Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Amazfit Neo Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Battery life:28 daysScreen size:1.2 inchHeart rate monitor:yesGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Amazfit Neo Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

7.7

Overall score

Score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

7.5

Technical score

20%

8.6

User score

▲Better than 75% of fitness-trackers
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

7.7

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.4

Battery

18%

7.1

Health

18%

6.6

Display

8%

6.5

Smart Features

8%

8.4

App & Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

8.3

Design & Durability

▲Better than 71% of fitness-trackers
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on 5,644 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 81% of fitness-trackers
  • amazfit-neo
  • amazfit-neo
  • amazfit-neo
  • amazfit-neo
  • amazfit-neo
  • amazfit-neo
amazfit-neo
amazfit-neo
amazfit-neo
amazfit-neo
amazfit-neo
amazfit-neo

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Amazfit Neo

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

7.7

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.4

Battery

18%

7.1

Health

18%

6.6

Display

8%

6.5

Smart Features

8%

8.4

App & Wellness

4%

7.7

Connectivity

4%

8.3

Design & Durability

7.5
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on 5,644 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Amazfit Neo has a popularity score of 9 points, which is higher than 78.4% of fitness trackers.
9.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.7

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.4
Heart rate monitor
yes
Heart rate monitor
yes
This fitness tracker supports heart rate monitoring. 40.2% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
yes
Resting heart rate
yes
This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate. 52.6% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
no
Vibrating alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts. 84.2% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
yes
Call control
yes
This fitness tracker supports call controls. 58.7% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Reject/mute only.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Zepp app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 5 which is newer than in 74.6% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 16.8% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
28 days
Battery life
28 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 28 days which is longer than that of 84.7% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 0.5% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
37 h
Battery life in power-saving mode
37 h
This fitness tracker offers a power-saving battery life of 37 h which is longer than that of 94.4% of fitness trackers.
Basic usage mode.
Battery capacity
160 mAh
Battery capacity
160 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 160 mAh which is higher than that of 61.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
yes
Display
yes
This fitness tracker has a display. 24.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
1.2 inch
Screen size
1.2 inch
This fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.2 inch which is larger than that of 62.9% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 2.8% of fitness trackers.
Display type
STN
Display type
STN
This fitness tracker uses STN display technology which is less advanced than that of 73.9% of fitness trackers.
Screen resolution
128x 128
Screen resolution
128x 128
This fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 128x128 which is higher than that of 68.8% of fitness trackers.
Pixel density
?
Show more
Form factor
watch
Hybrid design
?
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Quick-release band system.
Band width
20 mm
Show more

Amazfit Neo vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 18 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    28 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (28 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    28 days vs 10 days
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
    Low-power display remains continuously visible.
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Gorilla Glass 3
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass
  • 7% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Amazfit Neo
    the average fitness tracker
    Amazfit Neo has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.56 vs 8.000).
    8.56 vs 8
  • Lower resting heart rate
    Resting heart rate
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Resting heart rate, while the average fitness tracker does not. 47.7% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
  • 18 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    28 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (28 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    28 days vs 10 days
  • Low power mode
    Low power mode
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports low power mode, while the average fitness tracker does not. 24.1% of fitness trackers support low power mode.
  • 17 h longer power-saving battery life
    Battery life in power-saving mode
    37 h
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life in power-saving mode than the average fitness tracker (37 h vs 20 h). The average fitness tracker has 20 h of battery life in power-saving mode.
    Basic usage mode.
    37 h vs 20 h
  • 45.5% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    160 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (160 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    160 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • Always-on display
    Always-on display
    yes
    This fitness tracker has an always-on display, while the average fitness tracker does not. 25.6% of fitness trackers have an always-on display.
    Low-power display remains continuously visible.
  • Durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Gorilla Glass 3
    This fitness tracker uses more durable display glass than the average fitness tracker (Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass). The average fitness tracker uses glass display glass.
    Gorilla Glass 3 vs glass
  • 0.16 inch larger screen size
    Screen size
    1.2 inch
    This fitness tracker has a higher screen size than the average fitness tracker (1.2 inch vs 1.04 inch). The average fitness tracker has a screen size of 1.04 inch.
    1.2 inch vs 1.04 inch
  • Modern Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    5.0
    This fitness tracker supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average fitness tracker (5 vs 4). The average fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4.0.
    5.0 vs 4.0
  • Phone finder support
    Find my phone
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports phone finding, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.3% of fitness trackers support phone finding.
  • Call control
    Call control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports call controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.5% of fitness trackers support call controls.
    Reject/mute only.
  • 4 more physical buttons
    N. of physical buttons
    4
    This fitness tracker has a higher physical buttons than the average fitness tracker (4 vs 0). The average fitness tracker has 0 of physical buttons.
    4 vs 0
  • Gesture control
    Gesture control
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports gesture controls, while the average fitness tracker does not. 40.8% of fitness trackers support gesture controls.
  • Rugged design
    Rugged design
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports Rugged design, while the average fitness tracker does not. 5.4% of fitness trackers support Rugged design.
    Durable exterior case described for tough environments.
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
    Uses PAI.
  • No pace measurement
    Measures pace
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support pace measurement, while the average fitness tracker does. 61.7% of fitness trackers support pace measurement.
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2.5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 128
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x128 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x128 vs 194x368
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.
  • 28% heavier
    Thickness
    32 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (32 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    32 g vs 25 g
  • 0.7 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.7 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (11.7 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.7 mm vs 11 mm
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    Charging time
    2.5 hours
    This fitness tracker has a higher charging time than the average fitness tracker (2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours). The average fitness tracker needs 1.5 hours to charge.
    2.5 hours vs 1.5 hours
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    128 x 128
    This fitness tracker has a lower screen resolution than the average fitness tracker (128x128 vs 194x368). The average fitness tracker has a screen resolution of 194x368.
    128x128 vs 194x368
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • 28% heavier
    Thickness
    32 g mm
    This fitness tracker is heavier than the average fitness tracker (32 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    32 g vs 25 g
  • 0.7 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    11.7 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (11.7 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    11.7 mm vs 11 mm
  • No personalization options
    Can be personalised
    no
    This fitness tracker cannot be personalized, while the average fitness tracker can. 79.9% of fitness trackers can be personalized.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
androidauthority.com
13/10/2022
Summary of the review
T
thereviewsmiths.com
02/05/2021
Summary of the review
A
adventure52.com
16/08/2021
Summary of the review
J
jmcomms.com
12/10/2020
Summary of the review
A
androidcentral.com
15/11/2020
Summary of the review
N
nerdsheaven.de
18/03/2022
Summary of the review
B
beyondpixels.at
08/12/2020
Summary of the review
C
china-gadgets.de
18/05/2021
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
29/01/2021
Summary of the review
F
fr.xiaomitoday.it
14/11/2020
Summary of the review
C
clubic.com
07/06/2021
Summary of the review
I
iphoneitalia.com
15/02/2022
Summary of the review
T
techbestdeals.com
23/02/2021
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
13/06/2021
Summary of the review
T
tuttotech.net
06/11/2020
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
25/11/2020
Summary of the review
C
ct.nl
10/05/2021
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
23/10/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 5,644 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Amazfit Neo

  • Distinctive retro digital design reminiscent of classic Casio watches
  • Exceptional battery life often lasting between 20 to 28 days on a single charge
  • Always-on STN display that is highly readable in direct sunlight
  • Lightweight and comfortable for long-term daily wear and sleep
  • Affordable entry-level price point compared to full smartwatches
  • Effective basic tracking for heart rate, steps, and sleep cycles (including REM)

What we don't like about Amazfit Neo

  • Lacks a vibration motor; relys on audible beeps for alarms and notifications
  • Very limited notification support that only shows counts rather than message text
  • Heart rate accuracy can be inconsistent during high-intensity workouts
  • No built-in GPS, requiring a connected phone to track exercise routes
  • Limited sports modes (only covers walking, running, and cycling)
  • Proprietary straps can be difficult to replace without specific tools

Verdict

The Amazfit Neo is a lightweight 32g fitness tracker featuring a 1.2-inch always-on STN monochrome display and a distinctive retro four-button design reminiscent of classic digital watches. Its core specifications include 5 ATM water resistance, continuous 24/7 heart rate monitoring via a BioTracker PPG sensor, and sleep tracking, all powered by a 160mAh battery that delivers an exceptional life of up to 28 days on a single charge. Main pros include its durable, high-visibility outdoor screen, impressive battery longevity, and affordable price point. However, notable cons include the lack of a vibration motor—relying instead on beeps for alerts—limited notification detail that doesn't display full message text, and the absence of built-in GPS, requiring a tethered smartphone for route tracking.

Compare Amazfit Neo with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazfit Neo and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found