Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Samsung Gear FIT2 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£160Battery life:3.5 daysScreen size:1.5 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1.5 m

Samsung Gear FIT2 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.8

Overall score

Score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.8

Technical score

20%

7.6

User score

▲Better than 76% of fitness-trackers
7.8

Technical score

Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.7

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

9.5

Display

8%

8.9

Smart Features

8%

9.7

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Design & Durability

▲Better than 81% of fitness-trackers
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on 1,254 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 78% of fitness-trackers
  • samsung-gear-fit2
  • samsung-gear-fit2
  • samsung-gear-fit2
  • samsung-gear-fit2
  • samsung-gear-fit2
  • samsung-gear-fit2
samsung-gear-fit2
samsung-gear-fit2
samsung-gear-fit2
samsung-gear-fit2
samsung-gear-fit2
samsung-gear-fit2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Samsung Gear FIT2

Technical score
Technical score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.9

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.7

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

9.5

Display

8%

8.9

Smart Features

8%

9.7

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

6.9

Design & Durability

7.8
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

Based on 1,254 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Gear FIT2 has a popularity score of 7.8 points, which is higher than 66.7% of fitness trackers.
7.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.8

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

8.4
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
GPS + GLONASS
Satellite systems supported
GPS + GLONASS
This fitness tracker supports GPS + GLONASS satellite systems which is more versatile than that of 89.3% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 5.1% of fitness trackers.
Multi-GNSS support.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
yes
Acquires GPS faster
yes
This fitness tracker supports faster GPS acquisition. 92.4% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Faster satellite lock claimed.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Built-in speaker and microphone.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Samsung Health
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.2 which is newer than in 59.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 14.2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This fitness tracker supports Wi-Fi. 98.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
yes
Wi-Fi version
yes
This fitness tracker supports modern Wi-Fi. 99.5% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
Show more
Battery life
3.5 days
Battery life
3.5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 3.5 days which is shorter than that of 94.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1% of fitness trackers.
source range 3-4 days.
Battery life with GPS on
9 h
Battery life with GPS on
9 h
This fitness tracker offers a GPS-on battery life of 9 h which is longer than that of 73.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 6.7% of fitness trackers.
Battery life in training mode
9 h
Battery life in training mode
9 h
This fitness tracker offers a training-mode battery life of 9 h which is longer than that of 53.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.6% of fitness trackers.
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
200 mAh
Battery capacity
200 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 200 mAh which is higher than that of 78.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.5 inch
Screen size
1.5 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.5 inch which is larger than that of 85.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
322 ppi
Pixel density
322 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 322 ppi which is higher than that of 85.2% of fitness trackers.
Calculated from published resolution and display size.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
18 mm
Show more

Samsung Gear FIT2 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 33.3% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    600 nits
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (600 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    600 nits vs 450 nits
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 125x larger internal storage
    Internal storage
    4 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (4 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    4 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • 0.46 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.5 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 81.8% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    200 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (200 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    200 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Auto pause
    Auto pause
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports auto pause, while the average fitness tracker does not. 23.2% of fitness trackers support auto pause.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
    Predicts ovulation via the Samsung Health app.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 81.8% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    200 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (200 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    200 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 2 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    9 h
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life with GPS on than the average fitness tracker (9 h vs 7 h). The average fitness tracker has 7 h of battery life with GPS on.
    9 h vs 7 h
  • 33.3% higher screen brightness
    Screen brightness
    600 nits
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen brightness than the average fitness tracker (600 nits vs 450 nits). The average fitness tracker has screen brightness of 450 nits.
    600 nits vs 450 nits
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • 0.46 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.5 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • 31.4% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    322 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (322 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    Calculated from published resolution and display size.
    322 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3.
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Gorilla Glass 3
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Wi-Fi, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
  • Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports modern Wi-Fi, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
  • 125x larger internal storage
    Internal storage
    4 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (4 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    4 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Passcode protection
    Passcode protection
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Built-in speaker and microphone.
  • 10.42x higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1 GHz
    This fitness tracker has a higher CPU speed than the average fitness tracker (1 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The average fitness tracker has 0.096 GHz of CPU speed.
    1 GHz vs 0.096 GHz
  • 256x higher RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    0.512 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (0.5 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    0.512 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • 2 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    2
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • Music playback
    Music playback
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports music playback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1.4% of fitness trackers support music playback.
    Requires Bluetooth headphones for standalone playback.
  • Voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports voice feedback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2.3% of fitness trackers support voice feedback.
    Voice coaching works through paired Bluetooth headphones.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports third-party apps, while the average fitness tracker does not. 3.3% of fitness trackers support third-party apps.
    Limited to partner apps like Spotify and Under Armour.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
    Food intake can be logged in the official app, with a food tile/widget on supported models.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
    Includes a native hydration widget.
  • No account required
    No account required
    yes
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.2% of fitness trackers work without an account.
    Standalone mode works without account.
  • 6.5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3.5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (3.5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 3-4 days.
    3.5 days vs 10 days
  • 48.5 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • 0.33 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    1.83 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (1.8 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1.83 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • No shock resistance standard
    Shock resistance standard
    none
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810G
  • 2.29x more expensive
    Samsung Gear FIT2 is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£160 vs £70).
    £160 vs £70
  • 10.4 mm greater height
    Height
    51.2 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (51.2 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    51.2 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 0.9 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (11.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.9 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • 2.29x more expensive
    Samsung Gear FIT2 is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£160 vs £70).
    £160 vs £70
  • 4.6% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Gear FIT2
    the average fitness tracker
    Samsung Gear FIT2 has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.65 vs 8.000).
    7.65 vs 8
  • 6.5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3.5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (3.5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 3-4 days.
    3.5 days vs 10 days
  • 0.33 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    1.83 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (1.8 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1.83 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 48.5 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1.5 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1.5 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1.5 m vs 50 m
  • No shock resistance standard
    Shock resistance standard
    none
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810G
  • 10.4 mm greater height
    Height
    51.2 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (51.2 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    51.2 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 0.9 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.9 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (11.9 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.9 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -10 °C vs 0 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
expertreviews.co.uk
06/12/2016
Summary of the review
D
droid-life.com
21/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
15/07/2016
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
10/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
time.com
10/06/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
10/06/2016
Summary of the review
A
androidauthority.com
11/07/2016
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
10/06/2016
Summary of the review
R
root-nation.com
13/10/2016
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
11/01/2017
Summary of the review
M
mashable.com
28/06/2016
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
10/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
07/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
12/11/2018
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
23/06/2017
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
19/07/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
05/08/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
28/07/2016
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
28/07/2016
Summary of the review
F
fitnessarmband.eu
26/05/2021
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
05/08/2016
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
26/07/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
25/06/2016
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24/06/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
13/07/2016
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
26/07/2016
Summary of the review
M
montre-cardio-gps.fr
25/07/2016
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
25/06/2016
Summary of the review
M
montre-cardio-gps.fr
15/06/2016
Summary of the review
D
darty.com
22/06/2016
Summary of the review
G
goldengeek.net
03/08/2016
Summary of the review
I
ici.radio-canada.ca
21/07/2016
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
28/08/2016
Summary of the review
C
chilango.com
09/10/2016
Summary of the review
E
elespanol.com
27/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
teknofilo.com
17/09/2016
Summary of the review
X
xataka.com
26/09/2017
Summary of the review
E
es.root-nation.com
13/10/2016
Summary of the review
L
laptopmedia.com
28/08/2016
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
01/07/2016
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
25/07/2016
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
04/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
16/01/2017
Summary of the review
T
tuttoandroid.net
21/06/2016
Summary of the review
T
techpulse.be
22/03/2017
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
21/10/2016
Summary of the review
C
ct.nl
04/10/2016
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
22/09/2016
Summary of the review
S
smarthealth.live
04/08/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,254 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Gear FIT2

  • Vibrant, curved Super AMOLED display that is bright and easy to read
  • Built-in GPS for tracking runs and activities without needing a phone
  • Onboard music storage (4GB) for up to 1,000 songs with standalone playback
  • Slim, lightweight, and ergonomic design that is comfortable for all-day wear
  • Automatic exercise detection for common activities like walking and running
  • Displays detailed smartphone notifications with quick reply options

What we don't like about Samsung Gear FIT2

  • Short battery life, typically lasting only 2 to 3 days (less with GPS active)
  • Inconsistent heart rate sensor accuracy during high-intensity workouts
  • Limited water resistance (IP68); not suitable for swimming or showering
  • Lack of iOS support, making it compatible only with Android devices
  • Interface and S Health app can be complicated or confusing for new users
  • Altimeter and floor-counting features are occasionally unreliable

Verdict

The Samsung Gear Fit2 is a hybrid fitness tracker and smartwatch featuring a 1.5-inch curved Super AMOLED display with a 216 x 432 resolution, a 1GHz dual-core processor, 512MB of RAM, and 4GB of internal storage. Its main characteristics include built-in GPS for phone-free tracking, an IP68 water-resistance rating, and a suite of sensors including a heart rate monitor, barometer, and gyroscope. Main pros include its vibrant, high-resolution color touchscreen, automatic exercise detection for various activities, and the ability to store and play music directly via Bluetooth headphones. However, notable cons include a relatively short battery life of approximately 3 to 4 days, occasional inaccuracies in heart rate monitoring during intense workouts, and limited compatibility with non-Android devices at launch.

Compare Samsung Gear FIT2 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Gear FIT2 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found