OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£620RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon S4

Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.6

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

90%

5.6

Technical score

10%

?

User score

▼Worse than 70% of tablets
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

6.2

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

6.0

Connectivity

8%

5.9

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 65% of tablets
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £620

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
2GB + 64GB2GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

22%

5.1

Performance

20%

4.7

Display

16%

6.2

Camera

14%

6.5

Battery

12%

6.0

Connectivity

8%

5.9

Software & Features

5%

6.4

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

60%

5.6

Overall score

40%

7.2

Price

6.1
RAM capacity
2 GB
RAM capacity
2 GB
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
▼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
▼ Worse than 75% of models
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 75.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1366×768
Screen resolution
1366×768
▼ Worse than 66% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1366×768 which is lower than that of 65.6% of tablets and equal to that of 2.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
155 ppi
Pixel density
155 ppi
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 155 ppi which is lower than that of 84.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
1.9 MP
Front camera megapixels
1.9 MP
▼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.9 MP which is lower than in 79.1% of tablets and equal to that in 0.7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
▲ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
8,200 mAh
Battery capacity
8,200 mAh
▲ Better than 75% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,200 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 75.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Charging speed
18 W
▲ Better than 48% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Battery life
12 hours
▲ Better than 66% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
▼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
NFC
yes
▲ Better than 89% of models
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
Operating system
Windows
▼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
▲ Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
570 g
Weight
570 g
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 570 g which is heavier than 69.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Supports NFC
    NFC
    yes
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 225
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 225 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 225 vs Mali-G51
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 24.6% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,200 mAh
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8200 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,200 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Adreno 225
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    This tablet uses the Adreno 225 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 225 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    12 hours
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • 24.6% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,200 mAh
    ▲ Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8200 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,200 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    ▲ Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports NFC
    NFC
    yes
    ▲ Better than 89% of models
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • Includes stylus
    Stylus included
    yes
    ▲ Better than 83% of models
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3.1 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.9 MP
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.9 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.9 MP vs 5 MP
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 30.8% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    155 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2.38x more expensive
    Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£620 vs £260).
    £620 vs £260
  • 16.1% worse value for money
    Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.11 vs 7.1).
    6.11 vs 7.1
  • 4.81x less popular
    Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 2 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    2 GB
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.5 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    800 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    12.8 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 30.8% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    155 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    800:1
    ▼ Worse than 86% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (800:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    800:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 66 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    155 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1366×768
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1366×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1366×768 vs 1920×1200
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 3.1 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.9 MP
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.9 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.9 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    720 x 30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 16.3% heavier
    Weight
    570 g
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (570 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    570 g vs 490 g
  • 7 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    December 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • 0.9 mm thicker
    Thickness
    8.9 mm
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.9 mm vs 8.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
t3.com
30/08/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Ativ Tab review: Hands-on Would you like a comparison of how this specific Windows RT model performed against its Android-based Galaxy Tab cou...
S
sammobile.com
17/02/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung ATIV Tab (GT-P8510)
P
phonearena.com
05/11/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung ATIV Tab Review
C
coolsmartphone.com
04/01/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung ATIV Tab - Review
T
tomshardware.com
20/01/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung ATIV Tab Review: A Tablet To Hold Your Breath For?
I
itpro.com
04/01/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Ativ Tab review
H
hifitest.de
18/03/2026
Summary of the review
technische Daten Tablets - Samsung Ativ Tab P8510 Would you like a summary of the pros and cons mentioned across these German test reports?
(Translated)Show original
C
computerwoche.de
08/03/2013
Summary of the review
Tablet-PC: Samsung Ativ Tab GT-P8510 im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
08/11/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Ativ Tab im Test
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
31/12/2012
Summary of the review
Test Samsung ATIV Tab GT-P8510 Tablet
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
01/03/2013
Summary of the review
Samsung Ativ Tab (GT-P8510) (Tablet-PC) Test
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

  • Sleek and lightweight design makes it highly portable for its size
  • Strong WiFi performance that rivals premium competitors from Apple and Google
  • Excellent battery life, with some testers reaching up to 9 hours of continuous use
  • Bright and responsive 10.1-inch display with great viewing angles
  • Full-sized USB port and microSD slot for easy storage expansion and file transfers
  • Includes a comprehensive Microsoft Office suite pre-installed

What we don't like about Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB)

  • Windows RT operating system is highly restrictive, lacking support for legacy desktop software
  • Severe lack of quality applications available in the Windows Marketplace compared to Android or iOS
  • Plastic 'Hyperglaze' finish can feel cheap compared to the metal builds of rivals
  • Desktop mode is clumsy and difficult to navigate using only touch/finger input
  • Camera quality is poor, particularly when used in low-light environments
  • Initial app loading times can be sluggish, sometimes taking up to 5 seconds

Verdict

The Samsung ATIV Tab (GT-P8510) is a 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1366 x 768 resolution display and running on the ARM-based Windows RT operating system. It is powered by a 1.5 GHz dual-core Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus processor and, in this specific configuration, offers 4GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, expandable via a microSD slot. Key characteristics include its remarkably slim 8.9mm profile, a lightweight 570g plastic build, and a large 8,200 mAh battery providing approximately 10 to 12 hours of usage. Main pros include its highly portable design, the inclusion of a full-size USB 2.0 port and micro-HDMI for excellent connectivity, and pre-installed Microsoft Office Home & Student 2013. However, significant cons include the limited selection of apps available in the Windows Store and the inability to run legacy desktop Windows software due to the RT architecture.

Compare Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Ativ Tab WiFi (2GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found