OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£350RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Intel Atom x5-Z8350

Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.6

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

7.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 70% of tablets
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

4.4

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

6.1

Battery

12%

7.0

Connectivity

8%

6.3

Software & Features

5%

5.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 71% of tablets
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

6.0

Number of reviews

Based on 78 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 85% of tablets
  • lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
  • lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi
lenovo-ideapad-miix-320-4gb-64gb-wifi

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
4GB + 64GB2GB + 32GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components:

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

4.4

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

6.1

Battery

12%

7.0

Connectivity

8%

6.3

Software & Features

5%

5.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.5
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

6.0

Number of reviews

Based on 78 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 59% of models
Popularity:
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 6 points, which is lower than 59.3% of Tablets.
6.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

5.6

Overall score

40%

8.7

Price

6.5
RAM capacity
4 GB
RAM capacity
4 GB
â–² Better than 48% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Process node
14 nm
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
135 points
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
135 points
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 135 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 99.4% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.6% of tablets.
Chipset
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Chipset
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
This tablet uses the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 74.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.4% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
Screen resolution
1280×800
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
149 ppi
Pixel density
149 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 149 ppi which is lower than that of 86.8% of tablets and equal to that of 9.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
9,000 mAh
Battery capacity
9,000 mAh
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 9,000 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 82.9% of tablets and equal to those in 1.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
20 W
Charging speed
20 W
â–² Better than 60% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 20 W which is faster than in 60.4% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.2% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
â–¼ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
Operating system
Windows
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
550 g
Weight
550 g
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 550 g which is heavier than 64.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 36.8% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    9,000 mAh
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (9000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    9,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • 19,000 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    PWM dimming frequency
    19,000 Hz
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 Hz – >2.9k Hz
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (19000 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    At all brightness levels.
    19,000 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    12
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Intel Atom x5-Z8350
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This tablet uses the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3L
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3L vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3L vs LPDDR3
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    12
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Intel Atom x5-Z8350
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This tablet uses the Intel Atom x5-Z8350 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Atom x5-Z8350 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Newer DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    DDR3L
    â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3L vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3L vs LPDDR3
  • 19,000 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    PWM dimming frequency
    19,000 Hz
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <0 Hz – >2.9k Hz
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (19000 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    At all brightness levels.
    19,000 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • 36.8% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    9,000 mAh
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (9000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    9,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    Battery health monitoring
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Newer USB version
    USB version
    USB 3.2 Gen 1
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    â–² Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • 101 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    300 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    300 nits vs 401 nits
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    300 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • 13.6% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.04 vs 8.000).
    7.04 vs 8
  • 8.5% worse value for money
    Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.54 vs 7.1).
    6.54 vs 7.1
  • 80.5% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    369 points
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <725 points – >6.8k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (369 points vs 1891 points). The average tablet scores 1891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    369 points vs 1,891 points
  • 81.5% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    135 points
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (135 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    135 points vs 729 points
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    1,600 MHz
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    12.8 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Intel HD Graphics 400
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet uses the Intel HD Graphics 400 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Intel HD Graphics 400 vs Mali-G51
  • 4% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.92 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.92 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 33.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    149 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (149 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    149 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 101 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    300 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    300 nits vs 401 nits
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    300 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1280×800
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    HDR photo mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.2
    â–¼ Worse than 49% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.2 vs 5.0
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Windows
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • 12.2% heavier
    Weight
    550 g
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (550 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    550 g vs 490 g
  • 1 mm thicker
    Thickness
    9 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 73.7 mm wider
    Width
    249 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (249 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    249 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techaeris.com
10/08/2017
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 320 review: Great design with flaky performance
L
laptopmag.com
18/07/2017
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 320 Full Review and Benchmarks - Laptop Mag
U
uk.pcmag.com
31/07/2017
Summary of the review
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320 - Review 2017 - PCMag UK
P
pcmag.com
31/07/2017
Summary of the review
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320 Review - PCMag
N
notebookcheck.net
11/03/2017
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 320-10ICR-80XF001VGE - Notebookcheck Would you like me to find the latest firmware updates or driver downloads specifically for this Miix...
C
chip.de
17/01/2018
Summary of the review
Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320-10ICR Pro LTE (80XF002VGE) - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
27/07/2017
Summary of the review
Test Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320 Pro (x5-Z8350, LTE, 128 GB) Convertible
(Translated)Show original
D
doc.ubuntu-fr.org
01/07/2024
Summary of the review
Lenovo Miix 320 iCR - Wiki ubuntu-fr (Test de compatibilité Linux)
(Translated)Show original
F
fnac.com
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Fiche technique et avis : Tablette PC Lenovo Miix 320-10ICR
(Translated)Show original
G
geeko.lesoir.be
01/09/2017
Summary of the review
Test – Miix 320 : Lenovo démocratise les 2-en-1
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
25/09/2017
Summary of the review
Test Labo Lenovo Miix 320 : un PC polyvalent et abordable
(Translated)Show original
E
estunt.nl
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 Specificaties en Overzicht
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 78 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 44 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Affordable budget-friendly price point
  • Excellent battery life, often lasting 9-13 hours depending on usage
  • Highly portable, lightweight design (approx. 1kg with keyboard)
  • Sturdy and well-integrated magnetic keyboard connection
  • Includes essential connectivity like USB-C and multiple USB 2.0 ports
  • Decent audio quality with Dolby Advanced Audio enhancement

What we don't like about Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB)

  • Underpowered Intel Atom processor limits multitasking and heavy web browsing
  • Small, cramped keyboard can be difficult for adult touch-typists
  • Low-resolution display (1280x800 on base models) with poor outdoor visibility
  • Noticeable lag when multiple browser tabs or programs are open
  • Slow charging times compared to modern tablets
  • Plastic build feels less premium than aluminum competitors

Verdict

The Lenovo IdeaPad Miix 320 is a versatile 10.1-inch 2-in-1 detachable tablet powered by an Intel Atom x5-Z8350 quad-core processor, 4GB of DDR3L RAM, and 64GB of eMMC storage. It features a touch-sensitive display with a resolution of 1280 x 800, high-speed 802.11ac Wi-Fi, and a range of connectivity options including USB-C, micro-HDMI, and a microSD card reader. Key advantages include its lightweight 2.3-pound design (with keyboard), a functional island-key keyboard dock, and a long-lasting battery life of up to 10 hours, making it ideal for light productivity and media consumption. However, users may experience sluggish performance during heavy multitasking, and the display's limited brightness can make it difficult to use in direct sunlight.

Compare Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Lenovo Ideapad Miix 320 WiFi (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found