Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£660RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:13.3 inchesChipset:Intel Core i3-4012Y

Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4/10

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 75% of tablets
5.9

Value for money

Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

6.3

Performance

20%

4.5

Display

16%

5.2

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

6.2

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software & Features

5%

4.8

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 72%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Best prices
    N/A~ £660
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

6.3

Performance

20%

4.5

Display

16%

5.2

Camera

14%

4.3

Battery

12%

6.2

Connectivity

8%

7.0

Software & Features

5%

4.8

Design

3%

5.7

Audio & Multimedia

5.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) has a popularity of 1 point, which is higher than 65.8% of Tablets.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.4

Overall score

30%

7.0

Price

5.9
RAM capacity
4 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
22 nm
This tablet is built on a 22 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 57.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 7.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Intel Core i3-4012Y
This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-4012Y chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 66.6% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1366×768
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1366×768 which is lower than that of 65.6% of tablets and equal to that of 2.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
113 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 113 ppi which is lower than that of 99.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,950 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 2,950 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 97.2% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Charging speed
65 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 65 W which is faster than in 91.5% of tablets and equal to speeds in 1.7% of tablets.
Battery life
7 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 7 hours, which is shorter than that of 85.4% of tablets and equal to that of 5.5% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
IP69
This tablet has an IP rating of IP69 which is higher than that of 98.3% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Weight
2,250 g
This tablet weighs 2,250 g which is heavier than 99.7% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
2
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-4012Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i3-4012Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 3.2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (13.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    13.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 3.61x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (65 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    65 W vs 18 W
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP69 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP69 vs not rated
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 16 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (20 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    20 vs 4
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Intel Core i3-4012Y chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Intel Core i3-4012Y vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses SSD storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    SSD vs eMMC
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 16 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (20 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    20 vs 4
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3L vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3L vs LPDDR3
  • 3.2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (13.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    13.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 3.61x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (65 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    65 W vs 18 W
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Higher IP rating
    This tablet has a better IP rating than the average tablet (IP69 vs not rated). Water and dust protection are still uncommon on tablets.
    IP69 vs not rated
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 55.2% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (2950 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    2,950 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7 hours vs 10 hours
  • 49.6% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (113 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    113 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 150 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (250 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    250 nits vs 400 nits
  • 19.9% worse value for money
    Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.92 vs 7.1).
    5.92 vs 7.1
  • 2.54x more expensive
    Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£660 vs £260).
    £660 vs £260
  • 4.81x less popular
    Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1 vs 4.8).
    1 vs 4.81
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57.1% larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (22 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    22 nm vs 14 nm
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the Intel HD Graphics GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Intel HD Graphics vs Mali-G51
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1600 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 14.1% lower memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    12.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 49.6% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (113 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    113 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 225 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (176 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    176 nits vs 401 nits
  • 150 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (250 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    250 nits vs 400 nits
  • 103 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (118 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    118 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Lower contrast ratio
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (851:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    851:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1366×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1366×768 vs 1920×1200
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 55.2% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (2950 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    2,950 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 3 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (7 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    7 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • 4.59x heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (2250 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    2,250 g vs 490 g
  • 3.2 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11.2 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    11.2 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 164.7 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (340 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    340 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 6 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    August 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 30 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (230 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    230 mm vs 200.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
mobiletechreview.com
11/11/2013
Summary of the review
A
aztechbeat.com
02/12/2013
Summary of the review
G
gadgetguy.com.au
09/12/2013
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
29/12/2013
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
09/10/2013
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.com
07/10/2013
Summary of the review
0
01net.com
26/11/2013
Summary of the review
T
tomshw.it
18/01/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What we like about Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Versatile 2-in-1 design that functions well as both a laptop and a tablet
  • Excellent battery life when the tablet is docked with the keyboard's secondary battery
  • Built-in 4G LTE connectivity allows for easy internet access on the go
  • Comfortable full-size island-style keyboard and responsive trackpad
  • Includes a fast SSD for quick boot times and responsive system performance
  • Decent selection of ports including dual USB, HDMI, and dual SD card slots

What we don't like about Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB)

  • Extremely heavy for a tablet and top-heavy when used as a laptop
  • Display has low resolution (1366 x 768), poor contrast, and limited brightness
  • Large 13.3-inch screen makes it unwieldy and less portable in tablet mode
  • Processor and RAM are often considered underpowered for serious professional tasks
  • The docking mechanism can be fiddly to reconnect properly
  • Glossy screen has weak viewing angles and is difficult to use in sunlight

Verdict

The HP Split x2 is a 13.3-inch Windows 8 hybrid that functions as both a laptop and a detachable tablet, powered by an Intel Core i3-4010Y processor and 4GB of RAM. A standout feature is its dual-storage system, consisting of a 64GB SSD within the tablet for quick OS performance and a 500GB HDD in the keyboard dock for high-capacity file storage. It offers impressive battery longevity through a dual-battery configuration (one in the screen and one in the base) and includes premium audio via front-facing Beats Audio speakers. Major benefits include its sturdy build quality, responsive touchscreen, and a full-sized keyboard that provides a genuine laptop experience. However, the device is notably heavy and bulky for a 2-in-1, weighing nearly 2.3kg when docked, and the 1366x768 resolution display suffers from low brightness and poor contrast, making it difficult to use in outdoor environments.

Compare Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Hp Split X2 4G (4GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found