OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Puro Fit Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Battery life:?Screen size:0.96 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:?Waterproof depth rating:1 m

Puro Fit Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.9

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components

80%

7.9

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–²Better than 78% of fitness-trackers
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

20%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.6

Battery

18%

7.3

Health

18%

7.0

Display

8%

8.9

Smart Features

8%

8.7

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

7.5

Design & Durability

â–²Better than 82% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £20

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Puro Fit

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components:

20%

8.5

Sports & Navigation

20%

7.6

Battery

18%

7.3

Health

18%

7.0

Display

8%

8.9

Smart Features

8%

8.7

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

7.5

Design & Durability

7.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Puro Fit has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

7.9

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.5
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
â–² Better than 40% of models
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
?
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
?
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
â–¼ Worse than 9% of models
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
?
Call answering
?
Calendar sync
?
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
â–² Better than 2% of models
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
â–¼ Worse than 34% of models
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
?
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
yes
NFC
yes
â–² Better than 88% of models
This fitness tracker has NFC. 87.5% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery life with GPS on
?
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.96 inch
Screen size
0.96 inch
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.96 inch which is smaller than that of 53.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9.1% of fitness trackers.
Display type
?
Screen resolution
?
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
yes
Designed for kids
yes
★ Better than 98% of models
This fitness tracker is designed for kids. 98.1% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
No child-specific positioning found.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
â–² Better than 26% of models
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Quick-release band system.
Band width
?
Show more

Puro Fit vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • ECG support
    ECG technology
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports ECG, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support ECG.
  • NFC
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker has NFC, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • More child-focused design
    Designed for kids
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This fitness tracker is designed for kids, while the average fitness tracker is not. 2.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
    No child-specific positioning found.
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Puro Fit is cheaper than the average fitness tracker (£20 vs £70).
    £20 vs £70
  • ECG support
    ECG technology
    yes
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This fitness tracker supports ECG, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.7% of fitness trackers support ECG.
  • Color display
    Color display
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This fitness tracker has a color display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 37.7% of fitness trackers have a color display.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
  • NFC
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker has NFC, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
  • Smart alarm
    Smart alarm
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a smart alarm, while the average fitness tracker does not. 27.3% of fitness trackers support a smart alarm.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Camera remote control
    Camera remote control
    yes
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker supports camera remote control, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.9% of fitness trackers support camera remote control.
  • More child-focused design
    Designed for kids
    yes
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This fitness tracker is designed for kids, while the average fitness tracker is not. 2.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
    No child-specific positioning found.
  • No account required
    No account required
    yes
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.2% of fitness trackers work without an account.
    Basic tracking works without app.
  • Tracks temperature
    Temperature tracking
    yes
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    This fitness tracker supports temperature tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 12.9% of fitness trackers support temperature tracking.
    Measures body temperature.
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 hours – >5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >50 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.
  • 5.07x less popular
    Puro Fit has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 5.07x less popular
    Puro Fit has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 0.5 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 hours – >5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 0.08 inch smaller screen size
    Screen size
    0.96 inch
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <0 inch – >1.6 inch
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (1 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    0.96 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • 49 m lower waterproof depth rating
    Waterproof depth rating
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <0 m – >50 m
    This fitness tracker has a lower waterproof depth rating than the average fitness tracker (1 m vs 50 m). The average fitness tracker has a waterproof depth rating of 50 m.
    1 m vs 50 m
  • No BMI tracking
    BMI tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 71% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
smartworld.it
11/09/2015
Summary of the review
Puro Fit Watch review (photos and video)", "Puro Fit Watch, the review (photos and video)
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Puro Fit

  • Long battery life (reported up to 7 days on a full charge or 21 days on standby)
  • Affordable, budget-friendly price point compared to major brands
  • User-friendly and easy-to-use interface for both the watch and the mobile app
  • Lightweight and comfortable design suitable for all-day wear
  • Includes basic essential features like step counting, heart rate monitoring, and sleep tracking
  • Water-resistant (5ATM rating), allowing use during hand washing or in the rain

What we don't like about Puro Fit

  • Inaccurate data tracking, specifically regarding step counts (sometimes registering steps while stationary)
  • Poor synchronization between the device and the app; some features like step counting may not work without an active app connection
  • Lacks advanced health metrics found in competitors, such as blood oxygen (SpO2) or ECG monitoring
  • Build quality concerns, with some users feeling it is less robust than premium alternatives
  • Limited app ecosystem and fewer third-party integrations compared to Apple or Fitbit
  • Smaller and dimmer display which can be difficult to read in some lighting conditions

Verdict

The Puro Fit is a specialized fitness tracker designed for children, featuring a 1.5-inch color touch screen and a robust IP68 waterproof rating suitable for swimming and outdoor play. It provides comprehensive health monitoring, including step counting, heart rate tracking, and sleep analysis, alongside 19 distinct sport modes and a sedentary reminder to encourage active lifestyles. Key advantages include its lightweight design, a notable battery life of up to 4 to 5 days, and compatibility with both Android and iOS devices. However, some users have noted that it lacks advanced features like built-in GPS and a silent alarm, and its data accuracy may be less precise compared to premium, adult-oriented trackers.

Compare Puro Fit with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Puro Fit and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found