OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0
Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drawing tablets Methodology v1.0

HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019 Review | 66 Data compared

Avg. price:~£700Type:pen displayActive drawing area:127792 mm²Resolution:1920x1080Pen pressure levels:8192Report rate:266 RPS

HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019 Review: Compare 66 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drawing tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.9

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drawing tablet's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drawing tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components

90%

7.9

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

▲Better than 88% of drawing-tablets
7.9

Technical score

Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Drawing tablets category across these key areas: Form Factor, Display & Color, Pen & Input, Connectivity, Controls & Extras.
When it matters
When you want to compare drawing tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components

50%

8.6

Pen & Input

40%

7.5

Display & Color

4%

5.6

Form Factor

3%

7.1

Connectivity

3%

7.1

Controls & Extras

▲Better than 88% of drawing-tablets
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.0

Number of reviews

Based on 194 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 81% of drawing-tablets
  • huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
  • huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
  • huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
  • huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
  • huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
  • huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
  • huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
  • huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019
huion-kamvas-pro-22-2019

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drawing tablet HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019

Technical score
Technical score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Drawing tablets category across these key areas: Form Factor, Display & Color, Pen & Input, Connectivity, Controls & Extras.
When it matters
When you want to compare drawing tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 88% of models
Score components:

50%

8.6

Pen & Input

40%

7.5

Display & Color

4%

5.6

Form Factor

3%

7.1

Connectivity

3%

7.1

Controls & Extras

7.9
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you want to know how a drawing tablet performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.0

Number of reviews

Based on 194 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drawing tablet.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Popularity:
HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019 has a popularity score of 6 points, which is lower than 51.6% of drawing tablets.
6.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drawing tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drawing tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

60%

7.9

Overall score

40%

6.8

Price

7.6
Type
pen display
Display
yes
Display
yes
▲ Better than 52% of models
This drawing tablet has a display. This feature is present on 47.9% of drawing tablets.
Compatibility
Windows / macOS / Linux
Wireless capability
no
Wireless capability
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This drawing tablet does not support wireless use. 18.6% of drawing tablets support wireless use.
Weight
4,500 g
Weight
4,500 g
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
This drawing tablet weighs 4,500 g, heavier than 88.3% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Active drawing area
127,792 mm²
Active drawing area
127,792 mm²
▲ Better than 88% of models
Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
This drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 127,792 mm², larger than that of 87.8% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 3.2% of drawing tablets.
476.64 x 268.11 mm.
Screen size
21.5 inch
Screen size
21.5 inch
▲ Better than 69% of models
Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
This drawing tablet has a screen size of 21.5 inch, larger than that of 68.8% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 15.1% of drawing tablets.
Resolution
1920x1080
Resolution
1920x1080
▲ Better than 53% of models
This drawing tablet has a display resolution of 1920x1080, higher than that of 52.6% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of drawing tablets.
Pixel density
102 ppi
Pixel density
102 ppi
▼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
This drawing tablet has a pixel density of 102 ppi, lower than that of 87.1% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 11.8% of drawing tablets.
Typical brightness
250 nits
Typical brightness
250 nits
▲ Better than 47% of models
Market range: <220 nits – >310 nits
This drawing tablet has a typical brightness of 250 nits, higher than that of 47.3% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 27.5% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Stylus included
yes
Stylus included
yes
Category Benchmark
This drawing tablet comes with a stylus. This feature is present on 100% of drawing tablets.
Pen technology
EMR (battery-free)
Pen technology
EMR (battery-free)
▲ Better than 5% of models
This drawing tablet uses EMR (battery-free) pen technology, more advanced than that of 4.6% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 95.4% of drawing tablets.
Pen pressure levels
8,192
Pen pressure levels
8,192
▼ Worse than 15% of models
Market range: <8.2k – >16.4k
This drawing tablet supports 8,192 pen pressure levels, more than 9.3% of drawing tablets and equal to 75.8% of drawing tablets.
Pen resolution
5,080 LPI
Pen resolution
5,080 LPI
▲ Better than 6% of models
Market range: <5.1k LPI – >5.1k LPI
This drawing tablet supports a pen resolution of 5,080 LPI, higher than that of 5.7% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 94.3% of drawing tablets.
Report rate
266 RPS
Report rate
266 RPS
▲ Better than 61% of models
Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
This drawing tablet has a report rate of 266 RPS, higher than that of 61% of drawing tablets and equal to that of 22% of drawing tablets.
Show more
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 13% of models
This drawing tablet does not support Bluetooth. 13.1% of drawing tablets support Bluetooth.
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports
0
▼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-C) ports, fewer than 17.4% of drawing tablets and equal to 82.6% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
1
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports
1
▲ Better than 49% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This drawing tablet has 1 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-C) ports, more than 49.1% of drawing tablets and equal to 40.2% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports
0
▼ Worse than 1% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 2 (USB-A) ports, fewer than 1.1% of drawing tablets and equal to 99% of drawing tablets.
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports
0
USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports
0
▼ Worse than 2% of models
Market range: <0 – >0
This drawing tablet has 0 USB 3.2 Gen 1 (USB-A) ports, fewer than 1.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 98.4% of drawing tablets.
Show more
N. of express keys
20
N. of express keys
20
★ Better than 95% of models
Market range: <0 – >10
This drawing tablet has 20 express keys, more than 94.7% of drawing tablets and equal to 1.6% of drawing tablets.
10 keys per side.
N. of dials
0
N. of dials
0
▼ Worse than 22% of models
Market range: <0 – >1
This drawing tablet has 0 dials, fewer than 21.6% of drawing tablets and equal to 78.4% of drawing tablets.
Stand included
yes
Stand included
yes
▲ Better than 71% of models
This drawing tablet comes with a stand. This feature is present on 29.5% of drawing tablets.
Fold-out legs
no
Fold-out legs
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This drawing tablet does not have fold-out legs. 7.3% of drawing tablets have fold-out legs.
Uses separate stand.
Pen stand included
yes
Pen stand included
yes
▲ Better than 41% of models
This drawing tablet comes with a pen stand. This feature is present on 58.9% of drawing tablets.
Show more

HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019 vs the average drawing tablet

246810TotalForm FactorDisplay & ColorPen & InputConnectivityControls & Extras
  • 87,028 mm² larger work area
    Active drawing area
    127,792 mm²
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
    This drawing tablet has a larger active drawing area than the average drawing tablet (127792 mm² vs 40764 mm²). The average drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 40764 mm².
    476.64 x 268.11 mm.
    127,792 mm² vs 40,764 mm²
  • Fully laminated display
    Full lamination
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drawing tablet has full lamination, while the average drawing tablet does not. 39% of drawing tablets have full lamination.
  • 1 % wider sRGB coverage
    sRGB coverage
    100 %
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <96 % – >100 %
    This drawing tablet covers more sRGB than the average drawing tablet (100 % vs 99 %). The average drawing tablet covers 99 % of sRGB.
    100 % vs 99 %
  • 5.9 inch larger display
    Screen size
    21.5 inch
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
    This drawing tablet has a larger screen than the average drawing tablet (21.5 inch vs 15.6 inch). The average drawing tablet has a screen size of 15.6 inch.
    21.5 inch vs 15.6 inch
  • Anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This drawing tablet has an anti-reflection coating, while the average drawing tablet does not. 47.7% of drawing tablets have an anti-reflection coating.
    Etched anti-glare glass.
  • 14.2% higher report rate
    Report rate
    266 RPS
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
    This drawing tablet has a higher report rate than the average drawing tablet (266 RPS vs 233 RPS). The average drawing tablet has a report rate of 233 RPS.
    266 RPS vs 233 RPS
  • 14 more express keys
    N. of express keys
    20
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This drawing tablet has more express keys than the average drawing tablet (20 vs 6). The average drawing tablet has 6 express keys.
    10 keys per side.
    20 vs 6
  • Integrated display
    Display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This drawing tablet has a display, while the average drawing tablet does not. 48.2% of drawing tablets have a display.
  • Integrated display
    Display
    yes
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This drawing tablet has a display, while the average drawing tablet does not. 48.2% of drawing tablets have a display.
  • 87,028 mm² larger work area
    Active drawing area
    127,792 mm²
    ▲ Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <15.5k mm² – >127.8k mm²
    This drawing tablet has a larger active drawing area than the average drawing tablet (127792 mm² vs 40764 mm²). The average drawing tablet offers an active drawing area of 40764 mm².
    476.64 x 268.11 mm.
    127,792 mm² vs 40,764 mm²
  • Fully laminated display
    Full lamination
    yes
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    This drawing tablet has full lamination, while the average drawing tablet does not. 39% of drawing tablets have full lamination.
  • 1 % wider sRGB coverage
    sRGB coverage
    100 %
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <96 % – >100 %
    This drawing tablet covers more sRGB than the average drawing tablet (100 % vs 99 %). The average drawing tablet covers 99 % of sRGB.
    100 % vs 99 %
  • 5.9 inch larger display
    Screen size
    21.5 inch
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <11.6 inch – >23.8 inch
    This drawing tablet has a larger screen than the average drawing tablet (21.5 inch vs 15.6 inch). The average drawing tablet has a screen size of 15.6 inch.
    21.5 inch vs 15.6 inch
  • Anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    ▲ Better than 53% of models
    This drawing tablet has an anti-reflection coating, while the average drawing tablet does not. 47.7% of drawing tablets have an anti-reflection coating.
    Etched anti-glare glass.
  • 6 ms faster response
    Response time
    8 ms
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <8 ms – >25 ms
    This drawing tablet has a faster response time than the average drawing tablet (8 ms vs 14 ms). The average drawing tablet has a response time of 14 ms.
    8 ms vs 14 ms
  • 14.2% higher report rate
    Report rate
    266 RPS
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <200 RPS – >290 RPS
    This drawing tablet has a higher report rate than the average drawing tablet (266 RPS vs 233 RPS). The average drawing tablet has a report rate of 233 RPS.
    266 RPS vs 233 RPS
  • 1 more HDMI ports
    HDMI ports
    1
    ▲ Better than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 – >1
    This drawing tablet has more HDMI ports than the average drawing tablet (1 vs 0). The average drawing tablet has 0 HDMI ports.
    1 vs 0
  • 0.3 m longer cable
    Cable length
    1.8 m
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >1.8 m
    This drawing tablet has a longer cable than the average drawing tablet (1.8 m vs 1.5 m). The average drawing tablet has a cable length of 1.5 m.
    1.8 m vs 1.5 m
  • 14 more express keys
    N. of express keys
    20
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This drawing tablet has more express keys than the average drawing tablet (20 vs 6). The average drawing tablet has 6 express keys.
    10 keys per side.
    20 vs 6
  • Stand included
    Stand included
    yes
    ▲ Better than 71% of models
    This drawing tablet comes with a stand, while the average drawing tablet does not. 29.8% of drawing tablets come with a stand.
  • 38.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    102 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
    This drawing tablet has a lower pixel density than the average drawing tablet (102 ppi vs 166 ppi). The average drawing tablet has a pixel density of 166 ppi.
    102 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • 9.8% heavier pen
    Pen weight
    14.5 g
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <10 g – >16 g
    This drawing tablet includes a heavier pen than the average drawing tablet (14.5 g vs 13.2 g). The average drawing tablet pen weighs 13.2 g.
    14.5 g vs 13.2 g
  • 6.08x heavier design
    Weight
    4,500 g
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
    This drawing tablet is heavier than the average drawing tablet (4500 g vs 740 g). The average drawing tablet weighs 740 g.
    4,500 g vs 740 g
  • 232.2 mm bulkier body
    Width
    589 mm
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <211 mm – >567 mm
    This drawing tablet is wider than the average drawing tablet (589 mm vs 356.8 mm). The average drawing tablet is 356.8 mm wide.
    589 mm vs 356.8 mm
  • 4.38x more expensive
    HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019 is more expensive than the average drawing tablet (£700 vs £160).
    £700 vs £160
  • 121 mm taller body
    Height
    344 mm
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <139.2 mm – >359 mm
    This drawing tablet is taller than the average drawing tablet (344 mm vs 223 mm). The average drawing tablet is 223 mm tall.
    344 mm vs 223 mm
  • 10.5 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    21 mm
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <7.5 mm – >26 mm
    This drawing tablet is thicker than the average drawing tablet (21 mm vs 10.5 mm). The average drawing tablet is 10.5 mm thick.
    21 mm vs 10.5 mm
  • Older release
    Release date
    2019
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drawing tablet was released earlier than the average drawing tablet.
    July 2019.
    2,019 vs 2,021
  • 4.38x more expensive
    HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019 is more expensive than the average drawing tablet (£700 vs £160).
    £700 vs £160
  • 6.08x heavier design
    Weight
    4,500 g
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <250 g – >5.5k g
    This drawing tablet is heavier than the average drawing tablet (4500 g vs 740 g). The average drawing tablet weighs 740 g.
    4,500 g vs 740 g
  • 232.2 mm bulkier body
    Width
    589 mm
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <211 mm – >567 mm
    This drawing tablet is wider than the average drawing tablet (589 mm vs 356.8 mm). The average drawing tablet is 356.8 mm wide.
    589 mm vs 356.8 mm
  • 121 mm taller body
    Height
    344 mm
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <139.2 mm – >359 mm
    This drawing tablet is taller than the average drawing tablet (344 mm vs 223 mm). The average drawing tablet is 223 mm tall.
    344 mm vs 223 mm
  • 10.5 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    21 mm
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <7.5 mm – >26 mm
    This drawing tablet is thicker than the average drawing tablet (21 mm vs 10.5 mm). The average drawing tablet is 10.5 mm thick.
    21 mm vs 10.5 mm
  • Older release
    Release date
    2019
    ▼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drawing tablet was released earlier than the average drawing tablet.
    July 2019.
    2,019 vs 2,021
  • 38.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    102 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <102 ppi – >239 ppi
    This drawing tablet has a lower pixel density than the average drawing tablet (102 ppi vs 166 ppi). The average drawing tablet has a pixel density of 166 ppi.
    102 ppi vs 166 ppi
  • 9.8% heavier pen
    Pen weight
    14.5 g
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <10 g – >16 g
    This drawing tablet includes a heavier pen than the average drawing tablet (14.5 g vs 13.2 g). The average drawing tablet pen weighs 13.2 g.
    14.5 g vs 13.2 g
  • 3.43x higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    24 W
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <0.3 W – >31 W
    This drawing tablet uses more power than the average drawing tablet (24 W vs 7 W). The average drawing tablet uses 7 W of power.
    Typical operating power.
    24 W vs 7 W

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
lescahiersdudebutant.fr
30/09/2020
Summary of the review
Are Huion Graphics Tablets Any Good? Review and Verdict", "Huion Graphics Tablets Review: Worth Buying?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 194 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019

  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Full-laminated display significantly reduces parallax
  • Anti-glare etched glass provides a smooth, satisfying drawing texture
  • Battery-free pen (PW500) supports 8192 levels of pressure and tilt
  • Generous shortcut options with 20 customizable keys and 2 touch bars
  • Highly adjustable and sturdy stand (20° to 80°)
  • Versatile port selection including HDMI, DVI, and VGA

What we don't like about HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019

  • 1080p resolution can feel pixelated at a 22-inch screen size
  • Initial driver setup can be frustrating or require multiple reinstalls
  • Large footprint and weight make it non-portable and desktop-bound
  • Color accuracy may require manual calibration for professional work
  • Lack of multi-touch support; limited to stylus input only

Verdict

The Huion Kamvas Pro 22 (2019) is a 21.5-inch professional-grade pen display featuring a full-laminated IPS screen with 1920x1080 resolution and an anti-glare etched glass surface that mimics paper texture. It provides an upgraded 120% sRGB color gamut, 8,192 levels of pressure sensitivity, and ±60° tilt support via the battery-free PW500 stylus. Key pros include the reduction of parallax due to its laminated design, 20 programmable express keys with dual touch bars for enhanced workflow, and a sturdy adjustable stand (20° to 80°). However, some users note the 1080p resolution can feel low for a screen of this size, and potential cons include initial driver installation issues or the lack of a built-in pen eraser.

Compare HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019 with other products in the Drawing tablets category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of HUION Kamvas Pro 22 2019 and other products in the Drawing tablets category

No results found