OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Intel ARC Pro A60 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£330VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):130 W

Intel ARC Pro A60 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Intel ARC Pro A60
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

90%

6.7

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 57% of graphics cards
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

â–²Better than 57%
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

44%

5.8

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

7.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 57%
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 88%
  • intel-arc-pro-a60
  • intel-arc-pro-a60
intel-arc-pro-a60
intel-arc-pro-a60
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card Intel ARC Pro A60

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

44%

5.8

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

7.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.3

Platform & Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

9.6

Connectivity & Media

6.7
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

2.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
2.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Popularity:
Intel ARC Pro A60 has a popularity score of 2.4 points, which is lower than that of 54.7% of products in this category.
2.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 57% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

7.4
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
7,365 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 7,365 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 79.8% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
?
PassMark (G3D) result
9,493 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 9,493 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 85.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
9,493 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 9,493 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 62.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
10.04 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 10.04 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 75% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
384 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 384 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 60.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
4
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 4 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 2, which is more advanced than on 66.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
10 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 10 Gbps, which is slower than on 63.1% of graphics cards and equal to 1.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
130 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 130 W, which is lower than that of 79.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
130 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 130 W under peak load, which is lower than 80.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
130 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 130 W, which is lower than that of 81.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
75 W
Show more
Size
241x 112x 20 mm
Length
241 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 241 mm long, which is shorter than 75% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
20 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 20 mm tall, which is shorter than 100% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Weight
820 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 820 g, which is lighter than 69.6% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

Intel ARC Pro A60 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 216 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (256 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    256 vs 40
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 39.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    130 W vs 215 W
  • 105 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (20 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    20 mm vs 125 mm
  • 112 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (256 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    256 vs 144
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 216 more compute units
    This graphics card has more compute units than the average graphics card (256 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    256 vs 40
  • 112 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (256 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    256 vs 144
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 4.2% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 14.3% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • Supports virtual GPU
    This graphics card supports virtual GPU features, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (4 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    4 vs 3
  • Newer DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports a newer DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (2 vs 1.4a).
    2.0 vs 1.4a
  • 39.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    130 W vs 215 W
  • 42.2% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (130 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    130 W vs 225 W
  • 29 °C lower load temperature
    This graphics card has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (38 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    38 °C vs 67 °C
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 105 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (20 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    20 mm vs 125 mm
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 24 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    16 vs 40
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 18.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2050 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,050 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 3.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Intel ARC Pro A60
    the average graphics card
    Intel ARC Pro A60 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.73 vs 8.000).
    7.73 vs 8
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 24 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    16 vs 40
  • 18.2% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2050 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,050 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 31.2% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (262.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    262.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 55.5% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (10 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    10.04 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 58.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (9493 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    9,493 points vs 22,653 points
  • 49.8% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7365 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    7,365 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 19.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (131.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    131.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 2,304 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2048 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,048 vs 4,352
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 15.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (16000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    16,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 14.3% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (384 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    384 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 50% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (12 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    12 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 20% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    6 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    1 vs 8
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • 95% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (1150 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    1,150 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.6 vs 6.8).
    6.6 vs 6.8
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Intel ARC Pro A60

  • High VRAM capacity (12GB GDDR6) for its class, which is beneficial for complex workstation tasks and demanding titles
  • Compact single-slot design that fits into small form factor (SFF) workstations and leaves room for air circulation
  • Excellent hardware acceleration for AV1 encoding and media processing
  • Low peak power consumption (130W), making it compatible with most standard power supplies
  • ISV-certified drivers specifically optimized for professional applications like CAD and 3D modeling (e.g., Autodesk, SolidWorks)
  • Support for up to four 4K displays with high-resolution output (up to 8K) and HDR/Dolby Vision

What we don't like about Intel ARC Pro A60

  • Inconsistent performance across different applications and games compared to more mature platforms from NVIDIA or AMD
  • Lower raw computing power than consumer counterparts like the Arc A770, making it an entry-level to lower-midrange professional solution
  • Limited availability for standalone purchase, as it is often sold through authorized distributors or pre-installed in OEM systems
  • Requires motherboard support for Resizeable BAR (ReBAR) to achieve full performance; without it, performance can drop significantly
  • Drivers are still evolving and can sometimes be less polished, leading to stability issues or bugs in certain titles

Verdict

The Intel Arc Pro A60 is a professional workstation graphics card built on a 6nm process with the Xe-HPG architecture, featuring 16 Xe-cores, 16 ray tracing units, and 256 XMX engines for AI acceleration. It is equipped with 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing 384 GB/s of bandwidth, and operates within a 130W power envelope in a compact single-slot form factor. Main pros include its support for four 4K displays (or one 8K), hardware-accelerated AV1 encoding/decoding, and official ISV certifications for professional CAD and modeling software. However, it faces cons such as lower raw gaming performance compared to consumer-focused cards and potential driver instability with older legacy applications.

Compare Intel ARC Pro A60 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Intel ARC Pro A60 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found