Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£390VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

6.7

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

▼Worse than 57% of graphics cards
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

▲Better than 53%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

9.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.7

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 58%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 83%
  • kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
  • kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
  • kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
  • kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
  • kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
  • kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
kfa2-geforce-rtx-4060-ti-ex-8gb
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

6.1

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

9.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.7

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

6.7
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

4.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB has a popularity score of 4.7 points, which is higher than that of 51.7% of products in this category.
4.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.3
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
13,469 points
This graphics card scores 13,469 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 54.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
8,000 points
This graphics card scores 8,000 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 58.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,638 points
This graphics card scores 22,638 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
12,038 points
This graphics card scores 12,038 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
23.1 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 23.1 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is higher than that of 51.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
288 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 288 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 69.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.8% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
25.92 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 25.92 Gbps, which is faster than on 52.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
160 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 160 W, which is lower than that of 68% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
160 W
This graphics card draws 160 W under peak load, which is lower than 71.2% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
160 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 160 W, which is lower than that of 71.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
Size
251x 130x 40 mm
Length
251 mm
This graphics card is 251 mm long, which is shorter than 67.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Height
130 mm
This graphics card is 130 mm tall, which is taller than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
675 g
This graphics card weighs 675 g, which is lighter than 81.5% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more

KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 5.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2640 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 34 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (251 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    251 mm vs 285 mm
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 5.4% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2640 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,640 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 20.3% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2310 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,310 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 28.6% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Newer HDMI version
    This graphics card supports a newer HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.1a vs 2.1).
    2.1a vs 2.1
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 28.9% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (160 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    160 W vs 225 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 34 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (251 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    251 mm vs 285 mm
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 0.3% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB
    the average graphics card
    KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.98 vs 8.000).
    7.98 vs 8
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 22.4% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (126.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    126.7 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 11.4% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (337.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    337.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 35.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    288 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 5 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
guru3d.com
13/06/2023
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
23/05/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.net
04/07/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
01/07/2023
Summary of the review
C
cowcotland.com
21/12/2023
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB

  • Excellent power efficiency, consuming significantly less power (approx. 160W) than the previous generation RTX 3060 Ti
  • Compact 2-slot design and 25cm length makes it ideal for small form factor (SFF) and ITX builds
  • Supports latest NVIDIA features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and AV1 encoding for high-quality streaming
  • Runs remarkably cool and quiet under load, with die temperatures often staying in the low 60°C range
  • Strong performance for 1080p gaming, especially for users upgrading from much older GTX 10 or RTX 20 series cards
  • Uses a standard 8-pin power connector instead of the controversial 12VHPWR connector found on some other 40-series cards

What we don't like about KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB

  • Disappointing generational performance uplift, offering only roughly a 10% average improvement over the RTX 3060 Ti in raw rasterization
  • 8GB of VRAM is widely considered insufficient for modern AAA titles at ultra settings and limits future-proofing
  • Narrow 128-bit memory bus causes performance to drop significantly when moving from 1080p to 1440p or 4K resolutions
  • Poor value proposition at its $399 launch price compared to competitors like the Radeon RX 6700 XT, which offers more VRAM
  • Lacks DisplayPort 2.1 support, sticking with the older DisplayPort 1.4a standard
  • Inconsistent performance in some titles where it can occasionally perform slower than its predecessor

Verdict

The KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB is a mid-range graphics card powered by the NVIDIA Ada Lovelace architecture, featuring 4,352 CUDA cores and a factory-overclocked boost clock of 2,640 MHz (further extendable to 2,655 MHz via 1-Click OC). It is equipped with 8GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit interface with an 18 Gbps speed, delivering a bandwidth of 288 GB/s and drawing a maximum of 160W through a single 8-pin PCIe connector. Its main pros include exceptional power efficiency, access to advanced features like DLSS 3 Frame Generation and 3rd Gen Ray Tracing cores, and a compact dual-slot thermal design that maintains low temperatures around 60°C. However, its primary cons are the restrictive 8GB VRAM capacity and narrow 128-bit bus, which can significantly bottleneck performance at 1440p or 4K resolutions in modern, memory-intensive titles.

Compare KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of KFA2 GeForce RTX 4060 Ti EX 8GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found