Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):165 W

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
5.0/10

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.5

Technical score

10%

9.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 87% of graphics cards
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 80%
4.5

Technical score

Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

2.6

Performance

24%

4.0

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

6.3

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

8.2

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 90%
9.3

User score

User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 91%
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-980
nvidia-geforce-gtx-980
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

Technical score
Technical score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

2.6

Performance

24%

4.0

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

6.3

Platform & Features

5%

9.2

Design

4%

8.2

Connectivity & Media

4.5
User score
User score
9.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.3
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
4,500 points
This graphics card scores 4,500 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 87.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.5% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
4,500 points
This graphics card scores 4,500 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 73.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
11,071 points
This graphics card scores 11,071 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 82.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
4,747 points
This graphics card scores 4,747 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 84.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
4.61 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 4.61 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 89.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
4 GB
This graphics card has 4 GB of VRAM, which is less than 88% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
224.4 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 224.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12.1
This graphics card supports DirectX 12.1, which is older than on 77.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
5.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 5.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
165 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 165 W, which is lower than that of 65.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
200 W
This graphics card draws 200 W under peak load, which is lower than 54% of graphics cards and equal to 3.6% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
165 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 165 W, which is lower than that of 68.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
165 W
Show more
Size
267x 111x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 267x111x 40 mm, which is more compact than 85.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,030 g
This graphics card weighs 1,030 g, which is heavier than 50.4% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 4.01x faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (7010 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    7,010 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 4 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    4 vs 0
  • 23.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (165 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    165 W vs 215 W
  • 16.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.29 vs 8.000).
    9.29 vs 8
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 16.1% higher user score
    User score
    9.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.29 vs 8.000).
    9.29 vs 8
  • 9.64x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£55 vs £530).
    £55 vs £530
  • 2.37x more popular
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
    10 vs 4.22
  • 4.01x faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (7010 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    7,010 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 4 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    4 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 23.3% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (165 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    165 W vs 215 W
  • 26.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (165 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    165 W vs 225 W
  • 7 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (30 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    30 °C vs 37 °C
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 51.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1216 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,216 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 24 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    16 vs 40
  • 41.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1127 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,127 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 10.7% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.5 vs 7.2).
    6.5 vs 7.2
  • 51.5% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1216 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,216 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 24 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    16 vs 40
  • 41.3% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1127 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,127 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 59.2% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (155.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    155.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 52.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (77.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    77.82 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 77.9% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    4.98 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 51.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (11071 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    11,071 points vs 22,653 points
  • 69.3% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (4500 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    4,500 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 50.9% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (4500 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    4,500 points vs 9,166 points
  • 79.9% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (4.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    4.61 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 60.7% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (4747 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    4,747 points vs 12,074 points
  • 70.8% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.14 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 2,304 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2048 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,048 vs 4,352
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 63.1% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (7012 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    7,012 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 49.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (224.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    224.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 9 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2014 vs 2023).
    September 2014
    2,014 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    5 vs 8
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12.1 vs 12 Ultimate
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 77.3% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (5200 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    5,200 million vs 22,900 million
  • 34.9% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (398 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    398 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2 vs 2.1).
    2.0 vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    2 vs 6
  • 73% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 13 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (80 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    80 °C vs 67 °C
  • 31 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (31 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    31 dB vs 0 dB
  • 8.2 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (43.6 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    43.6 dB vs 35.4 dB

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
digitaltrends.com
20/09/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
21/10/2014
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
13/10/2014
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
22/09/2014
Summary of the review
L
legitreviews.com
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
P
phoronix.com
30/09/2014
Summary of the review
H
hexus.net
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
S
slashgear.com
19/09/2014
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
18/04/2016
Summary of the review
C
comptoir-hardware.com
29/12/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

  • Excellent power efficiency with a low TDP of 165W
  • Quiet operation, often described as 'eerily quiet' or 'nearly silent'
  • Strong cooling performance, maintaining low temperatures even under load
  • High performance for its time, especially at 1080p and 1440p resolutions
  • VR Ready certification, providing a smooth experience for virtual reality applications
  • Great overclocking potential due to thermal efficiency

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980

  • 4GB VRAM is a major limitation for modern, graphically demanding AAA titles
  • Struggles to maintain playable frame rates at 4K resolution on high settings
  • Historically poor price-to-performance value compared to cards like the GTX 970
  • Incremental performance gains over previous-generation flagships (like 780 Ti) rather than a 'revelatory' leap
  • Lacks modern features like hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS support

Verdict

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980, launched in 2014, is a high-end graphics card based on the Maxwell 2.0 architecture and a 28nm manufacturing process. It features 2,048 CUDA cores, a base clock of 1126 MHz (boosting to 1216 MHz), and 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit interface, delivering a memory bandwidth of 224 GB/s. Key advantages include its class-leading power efficiency with a low 165W TDP, support for DirectX 12, and then-innovative features like Dynamic Super Resolution (DSR) and Multi-Frame Sampled Anti-Aliasing (MFAA). However, its primary downsides today are the 4 GB VRAM limitation, which struggles with modern AAA titles, and the lack of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and DLSS support found in newer architectures.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found