Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon R9 380X Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):190 W

AMD Radeon R9 380X Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon R9 380X
4.5/10

Overall score

Score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.2

Technical score

10%

7.4

User score

â–¼Worse than 92% of graphics cards
6.1

Value for money

Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 89%
4.2

Technical score

Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

2.2

Performance

24%

3.6

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

6.3

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

5.3

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 92%
7.4

User score

User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 94%
  • amd-radeon-r9-380x
  • amd-radeon-r9-380x
  • amd-radeon-r9-380x
  • amd-radeon-r9-380x
  • amd-radeon-r9-380x
  • amd-radeon-r9-380x
  • amd-radeon-r9-380x
amd-radeon-r9-380x
amd-radeon-r9-380x
amd-radeon-r9-380x
amd-radeon-r9-380x
amd-radeon-r9-380x
amd-radeon-r9-380x
amd-radeon-r9-380x
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #1166 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon R9 380X

Technical score
Technical score
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

2.2

Performance

24%

3.6

Memory

12%

8.3

Power & Cooling

11%

6.3

Platform & Features

5%

8.8

Design

4%

5.3

Connectivity & Media

4.2
User score
User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

6.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.4
Popularity
Popularity
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD Radeon R9 380X has a popularity score of 6.9 points, which is higher than that of 65% of products in this category.
6.9
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.5

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
3,200 points
This graphics card scores 3,200 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
6,131 points
This graphics card scores 6,131 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 92.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
2,198 points
This graphics card scores 2,198 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 94.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
3.97 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 3.97 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 90.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
4 GB
This graphics card has 4 GB of VRAM, which is less than 88% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
182.4 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 182.4 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 89.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.2
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.2, which is older than on 95.1% of graphics cards and equal to 3.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
1
This graphics card offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
5.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 5.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
190 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 190 W, which is lower than that of 55.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
340 W
This graphics card draws 340 W under peak load, which is higher than 82.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
190 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 190 W, which is lower than that of 59% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
190 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
221 mm
This graphics card is 221 mm long, which is shorter than 85.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Height
115 mm
This graphics card is 115 mm tall, which is shorter than 72.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,010 g
This graphics card weighs 1,010 g, which is lighter than 50.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.4% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon R9 380X vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 64 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (221 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    221 mm vs 285 mm
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 9.64x cheaper
    AMD Radeon R9 380X is cheaper than the average graphics card (£55 vs £530).
    £55 vs £530
  • 10 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    115 mm vs 125 mm
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 9.64x cheaper
    AMD Radeon R9 380X is cheaper than the average graphics card (£55 vs £530).
    £55 vs £530
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 64 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (221 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    221 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 10 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (115 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    115 mm vs 125 mm
  • 61.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (970 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    970 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 49.5% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (970 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    970 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 81% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (31 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    31.04 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 17.3% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon R9 380X has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.13 vs 7.2).
    6.13 vs 7.2
  • 8.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon R9 380X
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon R9 380X has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.38 vs 8.000).
    7.38 vs 8
  • 61.3% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (970 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    970 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 49.5% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (970 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    970 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 81% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (31 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    31.04 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 67.4% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (124.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    124.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 82.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    3.97 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 56 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (128 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    128 vs 184
  • 8 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (32 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    32 vs 40
  • 72.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (6131 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    6,131 points vs 22,653 points
  • 78.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (3200 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    3,200 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 81.8% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (2198 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    2,198 points vs 12,074 points
  • 86.6% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (4 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    3.97 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 82.7% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (4 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    3.97 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 2,304 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (2048 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    2,048 vs 4,352
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 70% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (5700 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    5,700 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 59.3% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (182.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    182.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 18.6% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1425 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,425 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    16 vs 128
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 8 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2015 vs 2023).
    November 2015
    2,015 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    3 vs 8
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4).
    1.2 vs 1.4
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.5 vs 6.8).
    6.5 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 78.2% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (5000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    5,000 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
    1.4a vs 2.1
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 2.3).
    1.4 vs 2.3
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 73% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 13 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (50 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    50 °C vs 37 °C
  • 54.5% higher peak power draw
    This graphics card has a higher peak power draw than the average graphics card (340 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    340 W vs 220 W
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
legitreviews.com
20/11/2015
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
A
anandtech.com
23/11/2015
Summary of the review
H
hardwarecanucks.com
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
G
gamersnexus.net
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
30/12/2015
Summary of the review
G
goldfries.com
09/05/2016
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
22/12/2015
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
H
hexus.net
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
P
pcmasters.de
21/12/2015
Summary of the review
G
gamestar.de
19/11/2015
Summary of the review
N
noticias3d.com
28/11/2025
Summary of the review
H
hardware.info
19/11/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon R9 380X

  • Solid 1080p performance at maximum settings for its era
  • Comes with 4GB GDDR5 standard, aiding in VRAM-intensive games
  • Competitive pricing compared to Nvidia's GTX 960
  • Supports modern features like AMD FreeSync, Vulkan, and DirectX 12
  • Partner models often feature quiet operation and effective cooling solutions
  • Good performance-to-price ratio for entry-level 1440p gaming

What we don't like about AMD Radeon R9 380X

  • High power consumption compared to more efficient Nvidia competitors
  • Limited overclocking headroom with stability issues beyond factory tweaks
  • Minimal performance lead over the significantly cheaper R9 380
  • Outdated driver support limits its ability to run modern 2023+ titles
  • Uses older 'Antigua' architecture with a downgraded 256-bit memory bus
  • Can struggle with stuttering in demanding modern titles without lowering settings

Verdict

Launched in November 2015 for approximately $229, the AMD Radeon R9 380X is a performance-tier graphics card based on the 28nm Antigua XT (GCN 1.2) architecture. It features a fully unlocked core with 2,048 stream processors, 128 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs, operating at a base clock of 970 MHz alongside 4GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit interface (182.4 GB/s bandwidth). Its main advantages include solid 1080p and entry-level 1440p gaming performance that effectively bridged the market gap between the GTX 960 and GTX 970, alongside support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 and Vulkan. However, it is hindered by high power consumption with a 190W TDP, lack of HDMI 2.0 support, and diminished long-term driver maintenance.

Compare AMD Radeon R9 380X with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon R9 380X and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found