.241 mm vs 285.37 mm
15.4% lower PSU requirement
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply
When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.
Importance: LOW
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.550 W vs 650 W
19.8% higher user score
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.58 vs 8.000).
What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.58 vs 8.000).9.58 vs 8
Better FP64 ratio
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
What it is: Ratio of double-precision (FP64) to single-precision (FP32) performance
When it matters: When you need to know whether FP64 is merely present or genuinely useful.
Importance: LOW
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).1:16 vs 1:64
2.12x cheaper
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core is cheaper than the average graphics card (£250 vs £530).
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core is cheaper than the average graphics card (£250 vs £530).£250 vs £530
72.7% lower idle power draw
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (3 W vs 11 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 11 W.
What it is: Power consumption of the graphics card while idle.
When it matters: When the PC stays on for long hours and background power draw adds up.
Importance: LOW
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (3 W vs 11 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 11 W.3 W vs 11 W
Better FP64 ratio
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
38.6% lower TDP
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (132 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
Includes dual BIOS
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core includes dual BIOS, the average graphics card does not.
15.4% lower PSU requirement
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
72.7% lower idle power draw
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (3 W vs 11 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 11 W.
44.37 mm shorter card length
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.

Power & Cooling

Why is XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

20 fewer ray tracing cores
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (28 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.
12 fewer compute units
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
72 fewer TMUs
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (112 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
26% lower texture rate
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (279 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
15.3% lower base clock speed
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,626 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
2,560 fewer FP32 units
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1,792 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
61.4% lower compute throughput
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (8.9 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 23.105 TFLOPS.
0.4% lower boost clock speed
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2,491 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
128 bit narrower memory bus
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
50% lower memory bandwidth
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (224 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
4 GB less VRAM
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
26.3% slower memory speed
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
93.8% smaller L2 cache
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 32 MB). The average graphics card has 32 MB L2 cache.
50% less Infinity Cache
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer Infinity Cache than the average graphics card (32 MB vs 64 MB). The average graphics card has 64 MB Infinity Cache.
No DLSS support
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
Fewer PCIe lanes
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
40% larger process node
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
2 older
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,021 vs 2,023).
Older OpenCL version
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3.0).
No AV1 encoding
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
Older DisplayPort version
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
Narrower decode codec support
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
33.3% lower HDMI bandwidth
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower HDMI bandwidth than the average graphics card (32 Gbps vs 48 Gbps). The average graphics card has HDMI bandwidth of 48 Gbps.
1 fewer fans
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
17 °C lower thermal ceiling
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 93 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 93 °C.
No RGB lighting
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
4 mm higher card profile
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core is taller than the average graphics card (131 mm vs 127 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 127 mm.
128 bit narrower memory bus
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.128 bit vs 256 bit
20 fewer ray tracing cores
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (28 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.
What it is: Number of dedicated ray tracing processing cores or units
When it matters: When you care about ray-traced lighting, reflections, and shadows in newer games.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (28 vs 48). The average graphics card has 48 ray tracing cores.28 vs 48
1 fewer fans
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
What it is: Total number of cooling fans
When it matters: When you compare cooler designs and want one more clue about thermal potential.
Importance: MEDIUM
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).2 vs 3
12 fewer compute units
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (28 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.28 vs 40
50% lower memory bandwidth
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (224 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (224 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.224 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
72 fewer TMUs
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (112 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (112 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.112 vs 184
No DLSS support
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA DLSS upscaling technology
When it matters: When you play NVIDIA-supported games and want better frame rates at higher settings.
Importance: LOW
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
4 GB less VRAM
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.8 GB vs 12 GB

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core and

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

United States

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core?

Excellent 1080p gaming performance with high frame rates in modern titles
High power efficiency with significantly lower power draw than competitors like the RTX 3060
Compact dual-slot design (10.1 inches) suitable for small form factor (SFF) builds
Runs quiet and cool under standard gaming loads due to the Zero DB fan system
Strong price-to-performance value, often outperforming the RTX 3050 at a lower cost
Clean, 'barebones' aesthetic without RGB lighting, preferred by some users

What customers dislike about XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core?

Poor ray tracing performance that significantly impacts frame rates
Noticeable performance drop when used on older PCIe 3.0 motherboards due to 8x lane configuration
Mediocre performance in older legacy titles (DirectX 11) compared to Nvidia alternatives
Limited overclocking headroom; attempts to overclock often lead to system instability or crashes
Lack of 'bling' or RGB lighting may be a downside for users wanting a flashier build
Occasional driver stability issues and software 'glitches' reported by some users

Expert reviews

au.pcmag.com

14/10/2021

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Review (PCMag Australia)

The XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 is a capable mid-range graphics card built on AMD’s RDNA 2 architecture, designed primarily to handle 1080p gaming at high visual presets. Evaluated by PCMag Australia at a launch list price of A$699, it serves as a direct competitor to Nvidia's GeForce RTX 3060, regularly trading performance wins and losses depending on the specific title...Read more

uk.pcmag.com

13/10/2021

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Review (PCMag UK)

The XFX Speedster SWFT 210 is an able-enough 1080p-gaming graphics card built on AMD’s RDNA 2 architecture and the 7nm "Navi 23 XT" die. Launched at a list price of $329, it directly matches the MSRP and performance of Nvidia’s GeForce RTX 3060, trading frame rate wins and losses depending on the modern AAA or multiplayer game tested. Equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 memory, its standout...Read more

tomshardware.com

13/10/2021

AMD Radeon RX 6600 Review: RDNA2 Goes Mainstream - Tom's Hardware

XFX RX 6600 Speedster SWFT 210 Review Summary The XFX Radeon RX 6600 Speedster SWFT 210 is a highly barebones, dual-slot graphics card meant for mainstream 1080p gaming. Featuring a lightweight, compact design measuring 243x114x39 mm and weighing 615g, it utilizes two 95mm fans and a single 8-pin power connector to easily satisfy its low 132W TDP rating. The card reports an official...Read more

tech-critter.com

13/10/2021

Review - XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 igor´sLAB

The XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 is a highly efficient, dual-fan graphics card built specifically for solid 1080p rasterized gaming at an affordable price point. In benchmarks, it trades blows with NVIDIA's RTX 3060 and trails about 10% to 15% behind its sibling, the RX 6600 XT—a performance gap that users can easily close by overclocking the card through AMD's Adrenalin...Read more

pcper.com

13/10/2021

AMD Radeon RX 6600 Review - XFX SWFT 210 Tested - PC Perspective

The AMD Radeon RX 6600 (non-XT) is an entry-level graphics card powered by a scaled-down version of the Navi 23 GPU, featuring 28 Compute Units (1792 shaders), 32 MB of Infinity Cache, and 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit interface. Tested via the XFX Speedster SWFT 210 variant, the dual-fan, dual-slot card operates at a stock Game Clock of 2044 MHz and a Boost Clock of 2491 MHz,...Read more

pcmag.com

13/10/2021

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600Go to product viewer dialog for this item. Review - PCMag

The XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 is an able-enough 1080p gaming card competing with the Nvidia RTX 3060 at a $329 MSRP, offering strong performance in modern AAA titles and a low 132-watt power draw. It is highly efficient for compact builds, though it is limited by mediocre cooling performance and minimal overclocking headroom, according to PC Labs testing. Furthermore,...Read more

Video reviews

Best alternatives

ASRock ARC B580 Challenger OC

Graphics cards

XFX Speedster QICK 308 Radeon RX 7600 Black Edition

Graphics cards

PowerColor Fighter Radeon RX 7600

Graphics cards

Graphics cards

PowerColor Hellhound Radeon RX 7600

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 7600

Graphics cards

Acer Nitro ARC B580 OC

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 7600 OC Edition V2

Graphics cards

ASUS Prime GeForce RTX 5060 OC Edition

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6600

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce RTX 5050 Gaming OC

Graphics cards

XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 7600 Core Edition

Graphics cards

Compare XFX Speedster SWFT 210 Radeon RX 6600 Core with

Compare