Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£530RAM capacity:2 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 3

Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB)
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.7

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 61% of tablets
6.4

Value for money

Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 83%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

5.7

Display

16%

6.1

Camera

14%

5.3

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.6

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

6.0

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 63%
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

â–¼Worse than 73%
  • asus-vivotab-rt-32gb-2gb-32gb-wifi
asus-vivotab-rt-32gb-2gb-32gb-wifi
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

22%

4.8

Performance

20%

5.7

Display

16%

6.1

Camera

14%

5.3

Battery

12%

6.5

Connectivity

8%

6.6

Software & Features

5%

5.5

Design

3%

6.0

Audio & Multimedia

5.7
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.5

User ratings

30%

7.8

Number of reviews

7.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) has a user popularity of 7.8 points, which is lower than 76.2% of Tablets.
7.8
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

7.7

Price

6.4
RAM capacity
2 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 2 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 60.9% of tablets and equal to that of 15.6% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 3
This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 3 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 64.8% of tablets and equal to those in 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1366×768
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1366×768 which is lower than that of 65.6% of tablets and equal to that of 2.5% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
155 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 155 ppi which is lower than that of 84.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2% of tablets.
Display glass type
Chemically Strengthened Glass
This tablet uses Chemically Strengthened Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 65.1% of tablets and equal to that on 13% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
8 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 8 MP which is higher than that of 36.5% of tablets and equal to that of 31.8% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.2
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.2 which is wider than that of 30.2% of tablets and equal to that of 27.3% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
?
Charging speed
18 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 18 W which is faster than in 48% of tablets and equal to speeds in 12.3% of tablets.
Battery life
9 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 9 hours, which is shorter than that of 62.7% of tablets and equal to that of 6.8% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
yes
This tablet supports NFC. 89.1% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Windows
This tablet uses the Windows operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84.1%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
525 g
This tablet weighs 525 g which is heavier than 61.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.6% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 200 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (600 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    600 nits vs 400 nits
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 3 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • More capable chipset
    This tablet uses the Nvidia Tegra 3 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 8 more GPU execution units
    This tablet has more GPU execution units than the average tablet (12 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    12 vs 4
  • Newer DDR memory version
    This tablet supports a newer DDR version than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3). The average DDR version is LPDDR3.
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 200 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (600 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    600 nits vs 400 nits
  • Higher contrast ratio
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1324:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,324:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Allows manual focus
    This tablet allows manual focus control, the average tablet does not. 37.2% of tablets include manual focus.
  • Allows manual ISO
    This tablet allows manual ISO adjustment, the average tablet does not. 46% of tablets feature manual ISO.
  • Includes flash
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • Includes battery health monitoring
    This tablet features battery health monitoring, the average tablet does not. 37% of tablets include battery health tools.
  • Supports NFC
    This tablet has NFC support, the average tablet does not. 10.9% of tablets include NFC.
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • 30.8% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 35% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 2.04x more expensive
    Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£530 vs £260).
    £530 vs £260
  • 10.3% worse value for money
    Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.43 vs 7.1).
    6.43 vs 7.1
  • 5.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi
    the average tablet
    Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.57 vs 8.000).
    7.57 vs 8
  • Worse GPU
    This tablet uses the ULP GeForce GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 35% lower CPU speed
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.3 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 GB less RAM
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (2 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    2 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 50% less storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 366 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,500 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,500 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 20% slower GPU clock
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (520 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    520 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • 30.8% lower pixel density
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Less durable display glass
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Chemically Strengthened Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 66 ppi lower screen sharpness
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (155 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    155 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Lower screen resolution
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1366×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1366×768 vs 1920×1200
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • 1 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (9 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    9 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No cellular module
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows vs Android
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 7 older release date
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    October 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • 87.2 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (262.5 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    262.5 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 7.1% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (525 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    525 g vs 490 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
PhoneArena
≈ estimated
14/12/2012
Full review · battery, camera and keyboard dock tests
Verdict
Asus VivoTab RT WiFi is a thin, long-lasting Windows RT tablet and a solid contender, though it has some flaws.
9.3
Tablet-News.com
✓ explicit
23/10/2012
Full review · design, Windows RT, games and battery tests
Verdict
Asus VivoTab RT WiFi impresses with its slick design, good battery and display, though the price is a bit high.
7.0
UltrabookReview
≈ estimated
23/10/2012
Hands-on review · build, apps and price assessment
Verdict
Asus VivoTab RT WiFi is an interesting tablet with good looks, but it is overpriced and short on apps for now.
Brand video
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Overview video
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
theverge.com
23/10/2012
Summary of the review
L
laptopmag.com
22/10/2012
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
29/10/2012
Summary of the review
A
arstechnica.com
23/10/2012
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
23/10/2012
Summary of the review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
22/01/2013
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/05/2014
Summary of the review
T
t3.com
06/09/2012
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
13/11/2012
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
30/08/2012
Summary of the review
C
chip.de
07/12/2012
Summary of the review
P
pcwelt.de
05/11/2012
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
14/11/2012
Summary of the review
S
sueddeutsche.de
18/11/2012
Summary of the review
C
connect.de
12/02/2013
Summary of the review
F
futurezone.at
03/03/2013
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
14/01/2013
Summary of the review
S
spiegel.de
02/11/2012
Summary of the review
H
hardwareluxx.de
29/11/2012
Summary of the review
C
computerwoche.de
10/04/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB)

  • Exceptional battery life, reaching up to 16 hours with the mobile dock
  • Vibrant Super IPS+ display with high brightness (600 nits) and wide viewing angles
  • Lightweight and svelte design, weighing only 1.15 lbs (tablet only)
  • Pre-installed Microsoft Office Home & Student 2013 RT for productivity
  • Solid 8MP rear camera with LED flash that performs better than some competitors
  • Built-in NFC and highly accurate GPS sensors

What customers don't like about Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB)

  • Windows RT operating system limits software to the Windows Store, lacking desktop app compatibility
  • Severely limited app selection in the Windows Store compared to iOS and Android
  • Keyboard dock is uncomfortably cramped for extended typing
  • Proprietary charging connector is awkward and can be difficult to plug in/out
  • Trackpad on the dock is small and occasionally finicky or non-responsive
  • Build quality concerns, including a plastic strip that some felt looked cheap

Verdict

The Asus VivoTab RT WiFi (TF600T) is a 10.1-inch tablet featuring a bright 600-nit Super IPS+ display with 1366 x 768 resolution and Corning Fit Glass. Under the hood, it is powered by a quad-core NVIDIA Tegra 3 processor clocked at 1.3GHz, 2GB of DDR3 RAM, and 32GB of internal eMMC storage, which is expandable via a microSD card slot. Its main pros include an exceptionally slim 8.3mm metallic design, a high-quality 8MP rear camera with LED flash, and remarkable battery life that reaches up to 16 hours when paired with its optional mobile keyboard dock. However, common cons include the inherent software limitations of the Windows RT operating system, a relatively sparse selection of available apps in the Windows Store, and a somewhat cramped keyboard layout on the docking accessory.

Compare Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus Vivotab Rt WiFi (2GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found