Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70VRAM:6 GBMemory bus width:384 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):250 W

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
5.0/10

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.6

Technical score

10%

8.6

User score

▼Worse than 86% of graphics cards
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▼Worse than 80%
4.6

Technical score

Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

3.0

Performance

24%

4.6

Memory

12%

6.6

Power & Cooling

11%

6.1

Platform & Features

5%

8.5

Design

4%

8.1

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 89%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 74%
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
nvidia-geforce-gtx-980-ti
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

Technical score
Technical score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

3.0

Performance

24%

4.6

Memory

12%

6.6

Power & Cooling

11%

6.1

Platform & Features

5%

8.5

Design

4%

8.1

Connectivity & Media

4.6
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti has a popularity score of 8.7 points, which is higher than that of 81.1% of products in this category.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.5
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
6,000 points
This graphics card scores 6,000 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 82.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.3% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
13,702 points
This graphics card scores 13,702 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 77% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
6,114 points
This graphics card scores 6,114 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 78.8% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
5.63 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 5.63 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 85.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
6 GB
This graphics card has 6 GB of VRAM, which is less than 82.6% of graphics cards and equal to 5.2% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
384 bit
This graphics card uses a 384 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 89.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.3% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
336.5 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 336.5 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 63.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
vendor-name or prompt-tail contamination removed; Vulkan version unresolved.
OpenGL version
4.5
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.5, which is older than on 98.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
4
This graphics card supports up to 4 displays, which is more than 8.3% of graphics cards and equal to 88.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
5120x2880
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 5120x2880, which is lower than that of 91.1% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
3
This graphics card offers 3 DisplayPort outputs, which is more than 21% of graphics cards and equal to 76.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
5.4 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 5.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
250 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 250 W, which is higher than that of 58.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
250 W
This graphics card draws 250 W under peak load, which is higher than 56.8% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
600 W
This graphics card recommends a 600 W PSU, which is lower than that of 54.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 7.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
275 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 275 W, which is higher than that of 62.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
250 W
Show more
Size
267x 111x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 267x111x 40 mm, which is more compact than 85.9% of graphics cards and equal in size to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Length
267 mm
This graphics card is 267 mm long, which is shorter than 59.7% of graphics cards and equal in length to 3.5% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
1,290 g
This graphics card weighs 1,290 g, which is heavier than 64.4% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 4 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    4 vs 0
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 7.57x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti is cheaper than the average graphics card (£70 vs £530).
    £70 vs £530
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 7.57x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti is cheaper than the average graphics card (£70 vs £530).
    £70 vs £530
  • 7.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.60 vs 8.000).
    8.6 vs 8
  • 2.07x more popular
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti is more popular than the average graphics card (8.71 vs 4.2).
    8.71 vs 4.22
  • 32 more ROPs
    This graphics card has more ROPs than the average graphics card (96 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    96 vs 64
  • 128 bit wider memory bus
    This graphics card has a wider memory bus than the average graphics card (384 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    384 bit vs 256 bit
  • 0.2% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1753 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,753 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 4 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (4 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    4 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • Supports NVLink
    This graphics card supports NVLink, the average graphics card does not.
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 7.7% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (600 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    600 W vs 650 W
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    267x111 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 57% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1076 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,076 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 47.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1000 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 18 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (22 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    22 vs 40
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 10.3% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.53 vs 7.2).
    6.53 vs 7.2
  • 57% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1076 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,076 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 47.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1000 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 18 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (22 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    22 vs 40
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 50.3% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (189.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    189.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 73.2% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (6.1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    6.06 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 36.7% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (103.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    103.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 39.5% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (13702 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    13,702 points vs 22,653 points
  • 59.1% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (6000 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    6,000 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 99.4% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    0.19 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 75.5% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (5.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    5.63 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 60.4% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.19 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 49.4% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (6114 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    6,114 points vs 12,074 points
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 63.1% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (7012 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    7,012 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 24.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (336.5 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    336.5 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 62.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (48 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    48 vs 128
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
  • 8 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2015 vs 2023).
    June 2015
    2,015 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    vendor-name or prompt-tail contamination removed; Vulkan version unresolved.
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    5 vs 8
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • 2.04x larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (601 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    601 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older OpenGL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenGL version than the average graphics card (4.5 vs 4.6).
    4.5 vs 4.6
  • 65.1% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (8000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    8,000 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2 vs 2.1).
    2.0 vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    1 vs 6
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (5120x2880 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    5120x2880 vs 7680x4320
  • 73% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 16.3% higher TDP
    This graphics card has a higher TDP than the average graphics card (250 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    250 W vs 215 W
  • 16 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (83 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    83 °C vs 67 °C
  • 31 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (31 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    31 dB vs 0 dB
  • 8.9 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (44.3 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    44.3 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 22.2% higher board power limit
    This graphics card has a higher board power limit than the average graphics card (275 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    275 W vs 225 W
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
tomshardware.com
18/01/2016
Summary of the review
O
overclockers.com
28/07/2015
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
23/07/2015
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
22/06/2015
Summary of the review
N
nitroware.net
01/06/2015
Summary of the review
O
overclockersclub.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
A
anandtech.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
S
smallformfactor.net
06/09/2022
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
18/10/2015
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
10/07/2015
Summary of the review
B
babeltechreviews.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
T
tweaktown.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
T
techgage.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
P
pcgamer.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
31/05/2015
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
17/03/2016
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
12/02/2016
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
22/06/2015
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

  • Exceptional value compared to the Titan X, offering nearly identical gaming performance at a significantly lower price point.
  • High overclocking headroom, with users often reaching stable boost clocks around 1400-1465 MHz for a substantial performance gain.
  • Capable of handling 4K and 1440p gaming on a single card, especially in titles from its era.
  • Strong legacy performance; remains faster than more modern budget cards like the RX 580 and keeps up with the GTX 1070.
  • Full DirectX 12 support ensures compatibility with modern game engines.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

  • High power consumption and thermal output with a 250W TDP, requiring a robust power supply and well-ventilated case.
  • Reference models feature a blower-style cooler that is noted for being loud under load and quickly hitting thermal limits (84°C).
  • Approaching the end of life for official driver support, which may impact stability in the newest AAA titles.
  • Lacks modern features like dedicated Ray Tracing cores and newer upscaling technologies (DLSS) found in the RTX series.
  • Reference design fans do not stop during idle, making it noisier than custom board partner versions.

Verdict

Released in 2015, the Nvidia GeForce GTX 980 Ti is a high-end Maxwell-based graphics card featuring 2,816 CUDA cores, 6GB of GDDR5 memory on a 384-bit interface, and a 250W TDP. It delivers a base clock of 1,000MHz (boostable to 1,075MHz) with 336.5 GB/s of bandwidth, offering near-Titan X performance at a significantly lower price point, making it a powerful choice for 1440p and entry-level 4K gaming. While its high overclocking headroom and DirectX 12 support are major pros, it is held back by high power consumption compared to modern GPUs and a reference blower-style cooler that can lead to high temperatures and thermal throttling under heavy loads.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found