OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£540RAM capacity:4 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:12.3 inchesChipset:?

Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.6/10

Overall score

Score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Score components

90%

6.6

Technical score

10%

6.8

User score

▲Better than 60% of tablets
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

▼Worse than 59%
6.6

Technical score

Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components

22%

5.0

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

7.3

Camera

14%

8.0

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

7.7

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

4.6

Audio & Multimedia

▲Better than 62%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.1

Number of reviews

▼Worse than 88%
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £540
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
8GB + 64GBCheck price16GB + 256GBCheck price
Other versions:
4GB + 32GB8GB + 128GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 62% of models
Score components:

22%

5.0

Performance

20%

6.8

Display

16%

7.3

Camera

14%

8.0

Battery

12%

6.8

Connectivity

8%

7.7

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

4.6

Audio & Multimedia

6.6
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.1

Number of reviews

6.8
Popularity
Popularity
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Popularity:
Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB) has a popularity of 4.1 points, which is higher than 54.4% of Tablets.
4.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

70%

6.6

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

6.9
RAM capacity
4 GB
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 4 GB which is larger than the RAM capacity of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 17.6% of tablets.
Process node
14 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 14 nm process node, which is smaller than the node size used in 45% of tablets and equal to the node used in 8.6% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
893 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scored 893 points in Geekbench 6 (single-core) which is higher than the score of 54.9% of tablets and equal to the score of 0.3% of tablets.
Chipset
?
Show more
Screen resolution
3000×2000
This tablet has a screen resolution of 3000×2000 which is higher than that of 96.7% of tablets and equal to that of 0.6% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
LCD
This tablet uses a LCD display type. 83% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
293 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 293 ppi which is higher than that of 90.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass 5
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass 5 display glass which is stronger than that on 93.8% of tablets and equal to that on 5.8% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than in 69.7% of tablets and equal to that in 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/1.8
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/1.8 which is wider than that of 85.9% of tablets and equal to that of 14.1% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
45 W
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 45 W which is faster than in 83.8% of tablets and equal to speeds in 6.7% of tablets.
Battery life
12 hours
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 12 hours, which is longer than that of 65.7% of tablets and equal to that of 9.3% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
ChromeOS
This tablet uses the ChromeOS operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 97.5%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
731 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 731 g which is heavier than 90.2% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
yes
This tablet supports a backlit keyboard. 90.3% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
10 ms
Market range: <2 ms – >26 ms
This tablet has a pen latency of 10 ms, which is higher than that of 56.8% of tablets and equal to that of 7.8% of tablets.
Show more
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 2 microphones, which is more than in 55.1% of tablets and equal to the number in 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3000×2000 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3000×2000 vs 1920×1200
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • 2.2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.8 vs f/2.2
  • 30.8% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (293 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    293 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 20 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (24 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    24 vs 4
  • 2x higher memory bandwidth
    This tablet has a higher memory bandwidth than the average tablet (29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    29.8 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • Higher screen resolution
    This tablet has a higher screen resolution than the average tablet (3000×2000 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet resolution is 1920×1200.
    3000×2000 vs 1920×1200
  • 2.2 inches larger screen size
    This tablet has a higher screen size than the average tablet (12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    12.3 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 30.8% higher pixel density
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (293 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    293 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • More durable display glass
    This tablet uses better display glass than the average tablet (Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Corning Gorilla Glass 5 vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 72 ppi higher screen sharpness
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (293 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    293 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1473:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,473:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Supports HDR10 support
    This tablet supports HDR10, the average tablet does not. 21.8% of tablets are HDR10 compatible.
  • Wider front camera aperture
    This tablet has a better front camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.9 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 front camera aperture.
    f/1.9 vs f/2.2
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a better main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/1.8 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/1.8 vs f/2.2
  • 3 MP higher front camera megapixels
    This tablet has more front camera megapixels than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28.1% of tablets support PDAF.
  • 2.5x faster charging speed
    This tablet supports faster charging than the average tablet (45 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    45 W vs 18 W
  • Supports fast charging
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 2 hours longer battery life
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (12 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    12 hours vs 10 hours
  • Supports DisplayPort over USB-C
    This tablet supports DisplayPort over USB-C, the average tablet does not. 21.5% of tablets support DisplayPort over USB-C.
  • Newer USB version
    This tablet supports a newer USB version than the average tablet (USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2). The average tablet uses USB USB 2.0.
    USB 3.2 Gen 1 vs USB 2.0
  • Includes fingerprint scanner
    This tablet offers a better fingerprint scanner setup than the average tablet (yes vs no). Fingerprint scanner quality still varies a lot between tablets.
    Side-mounted fingerprint scanner.
  • Suitable for drawing
    This tablet is suitable for drawing, the average tablet is not. 41% of tablets are suitable for drawing.
  • Includes backlit keyboard
    This tablet has a backlit keyboard, the average tablet does not. 9.8% of tablets offer a backlit keyboard.
  • Supports stylus tilt
    This tablet supports stylus tilt, the average tablet does not. 33.6% of tablets support stylus tilt.
  • 1 mm thinner
    This tablet is thinner than the average tablet (7 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    7 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 1 more microphone/s
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet has 1 microphones.
    2 vs 1
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (ChromeOS vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    ChromeOS vs Android
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 49.2% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (731 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    731 g vs 490 g
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2.08x more expensive
    Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£540 vs £260).
    £540 vs £260
  • 17.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Google Pixel Slate
    the average tablet
    Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (6.81 vs 8.000).
    6.81 vs 8
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 70.5% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (192 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    192 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 29% lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    This tablet achieves a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score than the average tablet (1,343 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    1,343 points vs 1,891 points
  • 50% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • Inferior display type
    This tablet has an inferior display type compared to the average tablet (LCD vs IPS LCD). 0.00% of tablets use the superior display type.
    LCD vs IPS LCD
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No BSI sensor
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No LTE support
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4.2 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.2 vs 5.0
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (ChromeOS vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    ChromeOS vs Android
  • No widgets
    This tablet does not support widgets, the average tablet does. 93.5% of tablets support widgets.
  • 49.2% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (731 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    731 g vs 490 g
  • 115.55 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (290.9 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    290.85 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 1 ms higher pen latency
    This tablet has higher pen latency than the average tablet (10 ms vs 9 ms). The average tablet has pen latency of 9 ms.
    10 ms vs 9 ms
  • No 3.5 mm headphone jack
    This tablet does not have a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the average tablet does. 72.9% of tablets include a headphone jack.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

4.0
MrMobile [Michael Fisher]
≈ estimated
24/01/2019
Long-term test · two months of daily use
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate tries to be a tablet and a laptop, and is not great at either; last year's Pixelbook is better.
4.0
Sypnotix
≈ estimated
11/01/2019
Hands-on review · tablet mode, keyboard and Chrome OS
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate is disappointing next to the earlier Pixelbook, and hard to recommend to Chrome OS users.
5.0
Brian Tong
≈ estimated
05/01/2019
Hands-on review · software, keyboard and pen tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate is not the best tablet right now; it only suits people already invested in Google's ecosystem.
5.0
Pocketnow
≈ estimated
22/12/2018
Hands-on review · daily use, keyboard and software tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate is a great tablet, but it is hard to recommend over alternatives at the same price.
4.0
Lon.TV
≈ estimated
08/12/2018
Hands-on review · performance, keyboard and Android tests
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate is a disappointment: the hardware is nice, but the software and price don't justify buying it now.
4.0
Brad Colbow
≈ estimated
03/12/2018
Hands-on review · drawing tests with pen and apps
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate is not an artist's tablet: the pen, palm rejection and app support fall short for drawing.
5.0
Engadget
≈ estimated
30/11/2018
Hands-on review · Chrome OS, Android apps and games
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate has strong hardware, but its high price and software glitches make it a niche device.
7.0
Digital Trends
≈ estimated
28/11/2018
Hands-on review · battery tests and comparison with rivals
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate suits someone who wants one device for both roles; rivals are better at each.
8.0
Erin Lawrence
≈ estimated
28/11/2018
Hands-on review · size, keyboard and everyday use
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate could replace a laptop for many users, though its size and required keyboard are real drawbacks.
6.0
Chrome Unboxed
≈ estimated
27/11/2018
One-week impressions · keyboard and tablet experience
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate has a good display, keys and trackpad, but it is unstable on the lap and unsure whether a tablet like this is wanted.
4.0
The Verge
≈ estimated
27/11/2018
Hands-on review · performance, glitches and ports
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate is too experimental and unreliable; only Chrome OS diehards might consider it, and even they shouldn't.
7.0
ASBYT
≈ estimated
29/12/2018
First look · unboxing and first impressions
Verdict
Google Pixel Slate looks and feels lovely, but performance is untested, so judgement is withheld for now.
More graded video reviews (1)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theguardian.com
27/11/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate review: a strong case for death of Android tablets
W
wired.com
01/12/2018
Summary of the review
Pixel Slate review: a glitchy, mediocre Surface Pro imitation
E
expertreviews.co.uk
04/12/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate review: Not quite the finished article
T
thesun.co.uk
27/11/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate review – this half tablet, half laptop is the PERFECT computer for almost everybody
F
forbes.com
20/01/2019
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate Review: Better Laptop Than The 2018 iPad Pro?
Z
zoneoftech.com
31/01/2019
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate Review - ZONEofTECH
U
uk.pcmag.com
27/11/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate Review
T
techadvisor.com
21/11/2019
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate Review: Buy a Surface Instead
L
laptopmag.com
27/11/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate review - Laptop Mag Would you like a comparison of the different processor configurations (Celeron vs. Core i5) mentioned in these...
J
journalmetro.com
05/12/2018
Summary of the review
Essai: la Pixel Slate entre deux chaises
(Translated)Show original
E
es.gizmodo.com
28/11/2018
Summary of the review
El Pixel Slate de Google es una respuesta brillante al iPad Pro, pero tiene un problema
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
09/10/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate: esta es la nueva tablet de Google
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.it
10/10/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate, tablet premium che diventa laptop
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
24/10/2018
Summary of the review
Google Pixel Slate review: is deze high-end tablet een winnaar?
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB)

  • High-resolution 12.3-inch 'Molecular Display' with vibrant colors and sharp detail
  • Excellent front-facing stereo speakers providing clear and powerful audio
  • Premium, slim, and sturdy aluminum build quality
  • Solid battery life, often lasting a full workday (8–10 hours)
  • Fast and accurate fingerprint reader integrated into the power button
  • Desktop-class Chrome browser support unlike mobile-only versions
  • Dual USB-C ports allowing for simultaneous charging and peripheral use

What customers don't like about Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB)

  • Software bugs and performance lag, especially in early builds or on the entry-level Celeron model
  • Expensive launch price, with essential accessories like the keyboard and stylus sold separately
  • Lack of a built-in 3.5mm headphone jack
  • Android app integration can be hit-or-miss with scaling and stability issues
  • The official folio keyboard is unstable for use on a lap
  • No expandable storage (no microSD slot)
  • Device is now discontinued, making repairs and official support more difficult

Verdict

The Google Pixel Slate (4GB RAM + 32GB Storage) is an entry-level Chrome OS tablet featuring a 12.3-inch 'Molecular Display' with a high 3000 x 2000 resolution and 293 ppi. This specific configuration is powered by an Intel Celeron 3965Y processor and includes dual front-firing speakers, dual USB-C ports, and a fingerprint sensor integrated into the power button. Its main advantages are the exceptionally sharp screen, premium anodised aluminium build, and a battery life of up to 10–12 hours. However, this base model is often cited for sluggish performance under heavy multitasking, limited local storage for offline use, and the absence of a built-in headphone jack.

Compare Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Google Pixel Slate (4GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found