Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£400VRAM:8 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):205 W

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon Pro W5700
5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.6

Technical score

10%

7.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 78% of graphics cards
6.6

Value for money

Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

3.9

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

8.5

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 77%
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 95%
  • amd-radeon-pro-w5700
  • amd-radeon-pro-w5700
amd-radeon-pro-w5700
amd-radeon-pro-w5700
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon Pro W5700

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

3.9

Performance

24%

5.6

Memory

12%

7.1

Power & Cooling

11%

8.5

Platform & Features

5%

8.2

Design

4%

8.6

Connectivity & Media

5.6
User score
User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.2
Popularity
Popularity
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD Radeon Pro W5700 has a popularity score of 6.1 points, which is higher than that of 59.7% of products in this category.
6.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

6.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
8,654 points
This graphics card scores 8,654 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 75.9% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
3,600 points
This graphics card scores 3,600 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 77% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
14,128 points
This graphics card scores 14,128 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 76.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
7,614 points
This graphics card scores 7,614 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 72.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
8.89 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 8.89 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 77.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
8 GB
This graphics card has 8 GB of VRAM, which is less than 57.5% of graphics cards and equal to 25.1% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
448 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 448 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is higher than that of 41.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 11% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12.1
This graphics card supports DirectX 12.1, which is older than on 77.4% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
6
This graphics card supports up to 6 displays, which is more than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
5
This graphics card offers 5 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 99.9% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
25.92 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 25.92 Gbps, which is faster than on 52.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
205 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 205 W, which is lower than that of 51.3% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
205 W
This graphics card draws 205 W under peak load, which is lower than 53.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
550 W
This graphics card recommends a 550 W PSU, which is lower than that of 62.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 13.3% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
205 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 205 W, which is lower than that of 55.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
205 W
Show more
Size
267x 111x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 267x111x 40 mm, which is more compact than 85.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,200 g
This graphics card weighs 1,200 g, which is heavier than 59.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon Pro W5700 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 2 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (5 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    5 vs 3
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 3x larger L1 cache
    This graphics card has more L1 cache than the average graphics card (384 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    384 vs 128
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 2 more DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has more DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (5 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    5 vs 3
  • 3 more monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports more monitors per output type than the average graphics card (6 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    6 vs 3
  • 15.4% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (550 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    550 W vs 650 W
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 38.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1183 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,183 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 23% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1930 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,930 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 11.5% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon Pro W5700
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon Pro W5700 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.17 vs 8.000).
    7.17 vs 8
  • 9.9% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon Pro W5700 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.55 vs 7.2).
    6.55 vs 7.2
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 38.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1183 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,183 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 23% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1930 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,930 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 60.6% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (8.9 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    8.89 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 27.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (277.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    277.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 26.3% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (120.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    120.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 40 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (144 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    144 vs 184
  • 37.6% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (14128 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    14,128 points vs 22,653 points
  • 60.7% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (3600 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    3,600 points vs 9,166 points
  • 4 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (36 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    36 vs 40
  • 41% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (8654 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    8,654 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 96.4% lower INT8 performance
    This graphics card has a lower INT8 performance than the average graphics card (8.7 TOPS vs 242 TOPS). The average graphics card has INT8 performance of 242 TOPS.
    8.66 TOPS vs 242 TOPS
  • 61.3% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (8.9 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    8.89 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 4 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (8 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    8 GB vs 12 GB
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 83.3% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (4 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    4 MB vs 24 MB
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 40% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (7 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    7 nm vs 5 nm
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 4 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2019 vs 2023).
    November 2019
    2,019 vs 2,023
  • Lower VRS tier
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5.1 vs 6.8).
    5.1 vs 6.8
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12.1 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12.1 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • 55% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (10300 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    10,300 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • No HDMI output
    This graphics card does not include HDMI output, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 31 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (31 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    31 dB vs 0 dB
  • 10 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (77 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    77 °C vs 67 °C
  • 7.8 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (43.2 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    43.2 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
servethehome.com
10/05/2020
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
26/11/2019
Summary of the review
L
linkedin.com
03/02/2020
Summary of the review
I
igorslab.de
16/01/2020
Summary of the review
J
jonpeddie.com
06/12/2019
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
26/11/2019
Summary of the review
E
extremetech.com
19/11/2019
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
19/11/2019
Summary of the review
T
techgage.com
19/11/2019
Summary of the review
A
aecmag.com
19/11/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon Pro W5700

  • Excellent performance in professional CAD and design applications such as SolidWorks, Siemens NX, and Maya.
  • First workstation GPU to feature USB-C connectivity with 15W power delivery for displays or VR headsets.
  • Extensive multi-monitor support with five Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 outputs capable of driving 8K 60Hz or multiple 4K screens.
  • Competitive pricing, often undercutting the Nvidia Quadro RTX 4000 while delivering better performance in specific workloads.
  • Supports PCIe Gen4, providing higher bandwidth for compatible motherboards and systems.
  • Optimized professional drivers that ensure better stability and 10-bit OpenGL support across various applications.

What we don't like about AMD Radeon Pro W5700

  • Mediocre OpenCL and GPGPU compute performance, significantly trailing behind older Vega-based cards and Nvidia competitors in rendering tasks.
  • Higher power consumption (205W TDP) compared to similar Nvidia professional cards like the RTX 4000 (160W).
  • Lack of dedicated hardware for real-time ray tracing (RTX equivalent), which may affect future-proofing in certain rendering software.
  • Blower-style cooler can become audible under heavy load and lacks a 'fan stop' mode during idle periods.
  • No ECC (Error Correction Code) memory support, which is a critical requirement for some high-end professional environments.
  • Performance is highly workload-specific; it may not be the most cost-effective option for applications like 3ds Max or Cinema 4D.

Verdict

The AMD Radeon Pro W5700 is a professional workstation graphics card based on the 7nm RDNA architecture, featuring 2,304 stream processors, 8GB of GDDR6 VRAM on a 256-bit interface, and a high memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s. It was the first professional GPU to support PCIe 4.0 and offers versatile connectivity through five Mini-DisplayPort 1.4 outputs and a single USB-C port for VR headsets, delivering up to 8.89 TFLOPS of peak single-precision performance. Main advantages include its high power efficiency compared to previous GCN-based models and strong certified driver support for CAD and 3D modeling applications. However, it lacks Error Correction Code (ECC) memory support found in higher-end workstation cards and does not feature dedicated hardware for ray tracing or AI-specific tensor cores.

Compare AMD Radeon Pro W5700 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon Pro W5700 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found