Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£480VRAM:12 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):185 W

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

▼Worse than 70% of graphics cards
6.8

Value for money

Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

▼Worse than 68%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.4

Performance

24%

5.4

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.0

Platform & Features

5%

7.9

Design

4%

7.3

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 74%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

9.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 91%
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
  • asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
asus-dual-geforce-rtx-2060-evo-oc-12gb
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.4

Performance

24%

5.4

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

9.0

Platform & Features

5%

7.9

Design

4%

7.3

Connectivity & Media

5.9
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

9.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
9.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB has a popularity score of 9.5 points, which is higher than that of 88.2% of products in this category.
9.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

8.0

Price

6.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
7,500 points
This graphics card scores 7,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 79% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
4,244 points
This graphics card scores 4,244 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 74.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
15,936 points
This graphics card scores 15,936 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 73.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
28,995 points
This graphics card scores 28,995 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 93.2% of graphics cards and equal to 2.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
7.31 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 7.31 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 79.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
12 GB
This graphics card has 12 GB of VRAM, which is more than 45.5% of graphics cards and equal to 16% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
336 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 336 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 63.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
1
This graphics card offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
185 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 185 W, which is lower than that of 56.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
184 W
This graphics card draws 184 W under peak load, which is lower than 60.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
184 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 184 W, which is lower than that of 61.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
184 W
Show more
Size
242x 130x 53 mm
This graphics card measures 242x130x 53 mm, which is more compact than 60.1% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Length
242 mm
This graphics card is 242 mm long, which is shorter than 73.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
130 mm
This graphics card is 130 mm tall, which is taller than 58.6% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2.7 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2.7 slot/s, which is wider than 65% of graphics cards and equal in width to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,200 g
This graphics card weighs 1,200 g, which is heavier than 59.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 43 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    242 mm vs 285 mm
  • 16.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB
    the average graphics card
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.29 vs 8.000).
    9.29 vs 8
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 2.4x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (28995 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    28,995 points vs 12,074 points
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (242x130 x 53 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    242x130 x 53 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 2.25x more popular
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB is more popular than the average graphics card (9.5 vs 4.2).
    9.5 vs 4.22
  • 16.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB
    the average graphics card
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.29 vs 8.000).
    9.29 vs 8
  • 2.25x more popular
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB is more popular than the average graphics card (9.5 vs 4.2).
    9.5 vs 4.22
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 2.4x higher compute score
    This graphics card has a higher compute score than the average graphics card (28995 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    28,995 points vs 12,074 points
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 8 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (29 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    29 °C vs 37 °C
  • 43 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    242 mm vs 285 mm
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (242x130 x 53 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    242x130 x 53 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 31.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1710 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 50.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (80.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    80.64 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 40.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (228.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    228.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 6.2% worse value for money
    ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.78 vs 7.2).
    6.78 vs 7.2
  • 31.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1710 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 50.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (80.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    80.64 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 40.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (228.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    228.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 68.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (7.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    7.18 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 48 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (136 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    136 vs 184
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 6 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    34 vs 40
  • 6 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (34 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    34 vs 40
  • 48.9% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    7,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 29.7% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (15936 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    15,936 points vs 22,653 points
  • 53.7% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (4244 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    4,244 points vs 9,166 points
  • 68.2% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (7.3 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    7.31 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 58.3% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2,176 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2,176 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,176 vs 4,352
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 25% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.3% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1710 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,710 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • 2 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2021 vs 2023).
    December 2021
    2,021 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 50.8% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (445 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    445 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 52.8% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10800 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,800 million vs 22,900 million
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 10 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (105 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    105 °C vs 95 °C
  • 5 mm higher card profile
    This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    130 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.2 slot/s wider design
    This graphics card occupies more slots than the average graphics card (2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2.7 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techpowerup.com
03/01/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB

  • Efficient 12GB VRAM buffer for memory-intensive productivity apps and high-quality textures in modern games
  • Quiet operation thanks to Axial-tech fan design and 0dB technology for light workloads
  • Effective cooling performance with temperatures typically staying between 55°C and 70°C under load
  • Solid 1080p gaming performance with support for Ray Tracing and DLSS technology
  • Durable build quality featuring a protective backplate and Auto-Extreme automated manufacturing
  • Easy installation and setup process reported by multiple users

What we don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB

  • Diminishing returns on performance gains (often only 4-5%) compared to the original 6GB model
  • Limited memory bandwidth (192-bit bus) can bottleneck the card at higher resolutions like 1440p
  • Higher launch price and limited availability made it a poor value proposition for some gamers
  • Fixed neon blue/pink LED accent that cannot be customized or turned off via software
  • Ray tracing performance is considered underwhelming for modern, high-demand AAA titles

Verdict

The ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 EVO OC 12GB is a refreshed Turing-architecture graphics card featuring a significant VRAM upgrade to 12GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit interface. It operates with 2,176 CUDA cores and delivers a boosted clock speed of up to 1710 MHz in OC mode, supporting real-time ray tracing and DLSS via dedicated RT and Tensor cores. Its thermal design utilizes a 2.7-slot footprint with two Axial-tech fans and 0dB technology for silent operation under light loads, while a protective aluminum backplate adds structural rigidity. Pros include the substantial 12GB VRAM headroom for modern textures, excellent cooling performance, and an easy setup process. However, potential cons include its dated architecture compared to the RTX 30/40 series, lack of PCIe 4.0 support, and diminished value when priced near more modern mid-range alternatives.

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce RTX 2060 Evo OC 12GB and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found