OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£320RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Exynos 5420

Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.1

Overall score

Score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

90%

5.9

Technical score

10%

7.8

User score

▼Worse than 55% of tablets
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

22%

5.5

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.9

Software & Features

5%

5.9

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 56% of tablets
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on 504 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▼Worse than 67% of tablets
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
  • samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi
samsung-galaxy-tab-pro-10-1-2gb-16gb-wifi

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
2GB + 16GB
Other versions:
2GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

22%

5.5

Performance

20%

5.6

Display

16%

6.7

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

6.6

Connectivity

8%

6.9

Software & Features

5%

5.9

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.9
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 67% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

7.3

Number of reviews

Based on 504 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 72% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB) has a user popularity of 7.3 points, which is lower than 71.9% of Tablets.
7.3
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

60%

6.1

Overall score

40%

8.8

Price

6.9
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Exynos 5420
Chipset
Exynos 5420
▲ Better than 77% of models
This tablet uses the Exynos 5420 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 76.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2560×1600
Screen resolution
2560×1600
▲ Better than 78% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2560×1600 which is higher than that of 77.6% of tablets and equal to that of 10.1% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
TFT LCD
Display type
TFT LCD
▼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet uses a TFT LCD display type. 89.9% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
299 ppi
Pixel density
299 ppi
★ Better than 91% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 299 ppi which is higher than that of 91.4% of tablets and equal to that of 1% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
▲ Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
Main camera aperture
f/2.4
▼ Worse than 70% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.4 which is narrower than that of 69.8% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
▲ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
8,220 mAh
Battery capacity
8,220 mAh
▲ Better than 76% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,220 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 76.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
▼ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
▲ Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
▲ Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
▲ Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
App tracking protection
yes
▲ Better than 72% of models
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
469 g
Weight
469 g
▲ Better than 58% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 469 g which is lighter than 58.3% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
Keyboard accessory
no
▼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 5420
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 5420 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 5,420 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560×1600
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • 33.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 24.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,220 mAh
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8220 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,220 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • 78 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Includes app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 5420
    ▲ Better than 77% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 5420 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 5,420 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 33.5% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2560×1600
    ▲ Better than 78% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2560×1600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2560×1600 vs 1920×1200
  • 78 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    299 ppi
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (299 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    299 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Allows manual ISO
    Manual ISO
    yes
    ▲ Better than 54% of models
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 24.9% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,220 mAh
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8220 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,220 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    Fingerprint scanner
    yes
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Fingerprint scanner in the home button.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    yes
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    Stylus tilt support
    yes
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 0.7 mm thinner
    Thickness
    7.3 mm
    ▲ Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7.3 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-T628 MP6
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-T628 MP6 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-T628 MP6 vs Mali-G51
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-T628 MP6
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-T628 MP6 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-T628 MP6 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 5% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.9 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Inferior display type
    Display type
    TFT LCD
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (TFT LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    TFT LCD vs IPS LCD
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    812:1
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (812:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    812:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 26 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    375 nits
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (375 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    375 nits vs 401 nits
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Narrower front camera aperture
    Front camera aperture
    f/2.4
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.4
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.4 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.4 vs f/2.2
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 5 older release date
    Release date
    2014
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    March 2014
    2014 vs 2019
  • 43.1 mm taller
    Width
    243.1 mm
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (243.1 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    243.1 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

B
bobmckay.com
16/09/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 Review (Opening to 3 Months)
T
trustedreviews.com
10/01/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 Review
P
pocketnow.com
13/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy TabPRO 10.1 review: “Pro” in name only
H
hothardware.com
21/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 Review
N
newatlas.com
23/03/2014
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1
M
mobiletechreview.com
05/06/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 Review
W
wired.com
14/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 review
T
techradar.com
12/05/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 review
A
androidcentral.com
04/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro and Note Pro review
P
pocket-lint.com
03/04/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy TabPro 10.1 review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
14/04/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 review
C
computerbild.de
11/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1: Test - COMPUTER BILD
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
13/02/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 im ersten Test - connect
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
01/04/2014
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 - Tablette tactile
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
15/10/2014
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1, du Snapdragon efficace et un bon écran
(Translated)Show original
P
priice.fr
19/12/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 - Fiche et Avis
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
31/03/2017
Summary of the review
Test Labo de la Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
date non précisée
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 Wi-Fi
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
26/03/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab PRO 10.1, la recensione (foto e video)
(Translated)Show original
P
portablegear.nl
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy TabPRO 10.1 review - PortableGear.nl
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
12/06/2014
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 review - Notebookcheck.nl
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
30/04/2014
Summary of the review
Samsungs TabPro's: 8,4" en 10,1" - Review(www.tabletguide.nl) | 14 March 2014 | Samsung Galaxy TabPRO 10.1 review(www.allaboutphones.nl) | 2 April 201...
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 504 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB)

  • Stunning high-resolution 2560x1600 WQXGA display with vibrant colors
  • Slim, lightweight, and comfortable design that is easy to hold
  • Generally fast and responsive performance for basic tasks and gaming
  • Dependable battery life, with some users reporting up to 10 hours of use
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot (up to 64GB)
  • Useful features like an IR blaster for TV remote control and multi-window multitasking

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB)

  • Performance lag, random freezes, or app crashes when multitasking heavily
  • Limited internal storage (16GB base model) often requires an external card
  • High initial launch price compared to some competitors
  • The device can heat up significantly during prolonged or intensive use
  • Lengthy charging times to reach a full battery
  • Plastic build material may not feel as premium as metal alternatives

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10.1 (SM-T520) is a high-performance Android tablet featuring a stunning 10.1-inch WQXGA Super Clear LCD display with a high 2560 x 1600 resolution (299 PPI). This WiFi-only model is powered by an Exynos 5 Octa-core processor (1.9 GHz Quad + 1.3 GHz Quad), 2GB of RAM, and 16GB of internal storage expandable via microSD. Key advantages include its exceptionally thin and lightweight design (7.3mm, 469g), a long-lasting 8,220 mAh battery, and useful hardware extras like an IR blaster for remote control functionality. However, despite its 'Pro' branding, the tablet can experience performance lag and UI stuttering during heavy multitasking or intensive app usage, and some users find the plastic build and Magazine UX software less premium compared to competitors.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 10 1 WiFi (2GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found