OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

Microsoft Band 2015 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£240Battery life:2 daysScreen size:1.45 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:yesWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Microsoft Band 2015 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2

▲Better than 59% of fitness-trackers

7.4

▲Better than 65% of fitness-trackers

6.6

▼Worse than 86% of fitness-trackers

3.1
Swimming
Swimming
3.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for swimming performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this fitness-trackers meets your specific swimming needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
28.0%
1.0
ATM rating
24.0%
4.0
Open-water swim mode
18.0%
1.2
Waterproof depth rating
15.0%
10
GPS
15.0%
1.0
Battery life
3.1
Kids
Kids
3.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for kids performance.
When it matters
When selecting a durable, safe, and family-friendly fitness-trackers suitable for learning and young children.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
30.0%
1.0
Battery life
25.0%
1.0
Weight
20.0%
1.0
ATM rating
15.0%
9.5
Screen size
10.0%
9.3
Price

Best prices

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Microsoft Band 2015

7.2

Show more

Hide

Health

7.9

Show more

Hide

Heart rate monitor

Resting heart rate

Fast/slow heart rate alerts

Irregular heart rate alerts

?

Blood oxygen sensor

Show more

Sports & Navigation

8.4

Show more

Hide

GPS

Satellite systems supported

GNSS bands supported

Galileo support

Acquires GPS faster

Show more

Smart Features

7.8

Show more

Hide

Notifications

Vibrating alerts

Call control

Call answering

Calendar sync

Show more

App & Wellness

9.4

Show more

Hide

Activity reports

Goal setting

Achievements

Inactivity alerts

Coaching

Show more

Connectivity

8.4

Show more

Hide

Bluetooth version

Maximum Bluetooth range

NFC

Wi-Fi connectivity

Wi-Fi version

Show more

Battery

4.1

Show more

Hide

Battery life

Battery life with GPS on

Battery life in training mode

Battery life in power-saving mode

?

Battery capacity

Show more

Display

8.9

Show more

Hide

Display

Screen size

Display type

Screen resolution

Pixel density

Show more

Design & Durability

4.1

Show more

Hide

Form factor

wristband

Hybrid design

Designed for kids

Replaceable watch band

Band width

?

Show more

Microsoft Band 2015 vs the average fitness tracker

Why is Microsoft Band 2015 better than the average fitness tracker?

Show more

Hide

Always-on display
Always-on display
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
Measures VO2 max
VO2 max
yes
▲ Better than 79% of models
This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
App estimate.
Built-in GPS
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 89% of models
This fitness tracker has GPS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Lower resting heart rate
Resting heart rate
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Touchscreen
Touchscreen
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
Smart alarm
Smart alarm
yes
▲ Better than 73% of models
This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
30-minute wake window.
68.2% larger battery capacity
Battery capacity
185 mAh
▲ Better than 74% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (185 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
source range 170-200 mAh.
185 mAh vs 110 mAh
Coaching features
Coaching
yes
▲ Better than 67% of models
This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.

Measures VO2 max
VO2 max
yes
▲ Better than 79% of models
This fitness tracker supports VO2 max tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 21.8% of fitness trackers support VO2 max tracking.
App estimate.
Lower resting heart rate
Resting heart rate
yes
▲ Better than 53% of models
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Built-in temperature sensor
Temperature sensor
yes
★ Better than 91% of models
This fitness tracker has a temperature sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers have a temperature sensor.
Tracks skin temperature
Skin temperature tracking
yes
▲ Better than 89% of models
This fitness tracker supports skin temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers support skin temperature tracking.
Tracks skin temperature trends.
Sweat tracking
Sweat tracking
yes
★ Better than 93% of models
This fitness tracker supports sweat tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 7.7% of fitness trackers support sweat tracking.
Tracks perspiration via galvanic skin response.
EDA sensor
EDA sensor
yes
★ Better than 94% of models
This fitness tracker has an EDA sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.6% of fitness trackers have an EDA sensor.
Galvanic skin response sensor.

Built-in GPS
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 89% of models
This fitness tracker has GPS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Tracks elevation
Elevation tracking
yes
▲ Better than 73% of models
This fitness tracker supports elevation tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.4% of fitness trackers support elevation tracking.
Altitude via barometer and GPS
Tracks training load
Training load tracking
yes
▲ Better than 84% of models
This fitness tracker supports training load tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16.3% of fitness trackers support training load tracking.
Built-in gyroscope
Gyroscope
yes
▲ Better than 74% of models
This fitness tracker has a gyroscope, while the average fitness tracker does not. 26.5% of fitness trackers have a gyroscope.
Built-in barometer
Barometer
yes
▲ Better than 89% of models
This fitness tracker has a barometer, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11.3% of fitness trackers have a barometer.
Built-in route tracker
Has a route tracker
yes
▲ Better than 50% of models
This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
Built-in GPS route tracking.
Golf-ready design
Designed for golf
yes
★ Better than 99% of models
This fitness tracker is designed for golf, while the average fitness tracker is not. 1.9% of fitness trackers are designed for golf.
Advanced GNSS band support
GNSS bands supported
yes
★ Better than 92% of models
This fitness tracker supports advanced GNSS bands, while the average fitness tracker does not. 8.8% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
supports GNSS L1 band.
Auto lap
Auto lap
yes
▲ Better than 81% of models
This fitness tracker supports auto lap, while the average fitness tracker does not. 19.4% of fitness trackers support auto lap.
Fixed 1 mile or 1 kilometre intervals.
Broad satellite support
Satellite systems supported
GPS + GLONASS
▲ Better than 89% of models
This fitness tracker supports more satellite systems than the average fitness tracker (GPS + GLONASS vs no). The average fitness tracker supports no satellite systems.
Multi-GNSS support.
GPS + GLONASS vs no

68.2% larger battery capacity
Battery capacity
185 mAh
▲ Better than 74% of models
Market range: <30 mAh – >225 mAh
This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (185 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
source range 170-200 mAh.
185 mAh vs 110 mAh
Low power mode
Low power mode
yes
▲ Better than 76% of models
This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
Includes a battery saver mode.

Always-on display
Always-on display
yes
▲ Better than 75% of models
This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
Touchscreen
Touchscreen
yes
▲ Better than 56% of models
This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
0.41 inch larger screen size
Screen size
1.45 inch
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
1.45 inch vs 1.04 inch
Color display
Color display
yes
▲ Better than 63% of models
This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
Branded damage-resistant glass
Has branded damage-resistant glass
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
Corning Gorilla Glass 3.
Ambient light sensor
Ambient light sensor
yes
▲ Better than 84% of models
This fitness tracker has an ambient light sensor, while the average fitness tracker does not. 16.7% of fitness trackers have an ambient light sensor.
Durable display glass
Display glass type
Gorilla Glass 3
▲ Better than 84% of models
This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass

Windows compatible
Compatible with Windows
yes
▲ Better than 78% of models
This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
Via Microsoft Sync App.
Mac OS X compatible
Compatible with Mac OS X
yes
▲ Better than 72% of models
This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
Via Microsoft Band Sync app.

Smart alarm
Smart alarm
yes
▲ Better than 73% of models
This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
30-minute wake window.
2 more physical buttons
N. of physical buttons
2
★ Better than 92% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
2 vs 0
High voice commands
Voice commands
yes
★ Better than 95% of models
This fitness tracker supports voice commands, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support voice commands.
Requires Windows Phone.
Voice assistant support
Voice assistant support
yes
★ Better than 94% of models
This fitness tracker supports voice assistants, while the average fitness tracker does not. 6.9% of fitness trackers support voice assistants.
Works with Cortana.
Calendar sync
Calendar sync
yes
▲ Better than 80% of models
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Displays agenda events via synced Bluetooth connection.
Camera remote control
Camera remote control
yes
▲ Better than 61% of models
This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
Requires the Band Companion app.
Firmware update method
Firmware update method
over-the-air / USB
▲ Better than 87% of models
This fitness tracker uses a more convenient firmware update method than the average fitness tracker (over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air). The average fitness tracker uses over-the-air for firmware updates.
over-the-air / USB vs over-the-air
Gesture control
Gesture control
yes
▲ Better than 60% of models
This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
2x larger internal storage
Internal storage
0.064 GB
▲ Better than 54% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (0.1 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
0.064 GB vs 0.032 GB

28 mm lower height
Height
12.8 mm
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (12.8 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
12.8 mm vs 40.8 mm

Coaching features
Coaching
yes
▲ Better than 67% of models
This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Third-party app support
Third-party app support
yes
★ Better than 97% of models
This fitness tracker supports third-party apps, while the average fitness tracker does not. 3.3% of fitness trackers support third-party apps.
Supports third-party tiles via SDK.
Ad-free
Free app
yes
▲ Better than 4% of models
This fitness tracker has an ad-free app, while the average fitness tracker does not. 48.1% of fitness trackers have an ad-free app.
Official app support is now discontinued.

Why is Microsoft Band 2015 worse than the average fitness tracker?

Show more

Hide

8 days shorter battery life
Battery life
2 days
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (2 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
2 days vs 10 days
No automatic activity detection
Automatic activity detection
no
▼ Worse than 52% of models
This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
49 m lower waterproof depth rating
Waterproof depth rating
1 m
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <0 m – >50 m
This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
1 m vs 50 m
2.4x heavier
Thickness
60 g mm
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (60 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
60 g vs 25 g
5 ATM lower water resistance rating
ATM rating
0 ATM
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <1 ATM – >5 ATM
This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (0 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
Not waterproof.
0 ATM vs 5 ATM
Limited ip rating
IP rating
IP67
▼ Worse than 61% of models
This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
IP67 vs IP68
2 h shorter GPS battery life
Battery life with GPS on
5 h
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <5 h – >20 h
This fitness tracker has a lower battery life with GPS on than the average fitness tracker (5 h vs 7 h). The average fitness tracker has 7 h of battery life with GPS on.
5 h vs 7 h
No replaceable watch band
Replaceable watch band
no
▼ Worse than 75% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.

3.43x more expensive
Microsoft Band 2015 is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£240 vs £70).
£240 vs £70
21.3% lower user score
User score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Microsoft Band 2015
the average fitness tracker
Microsoft Band 2015 has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (6.59 vs 8.000).
6.59 vs 8

8 days shorter battery life
Battery life
2 days
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (2 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
2 days vs 10 days
2 h shorter GPS battery life
Battery life with GPS on
5 h
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <5 h – >20 h
This fitness tracker has a lower battery life with GPS on than the average fitness tracker (5 h vs 7 h). The average fitness tracker has 7 h of battery life with GPS on.
5 h vs 7 h
3 h shorter training-mode battery life
Battery life in training mode
5 h
▼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <5 h – >40 h
This fitness tracker has a lower battery life in training mode than the average fitness tracker (5 h vs 8 h). The average fitness tracker has 8 h of battery life in training mode.
Continuous GPS during training.
5 h vs 8 h

Lower screen resolution
Screen resolution
128 x 315
▲ Better than 81% of models
This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x315 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
128x315 vs 194x368

49 m lower waterproof depth rating
Waterproof depth rating
1 m
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <0 m – >50 m
This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
1 m vs 50 m
2.4x heavier
Thickness
60 g mm
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (60 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
60 g vs 25 g
5 ATM lower water resistance rating
ATM rating
0 ATM
▼ Worse than 96% of models
Market range: <1 ATM – >5 ATM
This fitness tracker has a lower ATM rating than the average fitness tracker (0 ATM vs 5 ATM). The average fitness tracker has an ATM rating of 5 ATM.
Not waterproof.
0 ATM vs 5 ATM
Limited ip rating
IP rating
IP67
▼ Worse than 61% of models
This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
IP67 vs IP68
No replaceable watch band
Replaceable watch band
no
▼ Worse than 75% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 74.5% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
1.8 mm thicker design
Thickness
12.8 mm
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.8 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
12.8 mm vs 11 mm
10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
Min operating temperature
-10 °C
▲ Better than 51% of models
Market range: <-20 °C – >5 °C
This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
-10 °C vs 0 °C

Not compatible with smart scales
Compatible with smart scales
no
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This fitness tracker is not compatible with smart scales, while the average fitness tracker is. 68.1% of fitness trackers are compatible with smart scales.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

allaboutwindowsphone.com

01/05/2015

Summary of the review

Review: Microsoft Band: prototype and proud?

The Microsoft Band is a cross-platform fitness tracker and smartwatch hybrid designed to be worn innovatively with its flat, 320 x 106 resolution colour display facing on the inside of the wrist. Priced at £170 in the UK, its primary strength lies in its extensive array of nine built-in sensors—including an optical heart rate sensor, GPS, UV sensor, and galvanic skin response—which map out highly detailed health metrics such as sleep cycles, steps, and guided gym workouts. It integrates seamlessly with Windows Phone devices, featuring a side-swipeable interface with up to 13 customisable tiles for notifications and a microphone that allows users to trigger Cortana voice commands directly from their wrist. Despite its high-tech capabilities, the reviewer heavily critiques the device as a "version 1" prototype due to notable hardware and software flaws. On the downside, the screen is made of plain glass rather than Gorilla Glass, leading to visible scratches within just 72 hours of regular wear. Additionally, it lacks full waterproofing, carrying only an IPX7 water-resistant rating that forces users to remove it for showers. The accompanying Microsoft...

t3.com

18/08/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: no beauty but a bit of a beast

Conversely, the physical design is a major drawback, described as a stiff, unyielding, and highly unattractive "handcuff" that is uncomfortable to wear, especially while sleeping. Performance-wise, the tracker is weighed down by less-than-stellar heart rate accuracy that fails to satisfy elite athletes, slow GPS satellite lock-on times, and an excess of pointless hardware like dormant skin temperature and galvanic response sensors. Additionally, its extensive feature set limits the battery life to just two days, though this can be stretched to three or four days if you charge it daily during short morning routines and skip the uncomfortable sleep-tracking functionality altogether.

neowin.net

10/11/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review: A few instruments shy of an orchestra

The Microsoft Band is described as a highly capable, feature-packed wearable with robust sensors—including accurate GPS and heart rate monitoring—alongside a stable cross-platform software ecosystem that supports Windows, iOS, and Android. Despite its $199 price point providing good value, the device suffers from a bulky, rigid design that fails to contour to the wrist, causing significant ergonomic issues during daily use.

trustedreviews.com

11/06/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review

The Trusted Reviews analysis of the Microsoft Band highlights a feature-rich, cross-platform health tracker boasting a sharp touchscreen, integrated GPS, and excellent value for fitness tracking, despite an underwhelming design. However, the device is criticized for being uncomfortable to wear due to its bulky, stiff, and flat construction that fails to conform to the wrist. While the sensor array and software offer high functionality, the poor physical wearability prevents it from being a top-tier product.

pocketnow.com

17/11/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: don’t call it a smartwatch

The Microsoft Band is a fitness-oriented wearable that doubles as a basic smartwatch, acting as a hardware showcase for Microsoft’s health platform. It stands out for its high density of body sensors, including an optical heart rate sensor, GPS, a UV radiation sensor, and a galvanic skin response sensor. Key pros highlighted in the review include its platform-agnostic syncing capabilities across Windows Phone, Android, iOS, Mac, and PC, alongside its capability for constant heart rate monitoring and guided workouts. The built-in GPS allows users to track runs without carrying a phone, and it successfully syncs data with third-party applications like MyFitnessPal and Runkeeper. However, the device suffers from several notable design and software drawbacks. On the hardware side, cons include a stiff, clunky rubber band that prevents the skin from breathing, a highly scratchable screen, and a proprietary magnetic charging port that traps dirt against the skin. The two-day battery life drains even faster when using GPS, and users run the risk of losing unsynced data if the battery dies completely. Additionally, the review heavily criticises the software for its...

zdnet.com

13/11/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: Unlike any other wearable and uniquely yours

The Microsoft Band is a highly customizable, data-dense wearable that serves as an activity tracker, smartwatch, GPS sports watch, and heart rate monitor all in one. It stands out as the only wearable capable of working across Windows Phone, iOS, and Android platforms. Its responsive touch display, accurate heart rate tracking, and specialized coached bodyweight workouts make it an excellent personal fitness companion, especially for frequent travelers. Users can heavily customize their experience by activating only the tiles they care about, such as fitness or social media notifications, and it even supports mobile payments at Starbucks directly from the wrist. However, the hardware sacrifices certain specialized capabilities to achieve this all-in-one functionality. While it boasts an exhaustive sensor suite and multi-platform support, its battery life drains rapidly when using GPS, depleting by nearly 50% during an eight-mile run, making it unsuitable for marathoners. Additional drawbacks include a proprietary charging cable, a plastic exterior prone to scratching without a screen protector, and limited dust and splash resistance. On the software side, it lacks desktop or browser access to sync full raw...

telegraph.co.uk

17/03/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: Surprisingly good

The Telegraph review describes the original Microsoft Band as a surprisingly good, comfortable hybrid device with excellent cross-platform compatibility and robust, detailed fitness tracking via integrated GPS and heart rate monitoring. Despite its utilitarian, less-than-appealing aesthetic, the device excels as a capable, reasonably priced alternative to dedicated running watches. However, the review highlights significant drawbacks, including a somewhat immature Microsoft Health app that struggles to present data effectively. Additionally, the device suffers from an awkward, unattractive design, with a horizontal screen orientation that makes reading data difficult while running.

wired.com

18/05/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: horrible (but good for you)

Microsoft Band Review Summary The Microsoft Band is a highly capable but visually unappealing fitness tracker and notification system that struggles to balance advanced utility with everyday wearability. On the positive side, the device boasts an impressive array of 10 sensors—including built-in GPS, a heart-rate monitor, a skin temperature sensor, and a galvanic skin response sensor—which provide comprehensive health data across various activities like running and cycling. It is cross-platform compatible via the Microsoft Health app, offers simple physical control buttons, and features a bright color touchscreen that remains readable in most lighting conditions. Additionally, it provides a rugged, splash-proof build and a relatively low price point compared to contemporary smartwatches like the Apple Watch. However, the device is severely hindered by its "aggressively ugly" and rigid design, which sits awkwardly on the wrist like a manacle and makes it uncomfortable for daily wear outside of the gym. Its software and feature performance also present notable flaws; the notification system is obtuse and frustratingly fiddly to navigate on busy days. Furthermore, during heavy testing such as a marathon, the battery...

wsj.com

04/11/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review: The Fitness Watch Built for Running Needs to Walk First

In a Wall Street Journal review, Joanna Stern outlines significant ergonomic and durability flaws in the first-generation Microsoft Band, describing its wide, flat design as awkward and highlighting that the bezel is highly susceptible to scratching. While the device includes a clever sliding metal clasp for a better fit, the hardware’s overall uncomfortable, rigid build is listed as a major drawback. Conversely, the device's software is a standout feature, with the Microsoft Health app praised for its intuitive, dynamic interface and superior data visualization compared to competitors. However, Stern concludes that these strengths are undermined by the hardware's poor design and questions regarding the reliability of its sensor data. WSJ

theguardian.com

15/04/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: sensor-packed – if you don't mind looking like an offender

The Microsoft Band is reviewed by Samuel Gibbs as a highly accurate, sensor-packed fitness tracker that successfully undercuts major competitors like the Fitbit Surge in price, retailing at £170. It is heavily praised for its cross-platform compatibility with Android and iOS devices, alongside a robust and intuitive Microsoft Health app that provides highly detailed charts and overlays for effortless data tracking. The device features a strong list of pros, including a reliable three-day battery life (with continuous heart rate monitoring active), built-in GPS that eliminates the need to run with a smartphone, an excellent guided workout tile with rep-counting abilities, and a unique, easily adjustable sliding clasp mechanism. However, the tracker suffers from glaring hardware and software limitations that prevent it from being a perfect wearable. The cons highlighted in the review focus on its bulky, polarizing "industrial" design, which many users may find resembles a house-arrest ankle bracelet rather than a stylish accessory. Additionally, the hardware is only splash-resistant—meaning showering, swimming, or getting it thoroughly wet is unsafe—and sleep tracking requires a tedious manual activation rather than being automated....

cnet.com

12/11/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: Microsoft's ambitious fitness band tries to be everything for everyone Would you like to see a comparison of how these reviewer...

The Microsoft Band represents an ambitious but flawed attempt to merge a comprehensive fitness tracker with a feature-rich smartwatch. On the positive side, it stands out for its extensive cross-platform compatibility, functioning smoothly across Android, iOS, and Windows Phone devices. It provides a highly robust notification system that successfully channels calls, texts, emails, and social media updates directly to your wrist. From a health standpoint, it delivers top-tier accuracy for walking and running metrics, thanks to a fast, reliable built-in GPS that tracks routes precisely. It also supports downloadable, guided workout routines from prominent fitness partners to assist users during gym sessions. However, the wearable's extensive feature list is heavily weighed down by hardware and design limitations. The band is described as thick, rigid, and physically uncomfortable—feeling more like a "fitness shackle" than a sleek accessory. It is notably not waterproof, forcing users to take it off for swimming or showering, and its plastic display is highly susceptible to scuffs and scratches. Performance issues further detract from the experience: the optical heart-rate sensor frequently spikes or becomes inconsistent during intense...

uk.pcmag.com

11/11/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review - Review 2014

The Microsoft Band is an ambitious but flawed hybrid fitness tracker and smartwatch that packs an impressive array of features into its design, though it ultimately falls short in everyday wearability. It stands out for its built-in GPS functionality, allowing users to accurately track running routes, distances, and split times without needing a smartphone. Additionally, it provides on-device workout coaching with guided instructions and vibrations, integrated through partners like Gold's Gym. The device tracks steps, workouts, sleep, and calories burned while displaying customizable screen tiles and push notifications for text messages and calendar reminders across iOS, Android, and Windows Phone. It also provides a respectable four days of battery life when the GPS is not actively running. Despite these positive features, the reviewer heavily criticized the band for being wildly uncomfortable and poorly constructed for long-term wear, noting that its rigid, dual-flat-surface design makes it ill-suited for petite wrists. The optical heart rate monitor, curiously placed on the inside of the wrist clasp, proved to be highly inaccurate during testing by drastically under-reporting or over-reporting active heart rates. Furthermore, the...

theverge.com

11/11/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review - The Verge

The Verge's review of the 2014 Microsoft Band praises the device for its extensive data tracking capabilities, featuring robust GPS, heart-rate monitoring, and broad cross-platform compatibility. However, the wearable is heavily criticized for its uncomfortable, rigid design, awkward screen orientation, and a cluttered user interface that makes daily navigation difficult.

geekwire.com

30/10/2014

Summary of the review

'Microsoft Band' Diary: Can this new wearable device change my life?

In this hands-on first impressions review from GeekWire, journalist Todd Bishop evaluates the initial setup, design, and capabilities of the original Microsoft Band wearable. Retailing for $199, the device is positioned as a cross-platform companion featuring 10 sensors and basic messaging capabilities linked to the Microsoft Health platform. Bishop praises the device's comprehensive feature set, including specialized tracking for nightly sleep cycles, calorie burn metrics (differentiating between fats and carbs), built-in GPS for precise stride tracking, and a unique UV sensor to prevent sunburn. He highlights its multi-platform compatibility as a major benefit, noting how smoothly the band integrates via Bluetooth with iOS notifications on his iPhone 5S, alongside its broader compatibility with Android, Windows Phone, and existing third-party applications like MyFitnessPal and RunKeeper. However, the hardware's unpolished physical design introduces several critical limitations. Bishop points out that the screen's rigid horizontal orientation makes wearing the band face-up highly awkward, forcing users to wear it under the wrist instead. This design alternative causes the screen's outer bezel to easily scratch against hard surfaces while typing at a desk. Additionally, the...

fortune.com

09/12/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band reviewed: A fine fitness tracker, but little more

The Fortune review characterizes the Microsoft Band as a highly capable, data-rich fitness tracker that falters as a functional smartwatch, offering robust health-monitoring metrics and detailed daily activity tracking. Key positives include its comprehensive suite of sensors, such as heart rate, GPS, and UV monitoring, that provide significant, actionable health data. However, the device is criticized for its awkward, horizontal display orientation which makes reading notifications uncomfortable, along with frequently unreliable Bluetooth synchronization with iPhones. These hardware and software flaws hinder its effectiveness as a daily productivity tool, restricting its utility mostly to a specialized fitness tool.

techadvisor.com

28/04/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review | MS Band buying advice

The Microsoft Band is a solid activity tracker with helpful smartwatch features that works seamlessly across Windows, iOS, and Android platforms. On the positive side, it features an accurate GPS for tracking runs or bike rides, a continuous heart-rate monitor for precise calorie calculations, and a snappy, highly responsive colour touchscreen. Its smartwatch notifications—such as text, email, and calendar previews accompanied by haptic vibration alerts—provide a highly useful way to filter incoming messages without constantly pulling out a smartphone. Additionally, the band is built with robust, water-resistant thermal plastic elastomer, ensuring it can easily withstand multiple intense workouts. However, the device is severely held back by its rigid, bulky design and poor comfort. The 9mm-thick straight-edged body weighs 60g and awkwardly rubs against the wrist bone, while the landscape-oriented screen forces users to bend their necks and arms just to read it. Battery life is another major drawback, consistently failing to reach Microsoft's claimed 48-hour life and making it difficult to utilize the sleep tracking functionality. Finally, the tracker struggles with accuracy in specific scenarios, failing to count steps entirely...

trainingarunner.com

29/04/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review - Training a Runner

The Microsoft Band provides a comprehensive suite of hardware features and precise data logging, making it a viable entry-level alternative to dedicated running watches. Its main advantages lie in its massive array of integrated sensors, featuring a highly accurate optical heart rate monitor and a standalone GPS module that matched a dedicated TomTom sports watch down to the metre. Additionally, runners benefit from a bright, customisable display that remains highly legible in direct sunlight, all backed by the intuitive, user-friendly Microsoft Health application. The companion platform functions excellently on both mobile and desktop setups, offering a robust layout for deep statistics, activity heatmaps, and seamless multi-platform cross-compatibility. However, the wearable is severely held back by critical design flaws, onboard software instability, and ergonomic discomfort. The primary drawback is its rigid, bulky build; the raised heart rate sensor digs into the skin, and the stiff edges prevent it from easily fitting under a standard shirt cuff. Furthermore, its screen is oriented sideways relative to the wrist, forcing runners into an awkward and dangerous arm-twisting contortion just to read metrics at racing...

coolsmartphone.com

25/05/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band - Review

Conversely, the review identifies significant drawbacks (cons) related to its physical build and platform limitations. The most severe design issue is the rigid, unyielding form factor; the device feels excessively tight during weightlifting, yet loosening it stops the heart rate sensor from recording correctly. Furthermore, the sensor unit covers physically pulled out arm hair, causing a bald patch after just a few days. The reviewer also strongly criticizes the flat display, stating it was "positively criminal" that Microsoft omitted a curved screen. Finally, non-Windows users suffer diminished functionality, as the lack of Cortana integration on Android and iOS strips away the ability to voice-control music, set voice reminders, or have text messages read aloud.

huffingtonpost.co.uk

20/04/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review: More Manager Than Artist

The Microsoft Band is evaluated as a powerful, indestructible, and highly capable fitness tracker rather than a stylish smartwatch. The Huffington Post UK review highlights several major performance advantages, particularly for fitness enthusiasts looking to train without a smartphone. A standout feature is the built-in GPS tracking and continuous heart-rate monitoring, which delivers highly accurate metrics and deep analytical data regarding calorie burn rates without heavily draining the battery. Furthermore, it features a highly practical "guided workouts" setting with instant instructional access, multi-platform compatibility across iOS, Android, and Windows Phone, and a built-in Starbucks card app for mobile payments. Windows Phone users receive added utility through Cortana integration, which acts as a voice-controlled personal assistant to schedule appointments and reply to messages. Despite its inner strength, the device severely falters in aesthetics, comfort, and interactive design. The physical design is heavily criticized for being too boring, blocky, and chunky to wear as an everyday timepiece, especially since it is packed with a cumbersome number of internal sensors. The display is notably tiny and pixelated, making it feel outdated by current...

pocket-lint.com

16/04/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: Heaps of potential offset by design downfall

The Microsoft Band is a multi-platform fitness tracker compatible with Windows Phone, iOS, and Android that functions more like a dedicated training aid than a basic step counter. On the positive side, it stands out for its extensive array of on-board sensors, including a heart-rate monitor, skin temperature tracking, UV light exposure measurements, and built-in GPS that allows phone-free activity tracking. Users can access excellent virtual personal training features through the Microsoft Health app, which pushes detailed, digestible data on workouts and sleep patterns directly to the device. However, the hardware suffers from major design flaws that impact its overall usability. The band features a chunky, unattractive, and rigid rubber aesthetic that feels awkward and genuinely painful to wear during initial use. Additionally, its short battery life lasts only two days at best, requiring daily charging if features like the display and smartphone syncing are heavily utilized. This limited battery capacity, paired with an unreliable smartphone pairing process and a high £170 price tag, prevents it from operating as a true 24/7 fitness wearable.

forbes.com

26/05/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Smartwatch Review: A Brutal Futuristic Fitness Tracker

Ewan Spence's Forbes review describes the Microsoft Band as a feature-rich, sensor-packed wearable that excels in health tracking—featuring continuous heart rate, GPS, and cross-platform compatibility—but suffers from a rigid, "brutal" design. While offering extensive data, the device is criticized for being uncomfortable to wear for long periods, having mediocre battery life, and requiring a proprietary charger.

pcmag.com

11/11/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review - PCMag

The PCMag review characterizes the original Microsoft Band as a feature-rich, ambitious, yet physically flawed activity tracker and smartwatch hybrid. Key strengths include built-in GPS for phone-free tracking, on-wrist workout coaching, actionable mobile notifications, and a customizable color touchscreen. However, significant drawbacks include a rigid, uncomfortable design that is particularly ill-suited for smaller wrists. Furthermore, the device suffers from inaccurate heart rate monitoring, lack of cycling tracking, and limited data visualization in the companion app.

cityam.com

29/04/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band review: The ultimate fitness tracker or another... Would you like to compare the technical specifications of this original Band to its...

However, the reviewer highlights significant drawbacks, focusing heavily on its cumbersome physical design and software limitations. The band is thick (7mm), heavy, made of inflexible rubber, and highly uncomfortable, making it an awkward spectacle on the wrist. Despite having built-in GPS, it fails to be a true standalone device because it lacks the ability to upload a music playlist, forcing runners to still carry a smartphone. Additionally, it lacks integration with popular third-party apps like Nike+ Running, lacks a smart alarm to wake users during light sleep cycles, and leaves the reviewer feeling that the wearable is too unwieldy for everyday use.

focus.de

18/06/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band: Smartwatch Review

The FOCUS online review evaluates the first-generation Microsoft Band as a mid-range entry into the wearable market, priced at $199. Structurally, it features a plastic casing with highly compact dimensions of 19 x 8.7 mm and an impressively thin profile of 7.9 mm. It is equipped with an ARM Cortex M4 MCU, 64 MB of internal storage, and an elongated 1.4-inch display sporting a 320 x 106 resolution (240 ppi pixel density). Power is supplied by a 2x100-mAh battery designed to last for two days of typical use, and its software ecosystem heavily promotes an integrated cloud service. The review highlights several distinct pros and cons regarding the device's hardware design and technical specifications. On the positive side, its ultra-thin 7.9 mm thickness and lightweight build of 60 grams are exceptionally well-suited for comfortable, everyday wear. Additionally, its $199 price tag makes it a competitively priced option compared to other current smartwatches, and the two-day battery life meets market standards. However, the device falls short in memory capacity, offering only 64 MB of internal storage, which is significantly less than...

sports-insider.de

30/05/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review: Microsoft's First Activity Tracker and Fitness Watch

The Microsoft Band is evaluated as a highly functional, sensor-packed health companion that bridges the gap between a standard activity tracker and a smartwatch. A standout feature is its multi-platform compatibility, performing exceptionally well not only with Windows Phone but also across iOS and Android devices via its companion app. The device features a vibrant, high-resolution 1.4-inch display (310 x 102px) that provides clear text delivery, smooth UI navigation, and basic smartwatch capabilities like checking emails, viewing calendar appointments, and interacting with Cortana. For fitness enthusiasts, it serves as a powerful standalone tool by using 10 integrated sensors—including a built-in GPS module, heart rate monitor, gyrometer, and accelerometer—to track routes, analyze precise sleep stages, and calculate calorie burns without needing a smartphone nearby. However, the review highlights notable structural and functional limitations. The band's plastic body is only splash-proof, meaning users cannot wear it while showering or swimming. Its ergonomic build suffers from high stiffness, which negatively affects overall wrist comfort during prolonged wear. Additionally, while the battery lasts up to two days under normal conditions and fully recharges in...

worldofppc.com

17/11/2014

Summary of the review

Review: Microsoft Band

Microsoft Band The Microsoft Band stands out as a pioneering, platform-agnostic wearable that bridges the gap between a fitness tracker and a smartwatch, operating seamlessly across Windows Phone, Android, and iOS. The reviewer praises its highly reliable notification system, which aggregates alerts like emails, texts, and social media updates, alongside a unique barcode feature that allows users to pay at Starbucks directly from their wrist. On the health side, its standout advantage is a built-in GPS that enables outdoor workouts without needing a smartphone, complemented by automated data syncing to third-party services like RunKeeper and detailed overnight sleep cycle analysis. However, the hardware leaves significant room for improvement, as the design was heavily criticized by others for being bulky and clunky, though the reviewer personally appreciates its futuristic aesthetic. Key hardware disadvantages include a subpar display resolution, materials that lack a premium feel, and a battery life that maxes out at just two days. Furthermore, the software ecosystem is limited by the lack of a dedicated app store. For international buyers in regions like Germany, using the device requires a...

trentejours.com

19/07/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band: a good GPS watch for running?", "Microsoft Band: a good GPS tracker for running?

The Microsoft Band serves as a sensor-rich fitness tracker featuring a built-in GPS and a built-in heart rate monitor, making it a decent option for running without a smartphone. The device seamlessly syncs with the Microsoft Health companion application, which provides users with vital metrics such as session summaries, route maps, and split times paired with heart rate data. Key advantages highlighted in the review include its autonomous GPS functionality that eliminates the need to carry a phone, and a high-contrast white-on-black color screen that offers excellent visibility when training outdoors. However, the reviewer points out several notable drawbacks that hinder the overall experience, giving the product a final rating of 2.5 out of 5 stars. Although Microsoft boasts compatibility with third-party apps like Runkeeper, Strava, and MapMyFitness, the data integration is flawed, notably failing to sync route maps over to Runkeeper accounts. Additionally, the built-in GPS can be frustratingly slow, taking several minutes to lock onto a signal. The touchscreen loses its responsiveness when it comes into contact with sweaty or damp fingers, and a lack of local music...

geeksandcom.com

26/01/2015

Summary of the review

Review of the Microsoft Band, a connected bracelet for iOS, Android, and Windows Phone", "Microsoft Band review: a smart band for iOS, Android, and Wi...

The Microsoft Band is a highly versatile and sensor-rich smartband that effectively serves as both a fitness tracker and a smartwatch. Retailing at $199 in the United States, it offers excellent value for money by including uncommon features like a built-in GPS, UV exposure sensors, and skin temperature monitoring. A major strength of the device is its cross-platform compatibility, performing reliably across iOS, Android, and Windows Phone, with Windows users gaining the exclusive benefit of Cortana voice assistant integration. The interface features an intuitive, customizable tile layout that allows users to read extensive notification text from messages and emails directly on the crisp 1.4-inch display without needing to pull out their smartphones. However, the device is held back by notable design, battery, and software limitations. Visually, the tracker features a bulky, rigid silicone aesthetic that lacks elegance and fails to stand out against its competitors. Its flat plastic display cover is incredibly fragile and prone to scratching, forcing users to rely on a screen protector. Furthermore, while it lasts a standard two days under normal use, activating the GPS and...

frandroid.com

14/01/2015

Summary of the review

Review of the Microsoft Band, the ambitious and cross-platform wearable", "Microsoft Band review: An ambitious, cross-platform fitness tracker

The Microsoft Band review from Frandroid highlights the device as a highly ambitious first attempt at a multi-platform fitness tracker, earning a final rating of 7 out of 10. A major strength of the device is its cross-platform compatibility, integrating smoothly across Android, iOS, and Windows Phone, alongside its ability to pull full smartphone notifications from third-party apps like WhatsApp and Facebook Messenger. Additionally, the review praises its incredibly dense array of ten sensors, which includes a continuous heart rate monitor, built-in GPS matching dedicated sports watches, and rare metrics like a UV exposure sensor and Galvanic Skin Response (GSR). The accompanying Microsoft Health app is also lauded for being highly comprehensive, featuring built-in, synchronized guided workout libraries to support different fitness levels. However, the review points out several significant drawbacks rooted in poor ergonomics and early-stage software bugs. The band's thick, rigid build makes it highly uncomfortable to wear, and its horizontal-only text alignment forces users into awkward wrist angles to scroll through notifications phrase by phrase. Furthermore, the 1.4-inch OLED touchscreen lacks Gorilla Glass protection, making it highly...

es.gizmodo.com

30/10/2014

Summary of the review

We tested the Microsoft Band: a highly promising smart sports wristband

The Gizmodo en Español review highlights the Microsoft Band as an ambitious, highly capable fitness tracker priced at $199 that sets a new standard by translating raw biological data into useful, actionable health guidance. A major pro emphasized by the reviewer is the device's advanced tracking capabilities powered by 10 distinct sensors, including an optical heart rate monitor and a built-in GPS that intelligently activates only when needed to conserve battery life. Additionally, the reviewer praises the hardware's smart, adjustable sliding strap—which ensures optimal sensor contact during rigorous workouts—and the Microsoft Health app's guided workout feature, which leverages haptic alerts to act as a "personal trainer on the wrist". The review also notes that its multi-platform cloud syncing provides advanced predictive insights, such as recommending structured downtime directly synchronized with stressful events in the user's calendar. However, the review points out several notable cons regarding the first-generation wearable's physical construction and interface limitations. While the band appears deceptively slim when viewed directly from above, it possesses an awkward, noticeably elevated profile from the side. Furthermore, the user interface animations struggle...

tweakers.net

24/12/2014

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band (2014) Large Black - makooy", "Review: Microsoft Band put to the test", "Review: Microsoft Band fitness tracker and smartwatch

The Tweakers community review by user makooy details the Microsoft Band (2014) Large Zwart, giving it an overall rating of 4 out of 5 stars. The reviewer notes that while the wristband takes some getting used to for a first-time watch wearer, it stands out as an excellent, sensor-packed option for tech enthusiasts. Purchased via Marktplaats to bypass direct US import routes, the reviewer highlights that its $199 retail price (roughly €165) offers fair value, especially since it includes a high-quality, self-healing screen protector. In daily use, the device features a highly readable, vibrant display, rapid initial pairing, and highly effective sports tracking that accurately monitors vital functions and recovery times. However, the review outlines several specific performance and availability drawbacks. The reviewer operates the wearable alongside an iPhone and points out that cross-platform optimization is severely limited, noting that advanced options—such as setting background photos or accessing specialized skin sensor apps—are strictly Windows Phone (Lumia) exclusives. Hardware and connectivity flaws include an oversensitive step counter that records false steps during typing, a slow-to-react heart rate sensor when at rest,...

id.nl

20/03/2015

Summary of the review

Microsoft Band Review

The Microsoft Band acts as a versatile, cross-platform hybrid bridging the gap between activity trackers and smartwatches, featuring extensive compatibility with Android, iOS, and Windows Phone via Bluetooth. It offers an impressive array of sensors, including integrated GPS for tracking runs without a phone, and provides sharp notifications with high data density. However, the device is notably bulky and rigid, resulting in discomfort during extended wear, particularly while sleeping or under tight clothing. Furthermore, the battery typically lasts less than 48 hours, with significantly faster drain when using GPS, and the unit lacks waterproofing for swim tracking.

Third-party reviews

Based on 134 buyer reviews from online shops.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Microsoft Band 2015

Comprehensive sensor suite including GPS, UV sensor, and continuous heart rate monitoring
Cross-platform compatibility with Windows Phone, Android, and iOS
Helpful guided workouts and integration with Microsoft Health software
Effective smart notifications for emails, texts, and calendar alerts
Useful lifestyle features like the built-in Starbucks payment tile
Responsive and customizable color touchscreen interface

What we don't like about Microsoft Band 2015

Uncomfortable, bulky, and rigid design that can be awkward for all-day wear
Screen is highly susceptible to scratching and scuffing without a protector
Mediocre battery life, typically lasting only 2 days or less with GPS active
Not waterproof; cannot be worn for swimming or in the shower
Inconsistent heart rate accuracy during high-intensity activities
Limited functionality for non-Windows Phone users, such as lack of Cortana support

Verdict

Released in late 2015, the Microsoft Band 2 features a curved 1.28-inch AMOLED display (320 x 128 resolution) protected by Gorilla Glass 3 and powered by an ARM Cortex M4 MCU. This advanced fitness tracker is distinguished by its 11 sensors, including built-in GPS, a continuous optical heart rate monitor, UV sensor, barometer, and galvanic skin response sensor for stress tracking. Its main pros include cross-platform compatibility (Windows, iOS, Android), highly accurate GPS for independent run tracking, and unique guided workouts that provide exercise prompts directly on the wrist. However, significant cons include a rigid, often uncomfortable design, a modest 48-hour battery life that drains quickly with GPS use, and a lack of true waterproofing, being only moisture-resistant.

Best alternatives

Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Withings ScanWatch 42mm

Fitness trackers

Samsung Gear FIT2

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Samsung Gear Fit

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Fitness trackers

Fitbit Charge 4

Fitness trackers

Fitbit Charge 3

Fitness trackers

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare Microsoft Band 2015 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Band 2015 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found