OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£220RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:10.4 inchesChipset:Unisoc Tiger T612

Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

6.5

User score

â–²Better than 59% of tablets
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

7.5

Camera

14%

6.9

Battery

12%

7.1

Connectivity

8%

8.7

Software & Features

5%

7.4

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–²Better than 61% of tablets
6.5

User score

User score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

4.4

Number of reviews

Based on 18 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 92% of tablets
  • nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
  • nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi
nokia-t21-4gb-128gb-wifi

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 128GB4GB + 64GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

22%

5.8

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

7.5

Camera

14%

6.9

Battery

12%

7.1

Connectivity

8%

8.7

Software & Features

5%

7.4

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

6.6
User score
User score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

4.4

Number of reviews

Based on 18 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.5
Popularity
Popularity
4.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Popularity:
Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a popularity of 4.4 points, which is higher than 52.2% of Tablets.
4.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

60%

6.6

Overall score

40%

9.4

Price

7.4
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
12 nm
Process node
12 nm
â–² Better than 54% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 12 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 53.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 13.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
Internal storage
128 GB
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
413 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
413 points
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 413 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 69.8% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.4% of tablets.
Chipset
Unisoc Tiger T612
Chipset
Unisoc Tiger T612
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet uses the Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 63.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2000×1200
Screen resolution
2000×1200
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2000×1200 which is higher than that of 58.2% of tablets and equal to that of 8.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
224 ppi
Pixel density
224 ppi
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 224 ppi which is higher than that of 50% of tablets and equal to that of 11.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 37% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
â–² Better than 70% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
â–² Better than 58% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0 which is wider than that of 57.5% of tablets and equal to that of 24.5% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
8,200 mAh
Battery capacity
8,200 mAh
â–² Better than 75% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 8,200 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 75.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Charging speed
18 W
Charging speed
18 W
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
?
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
â–² Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
NFC
yes
â–² Better than 89% of models
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
Update support duration
medium
â–² Better than 47% of models
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
â–² Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
App tracking protection
yes
â–² Better than 72% of models
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP52
IP rating
IP52
â–² Better than 85% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of IP52 which is higher than that of 85% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Weight
471 g
Weight
471 g
â–² Better than 57% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 471 g which is lighter than 57.3% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
?
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Number of microphones
2
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
FM radio
yes
â–² Better than 81% of models
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Supports NFC
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • Higher IP rating
    IP rating
    IP52
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.7% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • 24.6% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,200 mAh
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8200 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,200 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Unisoc Tiger T612
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses the Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Unisoc Tiger T612
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses the Unisoc Tiger T612 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Unisoc Tiger T612 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR4X
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    Internal storage
    128 GB
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    8
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • Better GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-G57
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-G57 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-G57 vs Mali-G51
  • 23.1% faster GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    800 MHz
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Includes anti-reflection coating
    Anti-reflection coating
    yes
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This tablet has anti-reflection coating, the average tablet does not. 24.7% of tablets use anti-reflection coating.
  • Supports HDR10 support
    HDR10 support
    yes
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • 0.3 inches larger screen size
    Screen size
    10.4 inches
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    2000×1200
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2000×1200 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    2000×1200 vs 1920×1200
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    8 MP
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Wider main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.0
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 24.6% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    8,200 mAh
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (8200 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    8,200 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Supports NFC
    NFC
    yes
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    App tracking protection
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Allows app offloading
    App offloading
    yes
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    This tablet allows app offloading, the average tablet does not. 26.4% of tablets support app offloading.
  • Supports dynamic theme
    Dynamic theme
    yes
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    This tablet features dynamic themes, the average tablet does not. 29% of tablets offer dynamic theming.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    Extra dim mode
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    Clipboard warnings
    yes
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • Higher IP rating
    IP rating
    IP52
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP52 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP52 vs not rated
  • Suitable for drawing
    Suitable for drawing
    yes
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    Number of microphones
    2
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    682:1
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (682:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    682:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 41 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    360 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    360 nits vs 401 nits
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 40 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    360 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    360 nits vs 400 nits
  • 43.3% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    413 points
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (413 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    413 points vs 729 points
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 22.9% lower user score
    User score
    6.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Nokia T21 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.51 vs 8.000).
    6.51 vs 8
  • 43.3% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    413 points
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (413 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    413 points vs 729 points
  • 10% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.8 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 24.2% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    1,434 points
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1434 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,434 points vs 1,891 points
  • 3 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (1 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    1 vs 4
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    12.8 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    682:1
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (682:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    682:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 41 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    360 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    360 nits vs 401 nits
  • 40 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    360 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (360 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    360 nits vs 400 nits
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 47.5 mm taller
    Width
    247.5 mm
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (247.5 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    247.5 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
irishtimes.com
19/01/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 review: This Android tablet is a good all-rounder
N
notebookcheck.net
19/01/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 review - Inexpensive tablet for rent as well
E
expertreviews.co.uk
13/01/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 review: A budget tablet to rival Amazon’s Fire
M
mirror.co.uk
11/04/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 Review: An affordable and solid rival to the Amazon Fire
I
indianexpress.com
05/04/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 tablet review: Can build quality and two Android updates save it?
U
uswitch.com
04/04/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 Tablet Review - Uswitch
H
hulldailymail.co.uk
06/03/2023
Summary of the review
Review: Nokia's T21 brings the premium feel on a budget
W
walesonline.co.uk
06/03/2023
Summary of the review
Review: Nokia's T21 brings the premium feel on a budget Would you like a comparison of the battery life results from these specific tests?
T
thehindubusinessline.com
01/03/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 review: T for trustworthy
T
themobileindian.com
10/02/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 Review: Is it Good or Bad?
T
trustedreviews.com
03/02/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 Review
T
techadvisor.com
20/01/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 Review: A Premium-looking Budget Android Tablet
M
mynexttablet.com
31/03/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 Review: Can It Beat Samsung? • MyNextTablet Would you like a comparison of the pros and cons mentioned across these specific reviews to help...
D
dailystar.co.uk
08/12/2022
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 review: A well-rounded slim tablet that offers long battery life
H
heise.de
20/04/2023
Summary of the review
HMD T21 im Test: Günstiges Tablet streamt in Full-HD
(Translated)Show original
W
winfuture.de
05/04/2023
Summary of the review
Das Nokia T21 im Test: Einstiegs-Tablet mit optionalem Stylus
(Translated)Show original
T
test.de
10/12/2025
Summary of the review
Test: Nokia T21 (TA-1495) - Stiftung Warentest
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
13/01/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 im Praxis-Test: Etwas Nachhaltigkeit zum kleinen Preis
(Translated)Show original
C
charlestech.fr
18/05/2024
Summary of the review
Test Nokia T21: Avis complet et détaillé Souhaitez-vous des précisions sur les performances relevées lors de ces tests ou une comparaison avec ses con...
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
28/04/2023
Summary of the review
Test Nokia T21: une tablette un peu trop limitée
(Translated)Show original
S
sudinfo.be
23/01/2023
Summary of the review
Tablette Nokia T21, test et avis: une tablette familiale performante
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
19/01/2023
Summary of the review
Test de la Nokia T21: une tablette bon marché à louer également
(Translated)Show original
U
ugeek.fr
08/01/2023
Summary of the review
Test de la tablette Nokia T21: du sérieux pour son prix
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
18/03/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 tablet - Hardware Info(www.nieuwsblad.be) | 1 februari 2023 | GETEST. Nokia T21: degelijke tablet en niet duur Consumentenbond
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
19/01/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 review - Goedkope tablet ook te huur
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
01/02/2023
Summary of the review
Nokia T21 Wifi - Test, Reviews & Prijzen
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 18 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 14 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Durable aluminum build with premium look and IP52 dust/water resistance
  • Exceptional battery life (8200mAh) often lasting 2-3 days with moderate use
  • Crisp 10.4-inch 2K resolution display suitable for indoor media consumption
  • Clean, near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware
  • Productivity features like active stylus support and second-screen functionality for PCs
  • Loud and clear stereo speakers enhanced by OZO Spatial Audio

What we don't like about Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB)

  • Underwhelming performance from the Unisoc T612 chipset; prone to lag and stuttering
  • Slow charging speeds (18W) taking roughly 2.5 to 3 hours to reach a full charge
  • No charger included in the box
  • Average camera quality that lacks sharpness, especially in low light
  • Display brightness (360 nits) and reflectiveness make outdoor use difficult
  • Lack of a fingerprint sensor for secure biometrics

Verdict

The Nokia T21 WiFi is a durable budget-friendly tablet featuring a 10.36-inch 2K (1200 x 2000) IPS display with 360 nits of brightness and active pen support. It is powered by an octa-core Unisoc T612 processor paired with 4GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, which is expandable via microSD up to 512GB. Key strengths include its premium aluminium chassis with an IP52 rating, a long-lasting 8,200mAh battery supporting 18W fast charging, and stereo speakers with OZO Playback for enhanced audio. It also functions as a second screen for Windows PCs and offers a clean, near-stock Android experience with guaranteed OS and security updates. However, it suffers from relatively slow performance in demanding apps or heavy multitasking, average 8MP cameras that struggle in low light, and a display that can be difficult to view in direct sunlight.

Compare Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Nokia T21 WiFi (4GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found