Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Samsung Activity Tracker Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:?Screen size:?Heart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Samsung Activity Tracker Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.8

Technical score

20%

8.7

User score

▲Better than 56% of fitness-trackers
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.8

Battery

18%

5.8

Health

18%

5.7

Display

8%

6.9

Smart Features

8%

6.5

App & Wellness

4%

5.7

Connectivity

4%

8.8

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 57% of fitness-trackers
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 3,006 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 83% of fitness-trackers
  • samsung-activity-tracker
  • samsung-activity-tracker
  • samsung-activity-tracker
  • samsung-activity-tracker
  • samsung-activity-tracker
samsung-activity-tracker
samsung-activity-tracker
samsung-activity-tracker
samsung-activity-tracker
samsung-activity-tracker

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Samsung Activity Tracker

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.6

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.8

Battery

18%

5.8

Health

18%

5.7

Display

8%

6.9

Smart Features

8%

6.5

App & Wellness

4%

5.7

Connectivity

4%

8.8

Design & Durability

6.8
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 3,006 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Samsung Activity Tracker has a popularity score of 8.6 points, which is higher than 75.1% of fitness trackers.
8.6
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.0
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
?
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
?
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
vibration/LED alerts only.
Vibrating alerts
?
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
yes
Calendar sync
yes
This fitness tracker supports calendar sync. 80.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Automatically syncs events from the connected phone calendar.
Show more
Activity reports
no
Activity reports
no
This fitness tracker does not support activity reports. 94.8% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
?
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
no
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 76.4% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
?
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
?
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
?
Show more

Samsung Activity Tracker vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 78% lighter
    Thickness
    5.5 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (5.5 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Core module weight only.
    5.5 g vs 25 g
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Readiness score support
    Shows readiness score
    yes
    This fitness tracker shows a readiness score, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.9% of fitness trackers show a readiness score.
    displays readiness or recovery score.
  • 2.9 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    8.1 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (8.1 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    8.1 mm vs 11 mm
  • 33.2 mm lower height
    Height
    7.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (7.6 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    7.6 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
    Automatically syncs events from the connected phone calendar.
  • 9% higher user score
    User score
    8.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Activity Tracker
    the average fitness tracker
    Samsung Activity Tracker has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.72 vs 8.000).
    8.72 vs 8
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Readiness score support
    Shows readiness score
    yes
    This fitness tracker shows a readiness score, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.9% of fitness trackers show a readiness score.
    displays readiness or recovery score.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Calendar sync
    Calendar sync
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calendar sync, while the average fitness tracker does not. 20.2% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
    Automatically syncs events from the connected phone calendar.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    1
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 78% lighter
    Thickness
    5.5 g mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (5.5 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    Core module weight only.
    5.5 g vs 25 g
  • 2.9 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    8.1 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (8.1 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    8.1 mm vs 11 mm
  • 33.2 mm lower height
    Height
    7.6 mm
    This fitness tracker is shorter than the average fitness tracker (7.6 mm vs 40.8 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 40.8 mm.
    7.6 mm vs 40.8 mm
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No exercise tagging
    Exercise tagging
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support exercise tagging, while the average fitness tracker does. 58.4% of fitness trackers support exercise tagging.
  • No activity reports
    Activity reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support activity reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 94.3% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • Not compatible with iOS
    Compatible with iOS
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 96.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • No achievements
    Activity reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No display
    Display
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • Not compatible with iOS
    Compatible with iOS
    no
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 96.7% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • 10 °C lower maximum operating temperature
    Max operating temperature
    35 °C
    This fitness tracker has a lower maximum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (35 °C vs 45 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a maximum operating temperature of 45 °C.
    Thermal alerts can begin above 35 C.
    35 °C vs 45 °C
  • No activity reports
    Activity reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support activity reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 94.3% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • No achievements
    Activity reports
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
au.pcmag.com
12/02/2025
Summary of the review
M
me.pcmag.com
11/02/2025
Summary of the review
A
androidauthority.com
15/02/2025
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
11/02/2025
Summary of the review
E
eu.community.samsung.com
01/05/2024
Summary of the review
D
digitalcitizen.life
31/07/2025
Summary of the review
P
phonearena.com
10/01/2025
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
11/02/2025
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
10/06/2025
Summary of the review
N
nextpit.de
13/05/2019
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
17/07/2019
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
12/06/2019
Summary of the review
G
giga.de
22/06/2019
Summary of the review
I
inside-digital.de
20/11/2020
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
02/12/2020
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
16/01/2021
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
08/08/2024
Summary of the review
A
allround-pc.com
12/04/2025
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
13/09/2024
Summary of the review
N
netzwelt.de
16/05/2025
Summary of the review
T
test-achats.be
N/A
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
20/02/2024
Summary of the review
A
airmore.ai
07/07/2025
Summary of the review
P
protegez-vous.ca
N/A
Summary of the review
A
altroconsumo.it
01/04/2024
Summary of the review
T
thatsgaming.nl
23/11/2024
Summary of the review
T
technologyinsider.nl
10/02/2025
Summary of the review
A
androidworld.nl
13/04/2025
Summary of the review
W
wielrenner.eu
24/03/2026
Summary of the review
H
hardloopzone.nl
Onbekend
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
28/10/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 3,006 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Samsung Activity Tracker

  • Vibrant and large AMOLED display that is easy to read in direct sunlight
  • Lightweight, slim aluminum design that is comfortable enough for all-day wear and sleep
  • Strong battery life typically lasting 7 to 10 days on a single charge
  • Affordable price point compared to full-scale smartwatches
  • Seamless integration and easy setup for users within the Samsung Galaxy ecosystem
  • Reliable heart rate monitoring and blood oxygen (SpO2) measurements during activities

What we don't like about Samsung Activity Tracker

  • Lack of built-in GPS, requiring a tethered phone for accurate route tracking
  • Limited compatibility; does not work with iOS (iPhone) and has restricted features on non-Samsung Android phones
  • Inconsistent sleep tracking results with occasional gaps in data recorded
  • Closed operating system that does not support third-party apps or tap-to-pay (NFC)
  • No built-in speaker or microphone for handling calls or voice assistants directly from the wrist

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Fit3 is a budget-friendly fitness tracker featuring a 1.6-inch AMOLED display (256 x 402 resolution) housed in a slim 18.5g aluminum body with 5ATM and IP68 water/dust resistance. It offers comprehensive health monitoring including continuous heart rate, SpO2 levels, stress tracking, and support for over 100 workout types. Main pros include its impressive 13-day battery life, accurate activity and sleep tracking, and a lightweight, comfortable design suitable for 24/7 wear. However, notable cons include the lack of built-in GPS and NFC for payments, complete incompatibility with iOS devices, and some advanced features being exclusive only to Samsung Galaxy smartphones.

Compare Samsung Activity Tracker with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Activity Tracker and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found