OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£1,060RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:18.4 inchesChipset:Nvidia Tegra 3

Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 17 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

35%

5.1

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

5.1

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 87% of tablets
5.7

Value for money

Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

4.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 99%
5.1

Technical score

Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

22%

6.1

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

4.4

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

5.9

Software

5%

3.7

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

â–¼Worse than 84%
5.1

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

5.1

Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

6.7

Average grade

20%

8.2

Popularity

Grades by review (17)
13 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 88%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £1,060
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Other versions:
8GB + 1TB2GB + 32GB4GB + 1TB6GB + 1TB8GB + 2TB

What reviewers say about the Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB)

Based on 13 · 4

Reviewers like switching operating systems and the two-in-one idea, but find it heavy and short on battery.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components:

22%

6.1

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

4.4

Camera

14%

4.2

Battery

12%

5.5

Connectivity

8%

5.9

Software

5%

3.7

Design

3%

4.8

Audio

5.1
Reviews score
5.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

4.9

Price

5.7
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 8 GB of RAM, which is more than 72.1% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Process node
40 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 40 nm process, which is larger than 86.9% of tablets and equal to 8% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 32 GB of internal storage, which is less than 60.9% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
?
Chipset
Nvidia Tegra 3
This tablet runs on Nvidia Tegra 3, which is less advanced than 64.8% of tablets and equal to 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1080
This tablet has a 1920×1080 screen, which is less sharp than 61.1% of tablets and equal to 2.6% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 60 Hz screen, which is smoother than 0.1% of tablets and equal to 73.4% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
120 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 120 ppi, which is lower than 98.8% of tablets and equal to 0.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
1 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 1 MP resolution, which is lower than 91.2% of tablets and equal to 1.3% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,130 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 5,130 mAh battery capacity, which is smaller than 62.9% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
33 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 33 W, which is faster than 74.8% of tablets and equal to 2.9% of tablets.
Battery life
5 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 5 hours, which is shorter than that of 95.6% of tablets and equal to that of 1.8% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
no
This tablet does not have built-in GPS. 82.9% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
Operating system
Windows 8
This tablet uses the Windows 8 operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 84%.
Update support duration
short
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.4% of tablets and equal to that of 47.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
no
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
not rated
This tablet's IP rating is not rated, which is less protected than 16.5% of tablets and the same as 83.6% of tablets.
Weight
2,400 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 2,400 g, which is heavier than 99.9% of tablets and equal to 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 1, which is more than 0.2% of tablets and equal to 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.8% of tablets.
FM radio
no
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer this.
Show more

Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 95% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.9 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 8.3 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (18.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    18.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (3000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    3,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 83.3% faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (33 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    33 W vs 18 W
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, while the average tablet does not. 9.9% of tablets support multithreading.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 71.8% more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 95% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (3.9 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    3.9 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • Supports multithreading
    This tablet supports multithreading, while the average tablet does not. 9.9% of tablets support multithreading.
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    Nvidia Tegra 3 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 71.8% more memory bandwidth
    This tablet has more memory bandwidth than the average tablet (25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has 14.9 GB/s of memory bandwidth.
    25.6 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (DDR3 vs LPDDR3).
    DDR3 vs LPDDR3
  • 8.3 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (18.4 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    18.4 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • More vivid contrast
    This tablet has more contrast than the average tablet (3000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    3,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 83.3% faster charging
    This tablet charges faster than the average tablet (33 W vs 18 W). The average tablet charges at 18 W.
    33 W vs 18 W
  • Supports HDMI output
    This tablet supports HDMI output, while the average tablet does not. 49.8% of tablets offer this.
  • 4 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1 MP vs 5 MP
  • 5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    5 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • 27.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    5.1

    Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.7

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (17)
    13 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.1 vs 7.0
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 45.7% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (120 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    120 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 27.1% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models

    5.1

    Mark 7.0 is below the typical mark 7.8 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    6.7

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (17)
    13 reviews: 7 with a printed score, 6 estimated from the review. 4 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    5.1 vs 7.0
  • 4.08x more expensive
    Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£1,060 vs £260).
    £1,060 vs £260
  • 33.3% worse value for money
    Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.66 vs 7.6).
    5.66 vs 7.55
  • More basic graphics
    This tablet has less advanced graphics than the average tablet (ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51).
    ULP GeForce vs Mali-G51
  • 2.86x larger process node
    This tablet has a larger process node than the average tablet (40 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    40 nm vs 14 nm
  • 69.2% lower multi-core score
    This tablet has a lower multi-core score than the average tablet (583 points vs 1,891 points). The average tablet scores 1,891 points in multi-core tests.
    583 points vs 1,891 points
  • 50% less internal storage
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 6 years older
    This tablet was released earlier than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    April 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 266 MHz slower RAM speed
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1,866 MHz.
    1,600 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • 45.7% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (120 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    120 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 101 nits dimmer screen
    This tablet is dimmer than the average tablet (300 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    300 nits vs 401 nits
  • 100 nits lower typical brightness
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (300 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    300 nits vs 400 nits
  • Less sharp display
    This tablet has a less sharp screen than the average tablet (1920×1080 vs 1920×1200).
    1,920×1,080 vs 1,920×1,200
  • 4 MP lower front resolution
    This tablet has a lower-resolution front camera than the average tablet (1 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    1 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No tap-to-focus
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, while the average tablet does. 83% of tablets support touch autofocus.
  • No HDR photo mode
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.8% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No burst mode
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.6% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No backside-illuminated sensor
    This tablet does not have a BSI sensor, while the average tablet does. 52.6% of tablets have a BSI sensor.
  • 5 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (5 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    5 hours vs 10 hours
  • 22.3% smaller battery capacity
    This tablet has a smaller battery capacity than the average tablet (5,130 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    5,130 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • No USB-C port
    This tablet does not have a USB Type-C port, while the average tablet does. 54% of tablets have one.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    This tablet has an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (3 vs 5).
    3 vs 5
  • Older Wi-Fi standard
    This tablet has an older Wi-Fi standard than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    This tablet does not include GPS, while the average tablet does. 82.9% of tablets include GPS.
  • No face recognition
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56.4% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Less advanced operating system
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Windows 8 vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Windows 8 vs Android
  • No split-screen
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.8% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61.4% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera and mic privacy
    This tablet does not support camera and mic privacy, while the average tablet does. 56.6% of tablets offer this.
  • No full-page screenshots
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 53% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    This tablet does not support dark mode, while the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets offer this.
  • No offline voice recognition
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.4% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 4.9x heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (2,400 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    2,400 g vs 490 g
  • 10 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (18 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    18 mm vs 8 mm
  • 94 mm taller
    This tablet is taller than the average tablet (294 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200 mm tall.
    294 mm vs 200 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

6.0
techradar.com
≈ estimated
11/01/2013
Hands-on test · Hybrid desktop tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AiO is an odd home hybrid that runs Windows 8 and Jelly Bean, but its 18.4-inch tablet is too unwieldy for everyday carrying.
8.0
expertreviews.co.uk
✓ explicit
07/03/2013
Expert review · Hybrid all-in-one PC
Verdict
The Asus Transformer P1801 is a technically impressive all-in-one, but its reflective tablet screen and unclear niche make it hard to recommend to most buyers.
5.0
timescolonist.com
≈ estimated
10/04/2013
Review · Oversized home tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AiO is a home-only hybrid, a huge tablet that is too heavy to carry out and lasts only about five hours.
6.0
uk.pcmag.com
≈ estimated
16/05/2014
Review · Hybrid all-in-one desktop
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AIO is an innovative hybrid that lets you move work from desktop to tablet, but two platforms in one device suit early adopters only.
7.0
pcmag.com
✓ explicit
07/03/2013
Lab review · Windows and Android hybrid
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AIO is a promising mix of desktop and tablet, but its quirks suit early adopters rather than mainstream buyers.
5.0
firstpost.com
≈ estimated
04/06/2013
Hands-on review · Windows and Android PC
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AiO is a great concept, but at 6.5 kg it is too bulky to carry, and an iPad plus a regular PC makes more sense.
4.0
digit.in
≈ estimated
02/08/2013
Hands-on review · Windows and Android hybrid
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AiO P1801 is muddled: its remote-screen tablet works, but the weak base PC and lag make it a poor buy.
5.0
chip.de
≈ estimated
14/01/2014
Lab test · Hybrid PC tablet
Verdict
The Asus Transformer P1801 combines a Windows PC and Android tablet, but its weak screen, average speed and bulky tablet make a plain all-in-one the better buy.
6.0
bilanz.ch
✓ explicit
19/04/2013
Crash test · Giant hybrid PC
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AiO P1801 is a bold concept that works surprisingly well, but its bulk and reflective HD screen suit early adopters, not mainstream buyers.
6.0
bilanz.ch
✓ explicit
19/04/2013
Crash test · Giant hybrid PC
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AiO P1801 is a bold concept that works surprisingly well, but its bulk and reflective HD screen suit early adopters, not mainstream buyers.
5.8
01net.com
✓ explicit
09/04/2013
Hands-on test · Dual-OS all-in-one
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AiO is an original PC and detachable 18.4-inch Android tablet, but its tablet screen and single DVD burner disappoint for the price.
9.0
geeknetic.es
✓ explicit
25/03/2013
Full review · Hybrid all-in-one PC
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AIO is a versatile all-in-one that switches to Android in about a second and runs its tablet smoothly, though its mouse scroll is hard to control.
7.0
tweakers.net
✓ explicit
29/03/2013
Lab test · Desktop and tablet hybrid
Verdict
The Asus Transformer AiO P1801 has strong graphics for an all-in-one, but it runs slower than rival desktops in practice, and its tablet part struggles with demanding games.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB)

  • Innovative dual-operating system design (Windows 8 and Android)
  • High-quality 18.4-inch IPS display with wide viewing angles
  • Seamless switching between environments via a dedicated button
  • Strong desktop performance with Intel Core processors and discrete graphics
  • Useful remote desktop capability (Splashtop) for using Windows around the house
  • Excellent built-in SonicMaster speakers for an All-in-One PC

What customers don't like about Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB)

  • Extremely heavy and unwieldy for use as a handheld tablet (2.5kg)
  • Significant lag and connectivity issues when streaming Windows 8 over Wi-Fi
  • Highly reflective 'mirror-like' screen finish causing glare
  • Mediocre battery life in tablet mode (roughly 4-5 hours)
  • Inconsistent software experience between the two unique ecosystems
  • Ergonomics of the included flat-design mouse are poor for larger hands

Verdict

The Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB) is a unique 18.4-inch hybrid that functions as both a Windows 8 all-in-one desktop and a standalone Android 4.1 tablet. The PC station base houses an Intel Core i5-3350P quad-core processor (3.1GHz), 8GB of DDR3 RAM, a 1TB HDD, and NVIDIA GeForce GT 730M graphics, while the detachable 1080p IPS display operates independently as a tablet via an NVIDIA Tegra 3 quad-core processor with 2GB of RAM and 32GB of flash storage. Main pros include its innovative dual-OS switching capability, high-quality 10-point multi-touch screen with wide viewing angles, and the ability to remotely stream the Windows desktop over Wi-Fi. However, significant cons include its heavy 2.4kg tablet weight, limited five-hour battery life, and occasional lag when using the remote desktop feature.

Compare Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Asus Transformer AiO P1801 (8GB + 1TB) and other tablets

No results found