Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80VRAM:2 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):175 W

AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
4.3/10

Overall score

Score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.9

Technical score

10%

8.2

User score

â–¼Worse than 94% of graphics cards
6.0

Value for money

Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.3

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 91%
3.9

Technical score

Technical score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

1.8

Performance

24%

3.3

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

6.1

Platform & Features

5%

8.6

Design

4%

7.0

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 94%
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 64%
  • amd-radeon-hd-7870-ghz-edition
  • amd-radeon-hd-7870-ghz-edition
amd-radeon-hd-7870-ghz-edition
amd-radeon-hd-7870-ghz-edition
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

Technical score
Technical score
3.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

1.8

Performance

24%

3.3

Memory

12%

7.5

Power & Cooling

11%

6.1

Platform & Features

5%

8.6

Design

4%

7.0

Connectivity & Media

3.9
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition has a popularity score of 7.3 points, which is higher than that of 68.1% of products in this category.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.3

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.0
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
1,700 points
This graphics card scores 1,700 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 96.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
4,692 points
This graphics card scores 4,692 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 94.2% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
4,665 points
This graphics card scores 4,665 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 84.2% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
2.56 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 2.56 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 94% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
2 GB
This graphics card has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
153.6 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 153.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 91.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
11.2
This graphics card supports DirectX 11.2, which is older than on 98.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.2
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.2, which is older than on 95.1% of graphics cards and equal to 3.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
6
This graphics card supports up to 6 displays, which is more than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
21.6 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 21.6 Gbps, which is faster than on 50.5% of graphics cards and equal to 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
175 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 175 W, which is lower than that of 62.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
175 W
This graphics card draws 175 W under peak load, which is lower than 65.5% of graphics cards and equal to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
175 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 175 W, which is lower than that of 66.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
175 W
Show more
Size
241x 105x 38 mm
Length
241 mm
This graphics card is 241 mm long, which is shorter than 75% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Height
105 mm
This graphics card is 105 mm tall, which is shorter than 90.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
650 g
This graphics card weighs 650 g, which is lighter than 84.1% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 21.33x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (512 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    512 MB vs 24 MB
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 20 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (105 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    105 mm vs 125 mm
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 6.63x cheaper
    AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition is cheaper than the average graphics card (£80 vs £530).
    £80 vs £530
  • 6.63x cheaper
    AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition is cheaper than the average graphics card (£80 vs £530).
    £80 vs £530
  • 2.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.20 vs 8.000).
    8.2 vs 8
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 21.33x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (512 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    512 MB vs 24 MB
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 18.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (175 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    175 W vs 215 W
  • 8 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (29 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    29 °C vs 37 °C
  • 20 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (105 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    105 mm vs 125 mm
  • 44 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (241 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    241 mm vs 285 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 60.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1000 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 47.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1000 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 19.6% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.01 vs 7.2).
    6.01 vs 7.2
  • 60.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1000 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 47.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1000 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 20 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (20 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    20 vs 40
  • 79% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (80 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    80 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 104 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (80 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    80 vs 184
  • 80.4% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (32 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    32 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 88.7% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (2.6 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    2.56 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 79.3% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (4692 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    4,692 points vs 22,653 points
  • 88.4% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (1700 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    1,700 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 88.9% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (2.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    2.56 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 91.4% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (2.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    2.56 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 61.4% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (4665 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    4,665 points vs 12,074 points
  • 3,072 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1,280 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    1,280 vs 4,352
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 74.7% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (4800 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    4,800 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 65.7% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (153.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    153.6 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 31.4% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1200 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,200 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    16 vs 128
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 11 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2012 vs 2023).
    March 2012
    2,012 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    1 vs 8
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4).
    1.2 vs 1.4
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (11.2 vs 12 Ultimate).
    11.2 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 3).
    1.2 vs 3.0
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.5 vs 6.8).
    6.5 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 87.8% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (2800 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    2,800 million vs 22,900 million
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
    1.4a vs 2.1
  • No VRR support
    This graphics card does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 2.3).
    1.4 vs 2.3
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 13.4 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (48.8 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    48.8 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 40 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (40 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    40 dB vs 0 dB
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hexus.net
05/03/2012
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
05/03/2012
Summary of the review
L
legitreviews.com
04/03/2012
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
04/03/2012
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
04/03/2012
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
09/09/2012
Summary of the review
W
wsgf.org
07/03/2012
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
02/03/2012
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
05/03/2012
Summary of the review
H
hexus.net
20/07/2012
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
11/07/2012
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
05/03/2012
Summary of the review
G
guru3d.com
04/03/2012
Summary of the review
G
gamezoom.net
29/08/2013
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
19/08/2012
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
29/03/2012
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
05/03/2012
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
19/04/2012
Summary of the review
E
elchapuzasinformatico.com
22/11/2012
Summary of the review
H
hwlegend.tech
05/07/2012
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

  • Solid 1080p performance for its era and modern eSports titles
  • Excellent power efficiency with ZeroCore technology (idles as low as 3W)
  • Strong overclocking headroom, often rivaling high-end cards like the GTX 580
  • Runs cool and quiet compared to previous generations
  • Versatile connectivity with support for up to 6 displays via Eyefinity

What we don't like about AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition

  • Limited longevity for modern AAA games due to 2GB VRAM
  • Incomplete DirectX 12 support (feature level 11_1 only)
  • Requires two 6-pin PCIe power connectors, which may be bulky for some builds
  • Dual-slot design can block adjacent expansion slots
  • Potential for fan longevity issues on certain partner models (e.g., Sapphire)

Verdict

The AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition is a performance-segment graphics card launched in 2012, featuring the 28 nm 'Pitcairn XT' GPU with 1,280 stream processors and a 1000 MHz core clock. It is equipped with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit interface, delivering a memory bandwidth of 153.6 GB/s and a TDP of 175W. Its main pros include excellent energy efficiency for its era, significant overclocking headroom, and high performance-per-dollar that allowed it to compete with high-end cards like the GTX 580 at launch. However, it faces notable cons such as its limited 2 GB VRAM being insufficient for modern titles, lack of support for advanced DirectX 12 feature levels (capped at 11_1), and a requirement for two 6-pin power connectors.

Compare AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon HD 7870 GHz Edition and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found