OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£520VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):200 W

EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

90%

6.4

Technical score

10%

9.2

User score

▼Worse than 59% of graphics cards
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

▼Worse than 62%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

44%

5.0

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

9.6

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 63%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 89%
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-3060-ti-xc-gaming
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components:

44%

5.0

Performance

24%

5.8

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

9.5

Platform & Features

5%

9.6

Design

4%

9.1

Connectivity & Media

6.4
User score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Score components

70%

9.1

User ratings

30%

9.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.2
Popularity
Popularity
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 89% of models
Popularity:
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming has a popularity score of 9.6 points, which is higher than that of 88.8% of products in this category.
9.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

7.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
10,631 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 10,631 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 67.7% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
7,136 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 7,136 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 61.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
22,046 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 22,046 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 54.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
9,896 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 9,896 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 61.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
16.63 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 16.63 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 61.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
32.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 32.4 Gbps, which is faster than on 57.6% of graphics cards and equal to 21.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
200 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 200 W, which is lower than that of 51.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.9% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
200 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 200 W under peak load, which is lower than 54% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
240 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 240 W, which is higher than that of 52% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
200 W
Show more
Size
201.8x 110x 38 mm
Length
201.8 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 201.8 mm long, which is shorter than 89.5% of graphics cards.
Height
110 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 110 mm tall, which is shorter than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
998 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 998 g, which is lighter than 54.7% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Show more

EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 83.2 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (201.8 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    201.8 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 15.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming
    the average graphics card
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.21 vs 8.000).
    9.21 vs 8
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2.27x more popular
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming is more popular than the average graphics card (9.56 vs 4.2).
    9.56 vs 4.22
  • 15.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming
    the average graphics card
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.21 vs 8.000).
    9.21 vs 8
  • 2.27x more popular
    EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming is more popular than the average graphics card (9.56 vs 4.2).
    9.56 vs 4.22
  • 16 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (80 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    80 vs 64
  • 3.65x higher BF16 performance
    This graphics card has a higher BF16 performance than the average graphics card (129.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has BF16 performance of 35.5 TFLOPS.
    129.6 TFLOPS vs 35.5 TFLOPS
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • Includes LHR limiter
    This graphics card includes an LHR limiter, the average graphics card does not.
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 83.2 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (201.8 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    201.8 mm vs 285 mm
  • 15 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (110 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    110 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 31.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1710 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 26.6% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1410 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,410 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 31.8% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (259.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    259.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 31.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1710 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 26.6% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1410 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,410 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 31.8% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (259.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    259.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 32 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (152 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    152 vs 184
  • 26.3% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (16.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    16.63 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 16.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (136.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    136.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 27.6% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (10631 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    10,631 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 22.1% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (7136 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    7,136 points vs 9,166 points
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • 60% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (8 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    8 nm vs 5 nm
  • 3 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    December 2020
    2,020 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 32.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (392 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    392 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    5 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 10 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (47 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    47 °C vs 37 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
windowscentral.com
15/03/2021
Summary of the review
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti review
T
thefpsreview.com
01/02/2021
Summary of the review
EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC GAMING REVIEW
T
tweakers.net
n.v.t.
Summary of the review
EVGA videokaarten vergelijken - Tweakers Would you like to see English-language technical reviews for this specific EVGA model, which often provide mo...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming

  • Excellent 1440p performance, often matching or exceeding the previous-gen RTX 2080 Super
  • Compact dual-slot design (approx. 202mm) makes it ideal for small form factor (SFF) builds
  • Solid build quality featuring a metal backplate for added protection and heat dissipation
  • Runs relatively cool under stock settings, typically staying below 70°C
  • Great price-to-performance ratio, especially when found near its original MSRP
  • EVGA's highly regarded customer service and transferable warranty support

What we don't like about EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming

  • Stock fan curve can be aggressive and loud under heavy load
  • Overclocking performance is limited by a single 8-pin power connector (220W power limit)
  • Significant fan noise increases if manually pushing for higher clock speeds
  • The 8GB of VRAM may act as a bottleneck for some modern AAA titles at ultra settings
  • Requires manual undervolting or custom fan curves to balance noise and thermals optimally

Verdict

The EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming is a compact, dual-slot graphics card built on NVIDIA's Ampere architecture, featuring 4,864 CUDA cores and 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit memory bus. This specific XC model is factory overclocked with a boost clock of 1,710 MHz and utilizes a shortened 201.8 mm PCB with a dual-fan iCX3 cooling system and a protective metal backplate. Its main advantages include exceptional 1080p and 1440p gaming performance that rivals the previous generation's RTX 2080 Super, alongside a small form factor ideal for Mini-ITX builds. However, some users have noted cons such as potential fan startup clicking noises due to the aggressive fan curve and the 8GB of VRAM being a limiting factor for high-resolution textures in some future titles compared to the standard 3060's 12GB variant.

Compare EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of EVGA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti XC Gaming and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found