Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£440VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):175 W

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.3

Technical score

10%

7.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 66% of graphics cards
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.6

Performance

24%

6.1

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

9.5

Design

4%

8.8

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 65%
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 95%
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
  • nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
nvidia-geforce-rtx-2060-super
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.6

Performance

24%

6.1

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

9.5

Design

4%

8.8

Connectivity & Media

6.3
User score
User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

5.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.2
Popularity
Popularity
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super has a popularity score of 5.4 points, which is higher than that of 55.4% of products in this category.
5.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

8.2

Price

7.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,120 points
This graphics card scores 9,120 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 74% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
4,977 points
This graphics card scores 4,977 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 72.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
16,483 points
This graphics card scores 16,483 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 72.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,703 points
This graphics card scores 6,703 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 76.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
7.18 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 7.18 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 80.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
175 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 175 W, which is lower than that of 62.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
175 W
This graphics card draws 175 W under peak load, which is lower than 65.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
218 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 218 W, which is lower than that of 52.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
175 W
Show more
Size
229x 113x 35 mm
Length
228.6 mm
This graphics card is 228.6 mm long, which is shorter than 82.8% of graphics cards.
Height
112.6 mm
This graphics card is 112.6 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
758 g
This graphics card weighs 758 g, which is lighter than 75.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 56.4 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (228.6 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    228.6 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 12.4 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112.6 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112.6 mm vs 125 mm
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 18.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (175 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    175 W vs 215 W
  • 6 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (89 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    89 °C vs 95 °C
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 18.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (175 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    175 W vs 215 W
  • 6 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (89 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    89 °C vs 95 °C
  • 56.4 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (228.6 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    228.6 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 12.4 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112.6 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112.6 mm vs 125 mm
  • 34.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1650 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 23.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1470 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,470 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 41.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (224.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    224.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 35.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (105.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    105.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 68.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 11% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.21 vs 8.000).
    7.21 vs 8
  • 34.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1650 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,650 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 23.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1470 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,470 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 41.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (224.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    224.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 35.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (105.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    105.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 68.1% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 27.2% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (16483 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    16,483 points vs 22,653 points
  • 37.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9120 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,120 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 45.7% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (4977 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    4,977 points vs 9,166 points
  • 68.8% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    7.18 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 44.5% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6703 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    6,703 points vs 12,074 points
  • 54.2% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.22 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2,176 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2,176 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,176 vs 4,352
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    July 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (6 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    6 vs 8
  • 50.8% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (445 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    445 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 52.8% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10800 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,800 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    4 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 11 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (78 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    78 °C vs 67 °C
  • 28 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (28 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    28 dB vs 0 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcgamer.com
09/11/2020
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
02/08/2019
Summary of the review
E
eurogamer.net
03/07/2019
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
03/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
21/09/2020
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
07/10/2019
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.net
24/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techgage.com
06/07/2019
Summary of the review
O
overclock3d.net
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
I
ign.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
10/12/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
02/08/2019
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
09/07/2019
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
09/07/2019
Summary of the review
R
rockpapershotgun.com
02/07/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

  • Strong performance for 1080p high-refresh and 1440p gaming
  • Improved 8GB GDDR6 VRAM over the original 6GB model, enhancing future-proofing
  • Excellent value, offering performance close to the original RTX 2070 for a lower price
  • High build quality and attractive aesthetic, particularly in Founders Edition models
  • Reliable drivers and solid support for features like DLSS and Ray Tracing
  • Efficient cooling on most models, maintaining stable temperatures under load

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super

  • Noticeable fan noise or coil whine reported on certain partner models
  • Not powerful enough for consistent 4K gaming or some ultra-demanding AAA titles at 1440p
  • Green LED logo on Founders Edition is non-customizable without third-party software
  • Ray tracing performance can still struggle in very demanding modern games
  • Larger physical size on some triple-fan variants may not fit in smaller cases

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce RTX 2060 Super is a midrange graphics card based on the 12nm Turing architecture, featuring 2,176 CUDA cores, 34 RT cores for hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and 272 Tensor cores supporting DLSS 2.0. A significant upgrade over the original 2060, it boasts 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a wider 256-bit memory interface, delivering a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s and a boost clock speed of 1650 MHz. Main pros include its expanded 8GB frame buffer which makes it highly capable for 1440p gaming, its competitive performance that rivals the original RTX 2070, and support for modern features like Variable Rate Shading and DirectX 12 Ultimate. However, cons include a higher power draw of 175W compared to its predecessor, lack of support for newer frame generation technologies found in the 40-series, and performance that may struggle with path tracing or high-refresh AAA gaming at resolutions above 1440p.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found