OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v3.0

Kogan Fortis Trackfit review: 163 specs compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:7 daysScreen size:0.91 inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Kogan Fortis Trackfit Review: Compare 163 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

Kogan Fortis Trackfit
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

35%

6.4

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.2, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.1, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 72% of fitness trackers
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 74%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

20%

6.8

Sports

20%

5.1

Battery

18%

5.6

Health

18%

6.2

Display

8%

7.9

Smart functions

8%

8.6

Wellness

4%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design

â–¼Worse than 76%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.2 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.2.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • kogan-fortis-trackfit
kogan-fortis-trackfit
Where to buy
    N/A~ £35
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Kogan Fortis Trackfit

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

20%

6.8

Sports

20%

5.1

Battery

18%

5.6

Health

18%

6.2

Display

8%

7.9

Smart functions

8%

8.6

Wellness

4%

6.8

Connectivity

4%

7.7

Design

6.4
Reviews score
7.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.9
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 64.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 53% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 36.5% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
?
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 32.2% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 12.7% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 14.4% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 85.6% of fitness trackers.
no satellite positioning support.
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.4% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 5.6% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.8% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 14.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
?
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 0.9% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.5% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.5% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
?
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 21.4% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
?
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 4.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 47% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
10 m
Market range: <9 m – >30 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m which is higher than that of 14.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 64.5% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 11.8% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 2.5% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
?
Show more
Battery life
7 days
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 7 days which is shorter than that of 56.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 21.9% of fitness trackers.
Alternative source gives 5-7 days / 168 hours.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Power-saving battery life
?
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 26.3% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
0.91 inch
Market range: <0.72 inch – >1.6 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 0.91 inch which is smaller than that of 72.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 3.2% of fitness trackers.
Display type
OLED
This fitness tracker uses OLED display technology which is more advanced than that of 54.6% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 19.1% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 32
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x32 which is lower than that of 50.5% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 8.2% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
163 ppi
Market range: <146 ppi – >326 ppi
This fitness tracker has a pixel density of 163 ppi which is lower than that of 82.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 1.7% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.1% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 3.3% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
no
This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band. 77.1% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
25 mm
Show more

Kogan Fortis Trackfit vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSportsBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart functionsDesignWellness
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • 62.5% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (9 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    Module weight only.
    9 g vs 24 g
  • Windows compatible
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 20.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via dedicated PC software.
  • 23 more stored activities
    This fitness tracker has more stored activities than the average fitness tracker (30 vs 7). The average fitness tracker stores 7 activities.
    30 vs 7
  • No account required
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers work without an account.
  • Available on PC
    This fitness tracker is available on PC, while the average fitness tracker is not. 17.2% of fitness trackers are available on PC.
    Windows app available.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 1 mm thinner design
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (10 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    10 mm vs 11 mm
  • 23 more stored activities
    This fitness tracker has more stored activities than the average fitness tracker (30 vs 7). The average fitness tracker stores 7 activities.
    30 vs 7
  • 0.5 hours shorter charging time
    This fitness tracker has a lower charging time than the average fitness tracker (1 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    1 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Windows compatible
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 20.9% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via dedicated PC software.
  • 1 more physical buttons
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    1 vs 0
  • 62.5% lighter
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (9 g vs 24 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 24 g.
    Module weight only.
    9 g vs 24 g
  • 1 mm thinner design
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (10 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    10 mm vs 11 mm
  • No account required
    This fitness tracker works without an account, while the average fitness tracker does not. 9.8% of fitness trackers work without an account.
  • Available on PC
    This fitness tracker is available on PC, while the average fitness tracker is not. 17.2% of fitness trackers are available on PC.
    Windows app available.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 63.9% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 56.4% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • Lower screen resolution
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • Higher resting heart rate
    This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Alternative source gives 5-7 days / 168 hours.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • No battery level indicator
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 89% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • 34% lower pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (163 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    163 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • Not compatible with iOS
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 97% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
  • 2.2% worse value for money
    Kogan Fortis Trackfit has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.89 vs 8.1).
    7.89 vs 8.07
  • No heart rate monitoring
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 63.9% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • Higher resting heart rate
    This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • No automatic activity detection
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 56.4% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No route tracker
    This fitness tracker does not support route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 52.3% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
  • 3 days shorter battery life
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (7 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Alternative source gives 5-7 days / 168 hours.
    7 days vs 10 days
  • No battery level indicator
    This fitness tracker does not have a battery level indicator, while the average fitness tracker does. 89% of fitness trackers have a battery level indicator.
  • Lower screen resolution
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x32 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x32 vs 194x368
  • 34% lower pixel density
    This fitness tracker has a lower pixel density than the average fitness tracker (163 ppi vs 247 ppi). The average fitness tracker has a pixel density of 247 ppi.
    163 ppi vs 247 ppi
  • 0.15 inch smaller screen size
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen size than the average fitness tracker (0.9 inch vs 1.06 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.06 inch.
    0.91 inch vs 1.06 inch
  • Not compatible with iOS
    This fitness tracker is not compatible with iOS, while the average fitness tracker is. 97% of fitness trackers are compatible with iOS.
  • Old Bluetooth version
    This fitness tracker supports an older Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (4 vs 4.1). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.1.
    4 vs 4.1
  • No stopwatch
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 60.5% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • No shock resistance standard
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (MIL-STD-810G vs MIL-STD-810H). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810H shock resistance standard.
    MIL-STD-810G vs MIL-STD-810H
  • No replaceable watch band
    This fitness tracker does not have a replaceable watch band, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.8% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
  • 4.68 mm greater height
    This fitness tracker is taller than the average fitness tracker (46 mm vs 41.3 mm). The average fitness tracker has a height of 41.325 mm.
    46 mm vs 41.325 mm
  • No exercise diary
    This fitness tracker does not have an exercise diary, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.6% of fitness trackers have an exercise diary.
  • No BMI tracking
    This fitness tracker does not support BMI tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.2% of fitness trackers support BMI tracking.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kogan Fortis Trackfit

  • Extremely affordable compared to major brands like Garmin or Fitbit
  • Lightweight design (only 9g) making it comfortable for daily wear
  • Includes essential tracking for steps, calories, distance, and sleep duration
  • Features a built-in display for immediate data viewing
  • Supports goal setting and activity reporting through its software
  • Rechargeable battery with reasonable longevity for its size

What customers don't like about Kogan Fortis Trackfit

  • Frequent reports of poor data accuracy, especially for step counting and distance estimation
  • Significant connectivity issues, with many users unable to pair it with iPhones
  • Requires a Windows PC for full data syncing as smartphone integration is limited or unreliable
  • Build quality concerns, with reports of devices failing after a very short period of use
  • Sleep tracking often fails to provide meaningful or accurate quality readings
  • Software bugs, such as alarms that cannot be deactivated once set
  • Limited availability of replacement parts like chargers from customer service

Verdict

The Kogan Fortis TrackFit is an entry-level fitness tracker designed for budget-conscious users, featuring a 0.91-inch OLED display and a lightweight 108g build. It monitors essential daily metrics including steps taken, distance traveled, calories burned, and sleep quality, while offering goal-setting capabilities through the dedicated TrackFit or Purifit apps. The device is powered by a rechargeable lithium polymer battery that provides 5 to 7 days of use on a single 60-to-120-minute charge via a standard USB connection. Its main advantages are its high affordability compared to major brands and its versatile design, which allows the core unit to be worn as a wristband or placed in a clip-on pouch. However, notable drawbacks include reported inaccuracies in stride and distance estimation, limited smartphone syncing reliability for some users, and a lack of advanced features like a heart rate monitor or integrated GPS.

Compare Kogan Fortis Trackfit with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kogan Fortis Trackfit and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found