OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Fitlinxx Pebble Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£45Battery life:365 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:?

Fitlinxx Pebble Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 81% of fitness-trackers
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

20%

7.3

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.9

Battery

18%

3.3

Health

18%

4.2

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

8.9

App & Wellness

4%

9.0

Connectivity

4%

8.1

Design & Durability

â–¼Worse than 80% of fitness-trackers
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £45

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Fitlinxx Pebble

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

20%

7.3

Sports & Navigation

20%

8.9

Battery

18%

3.3

Health

18%

4.2

Display

8%

3.5

Smart Features

8%

8.9

App & Wellness

4%

9.0

Connectivity

4%

8.1

Design & Durability

6.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Fitlinxx Pebble has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than 58.7% of fitness trackers.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.4
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
â–¼ Worse than 35% of models
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
â–¼ Worse than 12% of models
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
â–¼ Worse than 9% of models
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
no
Notifications
no
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
This fitness tracker does not support notifications. 73% of fitness trackers support notifications.
Vibrating alerts
no
Vibrating alerts
no
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts. 84.2% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
â–¼ Worse than 42% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
â–² Better than 6% of models
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
â–² Better than 2% of models
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
no
Achievements
no
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
This fitness tracker does not support achievements. 76.2% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
no
Inactivity alerts
no
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts. 77% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
yes
Coaching
yes
â–² Better than 67% of models
This fitness tracker supports coaching. 66.5% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
?
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
?
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
â–¼ Worse than 1% of models
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
Show more
Battery life
365 days
Battery life
365 days
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <5 days – >180 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 365 days which is longer than that of 95.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 4.5% of fitness trackers.
Standby claim also cited
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
?
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Display
no
Display
no
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 76.4% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
clip-on
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
â–² Better than 26% of models
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
N/A
Show more

Fitlinxx Pebble vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • 355 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    365 days
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (365 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Standby claim also cited
    365 days vs 10 days
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • 54.7% lighter
    Thickness
    11.33 g mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (11.3 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    11.33 g vs 25 g
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via FitLinxx Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via FitLinxx Connect.
  • Available on PC
    Available on PC
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This fitness tracker is available on PC, while the average fitness tracker is not. 18.1% of fitness trackers are available on PC.
    Web dashboard available.
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This fitness tracker has a removable battery, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.6% of fitness trackers have a removable battery.
    Uses a user-replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
  • 355 days longer battery life
    Battery life
    365 days
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <5 days – >180 days
    This fitness tracker has a higher battery life than the average fitness tracker (365 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    Standby claim also cited
    365 days vs 10 days
  • Removable battery
    Removable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This fitness tracker has a removable battery, while the average fitness tracker does not. 13.6% of fitness trackers have a removable battery.
    Uses a user-replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via FitLinxx Connect.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via FitLinxx Connect.
  • 54.7% lighter
    Thickness
    11.33 g mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is lighter than the average fitness tracker (11.3 g vs 25 g). The average fitness tracker weighs 25 g.
    11.33 g vs 25 g
  • Coaching features
    Coaching
    yes
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    This fitness tracker supports coaching, while the average fitness tracker does not. 33.8% of fitness trackers support coaching.
  • Available on PC
    Available on PC
    yes
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    This fitness tracker is available on PC, while the average fitness tracker is not. 18.1% of fitness trackers are available on PC.
    Web dashboard available.
  • Points-based system
    Points-based system
    yes
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This fitness tracker supports a points-based system, while the average fitness tracker does not. 38.6% of fitness trackers support a points-based system.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No automatic activity detection
    Automatic activity detection
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support automatic activity detection, while the average fitness tracker does. 52% of fitness trackers support automatic activity detection.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 5.07x less popular
    Fitlinxx Pebble has a lower popularity than the average fitness tracker (1 vs 5.1).
    1 vs 5.07
  • 7.2% worse value for money
    Fitlinxx Pebble has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.38 vs 7.9).
    7.38 vs 7.92
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • No sleep tracking
    Sleep tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep tracking, while the average fitness tracker does. 91.9% of fitness trackers support sleep tracking.
  • No sleep reports
    Provides sleep reports
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support sleep reports, while the average fitness tracker does. 84.8% of fitness trackers support sleep reports.
  • No rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a rechargeable battery, while the average fitness tracker does. 86% of fitness trackers have a rechargeable battery.
    Uses a replaceable coin-cell battery.
  • No display
    Display
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • No notifications
    Notifications
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support notifications, while the average fitness tracker does. 72.6% of fitness trackers support notifications.
  • No silent alarm
    Silent alarm
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support a silent alarm, while the average fitness tracker does. 80.4% of fitness trackers support a silent alarm.
  • No vibrating alerts
    Vibrating alerts
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support vibration alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 83.8% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • Limited ip rating
    IP rating
    IP67
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This fitness tracker has a lower IP rating than the average fitness tracker (IP67 vs IP68). The average fitness tracker has an IP rating of IP68.
    IP67 vs IP68
  • 1.7 mm thicker design
    Thickness
    12.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <8 mm – >13 mm
    This fitness tracker is thicker than the average fitness tracker (12.7 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    12.7 mm vs 11 mm
  • 20 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    -20 °C
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <-20 °C – >5 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (-20 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    -20 °C vs 0 °C
  • 4 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This fitness tracker was released earlier than the average fitness tracker (2012 vs 2016). The average fitness tracker was released in 2016.
    August 2012
    2012 vs 2016
  • No inactivity alerts
    Inactivity alerts
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support inactivity alerts, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.6% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
  • No achievements
    Achievements
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This fitness tracker does not support achievements, while the average fitness tracker does. 75.8% of fitness trackers support achievements.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
ai.rug.nl
21/08/2014
Summary of the review
Performance assessment and feedback of fitness exercises using a single wearable sensor
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Fitlinxx Pebble

  • Incredible battery life (up to 365 days) that eliminates the need for frequent charging
  • Lightweight and compact design, making it less intrusive to wear than larger smartwatches
  • Automatic activity detection for simple exercises like jogging
  • Always-on display for quick time checks without needing to wake the device
  • Affordable price point compared to high-end fitness trackers

What we don't like about Fitlinxx Pebble

  • Uneven or inaccurate fitness tracking, particularly for heart rate and step counts
  • Lack of essential modern sensors like heart rate monitors on some models
  • Outdated and basic user interface that can be difficult to read or navigate
  • Plastic, less attractive design that can feel 'obsolete' compared to current technology
  • Limited data accessibility, with some data being 'locked' on the device or failing to sync properly

Verdict

The FitLinxx Pebble is an ultra-compact activity tracker designed for versatile wear on the foot, hip, or chest, weighing just 11.33g with dimensions of 33.7mm x 30mm x 12.7mm. It stands out with an exceptional 365-day battery life on a single replaceable cell, alongside a waterproof rating of 30.5 meters, making it suitable for swimming and all-weather use. Its primary strengths include automatic activity detection for walking and running, multi-sport tracking, and seamless compatibility with Windows, Android, and iOS via a USB Sync Point. However, it lacks advanced sensors like a heart rate monitor or GPS, and users may find its small monochrome display and simple plastic build limiting compared to more feature-rich smartwatches.

Compare Fitlinxx Pebble with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitlinxx Pebble and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found