Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Amazfit X Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£290Battery life:7 daysScreen size:2.07 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Amazfit X Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.0

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

8.2

Technical score

20%

7.0

User score

▲Better than 81% of fitness-trackers
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

9.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

6.2

Battery

18%

9.3

Health

18%

8.6

Display

8%

8.3

Smart Features

8%

9.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Design & Durability

▲Better than 89% of fitness-trackers
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.6

Number of reviews

Based on 45 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 83% of fitness-trackers
  • amazfit-x
  • amazfit-x
  • amazfit-x
  • amazfit-x
  • amazfit-x
  • amazfit-x
  • amazfit-x
  • amazfit-x
amazfit-x
amazfit-x
amazfit-x
amazfit-x
amazfit-x
amazfit-x
amazfit-x
amazfit-x

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Amazfit X

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

9.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

6.2

Battery

18%

9.3

Health

18%

8.6

Display

8%

8.3

Smart Features

8%

9.0

App & Wellness

4%

7.9

Connectivity

4%

6.1

Design & Durability

8.2
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.6

Number of reviews

Based on 45 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.0
Popularity
Popularity
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Amazfit X has a popularity score of 4.6 points, which is lower than 51.6% of fitness trackers.
4.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.0

Overall score

40%

9.0

Price

8.3
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts. 65.8% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
High heart rate alert only.
Irregular heart rate alerts
yes
Irregular heart rate alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports irregular heart rate alerts. 88.1% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Irregular rhythm alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
Blood oxygen sensor
yes
This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor. 75.1% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
GPS + GLONASS
Satellite systems supported
GPS + GLONASS
This fitness tracker supports GPS + GLONASS satellite systems which is more versatile than that of 89.3% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 5.1% of fitness trackers.
Multi-GNSS support.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
yes
Acquires GPS faster
yes
This fitness tracker supports faster GPS acquisition. 92.4% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Zepp app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 74.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 16.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Battery life
7 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 53.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 22.8% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
205 mAh
Battery capacity
205 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 205 mAh which is higher than that of 81.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
2.07 inch
Screen size
2.07 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 2.07 inch which is larger than that of 100% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
206x 640
Screen resolution
206x 640
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 206x640 which is higher than that of 98.9% of fitness trackers.
Resolution supported by extracted display specs.
Pixel density
326 ppi
Pixel density
326 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 326 ppi which is higher than that of 86.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 74.9% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
19 mm
Show more

Amazfit X vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 1.03 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    2.07 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (2.1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    2.07 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 86.4% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    205 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (205 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    205 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Swim stroke counter
    Swim stroke counter
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
  • Blood oxygen monitoring
    Blood oxygen sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a blood oxygen sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
  • Measures VO2 max
    VO2 max
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Heart rate alerts
    Fast/slow heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports high and low heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 34.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
    High heart rate alert only.
  • Irregular heart rate alerts
    Irregular heart rate alerts
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports irregular heart rate alerts, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
    Irregular rhythm alerts.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Period notifications
    Has period notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker has period notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 31% of fitness trackers have period notifications.
  • Fertile window notifications
    Displays fertile window notifications
    yes
    This fitness tracker displays fertile window notifications, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers display fertile window notifications.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 86.4% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    205 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (205 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    205 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 0.25 hours shorter charging time
    Charging time
    1.25 hours
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1.3 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1.25 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 1.03 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    2.07 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (2.1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    2.07 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 33.1% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    326 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (326 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    326 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass.
  • Ambient light sensor
    Ambient light sensor
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an ambient light sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16.7% of fitness trackers have an ambient light sensor.
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    206 x 640
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (206x640 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    Resolution supported by extracted display specs.
    206x640 vs 194x368
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Passcode protection
    Passcode protection
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
    Uses an off-wrist lock.
  • High voice commands
    Voice commands
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports voice commands, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support voice commands.
    Supports Alexa and offline voice control.
  • Voice assistant support
    Voice assistant support
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports voice assistants, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.9% of fitness trackers support voice assistants.
    Requires a nearby phone for Alexa.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Works through Zepp app Lab settings.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses PAI.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 88% heavier
    Thickness
    47 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (47 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    47 g vs 25 g
  • 11.1% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    400 nits
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (400 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    400 nits vs 450 nits
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 4.14x more expensive
    Amazfit X is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£290 vs £70).
    £290 vs £70
  • 2.6 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    13.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (13.6 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    13.6 mm vs 11 mm
  • 14.6 mm greater height
    Height
    55.4 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (55.4 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    55.4 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 14.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Amazfit X
    the average fitness tracker
    Amazfit X has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (6.99 vs 8.000).
    6.99 vs 8
  • 4.14x more expensive
    Amazfit X is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£290 vs £70).
    £290 vs £70
  • 14.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Amazfit X
    the average fitness tracker
    Amazfit X has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (6.99 vs 8.000).
    6.99 vs 8
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    7 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • 11.1% lower screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    400 nits
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (400 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    400 nits vs 450 nits
  • 88% heavier
    Thickness
    47 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (47 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    47 g vs 25 g
  • No replaceable watch band
    Replaceable watch band
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 2.6 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    13.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (13.6 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    13.6 mm vs 11 mm
  • 14.6 mm greater height
    Height
    55.4 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (55.4 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    55.4 mm vs 40.8 mm

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
reviewed.com
12/08/2021
Summary of the review
C
carryitlikeharry.com
31/12/2021
Summary of the review
B
betatester.wordpress.com
02/10/2020
Summary of the review
P
presse-citron.net
22/10/2020
Summary of the review
C
ciclistarodando.com
15/10/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 45 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Amazfit X

  • Unique and futuristic 92° curved 2.07-inch AMOLED display that fits the wrist comfortably
  • High-quality titanium alloy one-piece body for a premium, durable build
  • Vibrant, sharp, and high-brightness screen (326 PPI) that is easy to read in most conditions
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for 24-hour wear
  • Comprehensive health tracking including SpO2, heart rate, stress, and sleep monitoring
  • Built-in GPS and GLONASS for independent outdoor activity tracking
  • Fluid user interface with haptic feedback and pressure-sensitive side sensors instead of physical buttons
  • Water-resistant up to 5 ATM, making it safe for swimming and showering

What we don't like about Amazfit X

  • Battery life often falls short of the advertised 7 days, typically lasting 4–5 days with regular use
  • High retail price compared to other fitness trackers with similar functionality
  • GPS can be slow to lock onto signals or occasionally unreliable
  • Limited selection of watch faces, with some designs appearing cluttered or lacking vital info
  • Zepp companion app criticized for poor data visualisation and unintuitive navigation
  • Inaccurate tracking reported for sleep stages and certain automatic activity detections
  • Lack of 'smart' features such as a microphone, speaker, NFC for payments, or third-party app support
  • Screen can be difficult to read in direct sunlight due to surface glare

Verdict

The Amazfit X is a futuristic fitness tracker distinguished by its signature 2.07-inch flexible AMOLED display with a 92° curvature and a sharp 326 PPI resolution. Encased in a buttonless titanium alloy unibody, it utilizes pressure-sensitive side sensors for navigation and features a unique curved 205mAh battery providing up to 7 days of life. Key pros include its strikingly bright 400-nit screen that fits the wrist like a bracelet, 5 ATM water resistance, and comprehensive health monitoring via the BioTracker 2 PPG sensor for 24/7 heart rate, SpO2, and sleep tracking. However, notable cons include reported inconsistencies with GPS locking, a lack of NFC, and the inability to interact with or reply to notifications directly from the device.

Compare Amazfit X with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit X and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found