OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55VRAM:6 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):120 W

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC

5.2/10

▼Worse than 84% of graphics cards

6.6

▼Worse than 78%

4.7

▼Worse than 87%

9.4

★Better than 95%

2.5
Gaming
Gaming
2.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for gaming performance.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
1.4
Floating-point performance
25.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.9
Video editing
Video editing
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for video editing performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
1.4
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.5
1080p
1080p
2.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1080p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
1.4
Floating-point performance
25.0%
3.6
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.3
1440p
1440p
2.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1440p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
1.4
Floating-point performance
30.0%
3.6
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.4
4K
4K
2.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 4k performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
1.4
Floating-point performance
35.0%
3.6
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC

5.2

Show more

Hide

Performance

3.0

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

Floating-point performance

Show more

Memory

3.5

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR version

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Show more

Platform & Features

7.3

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity & Media

7.5

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power & Cooling

8.9

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

120 W

Show more

Design

8.0

Show more

Hide

Size

242x 130x 43 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC vs the average graphics card

Why is ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

44.2% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (120 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
120 W vs 215 W
30.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (450 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
450 W vs 650 W
14.4% faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2002 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
2,002 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
43 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
242 mm vs 285 mm
46.7% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (120 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
120 W vs 225 W
17.9% higher user score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC
the average graphics card
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.43 vs 8.000).
9.43 vs 8
9.64x cheaper
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£55 vs £530).
£55 vs £530
1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

17.9% higher user score
User score
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC
the average graphics card
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.43 vs 8.000).
9.43 vs 8
9.64x cheaper
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC is cheaper than the average graphics card (£55 vs £530).
£55 vs £530
2.37x more popular
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
10 vs 4.22

14.4% faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2002 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
2,002 MHz vs 1,750 MHz

1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

44.2% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (120 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
120 W vs 215 W
30.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (450 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
450 W vs 650 W
46.7% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (120 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
120 W vs 225 W

43 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (242 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
242 mm vs 285 mm
0.4 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2.1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2.1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s

Why is ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

6 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
6 GB vs 12 GB
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
30 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (10 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
10 vs 40
27.8% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1809 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,809 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
3.2x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
16 nm vs 5 nm
112 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (72 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
72 vs 184
64 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
192 bit vs 256 bit
1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3

8.3% worse value for money
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.65 vs 7.2).
6.65 vs 7.2

40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
30 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (10 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
10 vs 40
27.8% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1809 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,809 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
112 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (72 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
72 vs 184
62.1% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (144.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
144.5 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
144 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
0 vs 144
55.7% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (72.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
72.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
82.5% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (3.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
3.94 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
18.3% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1569 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,569 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
16 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
48 vs 64
63.5% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (8264 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
8,264 points vs 22,653 points
71.8% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (4142 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
4,142 points vs 14,678.5 points
64.4% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (4298 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
4,298 points vs 12,074 points
80.1% lower compute throughput
This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (4.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
4.57 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
70.8% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.14 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
96.4% lower INT8 performance
This graphics card has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (8.8 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
8.8 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
3,072 fewer FP32 units
This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1,280 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
1,280 vs 4,352

6 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
6 GB vs 12 GB
64 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
192 bit vs 256 bit
57.1% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (192.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
192.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
57.9% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (8008 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
8,008 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
95.8% smaller L2 cache
This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (1 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
1 MB vs 24 MB
62.5% smaller L1 cache
This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
48 vs 128

3.2x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (16 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
16 nm vs 5 nm
No DLSS support
This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
Older PCIe version
This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
3.0 vs 4.0
7 older
This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2016 vs 2023).
July 2016
2,016 vs 2,023
No AI upscalers
This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
No mesh shaders
This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
Worse SAM support
This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Older encoder generation
This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
4.0 vs 8
Older DirectX version
This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
12.1 vs 12 Ultimate
No sampler feedback
This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
80.8% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (4400 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
4,400 million vs 22,900 million
Older FSR version
This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
3.0 vs 3.1

No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No AV1 decoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
2 vs 3
No DSC support
This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
Older HDMI version
This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2 vs 2.1).
2.0 vs 2.1
Narrower encode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Older DisplayPort version
This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
1.4 vs 1.4a
Narrower decode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
Older HDCP version
This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
2.2 vs 2.3
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
3 vs 6

1 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
2 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
7 °C higher load temperature
This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (74 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
74 °C vs 67 °C

No backplate
This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
5 mm higher card profile
This graphics card is taller than the average graphics card (130 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
130 mm vs 125 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

tweaktown.com

27/07/2017

Summary of the review

ASUS GeForce GTX 1060 Dual 3G: Mid-Range On The Cheap

The ASUS GeForce GTX 1060 Dual 3G is an affordable, entry-to-mid-range graphics card that delivers strong 1080p gaming performance for mainstream titles like CS:GO and Rocket League. Built using ASUS's automated Auto-Extreme Technology and Super Alloy Power II components, the card boasts enhanced efficiency, reduced power loss, and lower operating temperatures. Despite having only 3GB of VRAM, it runs surprisingly faster out of the box than its 6GB sibling due to higher base and boost GPU clocks, which peaked at 1784MHz during testing without manual adjustment. Additionally, it features patented wing-blade fans that provide high air pressure while running up to three times quieter than reference models. Beyond gaming, the card functions efficiently for digital cryptocurrency mining, drawing power from just a single 6-pin PCIe connector. Several notable pros and cons define this graphics card. On the positive side, it offers exceptional 1080p gaming performance at a low price point, high power efficiency, and a dual-fan cooling system that remains quiet under heavy workloads. Its white aesthetic also makes it a great match for themed PC builds. However, its primary...

tweakers.net

22/11/2016

Summary of the review

RX 480 en GTX 1060 Round-up (Inclusief Asus GTX 1060 Dual OC)

Based on the comprehensive hardware round-up, the review evaluates nine custom AMD Radeon RX 480 and Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 graphics cards to see how third-party manufacturers optimized these mainstream GPUs. The benchmarks reveal that performance differences between the individual cards are minimal, with out-of-the-box factory overclocks only providing negligible improvements in real-world gameplay. In terms of raw performance, the GTX 1060 variants generally hold a 10% to 20% lead in DirectX 11 titles like Dragon Age: Inquisition and Grand Theft Auto V. However, the RX 480 variants show greater longevity and consistency at higher resolutions like 1440p and 4K, occasionally taking the lead in newer DirectX 12 and Vulkan titles such as Hitman and Total War: Warhammer. Furthermore, AMD's crossfire capability and wider, more affordable FreeSync monitor support contrast with Nvidia's lack of SLI support for the 1060, though Nvidia users benefit from G-Sync compatibility. The review highlights several pros and cons for the specific manufacturer designs across both GPU lines. For the Nvidia GTX 1060 cards, the Gigabyte G1 Gaming stands out as a top value recommendation for...

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC

Excellent 1080p gaming performance for mainstream and eSport titles
Quiet operation with patented Wing-Blade fans that can run passively under light loads
Effective dual-fan cooling system that maintains stable temperatures during long sessions
Strong overclocking potential with easy-to-use GPU Tweak II utility
Attractive white-shroud design that complements specific PC build aesthetics
Reliable build quality featuring Auto-Extreme automated production technology
VR-friendly with dual HDMI ports for easier headset connectivity

What we don't like about ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC

Notable 'coil whine' or buzzing sounds reported by some users under heavy strain
Bulky physical size may not fit comfortably in smaller SFF (Small Form Factor) cases
Does not support SLI (Scalable Link Interface) for multi-GPU configurations
Plastic shroud material can feel somewhat cheap compared to higher-end series like Strix
Cooling performance is slightly inferior to more premium models like the ROG Strix
Performance begins to struggle at resolutions higher than 1080p or at Ultra settings in newer games

Verdict

The Asus Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC is a mid-range graphics card based on the Pascal architecture, featuring a white 'Stormtrooper' shroud designed to match Asus signature motherboards. Available in 6GB and 3GB GDDR5 variants, the 6GB OC model specifically features 1,280 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1,569MHz, and a boost clock reaching 1,809MHz in OC mode. Main characteristics include a 192-bit memory interface, a 120W TDP powered by a single 6-pin connector, and dual Patented Wing-Blade fans for 105% more air pressure. Key pros are its factory-overclocked performance, quiet operation with fans that stay idle below 60°C, and VR-friendly dual HDMI 2.0 ports. Notable cons include a lack of a protective backplate on standard models, potential coil whine under heavy load, and the 3GB variant's significantly reduced core count and memory capacity for modern gaming.

Best alternatives

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1060 WINDFORCE 2X 6GB

Graphics cards

PNY GeForce GTX 1060 6GB

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Graphics cards

ASUS GeForce GTX 980

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 480

Graphics cards

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 480 8GB

Graphics cards

Sapphire Radeon RX 480 8GB

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 480 Gaming 8GB

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon R9 380

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon R9 380X

Graphics cards

EVGA GeForce GTX 550 Ti 2GB

Graphics cards

EVGA GeForce GTX 970 Gaming

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1060 OC and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found