Scored using Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Fitness trackers Methodology v1.0

Fitbit Flex 2 Review | 171 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Battery life:5 daysScreen size:N/A inchHeart rate monitor:noGPS:noWaterproof depth rating:50 m

Fitbit Flex 2 Review: Compare 171 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Fitness trackers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the fitness tracker's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best fitness trackers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.1

Technical score

20%

8.4

User score

▼Worse than 69% of fitness-trackers
6.1

Technical score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

20%

8.3

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.5

Battery

18%

5.7

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

7.0

Smart Features

8%

9.0

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

8.6

Design & Durability

▼Worse than 87% of fitness-trackers
8.4

User score

User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on 7,123 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 77% of fitness-trackers
  • fitbit-flex-2
  • fitbit-flex-2
  • fitbit-flex-2
  • fitbit-flex-2
  • fitbit-flex-2
fitbit-flex-2
fitbit-flex-2
fitbit-flex-2
fitbit-flex-2
fitbit-flex-2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of fitness tracker Fitbit Flex 2

Technical score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Fitness trackers category across these key areas: Health, Sports & Navigation, Smart Features, App & Wellness, Connectivity, Battery, Display, Design & Durability.
When it matters
When you want to compare fitness trackers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

20%

8.3

Sports & Navigation

20%

3.5

Battery

18%

5.7

Health

18%

4.0

Display

8%

7.0

Smart Features

8%

9.0

App & Wellness

4%

8.7

Connectivity

4%

8.6

Design & Durability

6.1
User score
User score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

9.4

Number of reviews

Based on 7,123 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.4
Popularity
Popularity
9.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Fitbit Flex 2 has a popularity score of 9.4 points, which is higher than 83.1% of fitness trackers.
9.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the fitness tracker's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a fitness tracker with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.6
Heart rate monitor
no
Heart rate monitor
no
This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring. 60.3% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
Resting heart rate
no
Resting heart rate
no
This fitness tracker does not support Resting heart rate. 47.9% of fitness trackers support Resting heart rate.
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
Fast/slow heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support high and low heart rate alerts. 34.7% of fitness trackers support high and low heart rate alerts.
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
Irregular heart rate alerts
no
This fitness tracker does not support irregular heart rate alerts. 12.4% of fitness trackers support irregular heart rate alerts.
Blood oxygen sensor
no
Blood oxygen sensor
no
This fitness tracker does not have a blood oxygen sensor. 25.4% of fitness trackers have a blood oxygen sensor.
Show more
GPS
no
GPS
no
This fitness tracker does not have GPS. 11% of fitness trackers have GPS.
Satellite systems supported
no
Satellite systems supported
no
This fitness tracker supports no satellite systems which is less versatile than that of 12.2% of fitness trackers and the same as that of 87.8% of fitness trackers.
GNSS bands supported
no
GNSS bands supported
no
This fitness tracker does not support advanced GNSS bands. 8.9% of fitness trackers support advanced GNSS bands.
Galileo support
no
Galileo support
no
This fitness tracker does not support Galileo. 4.9% of fitness trackers support Galileo.
Acquires GPS faster
no
Acquires GPS faster
no
This fitness tracker does not support faster GPS acquisition. 8.1% of fitness trackers support faster GPS acquisition.
Show more
Notifications
yes
Notifications
yes
This fitness tracker supports notifications. 27.5% of fitness trackers support notifications.
vibration/LED alerts only.
Vibrating alerts
yes
Vibrating alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports vibration alerts. 16.3% of fitness trackers support vibration alerts.
Call control
no
Call control
no
This fitness tracker does not support call controls. 41.8% of fitness trackers support call controls.
Call answering
no
Call answering
no
This fitness tracker does not support call answering. 1% of fitness trackers support call answering.
Calendar sync
no
Calendar sync
no
This fitness tracker does not support calendar sync. 20.3% of fitness trackers support calendar sync.
Show more
Activity reports
yes
Activity reports
yes
This fitness tracker supports activity reports. 5.7% of fitness trackers support activity reports.
via Fitbit app
Goal setting
yes
Goal setting
yes
This fitness tracker supports goal setting. 2.4% of fitness trackers support goal setting.
Achievements
yes
Achievements
yes
This fitness tracker supports achievements. 24.3% of fitness trackers support achievements.
Inactivity alerts
yes
Inactivity alerts
yes
This fitness tracker supports inactivity alerts. 23.5% of fitness trackers support inactivity alerts.
Coaching
no
Coaching
no
This fitness tracker does not support coaching. 34% of fitness trackers support coaching.
Show more
Bluetooth version
4
Bluetooth version
4
This fitness tracker supports Bluetooth 4 which is newer than in 5.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that in 51.3% of fitness trackers.
Maximum Bluetooth range
30 m
Maximum Bluetooth range
30 m
This fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 30 m which is higher than that of 88.1% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 9% of fitness trackers.
NFC
no
NFC
no
This fitness tracker does not have NFC. 13% of fitness trackers have NFC.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This fitness tracker does not support Wi-Fi. 1.8% of fitness trackers support Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi connectivity.
Wi-Fi version
no
Wi-Fi version
no
This fitness tracker does not support modern Wi-Fi. 1% of fitness trackers support modern Wi-Fi.
no Wi-Fi support.
Show more
Battery life
5 days
Battery life
5 days
This fitness tracker offers a battery life of 5 days which is shorter than that of 79.2% of fitness trackers and equal to that of 12.4% of fitness trackers.
Battery life with GPS on
N/A
Battery life in training mode
N/A
Battery life in power-saving mode
N/A
Battery capacity
25 mAh
Battery capacity
25 mAh
This fitness tracker has a battery capacity of 25 mAh which is lower than that of 98% of fitness trackers.
Show more
Display
no
Display
no
This fitness tracker does not have a display. 76.4% of fitness trackers have a display.
Screen size
N/A
Display type
N/A
Screen resolution
N/A
Pixel density
N/A
Show more
Form factor
wristband
Hybrid design
no
Hybrid design
no
This fitness tracker does not support Hybrid design. 2.4% of fitness trackers support Hybrid design.
Designed for kids
no
Designed for kids
no
This fitness tracker is not designed for kids. 2.4% of fitness trackers are designed for kids.
Replaceable watch band
yes
Replaceable watch band
yes
This fitness tracker has a replaceable watch band. 25.6% of fitness trackers have a replaceable watch band.
Band width
11 mm
Show more

Fitbit Flex 2 vs the average fitness tracker

246810TotalHealthSports & NavigationBatteryDisplayConnectivitySmart FeaturesDesign & DurabilityApp & Wellness
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Fitbit Windows app.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • 4.2 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    6.8 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (6.8 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    6.8 mm vs 11 mm
  • 20 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    30 m vs 10 m
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Built-in route tracker
    Has a route tracker
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports route tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 49.8% of fitness trackers support route tracking.
    Uses connected phone GPS for route maps.
  • 5.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the fitness tracker.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a fitness tracker performs in daily use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Fitbit Flex 2
    the average fitness tracker
    Fitbit Flex 2 has a higher user score than the average fitness tracker (8.44 vs 8.000).
    8.44 vs 8
  • 85.8% more popular
    Fitbit Flex 2 has a higher popularity than the average fitness tracker (9.41 vs 5.1).
    9.41 vs 5.07
  • Tracks menstrual cycle
    Menstrual cycle tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports menstrual cycle tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.7% of fitness trackers support menstrual cycle tracking.
  • Ovulation prediction
    Predicts ovulation
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts ovulation, while the average fitness tracker does not. 41.6% of fitness trackers predict ovulation.
  • Cycle start prediction
    Predicts start date
    yes
    This fitness tracker predicts the start date, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42.5% of fitness trackers predict the start date.
  • Windows compatible
    Compatible with Windows
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Windows, while the average fitness tracker is not. 22.3% of fitness trackers are compatible with Windows.
    Via Fitbit Windows app.
  • Mac OS X compatible
    Compatible with Mac OS X
    yes
    This fitness tracker is compatible with Mac OS X, while the average fitness tracker is not. 28.8% of fitness trackers are compatible with Mac OS X.
    Via Fitbit Connect.
  • 20 m longer Bluetooth range
    Maximum Bluetooth range
    30 m
    This fitness tracker has a longer Bluetooth range than the average fitness tracker (30 m vs 10 m). The average fitness tracker offers a Bluetooth range of 10 m.
    30 m vs 10 m
  • 4.2 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    6.8 mm
    This fitness tracker is thinner than the average fitness tracker (6.8 mm vs 11 mm). The average fitness tracker has a thickness of 11 mm.
    6.8 mm vs 11 mm
  • Tracks calorie intake
    Calorie intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports calorie intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 39.3% of fitness trackers support calorie intake tracking.
  • Water intake tracking
    Water intake tracking
    yes
    This fitness tracker supports water intake tracking, while the average fitness tracker does not. 42% of fitness trackers support water intake tracking.
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 77.3% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    25 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (25 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    25 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No shock resistance standard
    Shock resistance standard
    none
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810G
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • No display
    Display
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    10 °C vs 0 °C
  • 4.4% worse value for money
    Fitbit Flex 2 has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.59 vs 7.9).
    7.59 vs 7.92
  • 4.4% worse value for money
    Fitbit Flex 2 has a lower value-for-money score than the average fitness tracker (7.59 vs 7.9).
    7.59 vs 7.92
  • No heart rate monitoring
    Heart rate monitor
    no
    This fitness tracker does not support heart rate monitoring, while the average fitness tracker does. 60% of fitness trackers support heart rate monitoring.
  • 5 days shorter battery life
    Battery life
    5 days
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery life than the average fitness tracker (5 days vs 10 days). The average fitness tracker has 10 days of battery life.
    5 days vs 10 days
  • 77.3% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    25 mAh
    This fitness tracker has a lower battery capacity than the average fitness tracker (25 mAh vs 110 mAh). The average fitness tracker has 110 mAh of battery capacity.
    25 mAh vs 110 mAh
  • No display
    Display
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a display, while the average fitness tracker does. 76.1% of fitness trackers have a display.
  • No stopwatch
    Stopwatch
    no
    This fitness tracker does not have a stopwatch, while the average fitness tracker does. 59.7% of fitness trackers have a stopwatch.
  • No shock resistance standard
    Shock resistance standard
    none
    This fitness tracker meets a weaker shock resistance standard than the average fitness tracker (none vs MIL-STD-810G). The average fitness tracker meets the MIL-STD-810G shock resistance standard.
    none vs MIL-STD-810G
  • 10 °C higher minimum operating temperature
    Min operating temperature
    10 °C
    This fitness tracker has a higher minimum operating temperature than the average fitness tracker (10 °C vs 0 °C). The average fitness tracker supports a minimum operating temperature of 0 °C.
    10 °C vs 0 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

A
androidauthority.com
12/12/2016
Summary of the review
A
androidpolice.com
30/11/2016
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
04/12/2019
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
27/02/2019
Summary of the review
F
forbes.com
12/12/2016
Summary of the review
S
stuff.tv
18/11/2016
Summary of the review
W
wareable.com
14/11/2016
Summary of the review
M
macworld.com
12/10/2016
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
29/09/2016
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
06/09/2016
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
05/09/2016
Summary of the review
E
endurancemag.com
06/02/2017
Summary of the review
T
time.com
26/10/2016
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
29/09/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
29/09/2016
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
09/11/2016
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
10/11/2016
Summary of the review
F
fitness-tracker-test.info
06/07/2020
Summary of the review
F
fitnessarmband.eu
26/05/2021
Summary of the review
F
fitnessuhr-tester.de
16/05/2020
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
04/11/2016
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
07/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
testbericht.guru
06/07/2020
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
21/11/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
02/11/2016
Summary of the review
V
vonguru.fr
02/01/2017
Summary of the review
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
06/01/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
03/12/2016
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
06/07/2017
Summary of the review
E
elgrupoinformatico.com
12/01/2017
Summary of the review
C
correrunamaraton.com
21/03/2017
Summary of the review
C
computerhoy.20minutos.es
20/12/2016
Summary of the review
A
andreagaleazzi.com
14/12/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
17/02/2017
Summary of the review
M
macitynet.it
24/12/2016
Summary of the review
S
smartworld.it
24/11/2016
Summary of the review
N
natuurlijklinda.nl
23/10/2016
Summary of the review
Y
yourambassadrice.com
07/11/2016
Summary of the review
C
coolesuggesties.nl
06/09/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 7,123 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Fitbit Flex 2

  • Slim, lightweight, and discreet design that is easy to forget you're wearing
  • Fully waterproof (swim-proof) with the ability to track swimming laps
  • Versatile customisation options, including interchangeable bands, bangles, and pendants
  • Automatic exercise detection (SmartTrack) for walking, running, and aerobic activities
  • Access to the user-friendly Fitbit app and its strong social/community features
  • Support for basic phone notifications (calls and texts) via vibrations and colour-coded LEDs

What we don't like about Fitbit Flex 2

  • No digital display or clock, making it reliant on a smartphone for most data
  • Battery life typically only lasts 4–5 days, which is lower than many non-screen competitors
  • LED notification patterns can be cryptic and difficult to decode without a 'decoder ring'
  • Lacks advanced sensors like a heart rate monitor, GPS, or altimeter for counting stairs
  • Proprietary charging cable is tiny, easy to lose, and requires removing the tracker from the band
  • The band's button clasp can be fiddly and difficult to secure for some users

Verdict

The Fitbit Flex 2 is an ultra-slim, minimalist fitness tracker featuring a removable 3-axis accelerometer module that is 30% smaller than its predecessor and water-resistant up to 50 meters. It automatically tracks daily steps, distance, calories burned, and sleep, and it is Fitbit's first device to offer automatic swim tracking for laps and duration. Main pros include its versatile design that can be worn in interchangeable bands, bangles, or pendants, and its discreet LED notification system for calls and texts. However, notable cons include the lack of a digital screen or clock, the absence of a heart rate monitor and altimeter, and a relatively short battery life of up to 5 days considering its limited display.

Compare Fitbit Flex 2 with other products in the Fitness trackers category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Fitbit Flex 2 and other products in the Fitness trackers category

No results found