Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£200Battery life:3.5 daysScreen size:1.5 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:yesWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

8.0

Overall score

Score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

8.0

Technical score

20%

7.8

User score

â–²Better than 80% of fitness-trackers
8.0

Technical score

Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

9.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.7

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

9.2

Display

8%

8.9

Smart Features

8%

9.8

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

8.4

Design & Durability

â–²Better than 87% of fitness-trackers
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on 740 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 76% of fitness-trackers
  • samsung-gear-fit2-pro
  • samsung-gear-fit2-pro
  • samsung-gear-fit2-pro
  • samsung-gear-fit2-pro
  • samsung-gear-fit2-pro
samsung-gear-fit2-pro
samsung-gear-fit2-pro
samsung-gear-fit2-pro
samsung-gear-fit2-pro
samsung-gear-fit2-pro

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro

Technical score
Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

9.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.7

Battery

18%

7.4

Health

18%

9.2

Display

8%

8.9

Smart Features

8%

9.8

App & Wellness

4%

7.8

Connectivity

4%

8.4

Design & Durability

8.0
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on 740 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro has a popularity score of 7.3 points, which is higher than 64.8% of fitness trackers.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

8.0

Overall score

40%

9.5

Price

8.4
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
This fitness tracker has GPS. 89.5% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
GPS + GLONASS + Galileo + BeiDou
Satellite systems supported
GPS + GLONASS + Galileo + BeiDou
This fitness tracker supports GPS + GLONASS + Galileo + BeiDou satellite systems which is more versatile than that of 97% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 0.5% of fitness trackers.
Multi-GNSS support.
GNSS bands supported
?
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
yes
Acquires GPS faster
yes
This fitness tracker supports faster GPS acquisition. 92.4% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Includes a calendar widget for synced phone events.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Samsung Health
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4.2
Bluetooth version
4.2
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.2 which is newer than in 59.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 14.2% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This fitness tracker supports Wi-Fi. 98.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
yes
Wi-Fi version
yes
This fitness tracker supports modern Wi-Fi. 99.5% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
Show more
Battery life
3.5 days
Battery life
3.5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 3.5 days which is shorter than that of 94.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1% of fitness trackers.
source range 3-4 days.
Battery life with GPS on
9 h
Battery life with GPS on
9 h
This fitness tracker offers a GPS-on battery life of 9 h which is longer than that of 73.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 6.7% of fitness trackers.
Battery life in training mode
9 h
Battery life in training mode
9 h
This fitness tracker offers a training-mode battery life of 9 h which is longer than that of 53.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.6% of fitness trackers.
With GPS.
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
200 mAh
Battery capacity
200 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 200 mAh which is higher than that of 78.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.6% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.5 inch
Screen size
1.5 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.5 inch which is larger than that of 85.3% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
216x 432
Screen resolution
216x 432
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 216x432 which is higher than that of 93.2% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
311 ppi
Pixel density
311 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 311 ppi which is higher than that of 84.3% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
18 mm
Show more

Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • Built-in GPS
    GPS
    yes
    This fitness tracker has GPS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 125x larger internal storage
    Internal storage
    4 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (4 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    About 2 GB usable for music.
    4 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • 0.46 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.5 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 81.8% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    200 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (200 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    200 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Swim stroke counter
    Swim stroke counter
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports swim stroke counting, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22% of fitness trackers support swim stroke counting.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • 81.8% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    200 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (200 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    200 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 2 h longer GPS battery life
    Battery life with GPS on
    9 h
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life with GPS on than the average fitness tracker (9 h vs 7 h). The average fitness tracker has 7 h of battery life with GPS on.
    9 h vs 7 h
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
  • 0.46 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.5 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.5 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • 26.9% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    311 ppi
    This fitness tracker has a higher pixel density than the average fitness tracker (311 ppi vs 245 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi.
    311 ppi vs 245 ppi
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3.
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Gorilla Glass 3
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4.2 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    4.2 vs 4.0
  • Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Wi-Fi, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
  • Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports modern Wi-Fi, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n).
  • 125x larger internal storage
    Internal storage
    4 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher internal storage than the average fitness tracker (4 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.032 GB of internal storage.
    About 2 GB usable for music.
    4 GB vs 0.032 GB
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Passcode protection
    Passcode protection
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports passcode protection, while the average fitness tracker does not. 17.6% of fitness trackers support passcode protection.
    Supports a 4-digit PIN lock.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • 10.42x higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1 GHz
    This fitness tracker has a higher CPU speed than the average fitness tracker (1 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The average fitness tracker has 0.096 GHz of CPU speed.
    1 GHz vs 0.096 GHz
  • Emergency SOS support
    Emergency SOS
    yes
    This fitness tracker has Emergency SOS, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2% of fitness trackers have Emergency SOS.
    SOS is triggered by pressing the Home key 3 times.
  • 256x higher RAM capacity
    RAM capacity
    0.512 GB
    This fitness tracker has a higher RAM capacity than the average fitness tracker (0.5 GB vs 0 GB). The average fitness tracker has 0.002 GB of RAM capacity.
    0.512 GB vs 0.002 GB
  • 2 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    2
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (2 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    2 vs 0
  • Music playback
    Music playback
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports music playback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 1.4% of fitness trackers support music playback.
    Requires Bluetooth headphones for standalone playback.
  • Voice feedback
    Voice feedback
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports voice feedback, while the average fitness tracker does not. 2.3% of fitness trackers support voice feedback.
    Audio feedback works through paired Bluetooth headphones.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
    Includes a calendar widget for synced phone events.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
    Uses the Galaxy Store Camera Controller app.
  • Rugged design
    Rugged design
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Rugged design, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support Rugged design.
    MIL-STD-810G rated.
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Third-party app support
    Third-party app support
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports third-party apps, while the average fitness tracker does not. 3.3% of fitness trackers support third-party apps.
    Supports apps via Galaxy Store.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
    Food intake can be logged in the official app, with a food tile/widget on supported models.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • No account required
    No account required
    yes
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.2% of fitness trackers work without an account.
    Standalone mode works without account.
  • 6.5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3.5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (3.5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 3-4 days.
    3.5 days vs 10 days
  • 0.33 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    1.83 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (1.8 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1.83 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 2.86x more expensive
    Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£200 vs £70).
    £200 vs £70
  • 1.6 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.6 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.6 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10.5 mm greater height
    Height
    51.3 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (51.3 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    51.3 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • 2.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro
    the average fitness tracker
    Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.78 vs 8.000).
    7.78 vs 8
  • 2.86x more expensive
    Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£200 vs £70).
    £200 vs £70
  • 2.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro
    the average fitness tracker
    Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro has a lower user score than the average fitness tracker (7.78 vs 8.000).
    7.78 vs 8
  • 6.5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3.5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (3.5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 3-4 days.
    3.5 days vs 10 days
  • 0.33 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    1.83 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (1.8 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1.83 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 1.6 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.6 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.6 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10.5 mm greater height
    Height
    51.3 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (51.3 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    51.3 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
afr.com
22/09/2017
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
04/12/2017
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
06/02/2019
Summary of the review
C
coachweb.com
01/05/2018
Summary of the review
P
phonearena.com
01/11/2017
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
30/11/2017
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
06/04/2018
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
04/06/2018
Summary of the review
T
techgearlab.com
15/02/2018
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
17/12/2017
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
30/10/2017
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
30/04/2018
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
18/07/2018
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
30/08/2017
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
18/10/2017
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
02/02/2018
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
21/10/2017
Summary of the review
F
fitnessmodern.de
21/12/2017
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
16/10/2017
Summary of the review
J
journaldugeek.com
21/10/2017
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
16/10/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
14/10/2017
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
18/10/2017
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
15/10/2017
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
20/09/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
14/10/2017
Summary of the review
L
labolsadelcorredor.com
24/01/2018
Summary of the review
R
runandthecity.it
19/12/2017
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
20/09/2017
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
30/08/2017
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
18/10/2017
Summary of the review
D
diskidee.be
13/02/2018
Summary of the review
H
hardware.info
20/09/2018
Summary of the review
C
ct.nl
01/05/2018
Summary of the review
G
gadgetgear.nl
07/02/2018
Summary of the review
I
id.nl
01/02/2019
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 740 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro

  • Vibrant and responsive 1.5-inch curved Super AMOLED display
  • Water-resistant up to 50 meters (5 ATM) with dedicated swim tracking
  • Built-in GPS and 4GB internal storage for offline music (e.g., Spotify)
  • Comfortable, lightweight design with a secure buckle-style clasp
  • Extensive smart features including detailed notification support
  • Automatic activity detection for common exercises like walking and running

What we don't like about Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro

  • Short battery life, typically requiring daily charging (1-2 days)
  • Inconsistent heart rate monitor accuracy during high-intensity workouts
  • Sluggish GPS signal acquisition in some environments
  • Limited app ecosystem compared to full smartwatches
  • Restricted functionality when paired with iOS/iPhones
  • Plasticky build quality and proprietary, non-replaceable strap design

Verdict

The Samsung Gear Fit2 Pro is a versatile fitness tracker featuring a vibrant 1.5-inch curved Super AMOLED display (216 x 432 resolution), built-in GPS, and 5 ATM water resistance suitable for swimming. It runs on Tizen OS with a dual-core 1.0 GHz processor, 512MB RAM, and 4GB of internal storage, which supports offline Spotify playlists for phone-free workouts. Key strengths include its lightweight 34g ergonomic design with a secure watch-style clasp, automatic activity detection, and continuous heart rate monitoring. However, users may encounter relatively short battery life (typically 2–3 days with regular use), an occasionally inconsistent heart rate sensor during intense exercise, and a limited selection of third-party apps compared to full smartwatches.

Compare Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Gear FIT2 Pro and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found