OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

WHOOP 5.0 review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£230Battery life:14 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:10 m

WHOOP 5.0 Review: Compare 168 technical specifications, 34 expert and video reviews and 20 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

WHOOP 5.0
7.8/10

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 81% of models
Score components

35%

7.0

Technical score

30%

9.0

List score

25%

7.8

Reviews score

10%

7.0

Sentiment score

▲Better than 81% of fitness trackers
8.3

Value for money

Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

▲Better than 73%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components

20%

7.2

Sports

20%

5.7

Battery

18%

9.4

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

7.9

Smart functions

8%

9.3

Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design

▲Better than 51%
7.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 56% of models

80%

7.6

Average grade

20%

8.6

Popularity

Grades by review (34)
34 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 56%
9.0

List score

List score
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (20)
List score: in 20 of 63 lists (32%)
★Better than 98%
  • whoop-5-0
  • whoop-5-0
  • whoop-5-0
  • whoop-5-0
  • whoop-5-0
  • whoop-5-0
  • whoop-5-0
  • whoop-5-0
  • whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
whoop-5-0
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the WHOOP 5.0

Based on 0 · 36

Sleep and recovery insights and coaching earn strong praise, but the subscription model is widely criticised, as are sports features.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the WHOOP 5.0

Based on 206 owners sharing their experience in online comments

31%positive9%mixed60%negative

Owners value screen-free, useful health tracking, but high subscription costs and broken upgrade promises fuel the strongest frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Owners say the membership is expensive and not worth the cost, and some cancel because the subscription does not justify the price.52
  • Owners feel misled because the promised free hardware upgrade now requires extra fees or a longer membership term.32
  • Owners say older 4.0 bands do not fit the 5.0, so buying the upgrade means buying new straps as well.13
  • Owners say heart rate readings are often off during workouts, especially weight lifting and intervals, compared with chest straps and other watches.8
  • Owners say sleep tracking is inaccurate and naps are not logged, and the band cannot wake them during light sleep.8
  • Owners report billing problems, such as renewal charges after cancelling and refunds for returns that were refused.6
  • Owners say the strength trainer is poor and that the band misses low-heart-rate activities such as fitness workouts.6
  • Owners say customer service failed to resolve device faults, such as a broken ECG feature, and gave no solution.5
  • Owners find the new tiers and plan changes confusing and feel the one-plan promise of free upgrades was broken.5
  • Owners find the band uncomfortable and fiddly to wear, with tightening issues and marks on the skin, and say the bicep band is awkward.5

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading category ranking...

Fitness trackers model ranking

Ranked #45 of 238 models in Fitness trackers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker WHOOP 5.0

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 51% of models
Score components:

20%

7.2

Sports

20%

5.7

Battery

18%

9.4

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

7.9

Smart functions

8%

9.3

Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

7.4

Design

7.0
Reviews score
7.8
List score
9.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models
Score components:

70%

7.8

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

8.3
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 36.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 47.5% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports irregular heart rate alerts. 86.8% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 68.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
What reviewers say
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
N/A
GNSS bands supported
N/A
Galileo support
N/A
Acquires GPS faster
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 40.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 64% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
What reviewers say
Bluetooth version
5.2
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5.2 which is newer than in 90.4% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 2.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 0.9% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
14 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 14 days which is longer than that of 59.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 14.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 74.2% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 23.4% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more
What reviewers say

WHOOP 5.0 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • Logs single exercises
    This fitness tracker records the single exercises inside a workout, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.1% of fitness trackers do this.
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Measures VO2 max
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.6% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Tracks HRV
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.1% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • 8x larger internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.5 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.512 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • Smart alarm
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 30.8% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Swim stroke counter
    This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.3% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • 12.5% higher list score
    List score
    9.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (20)
    List score: in 20 of 63 lists (32%)
    9.0 vs 8.0
  • 6.8% higher review score
    Reviews score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 56% of models

    80%

    7.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.6

    Popularity

    Grades by review (34)
    34 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    7.8 vs 7.3
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 32.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Tracks HRV
    This fitness tracker supports HRV tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.1% of fitness trackers support HRV tracking.
  • Measures VO2 max
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.6% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Tracks respiration rate
    This fitness tracker supports respiratory rate tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16% of fitness trackers support respiratory rate tracking.
  • Built-in temperature sensor
    This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.4% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    This fitness tracker supports irregular heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.6% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
  • Tracks skin temperature
    This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 15.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.2% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.6% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Readiness score support
    This fitness tracker shows a readiness score, while the average fitness tracker does not. 7.9% of fitness trackers show a readiness score.
  • Cycle start prediction
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 45.8% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Logs single exercises
    This fitness tracker records the single exercises inside a workout, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.1% of fitness trackers do this.
  • Swim stroke counter
    This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.3% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
  • Recovery time advisor
    This fitness tracker supports recovery time guidance, while the average fitness tracker does not. 14% of fitness trackers support recovery time guidance.
  • Tracks training load
    This fitness tracker supports training load tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 19.9% of fitness trackers support training load tracking.
  • Built-in gyroscope
    This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 28.7% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
  • Route support
    This fitness tracker supports route guidance, while the average fitness tracker does not. 3.4% of fitness trackers support route guidance.
  • Golf-ready design
    This fitness tracker is designed for golf, while the average fitness tracker is not. 2.1% of fitness trackers are designed for golf.
  • 136.5 more exercise modes
    This fitness tracker has more exercise modes than the average fitness tracker (145 vs 8.5). The average fitness tracker offers 8.5 exercise modes.
    145 vs 8.5
  • 4 days longer battery life
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (14 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    14 days vs 10 days
  • Supports wireless charging
    This fitness tracker supports wireless charging, while the average fitness tracker does not. 3.8% of fitness trackers support wireless charging.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5.2 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    5.2 vs 4.1
  • 8x larger internal storage
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.5 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.064 GB of internal storage.
    0.512 GB vs 0.064 GB
  • Smart alarm
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 30.8% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Coaching features
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 36.3% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Third-party app support
    This fitness tracker supports third-party apps, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.8% of fitness trackers support third-party apps.
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No distance tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support distance tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 95.4% of fitness trackers support distance tracking.
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • 4 ATM lower water resistance rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (1 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    1 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 40 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (10 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    10 m vs 50 m
  • 3.29x more expensive
    WHOOP 5.0 is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£230 vs £70).
    £230 vs £70
  • No stopwatch
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 60.5% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 3.29x more expensive
    WHOOP 5.0 is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£230 vs £70).
    £230 vs £70
  • 11.4% lower sentiment score
    7.0 vs 7.9
  • No pace measurement
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 62.9% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • No distance tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support distance tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 95.4% of fitness trackers support distance tracking.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No display
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 73.9% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • No phone finder
    This fitness tracker does not support phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does. 50.9% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • No stopwatch
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 60.5% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 4 ATM lower water resistance rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (1 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
    1 ATM vs 5 ATM
  • 40 m lower waterproof depth rating
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (10 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    10 m vs 50 m

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0
Ryan Smith Fit
≈ estimated
07/08/2026
Long-term test · 22 days of daily wear
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is being returned: strap comfort, subscription costs and heart rate accuracy outweighed its detailed insights.
9.0
fear no machine
≈ estimated
18/06/2026
Long-term test · 20 days of daily use
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 impressed over 20 days, with good battery life, solid accuracy and useful AI making a near-complete package.
8.0
Cybernews
≈ estimated
28/05/2026
Hands-on review · features, app and drawbacks
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is best for people who want to change everyday habits, though the subscription and lack of GPS are drawbacks.
9.0
VPNpro
≈ estimated
27/05/2026
Hands-on review · 30 days of use
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is a light, comfortable band whose sleep, stress and recovery insights help build better daily habits.
9.0
Healthnews
≈ estimated
15/05/2026
Hands-on review · five key features in daily use
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0's five core features make the band worth wearing and the subscription worthwhile.
9.0
CoolTechZone
≈ estimated
27/04/2026
Long-term test · three weeks of daily use
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is a strong fitness tracker for health-focused users, especially on the Peak plan.
9.0
Isaac Brown
≈ estimated
25/02/2026
Hands-on review · about 20 days of use
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is clearly recommended for sleep and recovery insights, though its activity tracking trails a Garmin.
9.0
Healthnews
≈ estimated
22/10/2025
Long-term review · 30 days of daily use
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is a strong pick for recovery-focused athletes, with small drawbacks for buyers who prefer smartwatches.
9.0
Shreyashi Sharma
≈ estimated
28/09/2025
Long-term test · 50 days of daily use
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is worth it for personal awareness of sleep, recovery and habits, despite the yearly cost.
7.0
TechBar
≈ estimated
22/08/2025
Hands-on review · daily habits, recovery and body age
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is worth it for health-focused people and athletes, but a smartwatch suits others better on cost.
7.0
PeteOnPurpose
≈ estimated
28/07/2025
Long-term test · 30 days of daily wear
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 could be worth it at the Peak tier for serious trainers, but high subscription prices and the upgrade policy count against it.
9.0
Judson Robertson
≈ estimated
01/07/2025
Long-term review · over a month of daily use
Verdict
WHOOP 5.0 is worth upgrading to from the 4.0 or buying new, though paying the upgrade fee was a mistake.
More graded video reviews (9)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Third-party reviews

What we like about WHOOP 5.0

  • A 14 days battery means it rarely needs charging.
  • At 24 g it is light enough to wear day and night.
  • Sleep, resting heart rate and HRV are tracked overnight.
  • A readiness score shows how hard to train on a given day.
  • Its 145 exercises cover a wide range of activities.
  • The band is designed for golf as well as training.

What we don't like about WHOOP 5.0

  • There is no display, so the time is never on your wrist.
  • No GPS and no distance tracking mean runners need another device.
  • A full charge takes 2.5 hours.
  • The 1 ATM rating rules out swimming.
  • A yearly membership is an extra cost on top of the band.

Verdict

Most of what the WHOOP 5.0 does happens while you are not looking at it. It is a screenless band with a battery that lasts 14 days, and it tracks sleep, resting heart rate and heart rate variability in the background. Its 145 exercises and swim stroke counter make it useful beyond sleep. A readiness score and a recovery time advisor turn the numbers into a plain daily idea of how hard to train. The trade-offs are real. There is no display, no GPS and no distance tracking, so a runner will want another device. A full charge takes 2.5 hours, and at 1 ATM it suits a splash or a shower rather than a swim. It fits someone who wants steady recovery feedback and does not need the band to show the time.

Compare WHOOP 5.0 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of WHOOP 5.0 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found