Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Sigma SD Quattro Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£660Sensor size:APS-CWeight:625 gBattery life (CIPA):235 shots

Sigma SD Quattro Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

4.8

Overall score

Score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.8

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 64% of cameras
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

6.3

Sensor & Image

25%

4.8

Photo Features

18%

2.5

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

5.0

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

â–¼Worse than 57% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £660

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Sigma SD Quattro

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

6.3

Sensor & Image

25%

4.8

Photo Features

18%

2.5

Video & Audio

14%

5.9

Display & Design

8%

5.0

Battery & Power

7%

2.7

Connectivity & Storage

4.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sigma SD Quattro has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.8

Overall score

40%

7.0

Price

5.5
Sensor size
APS-C
Sensor size
APS-C
This camera uses a sensor classified as APS-C; it is larger than the sensor in 57.4% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 25.7% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
29.5 MP
Main camera megapixels
29.5 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 29.5 MP, which is higher than that of 91.4% of cameras.
Foveon layered sensor.
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
Main camera pixel size
4.33 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 4.33 µm, which are larger than those in 73.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 1.4% of cameras.
Base ISO
100
Base ISO
100
This camera has a base ISO of 100 which is higher than that of 19.9% of cameras and equal to that of 52.4% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 6400 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 6,400
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 6,400, which is higher than that of 37.3% of cameras and equal to that of 16.2% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Sigma SA
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
9
N. of focus points
9
This camera has 9 focus points, fewer than the number offered by 67.1% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 26% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
625 g
Weight
625 g
This camera weighs 625 g which is heavier than 75.7% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.1% of cameras.
Width
147 mm
Width
147 mm
This camera has a width of 147 mm which is wider than 92.8% of cameras and equal to that of 1.2% of cameras.
Height
95.1 mm
Height
95.1 mm
This camera has a height of 95.1 mm which is taller than 74.4% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
90.8 mm
Thickness
90.8 mm
This camera has a thickness of 90.8 mm which is thicker than 88.2% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
235 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
235 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 235 shots, which is shorter than that of 78.7% of cameras and equal to that of 0.2% of cameras.
Battery capacity
?
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
USB Power Delivery (PD)
no
This camera does not support USB Power Delivery. 10.1% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
Wi-Fi connectivity
no
This camera does not support Wi-Fi. 47.9% of cameras include this feature.
Wi-Fi version
N/A
Bluetooth connectivity
no
Bluetooth connectivity
no
This camera does not have Bluetooth. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
USB Type-C
no
USB Type-C
no
This camera does not include USB Type-C. 14.6% of cameras use USB-C.
Show more

Sigma SD Quattro vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    29.5 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (29.5 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    Foveon layered sensor.
    29.5 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 0.32 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.1 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1.1 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.1 x vs 0.78 x
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    This camera supports a newer USB version than the average camera (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average camera uses USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • 0.32 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1.1 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1.1 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1.1 x vs 0.78 x
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    29.5 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (29.5 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    Foveon layered sensor.
    29.5 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • 0.99 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    4.33 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (4.3 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    4.33 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 3 newer
    Release date
    2016
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2016 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    July 2016
    2,016 vs 2,013
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • Lossless compressed RAW
    Lossless compressed RAW
    yes
    This camera supports lossless compressed RAW, while the average camera does not.
    Lossless RAW capture is supported.
  • Pixel shift shooting
    Pixel shift shot
    yes
    This camera supports pixel shift shooting, the average camera does not.
    High-resolution pixel-shift mode supported.
  • 90 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    120 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (120 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    120 s vs 30 s
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    This camera supports a newer USB version than the average camera (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average camera uses USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 230 g heavier
    Weight
    625 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (625 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    625 g vs 395 g
  • 95 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    235 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (235 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    235 shots vs 330 shots
  • 2.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 12.9% worse value for money
    Sigma SD Quattro has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.49 vs 6.2).
    5.49 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Sigma SD Quattro is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 2.28x more expensive
    Sigma SD Quattro is more expensive than the average camera (£660 vs £290).
    £660 vs £290
  • 230 g heavier
    Weight
    625 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (625 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    625 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 27.1 mm wider
    Width
    147 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (147 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    147 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 44.8 mm thicker
    Thickness
    90.8 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (90.8 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    90.8 mm vs 46 mm
  • 21.2 mm taller body
    Height
    95.1 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (95.1 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    95.1 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • Lacks HDR mode
    HDR mode
    no
    This camera does not support HDR mode, the average camera does. 55.1% of cameras include HDR mode.
  • 18,900 ISO lower extended sensitivity limit
    Max expanded ISO
    6,400 ISO
    This camera has a lower expanded ISO than the average camera (6400 ISO vs 25300 ISO). The average camera reaches an expanded ISO of 25300 ISO.
    6,400 ISO vs 25,300 ISO
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -1
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-1 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -1 vs -4
  • 2.1 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.6 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.6 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.6 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • 14 fewer AF points
    N. of focus points
    9
    This camera has fewer focus points than the average camera (9 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    9 vs 23
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 95 shots fewer shots per charge
    Battery life (CIPA)
    235 shots
    This camera has shorter battery life than the average camera (235 shots vs 330 shots). The average camera delivers 330 shots per charge.
    235 shots vs 330 shots

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

E
ephotozine.com
20/09/2016
Summary of the review
P
photigy.com
21/09/2016
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
20/06/2017
Summary of the review
D
digitalphoto.de
21/10/2016
Summary of the review
F
fotogenerell.wordpress.com
18/11/2017
Summary of the review
F
fotohits.de
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
01/01/1970
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
01/01/1970
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
06/09/2016
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
30/08/2016
Summary of the review
J
jacquesjulien.com
14/09/2020
Summary of the review
R
reponsesphoto.fr
26/06/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
07/02/2017
Summary of the review
P
photolari.com
14/09/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Sigma SD Quattro

  • Incomparable image quality and extreme detail at low ISO settings, often compared to medium format results.
  • Foveon X3 sensor provides natural color transitions and a film-like look without the need for an anti-aliasing filter.
  • Robust build quality with a unique, comfortable hand-grip and weather sealing when used with compatible lenses.
  • Highly customizable interface with a dedicated sub-display for quick setting adjustments.
  • Excellent value for high-resolution photography compared to the cost of high-end DSLRs or medium format systems.
  • Innovative Super Fine Detail (SFD) mode for maximizing resolution in still-life or landscape scenes.

What we don't like about Sigma SD Quattro

  • Poor low-light performance with significant noise levels at ISO 400 and above.
  • Sluggish autofocus speed, especially in low light or moving scenarios.
  • Very slow overall operating speed, including long file-writing times and start-up delays.
  • Limited battery life due to high power consumption of the sensor and processor.
  • Proprietary Sigma Photo Pro software is often described as slow and difficult to use.
  • Lack of video recording capabilities and built-in Wi-Fi.
  • Unconventional ergonomics and electronic viewfinder placement that may not suit all users.

Verdict

The Sigma sd Quattro is a unique mirrorless camera utilizing a 29.5-megapixel APS-C Foveon X3 CMOS sensor and Sigma's SA lens mount. It is characterized by its distinct multi-layered sensor technology that captures full RGB color data at every pixel site, a dust- and splash-proof magnesium alloy body, and a dual-monitor system featuring a secondary LCD for shooting settings. Main pros include extraordinary image sharpness and color fidelity at base ISO 100 that rivals medium format systems, native support for high-quality Sigma Global Vision lenses, and a Super Fine Detail mode that blends seven exposures for maximized dynamic range. However, the camera suffers from noticeably slow contrast- and phase-detection autofocus, poor image quality with heavy chroma noise at sensitivities above ISO 400, sluggish file writing speeds, and a short battery life.

Compare Sigma SD Quattro with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sigma SD Quattro and other products in the Cameras category

No results found