OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Hoover TH31 B001 Review | 52 Data compared

Avg. price:~£70Suction power (AW):?Battery runtime:N/A minutesCapacity:3 LWeight:5.2 kg

Hoover TH31 B001 Review: Compare 52 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Vacuum Cleaners category and whether it is worth buying.

6.4

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the vacuum cleaner's quality, based on technical analysis and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference for identifying the best vacuum cleaners on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

80%

6.1

Technical Score

20%

7.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 77% of vacuum-cleaners
6.1

Technical Score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

28%

6.9

Performance

22%

4.9

Battery

18%

8.1

Filtration

14%

5.7

Attachments

10%

5.3

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

â–¼Worse than 79% of vacuum-cleaners
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on 92 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 87% of vacuum-cleaners
  • hoover-th31-b001
  • hoover-th31-b001
hoover-th31-b001
hoover-th31-b001

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Hoover Breeze Evo TH31 B001 is a bagless upright vacuum cleaner featuring an 850W motor, an A+ energy efficiency rating, and a large 3-litre easy-empty dust bin. Key performance characteristics include a 7-metre power cord and a 4.5-metre stretch hose that provide a combined 12.5-metre cleaning radius, making it capable of vacuuming a full 13-step staircase in one go. Pros of this model are its highly adjustable rotating brush bar with a 4-level carpet height selector, multi-surface compatibility, lightweight 5.2 kg frame, washable EPA filtration, and convenient on-board tool storage. However, some cons include a somewhat flimsy plastic build quality, and it can be difficult to maneuver on deep, plush carpets unless the optional flexible base strips are removed.

Technical Specifications of vacuum cleaner Hoover TH31 B001

Technical Score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the vacuum cleaner's technical performance across six key areas: performance, battery and power supply, filtration, attachments, design, and smart features.
When it matters
When you want to compare vacuum cleaners by cleaning performance, specifications, and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

28%

6.9

Performance

22%

4.9

Battery

18%

8.1

Filtration

14%

5.7

Attachments

10%

5.3

Design

8%

4.0

Smart features

6.1
Hoover TH31 B001 has a technical score of 6.1 points, which is lower than 79% of vacuum cleaners.
User score
User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on 92 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.5
Hoover TH31 B001 has a user score of 7.5 points, which is lower than 87% of vacuum cleaners.
Popularity
Popularity
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
When it matters
When you prefer a vacuum cleaner that has been chosen and reviewed by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Popularity:
Hoover TH31 B001 has a popularity score of 5.9 points, which is higher than 51.2% of vacuum cleaners.
5.9
Hoover TH31 B001 has a popularity score of 5.9 points, which is higher than 51.2% of vacuum cleaners.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the vacuum cleaner's overall score with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a vacuum cleaner with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

60%

6.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.5
Hoover TH31 B001 has a value-for-money score of 7.5 points, which is lower than 60.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Suction power (AW)
?
Suction power (kPa)
?
Airflow
?
Motor type
Universal motor
Power consumption
850 W
Power consumption
850 W
â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
Market range: <165 W – >899 W
This vacuum cleaner draws 850 W, which is higher than the power consumption of 82.3% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 2.9% of vacuum cleaners.
Show more
Cordless
no
Cordless
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not work cordlessly. 49.5% of vacuum cleaners offer cordless operation.
Battery runtime
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery voltage
N/A
Show more
Filter class
epa
Filter class
epa
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses filter class epa, which is less advanced than the class used by 84.1% of vacuum cleaners and the same as the class used by 2.8% of vacuum cleaners.
Minimum overall efficiency
95%
Minimum overall efficiency
95%
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
This vacuum cleaner reaches 95% minimum overall efficiency, which is lower than that of 89.4% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 5% of vacuum cleaners.
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
Suitable for allergy sufferers
yes
â–² Better than 18% of models
This vacuum cleaner is suitable for allergy sufferers. 82.4% of vacuum cleaners are allergy-friendly.
Capacity
3 L
Capacity
3 L
â–² Better than 81% of models
Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
This vacuum cleaner has a dust capacity of 3 L, which is larger than that of 80.6% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 4.1% of vacuum cleaners.
Bagless
yes
Bagless
yes
â–² Better than 21% of models
This vacuum cleaner uses a bagless design. 78.6% of vacuum cleaners use this setup.
Show more
Main brush type
roll brush
Roller type
bristled
Anti-tangle brush
no
Anti-tangle brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an anti-tangle brush. 25.7% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
Mini motorized brush
no
Mini motorized brush
no
â–¼ Worse than 27% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a mini motorized brush. 26.9% of vacuum cleaners include this attachment.
Suitable for pet owners
no
Suitable for pet owners
no
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners. 72% of vacuum cleaners handle pet hair well.
Show more
Vacuum type
upright
Weight
5.2 kg
Weight
5.2 kg
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
This vacuum cleaner weighs 5.2 kg, which is greater than the weight of 72.1% of vacuum cleaners and equal to that of 0.4% of vacuum cleaners.
2-in-1 design
no
2-in-1 design
no
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not offer a 2-in-1 design. 53% of vacuum cleaners offer this flexible format.
Self-standing
yes
Self-standing
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This vacuum cleaner stands on its own. 18.9% of vacuum cleaners offer this convenience.
Adjustable tube height
no
Adjustable tube height
no
â–¼ Worse than 47% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include adjustable tube height. 47.4% of vacuum cleaners offer this ergonomic feature.
Show more
Auto suction adjustment
no
Auto suction adjustment
no
â–¼ Worse than 20% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support automatic suction adjustment. 19.9% of vacuum cleaners support this feature.
Dust particle sensor
no
Dust particle sensor
no
â–¼ Worse than 8% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a dust particle sensor. 8% of vacuum cleaners include this feature.
LED display
no
LED display
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include an LED display. 25.9% of vacuum cleaners include this interface feature.
Nozzle light
no
Nozzle light
no
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not include a nozzle light. 43.4% of vacuum cleaners include this visibility feature.
Mopping support
no
Mopping support
no
â–¼ Worse than 4% of models
This vacuum cleaner does not support mopping. 3.7% of vacuum cleaners support this multi-function feature.

Hoover TH31 B001 vs the average vacuum cleaner

246810TotalPerformanceBatteryFiltrationAttachmentsDesignSmart features
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • 2 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    3 L
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3 L vs 1 L).
    3 L vs 1 L
  • 60 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    320 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (320 mm vs 260 mm).
    320 mm vs 260 mm
  • 2.14x cheaper
    Hoover TH31 B001 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£70 vs £150).
    £70 vs £150
  • 2.14x cheaper
    Hoover TH31 B001 is cheaper than the average vacuum cleaner (£70 vs £150).
    £70 vs £150
  • 60 mm wider cleaning path
    Cleaning path width
    320 mm
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <230 mm – >309 mm
    This vacuum cleaner has a wider cleaning path than the average vacuum cleaner (320 mm vs 260 mm).
    320 mm vs 260 mm
  • 2 L larger dust container
    Capacity
    3 L
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0.44 L – >4 L
    This vacuum cleaner has a larger dust capacity than the average vacuum cleaner (3 L vs 1 L).
    3 L vs 1 L
  • Self-standing design
    Self-standing
    yes
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This vacuum cleaner stands on its own, the average vacuum cleaner does not.
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • 4.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    95 %
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (95 % vs 99.95 %).
    95 % vs 99.95 %
  • 43.6% higher weight
    Weight
    5.2 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5.2 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.2 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 250 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    850 W
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (850 W vs 600 W).
    850 W vs 600 W
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    epa
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa vs hepa).
    epa vs hepa
  • 6.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews with the total number of reviews received by the vacuum cleaner.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a vacuum cleaner performs in everyday use and how reliable owners find it over time.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Hoover TH31 B001
    the average vacuum cleaner
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Hoover TH31 B001 has a lower user score than the average vacuum cleaner (7.50 vs 8.000).
    7.5 vs 8
  • 2.3% worse value for money
    Hoover TH31 B001 offers worse value for money than the average vacuum cleaner (7.48 vs 7.6).
    7.48 vs 7.65
  • More operating noise
    Noise level (Min-Max)
    80-80 dB
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <65 dB – >83 dB
    This vacuum cleaner is noisier than the average vacuum cleaner (80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB).
    80-80 dB vs 77-77 dB
  • No cyclonic technology
    Cyclonic technology
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not use cyclonic technology, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 250 W higher power consumption
    Power consumption
    850 W
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <165 W – >899 W
    This vacuum cleaner draws more power than the average vacuum cleaner (850 W vs 600 W).
    850 W vs 600 W
  • 1 fewer power levels
    Number of speeds
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <1 – >4
    This vacuum cleaner offers fewer speed levels than the average vacuum cleaner (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 4.95 % lower filtration efficiency
    Minimum overall efficiency
    95 %
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <95 % – >99.99 %
    This vacuum cleaner has lower filtration efficiency than the average vacuum cleaner (95 % vs 99.95 %).
    95 % vs 99.95 %
  • Lower filter class
    Filter class
    epa
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This vacuum cleaner uses a lower filter class than the average vacuum cleaner (epa vs hepa).
    epa vs hepa
  • Not pet-hair friendly
    Suitable for pet owners
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This vacuum cleaner is not suitable for pet owners, the average vacuum cleaner is.
  • No handheld conversion
    2-in-1 design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This vacuum cleaner does not have a 2-in-1 design, the average vacuum cleaner does.
  • 43.6% higher weight
    Weight
    5.2 kg
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <2.15 kg – >7.1 kg
    This vacuum cleaner is heavier than the average vacuum cleaner (5.2 kg vs 3.62 kg).
    5.2 kg vs 3.62 kg
  • 55 mm wider body
    Width
    320 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <229 mm – >350 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is wider than the average vacuum cleaner (320 mm vs 265 mm).
    320 mm vs 265 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2017
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This vacuum cleaner has an older release date than the average vacuum cleaner (2017 vs 2021).
    Released in August 2017.
    2017 vs 2021
  • 45 mm deeper body
    Depth
    310 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <170 mm – >440 mm
    This vacuum cleaner is deeper than the average vacuum cleaner (310 mm vs 265 mm).
    310 mm vs 265 mm

Graphic comparison of Hoover TH31 B001 and other vacuum cleaners

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 92 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Hoover TH31 B001?

  • Affordable budget-friendly price point
  • Excellent suction power for picking up dirt and pet hair
  • Large 3-liter bagless dust bin capacity
  • Easy and hygienic one-touch bin emptying
  • Long 4.5-meter stretch hose enables easy 13-step stair cleaning
  • Adjustable brush bar height dial for different carpet types
  • A+ energy efficiency rating reduces electricity usage
  • Long 7-meter power cable provides a wide cleaning reach

What customers dislike about Hoover TH31 B001?

  • Changing suction settings requires bending down to turn the dial on the floorhead
  • Can be heavy or stiff to push on thick, plush carpets
  • Disconnecting the short upright hose to attach the long stretch hose is cumbersome
  • Clunky upright design makes it difficult to fit under low furniture like sofas
  • Stiff bristles on the included 2-in-1 dusting and upholstery tool
  • The power cable is reported by some users to feel thin and prone to wearing over time

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

Y
yourhomeandstyle.com
27/07/2023
Summary of the review
Hoover Breeze Evo Upright vacuum cleaner review

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Hoover TH31 B001 with other vacuum cleaners

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)