NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£280VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):150 W

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.3

Technical Score

10%

7.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 81% of graphics-cards
5.3

Technical Score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

3.3

Performance

24%

5.0

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

7.4

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

8.3

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 80% of graphics-cards
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

Based on 118 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 87% of graphics-cards
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1070

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1070 is a high-performance graphics card built on the 16nm Pascal architecture, featuring 1,920 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1506 MHz, and a boost clock of 1683 MHz. It is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 256 GB/s of bandwidth and approximately 6.5 TFLOPS of single-precision performance within a 150W TDP. Key advantages include its excellent power efficiency, generous VRAM for its class, and strong capability for 1080p and 1440p gaming even in modern titles with reduced settings. However, it lacks hardware support for real-time ray tracing (RT cores) and DLSS, and it can struggle with maintaining high frame rates at 4K resolution or in the most demanding current AAA games.

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

Technical Score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

3.3

Performance

24%

5.0

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

7.4

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

8.3

Connectivity & Media

5.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has a technical score of 5.3 points, which is lower than that of 80.5% of products in this category.
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.3

Number of reviews

Based on 118 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has a user score of 7.76 points, which is lower than that of 86.7% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has a popularity score of 6.3 points, which is higher than that of 60.5% of products in this category.
6.3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has a popularity score of 6.3 points, which is higher than that of 60.5% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

5.5

Overall score

40%

9.0

Price

6.6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has a value-for-money score of 6.6 points, which is lower than that of 73.9% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
6,000 points
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
6,000 points
This graphics card scores 6,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 82.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
1,210 points
3DMark Port Royal score
1,210 points
This graphics card scores 1,210 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 81% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
13,508 points
PassMark (G3D) result
13,508 points
This graphics card scores 13,508 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 77.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,112 points
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,112 points
This graphics card scores 6,112 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 78.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
6.46 TFLOPS
Floating-point performance
6.46 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 6.46 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 82.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5X
GDDR version
GDDR5X
This graphics card uses GDDR5X memory, which is older than on 84.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
256 GB/s
Maximum memory bandwidth
256 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 256 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 80.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12.1
DirectX version
12.1
This graphics card supports DirectX 12.1, which is older than on 77.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
150 W
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
150 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 150 W, which is lower than that of 73.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
155 W
Power consumption while under peak load
155 W
This graphics card draws 155 W under peak load, which is lower than 75.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
150 W
Board power limit
150 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 150 W, which is lower than that of 75.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.8% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
150 W
Show more
Size
267x 112x 40 mm
Length
267 mm
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
112 mm
Height
112 mm
This graphics card is 112 mm tall, which is shorter than 76.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 3.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,094 g
Weight
1,094 g
This graphics card weighs 1,094 g, which is heavier than 53.6% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • Supports ECC memory
    ECC memory
    yes
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    500 W
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    150 W
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 14.4% faster VRAM clock
    GPU memory speed
    2002 MHz
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2002 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,002 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    Slot width
    2 slot/s
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    Height
    112 mm
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    Multi-GPU max
    2
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    DVI outputs
    1
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • Supports ECC memory
    ECC memory
    yes
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 14.4% faster VRAM clock
    GPU memory speed
    2002 MHz
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2002 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,002 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    Multi-GPU max
    2
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    SLI/CrossFire
    yes
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    NVLink/Bridge
    yes
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    DVI outputs
    1
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    Recommended PSU wattage
    500 W
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    Thermal Design Power (TDP)
    150 W
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    150 W vs 215 W
  • 33.3% lower board power limit
    Board power limit
    150 W
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    150 W vs 225 W
  • Uses hybrid cooling
    Has air-water cooling
    yes
    This graphics card uses hybrid cooling, the average graphics card does not.
  • 50% lower idle power draw
    Idle power consumption
    6 W
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    6 W vs 12 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    Slot width
    2 slot/s
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 13 mm lower card height
    Height
    112 mm
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (112 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    112 mm vs 125 mm
  • 32.8% lower boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    1,683 MHz
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1683 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,683 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    0
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    Fan count
    1
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 3.2x larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    16 nm
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • 25 fewer compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    15
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (15 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    15 vs 40
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    VRAM
    8 GB
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • No DLSS support
    DLSS
    no
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    Ray tracing
    no
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 9.6% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.57 vs 7.2).
    6.57 vs 7.2
  • 3.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.76 vs 8.000).
    7.76 vs 8
  • 32.8% lower boost clock speed
    Boost GPU clock
    1,683 MHz
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1683 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,683 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    Ray tracing cores / units
    0
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 25 fewer compute units
    SM count / Compute Units
    15
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (15 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    15 vs 40
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    Tensor/AI cores
    0
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 47% lower texture rate
    Texture rate
    202 GTexel/s
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (202 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    202 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 64 fewer TMUs
    Texture mapping units (TMUs)
    120
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (120 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    120 vs 184
  • 21.6% lower base clock speed
    Base GPU clock
    1,506 MHz
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1506 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,506 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 71.2% lower FP32 performance
    FP32 performance
    6.5 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 34% lower pixel rate
    Pixel rate
    107.7 GPixel/s
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (107.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    107.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 86.8% lower ray tracing score
    3DMark Port Royal score
    1,210 points
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (1210 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    1,210 points vs 9,166 points
  • 40.4% lower PassMark score
    PassMark (G3D) result
    13,508 points
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (13508 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    13,508 points vs 22,653 points
  • 59.1% lower gaming score
    3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
    6,000 points
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (6000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    6,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 99.7% lower FP16 performance
    FP16 performance
    0.1 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    0.1 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 49.4% lower compute score
    PassMark (DirectCompute) result
    6,112 points
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6112 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    6,112 points vs 12,074 points
  • 2,432 fewer FP32 units
    FP32 ALUs (count)
    1920
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1920 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    1,920 vs 4,352
  • 71.9% lower compute throughput
    FP32 performance
    6.46 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    6.46 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 58.3% lower FP64 performance
    FP64 performance
    0.2 TFLOPS
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    VRAM
    8 GB
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 57.9% slower memory speed
    Effective memory speed
    8,000 MHz
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (8000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    8,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 42.9% lower memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    256 GB/s
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (256 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    256 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    L2 cache size
    2 MB
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    L1 cache size
    48
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 3.2x larger process node
    Semiconductor size
    16 nm
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    16 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    DLSS
    no
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    Ray tracing
    no
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    PCI Express (PCIe) version
    3.0
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 7 older
    Release date
    2016
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2016 vs 2023).
    June 2016
    2,016 vs 2,023
  • No AI upscalers
    AI upscalers
    no
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    Mesh shaders support
    no
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    Resizable BAR / Smart Access Memory (SAM)
    no
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Lower VRS tier
    Variable Rate Shading (VRS) tier
    Tier 1
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older encoder generation
    Encoder generation
    6
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (6 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    6 vs 8
  • Older DirectX version
    DirectX version
    12.1
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12.1 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older shader model
    Shader Model
    6.4
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.4 vs 6.8).
    6.4 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    Sampler Feedback support
    no
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 68.6% fewer transistors
    Number of transistors
    7,200 million
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (7200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    7,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    FSR versions
    3.0
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    AV1 encode
    no
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    AV1 decode
    no
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    DSC
    no
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    DisplayPort version
    1.4
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower decode codec support
    HW decode codecs
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    HDMI version
    2.0b
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    HW encode codecs
    H.264/H.265/VP9
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    HDCP version
    2.2
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    Max monitors per output type
    1
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    NVDEC generation
    3
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    3 vs 6
  • 2 fewer fans
    Fan count
    1
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 30 dB noisier at idle
    Idle noise level
    30 dB
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (30 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    30 dB vs 0 dB
  • 11 °C higher load temperature
    Load GPU temperature
    78 °C
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (78 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    78 °C vs 67 °C
  • 6.6 dB noisier under load
    Load noise level
    42 dB
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (42 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    42 dB vs 35.4 dB

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 118 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070?

  • Excellent longevity: Still capable of 60+ FPS in many modern titles at 1080p.
  • Generous VRAM: 8GB of memory has aged better than contemporaries with only 4GB or 6GB.
  • High power efficiency: Low TDP (150W) allows for cool and quiet operation even under load.
  • Legendary value: Widely considered one of the best price-to-performance cards in Nvidia's history.
  • 1440p capable: Solid performance at 1440p for older games and well-optimised newer titles.

What customers dislike about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070?

  • No hardware Ray Tracing: Lacks the RT cores found in newer RTX series cards.
  • End of life support: Driver support is reportedly reaching its final stages as of 2025.
  • Struggles with UE5: Modern AAA games using Unreal Engine 5 often fail to reach 30 FPS even on low settings.
  • Lack of DLSS: Cannot use Nvidia's AI upscaling (DLSS), though it can use the less-effective AMD FSR.
  • Founders Edition thermal design: Reference models use a blower fan that can trap heat compared to triple-fan partner cards.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techspot.com
14/07/2021
Summary of the review
G
gamespot.com
26/07/2017
Summary of the review
N
nordic.ign.com
16/12/2016
Summary of the review
P
pugetsystems.com
11/06/2016
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
10/06/2016
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
31/05/2016
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
30/05/2016
Summary of the review
B
babeltechreviews.com
29/05/2016
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
29/05/2016
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
29/05/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
01/06/2017
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
07/07/2018
Summary of the review
S
sea.ign.com
17/12/2016
Summary of the review
O
overclockersclub.com
29/05/2016
Summary of the review
H
hardwarecanucks.com
29/05/2016
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
01/08/2016
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
10/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
01/06/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
03/06/2016
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
29/05/2016
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
30/05/2016
Summary of the review
H
hardware.fr
19/07/2016
Summary of the review
O
otakugame.fr
29/05/2016
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
12/06/2017
Summary of the review
M
multiplayer.it
31/05/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
02/11/2016
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
20/06/2016
Summary of the review

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)