Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Samsung Gear Fit Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180Battery life:3.5 daysScreen size:1.84 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:1 m

Samsung Gear Fit Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical score

20%

8.2

User score

â–²Better than 54% of fitness-trackers
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.6

Battery

18%

6.7

Health

18%

8.2

Display

8%

7.8

Smart Features

8%

9.0

App & Wellness

4%

5.7

Connectivity

4%

6.7

Design & Durability

â–¼Worse than 56% of fitness-trackers
8.2

User score

User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 6,019 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 73% of fitness-trackers
  • samsung-gear-fit
  • samsung-gear-fit
samsung-gear-fit
samsung-gear-fit

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Samsung Gear Fit

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.1

Sports & Navigation

20%

4.6

Battery

18%

6.7

Health

18%

8.2

Display

8%

7.8

Smart Features

8%

9.0

App & Wellness

4%

5.7

Connectivity

4%

6.7

Design & Durability

6.9
User score
User score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

Based on 6,019 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.2
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Gear Fit has a popularity score of 8.8 points, which is higher than 76.1% of fitness trackers.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.1

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Built-in speaker and microphone.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Requires Samsung Calendar on the connected mobile device.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Samsung Health
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
3.5 days
Battery life
3.5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 3.5 days which is shorter than that of 94.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1% of fitness trackers.
source range 3-4 days.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
210 mAh
Battery capacity
210 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 210 mAh which is higher than that of 82.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.84 inch
Screen size
1.84 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.84 inch which is larger than that of 98.6% of fitness trackers.
Display type
AMOLED
Display type
AMOLED
This fitness tracker uses AMOLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 74.9% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 25.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
432x 128
Screen resolution
432x 128
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 432x128 which is higher than that of 84.7% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
245 ppi
Pixel density
245 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 245 ppi which is higher than that of 49.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.9% of fitness trackers.
Calculated from published resolution and display size.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more

Samsung Gear Fit vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 0.8 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.84 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.8 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.84 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 90.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    210 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (210 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    210 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3.
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 2.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Gear Fit
    the average fitness tracker
    Samsung Gear Fit has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.21 vs 8.000).
    8.21 vs 8
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • 90.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    210 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (210 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    210 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 0.8 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.84 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.8 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.84 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a touchscreen, while the average fitness tracker does not. 43.8% of fitness trackers have a touchscreen.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Branded damage-resistant glass
    Has branded damage-resistant glass
    yes
    This fitness tracker uses branded damage-resistant glass, while the average fitness tracker does not. 22.2% of fitness trackers use branded damage-resistant glass.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 3.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Built-in speaker and microphone.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
    Requires Samsung Calendar on the connected mobile device.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 87.5% higher CPU speed
    CPU speed
    0.18 GHz
    This fitness tracker has a higher CPU speed than the average fitness tracker (0.2 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The average fitness tracker has 0.096 GHz of CPU speed.
    0.18 GHz vs 0.096 GHz
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • 6.5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3.5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (3.5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 3-4 days.
    3.5 days vs 10 days
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • Not compatible with iOS
    Compatible with iOS
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 96.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
  • 2.57x more expensive
    Samsung Gear Fit is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£180 vs £70).
    £180 vs £70
  • 2.57x more expensive
    Samsung Gear Fit is more expensive than the average fitness tracker (£180 vs £70).
    £180 vs £70
  • 6.5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    3.5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (3.5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    source range 3-4 days.
    3.5 days vs 10 days
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    432 x 128
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (432x128 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    432x128 vs 194x368
  • Not compatible with iOS
    Compatible with iOS
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 96.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 16.6 mm greater height
    Height
    57.4 mm
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (57.4 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    57.4 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • 8% heavier
    Thickness
    27 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (27 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    27 g vs 25 g
  • 0.95 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.95 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.95 mm vs 11 mm
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hardwarezone.com.sg
06/05/2014
Summary of the review
P
phonearena.com
02/05/2014
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
04/04/2014
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
10/07/2014
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
22/06/2014
Summary of the review
S
slashgear.com
13/04/2014
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
07/04/2014
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
25/02/2014
Summary of the review
I
irishtimes.com
02/05/2014
Summary of the review
L
livescience.com
28/04/2014
Summary of the review
D
dcrainmaker.com
16/04/2014
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
15/04/2014
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
14/04/2014
Summary of the review
T
theguardian.com
11/04/2014
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
08/04/2014
Summary of the review
F
futurezone.at
22/04/2014
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
26/02/2014
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
25/08/2014
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
10/07/2015
Summary of the review
L
lemondenumerique.ouest-france.fr
02/09/2014
Summary of the review
D
dailymotion.com
22/05/2014
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
03/05/2014
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
25/04/2014
Summary of the review
P
phonandroid.com
23/04/2014
Summary of the review
X
xatakandroid.com
13/06/2014
Summary of the review
T
tuexperto.com
07/04/2014
Summary of the review
W
wired.it
04/06/2014
Summary of the review
T
tuttoandroid.net
09/04/2014
Summary of the review
D
dday.it
23/06/2014
Summary of the review
A
androidplanet.nl
06/05/2014
Summary of the review
S
smarthealth.live
22/05/2014
Summary of the review
I
intogadgets.nl
08/01/2022
Summary of the review
A
androidplanet.nl
14/04/2014
Summary of the review
P
portablegear.nl
21/05/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 6,019 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Gear Fit

  • Sleek and stylish curved Super AMOLED display that offers vibrant colors and deep blacks
  • Lightweight and comfortable design that is often unnoticed after half an hour of wear
  • Effective integration of smartwatch notifications (calls, texts, and alerts)
  • Includes a built-in heart rate monitor and basic coaching tips for a healthy lifestyle
  • Dust and water-resistant (IP67) for basic protection against the elements
  • Interchangeable straps allowing for color customization

What we don't like about Samsung Gear Fit

  • Software requires managing multiple apps (Gear Fit Manager and S Health) for full data viewing
  • Inconsistent tracking accuracy, particularly with the pedometer and sleep monitor, which often require manual activation
  • The vertical screen orientation can make reading longer notifications awkward on the wrist
  • Lack of an ambient light sensor, requiring manual brightness adjustments for outdoor use
  • Higher price point compared to dedicated fitness trackers with similar or better sensor accuracy

Verdict

The Samsung Gear Fit is a hybrid fitness tracker and smartwatch featuring a distinctive 1.84-inch curved Super AMOLED touchscreen with a 432x128 resolution and an IP67 dust and water resistance rating. It comes equipped with a built-in optical heart rate monitor, pedometer, and sleep tracking sensors, all housed in a lightweight 27g body powered by a 210mAh battery providing approximately 3 to 4 days of use. Main pros include its vibrant, high-contrast display, comfortable interchangeable rubber bands, and the ability to receive real-time smartphone notifications. However, it is limited by its strict compatibility with only select Samsung Galaxy devices, the lack of an ambient light sensor for automatic brightness adjustment, and a vertical screen orientation that can sometimes make reading text awkward.

Compare Samsung Gear Fit with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Gear Fit and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found