OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Rowenta RO2611 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:2.5 LWeight:4.6 kg

Rowenta RO2611 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical Score

20%

7.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 93% of vacuum-cleaners
5.7

Technical Score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

28%

6.5

Performance

22%

3.5

Battery

18%

7.1

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

5.6

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 97% of vacuum-cleaners
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on 47 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 85% of vacuum-cleaners
  • rowenta-ro2611
  • rowenta-ro2611
  • rowenta-ro2611
  • rowenta-ro2611
  • rowenta-ro2611
rowenta-ro2611
rowenta-ro2611
rowenta-ro2611
rowenta-ro2611
rowenta-ro2611

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Rowenta City Space RO2611 is a corded, bagged cylinder vacuum cleaner tailored for small living spaces, featuring a 750W high-efficiency motor that delivers cleaning performance equivalent to a 2000W model alongside an A-class energy rating. Key characteristics include a 2.5-litre dust bag capacity, dual-stage foam filtration, a 5-metre power cord providing a 7.65-metre operating radius, a metal telescopic tube, and an integrated 2-in-1 crevice tool. Its main pros are an ultra-compact, lightweight frame with an ergonomic carrying handle for effortless maneuverability and storage, excellent performance on hard floors, and low annual energy consumption (28 kWh/year). However, notable cons include a relatively loud noise level of 78 dB at maximum power, a short cord reach that limits its use in larger rooms, and a non-washable filter system.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Rowenta RO2611

Technical Score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components:

28%

6.5

Performance

22%

3.5

Battery

18%

7.1

Filtration

14%

6.5

Attachments

10%

5.6

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

5.7
Rowenta RO2611 has a technical score of 5.7 points, which is lower than 96.9% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on 47 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Rowenta RO2611 has a user score of 7.57 points, which is lower than 84.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Popularity:
Rowenta RO2611 has a popularity score of 5.2 points, which is lower than 52.9% of vacuum cleaners.
5.2
Rowenta RO2611 has a popularity score of 5.2 points, which is lower than 52.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

6.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.2
Rowenta RO2611 has a value-for-money score of 7.2 points, which is lower than 86.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
25.4 kPa
Suction power (kPa)
25.4 kPa
â–² Better than 82% of models
Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
This vacuum cleaner has a suction pressure of 25.4 kPa, which is higher than that of 82.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Airflow
22.4 L/s
Airflow
22.4 L/s
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
This vacuum cleaner delivers 22.4 L/s airflow, which is lower than that of 75.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Motor type
effitech
Power consumption
750 W
Power consumption
750 W
â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 750 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 69.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 6.6% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
hepa
Filter class
hepa
â–¼ Worse than 38% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class hepa, which is more advanced than the class used by 16% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 46% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
99.97%
Minimum overall efficiency
99.97%
â–² Better than 59% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 99.97% minimum overall efficiency, which is higher than that of 59.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 19.4% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
Suitable for allergy sufferers
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
2.5 L
Capacity
2.5 L
â–² Better than 76% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 2.5 L, which is larger than that of 76% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
no
Bagless
no
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
classic
Roller type
none
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
yes
Suitable for pet owners
yes
â–² Better than 28% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
canister
Weight
4.6 kg
Weight
4.6 kg
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 4.6 kg, which is greater than the weight of 66.7% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.7% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
no
Self-standing
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not stand on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
yes
Adjustable tube height
yes
â–² Better than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner includes adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Rowenta RO2611 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • 5.4 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    25.4 kPa
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (25.4 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    25.4 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 895 mm shorter body
    Height
    205 mm
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (205 mm vs 1100 mm).
    205 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 0.02 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.97 %
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.97 % vs 99.95 %
  • 1.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.5 L
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 L vs 1 L).
    2.5 L vs 1 L
  • 87.5% cheaper
    Rowenta RO2611 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£80 vs £150).
    £80 vs £150
  • 87.5% cheaper
    Rowenta RO2611 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£80 vs £150).
    £80 vs £150
  • 5.4 kPa higher suction pressure
    Suction power (kPa)
    25.4 kPa
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <11 kPa – >30 kPa
    This vacuum cleaner has higher suction pressure than the average vacuum cleaner (25.4 kPa vs 20 kPa).
    25.4 kPa vs 20 kPa
  • Includes full bin indicator
    Full bin indicator
    yes
    â–² Better than 73% of models
    This vacuum cleaner includes a full bin indicator, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 0.02 % higher filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    99.97 %
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has higher filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (100 % vs 99.95 %).
    99.97 % vs 99.95 %
  • 1.5 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    2.5 L
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (2.5 L vs 1 L).
    2.5 L vs 1 L
  • 895 mm shorter body
    Height
    205 mm
    ★ Better than 99% of models
    Market range: <290 mm – >1.2k mm
    This vacuum cleaner is shorter than the average vacuum cleaner (205 mm vs 1100 mm).
    205 mm vs 1,100 mm
  • Adjustable tube height
    Adjustable tube height
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner has adjustable tube height, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • 5.4 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    22.4 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (22.4 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    22.4 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No washable filter
    Washable filter
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a washable filter, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 1.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (5 m vs 6.5 m).
    5 m vs 6.5 m
  • 5.8% worse value for money
    Rowenta RO2611 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.23 vs 7.6).
    7.23 vs 7.65
  • 5.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Rowenta RO2611
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Rowenta RO2611 has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (7.57 vs 8.000).
    7.57 vs 8
  • 5.4 L/s lower airflow
    Airflow
    22.4 L/s
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <16.5 L/s – >52 L/s
    This vacuum cleaner delivers lower airflow than the average vacuum cleaner (22.4 L/s vs 27.8 L/s).
    22.4 L/s vs 27.8 L/s
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 1 fewer power levels
    Number of speeds
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers fewer speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 150 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    750 W
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (750 W vs 600 W).
    750 W vs 600 W
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    78-78 dB
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (78-78 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    78-78 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 1.5 m shorter power cord
    Power cord length
    5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
    Market range: <5 m – >9.3 m
    This vacuum cleaner has a shorter power cord than the average vacuum cleaner (5 m vs 6.5 m).
    5 m vs 6.5 m
  • Not allergy-friendly
    Suitable for allergy sufferers
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for allergy sufferers, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No bagless design
    Bagless
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use a bagless design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No washable filter
    Washable filter
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include a washable filter, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No upholstery nozzle
    Upholstery nozzle
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not include an upholstery nozzle, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 27.1% higher weight
    Weight
    4.6 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (4.6 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    4.6 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 134 mm deeper body
    Depth
    399 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (399 mm vs 265 mm).
    399 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2017
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2017 vs 2021).
    Released in September 2017.
    2017 vs 2021

Graphic comparison of Rowenta RO2611 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 47 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Rowenta RO2611?

  • Excellent suction power, especially on carpets and hard floors
  • Lightweight, compact design making it easy to carry and store
  • Generous 2.5-litre dust bag capacity for its compact size
  • Good maneuverability thanks to its extra-large rear wheels
  • Onboard storage for the 2-in-1 crevice nozzle ensures accessories are always at hand
  • Ideal for small spaces, studio apartments, and quick car cleaning

What customers dislike about Rowenta RO2611?

  • The extreme suction can cause the nozzle to stick aggressively to hard floors, making it difficult to glide
  • Lacks an electronic power adjustment dial (suction control is only managed mechanically via a manual air regulator slide on the handle)
  • Short power cord restricts the cleaning radius, requiring frequent plug changes in larger spaces
  • Relatively noisy during operation, with a maximum sound level of 78 dB
  • Exhaust air blows out from the main body chassis, which can feel disruptive or blow dust around if not angled away

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

Q
quechoisir.org
18/10/2024
Summary of the review
Rowenta RO2611EA City Space Vacuum Cleaner Review - Que Choisir
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
18/10/2024
Summary of the review
Rowenta RO2611EA City Space Vacuum Cleaner Review - Que Choisir
(Translated)Show original

Compare Rowenta RO2611 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)