Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ210RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:128 GBScreen size:11.5 inchesChipset:Qualcomm Snapdragon 685

Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

7.0

Technical score

10%

9.0

User score

â–˛Better than 72% of tablets
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

â–˛Better than 80%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

6.7

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

7.3

Camera

14%

7.1

Battery

12%

6.7

Connectivity

8%

8.7

Software & Features

5%

6.2

Design

3%

6.1

Audio & Multimedia

â–˛Better than 69%
9.0

User score

User score
9.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

â–˛Better than 89%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ ÂŁ210
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
Other versions:
6GB + 128GB8GB + 256GB
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

6.7

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

7.3

Camera

14%

7.1

Battery

12%

6.7

Connectivity

8%

8.7

Software & Features

5%

6.2

Design

3%

6.1

Audio & Multimedia

7.0
User score
User score
9.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

9.0
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) has a user popularity of 8.7 points, which is lower than 83.8% of Tablets.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.4

Price

7.9
RAM capacity
4 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 76.4% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
128 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 128 GB which is larger than the storage of 56.7% of tablets and equal to that of 19.6% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
474 points
This tablet scored 474 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is lower than the score of 58.8% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.1% of tablets.
Chipset
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 60.5% of tablets and equal to those in 0.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
2000Ă—1200
This tablet has a screen resolution of 2000Ă—1200 which is higher than that of 58.2% of tablets and equal to that of 8.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 120 Hz which is higher than in 80.4% of tablets and equal to that in 10.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
203 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 203 ppi which is lower than that of 62.9% of tablets and equal to that of 0.6% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
5 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 5 MP which is higher than in 48.8% of tablets and equal to that in 19.6% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
7,250 mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 7,250 mAh which is larger than the batteries in 60.3% of tablets and equal to those in 2% of tablets.
Charging speed
22.5 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 22.5 W which is faster than in 66.6% of tablets and equal to speeds in 2.4% of tablets.
Battery life
13 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 13 hours, which is longer than that of 76.1% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
local video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
yes
This tablet supports on-device AI. 71.8% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
yes
This tablet includes app tracking protection. 71.8% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
499 g
This tablet weighs 499 g which is heavier than 53.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.4% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
6
This tablet includes 6 speakers, which is more than in 93.7% of tablets and equal to the number in 2.7% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 2x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    local video playback
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • 40% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 4 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (6 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    6 vs 2
  • 1.4 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 12.9% higher user score
    User score
    9.0/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Honor Pad X9 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (9.03 vs 8.000).
    9.03 vs 8
  • 80.2% more popular
    Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) is more popular than the average tablet (8.67 vs 4.8).
    8.67 vs 4.81
  • 10.7% better value for money
    Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) has better value for money than the average tablet (7.86 vs 7.1).
    7.86 vs 7.1
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 40% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.8 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Better GPU
    This tablet uses the Adreno 610 GPU, while the average tablet uses Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Adreno 610 vs Mali-G51
  • 93.8% faster GPU clock
    This tablet has a higher GPU frequency than the average tablet (1,260 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    1,260 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet uses a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 2x more storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (128 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    128 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2 more CPU threads
    This tablet has more CPU threads than the average tablet (8 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    8 vs 6
  • 2x higher refresh rate
    This tablet has a higher refresh rate than the average tablet (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has refresh rate of 60 Hz.
    120 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • Supports adaptive refresh rate
    This tablet has adaptive refresh rate, the average tablet does not. 17.6% of tablets support adaptive refresh rate.
  • 1.4 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (11.5 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    11.5 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1603:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,603:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (2000Ă—1200 vs 1920Ă—1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920Ă—1200.
    2000Ă—1200 vs 1920Ă—1200
  • Allows manual shutter speed
    This tablet allows manual shutter speed control, the average tablet does not. 21.9% of tablets offer manual shutter speed control.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 3 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (13 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    local video playback
    13 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 25% faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (22.5 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    22.5 W vs 18 W
  • 10.2% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a higher battery capacity than the average tablet (7,250 mAh vs 6,580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6,580 mAh.
    7,250 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet supports a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.1 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    5.1 vs 5.0
  • Includes on-device AI
    This tablet includes on-device AI, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets include on-device AI.
  • Supports live text recognition
    This tablet supports live text recognition, the average tablet does not. 34.9% of tablets can recognize text from images.
  • Includes app tracking protection
    This tablet includes app tracking protection, the average tablet does not. 28.3% of tablets offer app tracking protection.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet features extra dim mode, the average tablet does not. 35.4% of tablets support extra diming.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 39.9% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
  • 1.1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (6.9 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    6.9 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • Designed for kids
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 4 newer release date
    This tablet has a newer release date than the average tablet (2023 vs 2019).
    July 2023
    2023 vs 2019
  • 4 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (6 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    6 vs 2
  • Supports LDAC
    This tablet supports LDAC, the average tablet does not. 25.2% of tablets support LDAC.
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.
  • 9.4% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (203 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    203 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • 35% lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score than the average tablet (474 points vs 729 points). The average tablet scores 729 points in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    474 points vs 729 points
  • 17.8% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,554 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,554 points vs 1,891 points
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 9.4% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (203 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    203 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 18 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (203 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    203 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • 92 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (267.3 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    267.3 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

S
stuff.tv
07/07/2023
Summary of the review
P
pocketnow.com
23/08/2023
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
17/08/2023
Summary of the review
M
makeuseof.com
13/10/2023
Summary of the review
P
pocket-lint.com
06/07/2023
Summary of the review
Y
yugatech.com
24/12/2023
Summary of the review
H
hitechcentury.com
10/09/2023
Summary of the review
E
en.techreviewer.de
02/07/2023
Summary of the review
S
smartzone.de
20/07/2025
Summary of the review
T
techreviewer.de
09/07/2023
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
11/12/2023
Summary of the review
C
cnetfrance.fr
03/02/2024
Summary of the review
F
fr.techreviewer.de
09/07/2023
Summary of the review
Q
quechoisir.org
28/11/2023
Summary of the review
E
elespanol.com
03/11/2023
Summary of the review
I
infobae.com
27/03/2024
Summary of the review
L
larazon.es
24/10/2023
Summary of the review
E
evosmart.it
21/12/2023
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
13/09/2023
Summary of the review
C
consumentenbond.nl
18/03/2026
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB)

  • Excellent value for money in the budget tablet category.
  • Large 11.5-inch 120Hz display provides a smooth and fluid user experience for scrolling and media.
  • Immersive audio quality delivered by a 6-speaker surround sound system.
  • Premium-feeling full metal body design that is both sleek and lightweight.
  • Snappy performance for everyday tasks like web browsing, streaming, and light gaming.
  • Solid battery life that can typically last a full day of general use.

What customers don't like about Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB)

  • Extremely slow charging speeds, taking up to 5 hours for a full charge with the included 10W adapter.
  • Lack of a 3.5mm headphone jack and microSD card expansion slot.
  • No fingerprint sensor for secure biometric unlocking; relies on less secure face unlock.
  • Cameras perform poorly in low-light conditions, producing noisy or blurry images.
  • Software includes some pre-installed bloatware and pushy prompts for first-party Honor accounts.
  • Display brightness and viewing angles can be insufficient for comfortable outdoor use in direct sunlight.

Verdict

The Honor Pad X9 WiFi is a slim, 6.9mm metal-unibody tablet featuring an 11.5-inch 120Hz 2K FullView display with a 2000 x 1200 resolution and TUV Rheinland eye-protection certifications. It is powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 octa-core processor paired with 6GB of RAM and 128GB of internal storage, running on MagicOS 7.1 based on Android 13. Its primary advantages include an immersive six-speaker surround sound system, a lightweight 499g portable design, and a long-lasting 7250mAh battery providing up to 13 hours of video playback. However, it lacks a 3.5mm headphone jack, does not support microSD storage expansion, and features relatively modest 5MP front and rear cameras that struggle in low-light conditions.

Compare Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Honor Pad X9 WiFi (6GB + 128GB) and other tablets

No results found