OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Shark NV602UKT Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£150Suction power (AW):80 AWBattery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:1.1 LWeight:5.25 kg

Shark NV602UKT Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

80%

6.1

Technical Score

20%

7.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 75% of vacuum-cleaners
6.1

Technical Score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

28%

6.0

Performance

22%

4.6

Battery

18%

8.8

Filtration

14%

6.6

Attachments

10%

5.4

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 77% of vacuum-cleaners
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 87% of vacuum-cleaners
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £150
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Shark NV602UKT is a 750W corded bagless upright vacuum cleaner featuring a 1.1-litre dust capacity, a 1.45-metre stretch hose, and an 8-metre power cable. Main characteristics and pros include its versatile Lift-Away technology that detaches the 3.4kg canister for portable cleaning on stairs, 2 optimized floor modes for seamless carpet and hard floor transitions, LED headlights, and an Anti-Allergen Complete Seal that captures 99.9% of dust and allergens alongside a dedicated TruePet turbo tool for stubborn pet hair. However, notable cons include its lack of Shark's Anti Hair Wrap technology, meaning hair easily tangles around the non-detachable brush roller, and the high maximum suction power can make the vacuum heavy and difficult to push on certain carpets.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Shark NV602UKT

Technical Score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components:

28%

6.0

Performance

22%

4.6

Battery

18%

8.8

Filtration

14%

6.6

Attachments

10%

5.4

Design

8%

5.2

Smart features

6.1
Shark NV602UKT has a technical score of 6.1 points, which is lower than 77% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

10

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.5
Shark NV602UKT has a user score of 7.52 points, which is lower than 86.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Popularity:
Shark NV602UKT has a popularity score of 1.7 points, which is lower than 60.8% of vacuum cleaners.
1.7
Shark NV602UKT has a popularity score of 1.7 points, which is lower than 60.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

9.7

Price

7.4
Shark NV602UKT has a value-for-money score of 7.4 points, which is lower than 69.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
80 AW
Suction power (AW)
80 AW
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
This vacuum cleaner has a suction power of 80 AW, which is lower than that of 80.8% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
Universal motor
Power consumption
750 W
Power consumption
750 W
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 750 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 69.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.9%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.9%
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.9% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 68.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 10.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
1.1 L
Capacity
1.1 L
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 1.1 L, which is larger than that of 54.5% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
upright
Weight
5.25 kg
Weight
5.25 kg
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 5.25 kg, which is greater than the weight of 72.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.1% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
yes
Self-standing
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This vacuum cleaner stands on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
yes
Nozzle light
yes
â–² Better than 57% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Shark NV602UKT vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 1.5 m longer power cord
    Power cord length
    8 m
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a longer power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (8 m vs 6.5 m).
    8 m vs 6.5 m
  • 25 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    285 mm
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (285 mm vs 260 mm).
    285 mm vs 260 mm
  • 25 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    285 mm
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (285 mm vs 260 mm).
    285 mm vs 260 mm
  • 1.5 m longer power cord
    Power cord length
    8 m
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a longer power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (8 m vs 6.5 m).
    8 m vs 6.5 m
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Includes nozzle light
    Nozzle light
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a nozzle light, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 70 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    80 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (80 AW vs 150 AW).
    80 AW vs 150 AW
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 45% higher weight
    Weight
    5.25 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5.3 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.25 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 0.05 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.9 %
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.9 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.9 % vs 99.95 %
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 6.3% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark NV602UKT
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Shark NV602UKT has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (7.52 vs 8.000).
    7.52 vs 8
  • 3.1% worse value for money
    Shark NV602UKT offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.42 vs 7.6).
    7.42 vs 7.65
  • 70 AW lower suction power
    Suction power (AW)
    80 AW
    â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <40 AW – >280 AW
    This vacuum cleaner has lower suction power than the average vacuum cleaner (80 AW vs 150 AW).
    80 AW vs 150 AW
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • 0.05 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.9 %
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (99.9 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.9 % vs 99.95 %
  • No soft dusting brush
    Soft dusting brush
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a soft dusting brush, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 45% higher weight
    Weight
    5.25 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5.3 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.25 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 20 mm wider body
    Width
    285 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (285 mm vs 265 mm).
    285 mm vs 265 mm
  • 80 mm taller body
    Height
    1,180 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is taller than the average vacuum cleaner (1180 mm vs 1100 mm).
    1,180 mm vs 1,100 mm

Graphic comparison of Shark NV602UKT and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Shark NV602UKT?

  • Excellent suction power on both carpets and hard floors
  • Versatile Lift-Away feature easily converts it into a portable handheld unit
  • Effective at picking up embedded pet hair using the included TruePet brush tool
  • Highly efficient filtration system with the Anti-Allergen Complete Seal and HEPA filter
  • Bright LED headlights integrated into the floorhead illuminate hidden dust
  • Large 1.1-litre dust capacity means less frequent emptying
  • Relatively quiet operation compared to similar upright models
  • Affordable price point offering strong value for money

What customers dislike about Shark NV602UKT?

  • Lacks the 'Anti-Hair Wrap' technology, causing long hair to tangle around the main brush roll
  • Lacks the dual-roller 'DuoClean' head, making it struggle to pick up larger particles on hard floors
  • Maximum suction power can make the vacuum stiff and difficult to push on deep-pile carpets
  • Short stretch hose length (1.45m) can cause the lightweight unit to pull over easily when extended
  • Corded design requires manual cable management and plugging into multiple sockets for larger areas

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
smartvacuums.co.uk
28/04/2021
Summary of the review
Shark NV602UKT Lift-Away Review - Smart Vacuums
W
which.co.uk
01/07/2021
Summary of the review
Shark NV602UKT review - Vacuum cleaners - Which.co.uk

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Shark NV602UKT with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)