Scored using Cameras Methodology v1.0
Cameras Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Cameras Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Cameras Methodology v1.0

Hasselblad X2D II 100C Review | 108 Data compared

Avg. price:~£6,340Sensor size:medium formatWeight:840 gBattery life (CIPA):327 shots

Hasselblad X2D II 100C Review: Compare 108 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Cameras category and whether it is worth buying.

7.3

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best cameras on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 87% of cameras
7.3

Technical score

Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

28%

8.6

Sensor & Image

25%

8.7

Photo Features

18%

3.3

Video & Audio

14%

6.9

Display & Design

8%

7.7

Battery & Power

7%

6.9

Connectivity & Storage

â–²Better than 87% of cameras
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £6,340

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera Hasselblad X2D II 100C

Technical score
Technical score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Cameras category across these key areas: Sensor & Image, Photo Features, Video & Audio, Display & Design, Battery & Power, Connectivity & Storage.
When it matters
When you want to compare cameras based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

28%

8.6

Sensor & Image

25%

8.7

Photo Features

18%

3.3

Video & Audio

14%

6.9

Display & Design

8%

7.7

Battery & Power

7%

6.9

Connectivity & Storage

7.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera.
When it matters
When you want to see which cameras attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Hasselblad X2D II 100C has a popularity score of 1, which is lower than 51.3% of cameras.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.3

Overall score

40%

1.0

Price

5.4
Sensor size
medium format
Sensor size
medium format
This camera uses a sensor classified as medium format; it is larger than the sensor in 97.9% of cameras and the same size as the sensor in 2.1% of cameras.
Main camera megapixels
100 MP
Main camera megapixels
100 MP
This camera has a sensor resolution of 100 MP, which is higher than that of 99.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
Main camera pixel size
3.76 µm
This camera has sensor pixels measuring 3.76 µm, which are larger than those in 55.4% of cameras and the same size as those in 5.3% of cameras.
Base ISO
50
Base ISO
50
This camera has a base ISO of 50 which is lower than that of 99.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.7% of cameras.
Max ISO
ISO 25600 ISO
Max ISO
ISO 25,600
This camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of ISO 25,600, which is higher than that of 75.6% of cameras and equal to that of 12.5% of cameras.
Show more
Lens mount
Hasselblad X
Built-in focus motor
no
Built-in focus motor
no
This camera does not have a built-in focus motor. 11% of cameras have a built-in focus motor.
N. of focus points
425
N. of focus points
425
This camera has 425 focus points, more than the number offered by 90.3% of cameras and equal to the number offered by 3.8% of cameras.
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
yes
This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos. 37.3% of cameras support phase-detection autofocus for photos.
AF tracking
yes
AF tracking
yes
This camera supports AF tracking. This feature is available on 88% of cameras.
Show more
Max video resolution
N/A
Video bitrate
N/A
Video bit depth
N/A
Video chroma subsampling
N/A
Video codecs
N/A
Show more
Type
mirrorless
Weight
840 g
Weight
840 g
This camera weighs 840 g which is heavier than 91.2% of cameras and equal to the weight of 0.2% of cameras.
Width
148.5 mm
Width
148.5 mm
This camera has a width of 148.5 mm which is wider than 94.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Height
106 mm
Height
106 mm
This camera has a height of 106 mm which is taller than 90.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Thickness
75 mm
Thickness
75 mm
This camera has a thickness of 75 mm which is thicker than 69.3% of cameras and equal to that of 0.3% of cameras.
Show more
Battery life (CIPA)
327 shots
Battery life (CIPA)
327 shots
This camera has a CIPA-rated battery life of 327 shots, which is shorter than that of 52.1% of cameras.
Battery capacity
3,400 mAh
Battery capacity
3,400 mAh
This camera has a battery capacity of 3,400 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 99.4% of cameras and equal to those in 0.2% of cameras.
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
This camera has a removable battery, and 98.7% of cameras include one.
USB Power Delivery (PD)
yes
USB Power Delivery (PD)
yes
This camera supports USB Power Delivery. 10% of cameras support USB Power Delivery.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This camera supports Wi-Fi. This feature is available on 47.8% of cameras.
802.11ax
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
This camera uses Wi-Fi version Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) which is newer than that of 99.6% of cameras and equal to that of 0.1% of cameras.
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This camera has Bluetooth. 22.6% of cameras support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth 5.2.
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
This camera supports Bluetooth version 5 which is newer than that supported by 96% of cameras and equal to that of 3.2% of cameras.
USB Type-C
yes
USB Type-C
yes
This camera features USB Type-C. 14.5% of cameras use USB-C ports.
Show more

Hasselblad X2D II 100C vs the average camera

246810TotalDisplay & DesignSensor & ImagePhoto FeaturesVideo & AudioBattery & PowerConnectivity & Storage
  • 402 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    425
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (425 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    425 vs 23
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    100 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (100 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    100 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 6 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    10 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (10 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    10 stops vs 4 stops
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    medium format
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (medium format vs APS-C).
    medium format vs APS-C
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Better viewfinder type
    Viewfinder type
    electronic
    This camera uses a more advanced viewfinder than the average camera (electronic vs none).
    electronic vs none
  • 3400000 dots higher EVF resolution
    EVF resolution
    5,760,000 dots
    This camera has a higher EVF resolution than the average camera (5760000 dots vs 2360000 dots). The average camera has an EVF resolution of 2360000 dots.
    5760000 dots vs 2360000 dots
  • 0.6 in larger screen diagonal
    Screen size
    3.6 in
    This camera has a larger screen than the average camera (3.6 in vs 3 in). The average camera has a screen size of 3 in.
    3.6 in vs 3 in
  • Has a touchscreen
    Touchscreen
    yes
    This camera has a touchscreen, the average camera does not. 36.6% of cameras support touchscreen input.
  • 8 more customizable buttons
    Customizable button count
    8
    This camera has more customizable buttons than the average camera (8 vs 0). The average camera offers 0 customizable buttons.
    8 vs 0
  • 0.22 x more viewfinder magnification
    Viewfinder magnification
    1 x
    This camera has a higher viewfinder magnification than the average camera (1 x vs 0.78 x). The average camera has a viewfinder magnification of 0.78 x.
    1 x vs 0.78 x
  • Higher sensor resolution
    Main camera megapixels
    100 MP
    This camera has a higher sensor resolution than the average camera (100 MP vs 16.2 MP). The average camera has a sensor resolution of 16.2 MP.
    100 MP vs 16.2 MP
  • Larger sensor
    Sensor size
    medium format
    This camera has a larger sensor than the average camera (medium format vs APS-C).
    medium format vs APS-C
  • 19,200 ISO higher maximum sensitivity limit
    Max ISO
    25,600 ISO
    This camera has a higher maximum sensitivity than the average camera (25600 ISO vs 6400 ISO). The average camera reaches a maximum sensitivity of 6400 ISO.
    25,600 ISO vs 6,400 ISO
  • Uses a BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    yes
    This camera uses a BSI sensor, the average camera does not. 34.8% of cameras use a BSI sensor.
  • Supports HEIF photos
    HEIF photo support
    yes
    This camera supports HEIF photos, the average camera does not.
    HEIF still-photo support.
  • 12 newer
    Release date
    2025
    This camera is newer than the average camera (2025 vs 2013). The average camera was released in 2013.
    August 2025
    2,025 vs 2,013
  • Higher RAW bit depth
    RAW bit depth
    16-bit
    This camera supports higher RAW bit depth than the average camera (16-bit vs 14-bit). The average camera supports 14-bit RAW capture.
    16-bit vs 14-bit
  • 0.42 µm larger sensor pixels
    Main camera pixel size
    3.76 µm
    This camera has larger sensor pixels than the average camera (3.8 µm vs 3.34 µm). The average sensor pixel size is 3.34 µm.
    3.76 µm vs 3.34 µm
  • 402 more AF points
    N. of focus points
    425
    This camera has more focus points than the average camera (425 vs 23). The average camera offers 23 focus points.
    425 vs 23
  • In-body stabilization
    Sensor-shift stabilization
    yes
    This camera supports in-body stabilization, the average camera does not.
    5-axis in-body stabilization.
  • Phase-detect AF for photos
    Phase-detection autofocus (photos)
    yes
    This camera supports phase-detection autofocus for photos, the average camera does not.
  • 6 stops more CIPA-rated stabilization
    Image stabilization rating (CIPA)
    10 stops
    This camera offers more CIPA-rated stabilization than the average camera (10 stops vs 4 stops). The average camera reaches 4 stops.
    10 stops vs 4 stops
  • Human eye AF
    Eye detection AF (human)
    yes
    This camera supports human eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • Animal eye AF
    Eye detection AF (animal)
    yes
    This camera supports animal eye-detection AF, the average camera does not.
  • 4,050 s longer maximum exposure
    Longest shutter speed
    4,080 s
    This camera supports a longer maximum exposure than the average camera (4080 s s vs 30 s s). The average camera supports a longest shutter speed of 30 s s.
    68 minutes maximum exposure.
    4,080 s vs 30 s
  • Supports touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    yes
    This camera supports touch autofocus, the average camera does not. 34.9% of cameras support touch autofocus.
  • Pixel shift shooting
    Pixel shift shot
    yes
    This camera supports pixel shift shooting, the average camera does not.
    Up to 400 MP composite mode.
  • Supports focus bracketing
    Focus bracketing
    yes
    This camera supports focus bracketing, the average camera does not.
  • Has microphone input
    Microphone input
    yes
    This camera has microphone input, the average camera does not.
    3.5 mm mic input
  • Built-in timelapse
    Timelapse function
    yes
    This camera includes timelapse capture, the average camera does not.
  • 2,280 mAh larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,400 mAh
    This camera has a higher battery capacity than the average camera (3400 mAh vs 1120 mAh). The average camera has a battery capacity of 1120 mAh.
    3,400 mAh vs 1,120 mAh
  • USB Power Delivery
    USB Power Delivery (PD)
    yes
    This camera supports USB Power Delivery, the average camera does not.
  • Has USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    yes
    This camera has a USB Type-C port, the average camera does not. 14.5% of cameras use USB-C.
  • Has Bluetooth
    Bluetooth connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Bluetooth, the average camera does not. 22.7% of cameras support Bluetooth.
    Bluetooth 5.2.
  • Supports Wi-Fi connectivity
    Wi-Fi connectivity
    yes
    This camera supports Wi-Fi, the average camera does not. 47.8% of cameras support Wi-Fi.
    802.11ax
  • Smartphone remote control
    Smartphone remote control
    yes
    This camera supports smartphone remote control, the average camera does not. 46.2% of cameras support smartphone remote control.
  • 1,000 GB more storage
    Internal storage
    1,000 GB
    This camera has a higher internal storage than the average camera (1000 GB vs 0 GB). The average camera offers 0 GB of internal storage.
    1,000 GB vs 0 GB
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 2
    This camera supports a newer USB version than the average camera (USB 3.2 Gen 2 vs USB 2). The average camera uses USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 2 vs USB 2.0
  • More versatile card slots
    Memory card slot types
    CFexpress Type B
    This camera uses more versatile card slots than the average camera (CFexpress Type B vs SD). The average camera supports SD memory card slot types.
    Internal storage only.
    CFexpress Type B vs SD
  • 445 g heavier
    Weight
    840 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (840 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    840 g vs 395 g
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • 2.4 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 32.1 mm taller body
    Height
    106 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (106 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    106 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 21.86x more expensive
    Hasselblad X2D II 100C is more expensive than the average camera (£6,340 vs £290).
    £6,340 vs £290
  • 21.86x more expensive
    Hasselblad X2D II 100C is more expensive than the average camera (£6,340 vs £290).
    £6,340 vs £290
  • 15.2% worse value for money
    Hasselblad X2D II 100C has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera (5.38 vs 6.2).
    5.38 vs 6.2
  • 93% less popular
    Hasselblad X2D II 100C is less popular than the average camera (1 vs 1.9).
    1 vs 1.93
  • 445 g heavier
    Weight
    840 g
    This camera is heavier than the average camera (840 g vs 395 g). The average camera weighs 395 g.
    840 g vs 395 g
  • No flash
    Flash
    no
    This camera does not have a built-in flash, the average camera does. 73.4% of cameras have a flash.
  • 32.1 mm taller body
    Height
    106 mm
    This camera is taller than the average camera (106 mm vs 73.9 mm). The average camera has a height of 73.9 mm.
    106 mm vs 73.9 mm
  • 28.6 mm wider
    Width
    148.5 mm
    This camera is wider than the average camera (148.5 mm vs 119.9 mm). The average camera has a width of 119.9 mm.
    148.5 mm vs 119.9 mm
  • 29 mm thicker
    Thickness
    75 mm
    This camera is thicker than the average camera (75 mm vs 46 mm). The average camera has a thickness of 46 mm.
    75 mm vs 46 mm
  • 2.4 fps slower mechanical burst
    Continuous shooting (mechanical)
    3.3 fps
    This camera has a slower mechanical burst than the average camera (3.3 fps vs 5.7 fps). The average camera reaches 5.7 fps.
    3.3 fps vs 5.7 fps
  • Worse low-light autofocus
    AF low-light sensitivity
    -3
    This camera has a worse low-light AF sensitivity than the average camera (-3 EV vs -4 EV). The average camera reaches a low-light AF sensitivity of -4 EV.
    -3 vs -4
  • 2 fewer microphones
    N. of microphones
    0
    This camera has fewer microphones than the average camera (0 vs 2). The average camera has 2 microphones.
    0 vs 2
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus (video)
    no
    This camera does not support continuous autofocus in video, the average camera does.
    no video recording
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    This camera does not support HDMI output, the average camera does. 78.7% of cameras support HDMI output.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

D
digitalcameraworld.com
26/08/2025
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
15/09/2025
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
10/12/2025
Summary of the review
D
dpreview.com
17/12/2025
Summary of the review
M
medium.com
26/01/2026
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
26/08/2025
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
10/12/2025
Summary of the review
C
camerajabber.com
26/04/2026
Summary of the review
F
fstoppers.com
09/09/2025
Summary of the review
C
captureintegration.com
26/08/2025
Summary of the review
P
petapixel.com
26/08/2025
Summary of the review
N
nytimes.com
10/02/2026
Summary of the review
D
digitalkamera.de
13/02/2026
Summary of the review
C
computerbild.de
15/11/2025
Summary of the review
G
galaxus.at
28/10/2022
Summary of the review
M
mpb.com
19/12/2024
Summary of the review
Q
qimago.de
07/09/2022
Summary of the review
P
phototrend.fr
04/11/2025
Summary of the review
F
frandroid.com
24/11/2025
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
02/03/2026
Summary of the review
J
juzaphoto.com
21/10/2026
Summary of the review
P
photofacts.nl
19/12/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Hasselblad X2D II 100C

  • Sensational 100-megapixel medium format image quality and resolution
  • Astonishing 5-axis in-body image stabilization compensating up to 10 stops
  • Greatly improved continuous autofocus supported by phase detection and LiDAR
  • Generous, fast, and highly convenient 1TB internal SSD storage
  • Ultra-bright 1400-nit tilting OLED touchscreen with HDR preview support
  • Excellent, premium build quality with a highly ergonomic grip
  • Simple, logical, and intuitive smartphone-like user interface

What we don't like about Hasselblad X2D II 100C

  • High financial investment required for the camera body and lenses
  • Slow startup times and slightly delayed electronic viewfinder activation
  • Slower operational speeds and buffer clearance compared to full-frame flagships
  • Subpar battery life that depletes quickly when using standby mode
  • Complete lack of native video recording capabilities
  • The tilting screen only adjusts vertically and cannot flip sideways or downward
  • Noticeable heat generation even during slow or moderate shooting conditions

Verdict

The Hasselblad X2D II 100C is a flagship medium-format mirrorless camera featuring a 100MP BSI CMOS sensor that delivers 16-bit color depth and an expansive 15.3 stops of dynamic range. Key characteristics include an industry-leading 10-stop 5-axis in-body image stabilization (IBIS) system, a 1TB internal SSD for high-speed storage, and a new hybrid autofocus system utilizing 425 phase-detection points combined with integrated LiDAR technology for improved tracking of humans, animals, and vehicles. Its primary advantages are unparalleled image quality with the Hasselblad Natural Colour Solution (HNCS), a bright 1400-nit tilting OLED touchscreen, and a refined ergonomic design that is 7.5% lighter than its predecessor. However, notable drawbacks include the total absence of video recording capabilities, a lack of full weather sealing, and relatively short battery life.

Compare Hasselblad X2D II 100C with other products in the Cameras category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Hasselblad X2D II 100C and other products in the Cameras category

No results found