Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£860RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:10.6 inchesChipset:Intel Core i5-4300U

Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.7

Technical score

10%

7.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 59% of tablets
5.9

Value for money

Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

6.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

6.8

Performance

20%

5.4

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

5.2

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

4.5

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 62%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

5.3

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 65%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £860
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
Other versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

6.8

Performance

20%

5.4

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

5.2

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

6.5

Software & Features

5%

4.5

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

5.7
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

5.3

Number of reviews

7.9
Popularity
Popularity
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) has a user popularity of 5.3 points, which is lower than 53.2% of Tablets.
5.3
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

6.0

Price

5.9
RAM capacity
8 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 8 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 72.3% of tablets and equal to that of 17.8% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 57.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 256 GB which is larger than the storage of 76.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15.7% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
935 points
This tablet scored 935 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 56.4% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Core i5-4300U
This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-4300U chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 74.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1080
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1080 which is lower than that of 61% of tablets and equal to that of 2.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
208 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 208 ppi which is lower than that of 58.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.3% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
1.2 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 1.2 MP which is lower than that of 99.3% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
1.2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.2 MP which is lower than in 86.3% of tablets and equal to that in 4.8% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,676 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,676 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 59.9% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
48 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 48 W which is faster than in 90.5% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.1% of tablets.
Battery life
7.5 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 7.5 hours, which is shorter than that of 84.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
915 g
This tablet weighs 915 g which is heavier than 97% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
45 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 45 ms, which is higher than that of 97.7% of tablets and equal to that of 1.4% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-4300U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-4300U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2.67x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (48 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    48 W vs 18 W
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i5-4300U chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i5-4300U vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 4x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM capacity than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 16 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (20 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    20 vs 4
  • 71.8% higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 0.5 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (10.6 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    10.6 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • 2.67x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (48 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    48 W vs 18 W
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes stylus
    This tablet includes a stylus, the average tablet does not. 16.9% of tablets come with a stylus.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • 3.8 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 6.8 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    1.2 MP vs 8 MP
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 2.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • 3.31x more expensive
    Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£860 vs £260).
    £860 vs £260
  • 19.4% worse value for money
    Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.95 vs 7.1).
    5.95 vs 7.1
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • Slower storage type
    This tablet uses mSATA storage, while the average tablet uses faster eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    mSATA vs eMMC
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 69.2% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (200 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    200 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 57.1% larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 7.1% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (208 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    208 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (982:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    982:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1920×1080 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1920×1080 vs 1920×1200
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 13 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (208 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    208 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3.8 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 6.8 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (1.2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    1.2 MP vs 8 MP
  • Worse main-camera video
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 2.5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7.5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7.5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 13.7% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5,676 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    5,676 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 86.7% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (915 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    915 g vs 490 g
  • 5.5 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (13.5 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    13.5 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 36 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (45 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    45 ms vs 9 ms
  • 99.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (275 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    275 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 3 points lower iFixit repairability score
    This tablet has a lower repairability score than the average tablet (1 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    1 points vs 4 points
  • 6 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    October 2013
    2013 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
mobiletechreview.com
31/10/2013
Summary of the review
I
itpro.com
07/11/2013
Summary of the review
L
laptopmag.com
19/11/2013
Summary of the review
W
wired.com
21/11/2013
Summary of the review
P
pcmag.com
21/02/2014
Summary of the review
N
newatlas.com
13/03/2014
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
29/05/2014
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
22/10/2013
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
14/07/2014
Summary of the review
T
techadvisor.com
02/06/2014
Summary of the review
O
overclock.net
01/01/2014
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
14/07/2014
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
21/10/2013
Summary of the review
C
computerbase.de
29/10/2013
Summary of the review
N
n-tv.de
31/10/2013
Summary of the review
P
pctipp.ch
24/03/2014
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
27/09/2013
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
21/10/2013
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
15/11/2013
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
12/11/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Powerful Intel Core i5 processor allows it to run full desktop legacy applications smoothly
  • High-quality 10.6-inch 1080p ClearType display with excellent viewing angles and color reproduction
  • Included pressure-sensitive Wacom stylus is highly praised for note-taking and digital art
  • Improved dual-stage kickstand provides better stability when using the device on a lap compared to the original model
  • Significant battery life improvement over the first-generation Surface Pro, typically reaching 6–8 hours
  • Solid, premium build quality with a sturdy magnesium alloy chassis

What customers don't like about Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB)

  • Heavy and thick (907g and 13.5mm) compared to contemporary dedicated tablets like the iPad Air
  • High initial price point, especially since essential accessories like the Type Cover are sold separately
  • Poor scaling in Windows 8.1 makes traditional desktop icons and text either too tiny or blurry on the high-res screen
  • Limited port selection with only a single USB 3.0 port
  • Subpar camera quality (720p) that performs poorly in low-light conditions
  • Magnetic charging port and stylus attachment are often described as 'fiddly' or insecure

Verdict

The Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) is a versatile 2-in-1 hybrid powered by a 4th-generation Intel Core i5 processor (Haswell) and Intel HD Graphics 4400, offering the performance of an Ultrabook in a portable form factor. It features a 10.6-inch ClearType Full HD touchscreen with a 1920x1080 resolution, supported by an included Wacom digitizer pen for precise input. Main characteristics include a durable magnesium alloy 'VaporMg' chassis, a dual-angle kickstand (22 and 55 degrees), and a full-size USB 3.0 port, microSDXC card reader, and Mini DisplayPort for connectivity. Pros include a significant battery life improvement over its predecessor (up to 7–8 hours), a vibrant display with high colour accuracy, and the ability to run full legacy Windows applications. However, it is notably heavy and bulky for a tablet at 907g, lacks a built-in keyboard (which must be purchased separately), and has mediocre 720p cameras with poor low-light performance.

Compare Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Microsoft Surface Pro 2 (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found