OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:8 GBScreen size:10.1 inchesChipset:Rockchip RK3188

Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

4.6

Overall score

Score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

90%

4.9

Technical score

10%

1.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of tablets
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

5.0

Camera

14%

2.6

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

5.2

Software & Features

5%

5.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 89% of tablets
1.9

User score

User score
1.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

2.0

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 99% of tablets
  • archos-101-neon-1gb-8gb
  • archos-101-neon-1gb-8gb
  • archos-101-neon-1gb-8gb
  • archos-101-neon-1gb-8gb
archos-101-neon-1gb-8gb
archos-101-neon-1gb-8gb
archos-101-neon-1gb-8gb
archos-101-neon-1gb-8gb

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 8GB1GB + 16GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Score components:

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

6.2

Display

16%

5.0

Camera

14%

2.6

Battery

12%

5.8

Connectivity

8%

5.2

Software & Features

5%

5.1

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

4.9
User score
User score
1.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

2.0

User ratings

30%

1.7

Number of reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
1.9
Popularity
Popularity
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Popularity:
Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) has a popularity of 1.7 points, which is higher than 63.5% of Tablets.
1.7
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

60%

4.6

Overall score

40%

9.8

Price

6.2
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
8 GB
Internal storage
8 GB
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 8 GB which is smaller than the storage of 93.5% of tablets and equal to that of 4.9% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Rockchip RK3188
Chipset
Rockchip RK3188
â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
This tablet uses the Rockchip RK3188 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 95.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1024×600
Screen resolution
1024×600
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1024×600 which is lower than that of 92.8% of tablets and equal to that of 6.2% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
118 ppi
Pixel density
118 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 118 ppi which is lower than that of 99.3% of tablets and equal to that of 0.5% of tablets.
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
Display glass type
Tempered Glass
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
This tablet uses Tempered Glass display glass which is weaker than that on 78.1% of tablets and equal to that on 19.5% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 0.3 MP which is lower than in 93% of tablets and equal to that in 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
Battery capacity
5,000 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 69.8% of tablets and equal to those in 2% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
6 hours
Battery life
6 hours
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6 hours, which is shorter than that of 92% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
?
Weight
690 g
Weight
690 g
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 690 g which is heavier than 87.9% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
â–¼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 2x cheaper
    Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£130 vs £260).
    £130 vs £260
  • 39 mm shorter
    Width
    161.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (161 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    161.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 2x cheaper
    Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£130 vs £260).
    £130 vs £260
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 39 mm shorter
    Width
    161.0 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (161 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    161.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-400 MP2
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-400 MP2 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-400 MP2 vs Mali-G51
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1024×600
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×600 vs 1920×1200
  • 47.3% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    118 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (118 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    118 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 4.17x lower user score
    User score
    1.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Archos 101 Neon
    the average tablet
    Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (1.92 vs 8.000).
    1.92 vs 8
  • 14.5% worse value for money
    Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.2 vs 7.1).
    6.2 vs 7.1
  • 2.79x less popular
    Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) is less popular than the average tablet (1.73 vs 4.8).
    1.73 vs 4.81
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-400 MP2
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-400 MP2 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-400 MP2 vs Mali-G51
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 30% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 87.5% less storage
    Internal storage
    8 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (8 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    8 GB vs 64 GB
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1024×600
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×600 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×600 vs 1920×1200
  • 47.3% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    118 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (118 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    118 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • Less durable display glass
    Display glass type
    Tempered Glass
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    This tablet uses weaker display glass than the average tablet (Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass). Display glass choice still varies across tablets.
    Tempered Glass vs Corning Gorilla Glass
  • 103 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    118 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (118 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    118 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • 24% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    5,000 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    5,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No Ethernet support
    Ethernet support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No voice command support
    Voice commands
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    This tablet does not support voice commands, the average tablet does. 96.3% of tablets include voice command support.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 40.8% heavier
    Weight
    690 g
    â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (690 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    690 g vs 490 g
  • 4.1 mm thicker
    Thickness
    12.1 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (12.1 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    12.1 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 96.7 mm wider
    Width
    272 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (272 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    272 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 5 older release date
    Release date
    2014
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    2014 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hifitest.de
Unknown
Summary of the review
technische Daten Tablets - Archos 101 Neon - Test
(Translated)Show original
T
test-achats.be
N/A
Summary of the review
Test ARCHOS 101e Neon - Testachats
(Translated)Show original
L
leclaireur.fnac.com
18/12/2016
Summary of the review
Test Labo de l'Archos 101e Neon: rien pour plaire
(Translated)Show original
Q
quechoisir.org
N/A
Summary of the review
Test Archos 101 Neon - Tablette tactile - Archive
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
22/10/2011
Summary of the review
Archos 101 Internet Tablet - Reviews - Tweakers (User review for Archos 101 Neon included in list)
(Translated)Show original
T
test-aankoop.be
No date provided
Summary of the review
ARCHOS 101E NEON test en review - Testaankoop
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
No date provided
Summary of the review
Archos 101 Neon - Test, Reviews & Prijzen - Consumentenbond
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 1 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB)

  • Large 10.1-inch display suitable for video and web browsing
  • Excellent connectivity options including Mini-HDMI output and full USB 2.0 host support
  • Expandable storage via microSD slot (up to 64GB supported)
  • Affordable price point compared to contemporary high-end tablets
  • Capable of playing various video file formats natively without conversion
  • Features built-in stereo speakers and a dedicated kickstand for media viewing

What we don't like about Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB)

  • Low screen resolution (1024x600) leads to less sharp text and images
  • Poor viewing angles and screen visibility issues under direct light
  • Performance can be sluggish or prone to freezing when multitasking
  • Low-quality cameras with significant visual noise in photos and video
  • Proprietary wall adapter required for charging instead of standard micro-USB
  • Lacks the official Google Play Store out of the box, requiring a manual workaround
  • Build quality feels somewhat flimsy with a plastic casing that can creak

Verdict

The Archos 101 Neon is a budget-oriented 10.1-inch tablet featuring a 1024 x 600 resolution capacitive display and running on Android 4.2 Jelly Bean. Under the hood, it is powered by a 1.4 GHz quad-core A9 processor paired with 1GB of RAM and 8GB of internal storage, which is expandable up to 64GB via a microSD slot. Key advantages include its mini-HDMI output for connecting to external displays, full access to the Google Play Store, and a lightweight design for its size at approximately 690g. However, it is held back by a relatively low-resolution screen for a 10-inch device, a modest 5000 mAh battery offering limited endurance, and the absence of a high-quality rear camera, typically featuring only a basic front-facing VGA sensor.

Compare Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Archos 101 Neon (1GB + 8GB) and other tablets

No results found