OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£380VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):175 W

MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

90%

6.2

Technical score

10%

9.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 65% of graphics cards
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

â–¼Worse than 58%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components

44%

4.6

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 69%
9.6

User score

User score
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

70%

9.5

User ratings

30%

9.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 99%
  • msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
  • msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
  • msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
  • msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
  • msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
  • msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
  • msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
msi-geforce-rtx-2060-super-ventus-gp-oc
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Score components:

44%

4.6

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

8.2

Power & Cooling

11%

8.9

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

8.7

Connectivity & Media

6.2
User score
User score
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 99% of models
Score components

70%

9.5

User ratings

30%

9.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.6
Popularity
Popularity
9.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Popularity:
MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC has a popularity score of 9.9 points, which is higher than that of 91.2% of products in this category.
9.9
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
9,000 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 9,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 74.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
5,216 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 5,216 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 71.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
13,503 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 13,503 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 77.3% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,623 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 7,623 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 72.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
7.25 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 7.25 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 80% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
14 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 14 Gbps, which is slower than on 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
175 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 175 W, which is lower than that of 62.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
184 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 184 W under peak load, which is lower than 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
217 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 217 W, which is lower than that of 53% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
184 W
Show more
Size
232x 127x 42 mm
This graphics card measures 232x127x 42 mm, which is more compact than 83.7% of graphics cards.
Length
232 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 232 mm long, which is shorter than 80.6% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
127 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 127 mm tall, which is taller than 53.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
728 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 728 g, which is lighter than 76.9% of graphics cards.
Show more

MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 53 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (232 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    232 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 20.3% higher user score
    User score
    9.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.63 vs 8.000).
    9.63 vs 8
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (232x127 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    232x127 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 18.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (175 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    175 W vs 215 W
  • 6 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (89 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    89 °C vs 95 °C
  • 20.3% higher user score
    User score
    9.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC
    the average graphics card
    MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.63 vs 8.000).
    9.63 vs 8
  • 2.34x more popular
    MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC is more popular than the average graphics card (9.85 vs 4.2).
    9.85 vs 4.22
  • 128 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (272 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    272 vs 144
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 18.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (175 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    175 W vs 215 W
  • 6 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (89 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    89 °C vs 95 °C
  • 53 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (232 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    232 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (232x127 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    232x127 x 42 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 33.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1665 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,665 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 23.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1470 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,470 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 40.6% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (226.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    226.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 33.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1665 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,665 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 23.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1470 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,470 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 40.6% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (226.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    226.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 34.7% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (106.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    106.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 68.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    7.18 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 40.4% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (13503 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    13,503 points vs 22,653 points
  • 38.7% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (9000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    9,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 43.1% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (5216 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    5,216 points vs 9,166 points
  • 68.5% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (7.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    7.25 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 58.3% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2,176 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2,176 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,176 vs 4,352
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    July 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 50.8% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (445 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    445 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 52.8% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10800 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,800 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • No 3D output
    This graphics card does not support 3D output, the average graphics card does.
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    4 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

B
bit-tech.net
21/02/2020
Summary of the review
CyberpowerPC Ultra 5 RTX Super Review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC

  • Strong 1080p and capable 1440p gaming performance, often matching more expensive models through overclocking.
  • Efficient and quiet twin-fan cooling system under standard loads.
  • Compact 23cm length makes it suitable for mini-ITX and smaller case builds.
  • Solid value proposition for entry-level ray tracing and DLSS support.
  • Reliable build quality with a protective backplate for structural reinforcement.

What we don't like about MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC

  • Plastic backplate rather than metal, which does not assist with heat dissipation.
  • Lacks a 'zero-fan' mode; fans remain spinning even when the system is idle.
  • Missing a VirtualLink USB-C port, which is present on the Founders Edition model.
  • Heatsink is smaller than some competitors, leading to high temperatures under extreme stress or poor airflow.
  • Fans can become significantly loud when pushed to 100% speed or high manual fan curves.

Verdict

The MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus GP OC is a factory-overclocked mid-range graphics card powered by the NVIDIA Turing architecture, featuring 2,176 CUDA cores, 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, and a boost clock speed of 1665 MHz. It utilises a dual-fan TORX Fan 2.0 thermal design for efficient airflow and a sturdy backplate for structural reinforcement, making it a capable choice for 1080p and 1440p gaming with support for real-time ray tracing and DLSS. Main pros include its solid 1440p performance, quiet operation under load, and reliable cooling efficiency. However, cons include its lack of a VirtualLink USB-C port, a plastic shroud and backplate that may feel less premium than metal alternatives, and its inability to handle demanding AAA titles at 4K resolution with high settings.

Compare MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of MSI GeForce RTX 2060 Super Ventus Gp OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found