OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v3.0
Tablets Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Tablets Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Tablets Methodology v3.0

AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB) review: 168 specs compared

Avg. price:~£330RAM capacity:8 GBInternal storage:256 GBScreen size:11 inchesChipset:MediaTek Helio G99

AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and 16 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB)
7.4/10

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, expert reviews and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 35%, List score 30%, Reviews score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

35%

7.1

Technical score

30%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

25%

8.2

Reviews score

10%

?

Sentiment scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 6.9, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 71% of tablets
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

â–²Better than 64%
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

22%

7.3

Performance

20%

6.6

Display

16%

8.2

Camera

14%

5.4

Battery

12%

6.7

Connectivity

8%

8.7

Software

5%

6.8

Design

3%

7.5

Audio

â–²Better than 70%
8.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

8.2

Popularity

Grades by review (16)
9 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–²Better than 74%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 30% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
  • agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
  • agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
  • agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
  • agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
  • agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
  • agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
agm-pad-p2-active-8gb-256gb-wifi
Where to buy
    N/A~ £330
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

Based on 9 · 7

Reviewers praise the tough build and solid performance, but dislike the camera image quality and the heavy, bulky size.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 35% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

22%

7.3

Performance

20%

6.6

Display

16%

8.2

Camera

14%

5.4

Battery

12%

6.7

Connectivity

8%

8.7

Software

5%

6.8

Design

3%

7.5

Audio

7.1
Reviews score
8.2
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the tablet's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a tablet with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components:

70%

7.4

Overall score

30%

8.8

Price

7.8
RAM capacity
8 GB
Market range: <1 GB – >8 GB
This tablet has 8 GB of RAM, which is more than 72.1% of tablets and equal to 17.9% of tablets.
Process node
6 nm
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 6 nm process, which is smaller than 76.1% of tablets and equal to 8.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
256 GB
Market range: <16 GB – >256 GB
This tablet has 256 GB of internal storage, which is more than 76.4% of tablets and equal to 15.8% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core score
729 points
Market range: <233 points – >2.3k points
This tablet scores 729 points in single-core tests, which is higher than 47.7% of tablets and equal to 2.9% of tablets.
Chipset
MediaTek Helio G99
This tablet runs on MediaTek Helio G99, which is less advanced than 50.8% of tablets and equal to 2.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Screen resolution
1920×1200
This tablet has a 1920×1200 screen, which is sharper than 39.1% of tablets and equal to 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
90 Hz
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet has a 90 Hz screen, which is smoother than 73.5% of tablets and equal to 6.7% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
206 ppi
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 206 ppi, which is lower than 60.7% of tablets and equal to 1.2% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Optical image stabilization
no
This tablet does not support optical stabilisation. 0.4% of tablets offer this.
Main camera megapixels
50 MP
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a rear camera with 50 MP resolution, which is higher than 97.6% of tablets and equal to 2% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
8 MP
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera with 8 MP resolution, which is higher than 69.6% of tablets and equal to 19.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.0
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.0, which is wider than 57.4% of tablets and equal to 24.7% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
This tablet has 1xx optical zoom, which is stronger than 18.2% of tablets and equal to 80.9% of tablets.
Show more
What reviewers say
Battery capacity
8,000 mAh
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has 8,000 mAh battery capacity, which is larger than 70.2% of tablets and equal to 4% of tablets.
Charging speed
20 W
Market range: <10 W – >45 W
This tablet charges at 20 W, which is faster than 60.4% of tablets and equal to 6.2% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Market range: <7 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets offer this.
Fast charging
yes
This tablet supports fast charging. 43.2% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
LTE support
no
This tablet does not have built-in LTE. 42.9% of tablets offer this.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This tablet connects to Wi-Fi. 0.2% of tablets offer this.
GPS
yes
This tablet has built-in GPS. 17.1% of tablets offer this.
5G connectivity
no
This tablet does not support 5G. 8.1% of tablets offer this.
NFC
no
This tablet does not include NFC. 10.8% of tablets offer this.
Show more
Operating system
Android
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.2%.
Update support duration
medium
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.6% of tablets and equal to that of 32.4% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
This tablet supports direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets offer this.
On-device AI
?
App tracking protection
no
This tablet does not support app tracking protection. 28.4% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say
IP rating
IP68/IP69K
This tablet's IP rating is IP68/IP69K, which is more protected than 98.3% of tablets and the same as 1.7% of tablets.
Weight
565 g
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 565 g, which is heavier than 67.6% of tablets and equal to 0.8% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.7% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
What reviewers say
Number of microphones
2
Market range: <1 – >3
This tablet has a microphone array of 2, which is more than 55.1% of tablets and equal to 32.7% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this.
Dolby Atmos support
no
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.3% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This tablet includes 4 speakers, which is more than in 70.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 22.9% of tablets.
FM radio
yes
This tablet includes an FM radio. 81.1% of tablets offer this.
Show more
What reviewers say

AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftwareDesignAudio
  • 42 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (50 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 50% faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP68/IP69K vs not rated).
    IP68/IP69K vs not rated
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 17.1% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.4 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 74% of models

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.2

    Popularity

    Grades by review (16)
    9 reviews: 6 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 7 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.2 vs 7.0
  • 4x more internal storage
    This tablet has more internal storage than the average tablet (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet has 64 GB of internal storage.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Faster storage type
    This tablet uses UFS storage, while the average tablet uses eMMC. Storage technology still varies widely across tablets.
    UFS vs eMMC
  • 4 GB more RAM
    This tablet has more RAM than the average tablet (8 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    8 GB vs 4 GB
  • More advanced chipset
    This tablet has a more advanced chipset than the average tablet (MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A).
    MediaTek Helio G99 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 57.1% smaller process node
    This tablet has a smaller process node than the average tablet (6 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet is built on 14 nm.
    6 nm vs 14 nm
  • More advanced memory type
    This tablet uses more advanced memory than the average tablet (LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3).
    LPDDR4X vs LPDDR3
  • 5 years newer
    This tablet was released more recently than the average tablet (2024 vs 2019). The average tablet was released in 2019.
    July 2024
    2024 vs 2019
  • 10% higher CPU speed
    This tablet has a higher CPU speed than the average tablet (2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    2.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • More advanced graphics
    This tablet has more advanced graphics than the average tablet (ARM Mali-G57 MC2 vs Mali-G51).
    ARM Mali-G57 MC2 vs Mali-G51
  • 50% faster refresh rate
    This tablet has a faster refresh rate than the average tablet (90 Hz vs 60 Hz). The average tablet has a 60 Hz refresh rate.
    90 Hz vs 60 Hz
  • 80 nits higher typical brightness
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (480 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    480 nits vs 400 nits
  • 0.9 inches larger screen
    This tablet has a larger screen than the average tablet (11 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet measures 10.1 inches.
    11 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 79 nits brighter screen
    This tablet is brighter than the average tablet (480 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits.
    480 nits vs 401 nits
  • 42 MP higher rear resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution rear camera than the average tablet (50 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a rear camera of 8 MP.
    50 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 MP higher front resolution
    This tablet has a higher-resolution front camera than the average tablet (8 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has a front camera of 5 MP.
    8 MP vs 5 MP
  • Supports PDAF
    This tablet supports PDAF, the average tablet does not. 28% of tablets support PDAF.
  • Manual focus control
    This tablet supports manual focus, while the average tablet does not. 36.9% of tablets support manual focus.
  • Wider main camera aperture
    This tablet has a wider main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2 vs f/2.2). The average tablet's main camera aperture is f/2.2.
    f/2.0 vs f/2.2
  • Built-in camera flash
    This tablet has a camera flash, while the average tablet does not. 45.5% of tablets have one.
  • 21.2% larger battery capacity
    This tablet has a larger battery capacity than the average tablet (8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh). The average tablet offers 6,600 mAh of battery capacity.
    8,000 mAh vs 6,600 mAh
  • Newer Bluetooth version
    This tablet has a newer Bluetooth version than the average tablet (5.2 vs 5).
    5.2 vs 5
  • Supports app offloading
    This tablet supports app offloading, while the average tablet does not. 26.3% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports dynamic themes
    This tablet supports dynamic themes, while the average tablet does not. 29.5% of tablets offer this.
  • Supports extra dim mode
    This tablet supports extra dim mode, while the average tablet does not. 35.9% of tablets offer this.
  • Includes clipboard warnings
    This tablet has clipboard warnings, the average tablet does not. 40.3% of tablets include clipboard warnings.
    paste warning
  • More dust and water protection
    This tablet offers better dust and water protection than the average tablet (IP68/IP69K vs not rated).
    IP68/IP69K vs not rated
  • 2 more speakers
    This tablet has more speakers than the average tablet (4 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    4 vs 2
  • 1 more microphones
    This tablet has more microphones than the average tablet (2 vs 1). The average tablet's microphone count is 1.
    2 vs 1
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 15.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (565 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    565 g vs 490 g
  • 1.3 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.3 mm vs 8 mm
  • 83.07 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (258.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    258.37 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 6.8% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (206 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    206 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • 6.8% softer screen detail
    This tablet has softer screen detail than the average tablet (206 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has a pixel density of 221 ppi.
    206 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • No manual exposure control
    This tablet does not support manual exposure, while the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets support manual exposure.
  • No panorama mode
    This tablet does not support panorama mode, while the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets support panorama mode.
  • No timelapse video
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, while the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets support timelapse video.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 15.3% heavier
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (565 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    565 g vs 490 g
  • 1.3 mm thicker
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (9.3 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8 mm thick.
    9.3 mm vs 8 mm
  • 83.07 mm wider
    This tablet is wider than the average tablet (258.4 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    258.37 mm vs 175.3 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
TechieViewVideo
≈ estimated
16/11/2025
Hands-on review · several months of use and outdoor tests
Verdict
AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi is a well-rounded, reliable tablet, best suited to simple outdoor use rather than everything.
8.0
Tech Brothers
≈ estimated
03/05/2025
Hands-on review · benchmarks, games, camera and battery
Verdict
AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi is a good all-round tablet with excellent battery life and a useful rear ring, though nothing really stands out.
8.0
Tech Man Pat
≈ estimated
17/08/2024
Hands-on review · performance, camera and build impressions
Verdict
AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi is chunky and sometimes slow, with poor photos, but it offers great build quality and good value for the money.
9.0
TechMagnet
≈ estimated
12/08/2024
Hands-on review · setup, display and camera tests
Verdict
AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi is a great rugged tablet with smooth performance and clean software, and especially good value for its price.
9.0
Tech Guy Beau
≈ estimated
09/08/2024
Hands-on review · durability, water, gaming and screen tests
Verdict
AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi is a nice rugged tablet for the price, with a good screen, loud speakers and fine gaming performance.
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
techradar.com
✓ explicit
30/07/2024
Hands-on test · Rugged tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 Active is a useful, cheap rugged tablet, though its oversized case is clumsy to remove and makes charging awkward.
8.0
chinamobilemag.de
✓ explicit
08/08/2024
Hands-on test · Rugged tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 Active is a well-built metal tablet that turns rugged with its case, but the case makes it heavy and the screen washes out in direct sun.
8.0
heise.de
✓ explicit
28/10/2024
Lab test · Rugged tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 Active is a tough, sharp-screened outdoor tablet, but poor photos, short battery life and a steep premium over the basic model hold it back.
8.6
basic-tutorials.de
✓ explicit
08/05/2024
Lab test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 is a well-built tablet with IP68 protection and a crisp 90Hz screen, but slow 18-watt charging and a weak camera are its trade-offs.
9.0
zdnet.fr
≈ estimated
01/08/2024
Hands-on test · Android tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 is a good everyday Android tablet with smooth apps, long battery life and a bright screen, but its cover feels fragile.
8.0
metatrone.fr
≈ estimated
25/07/2024
Hands-on test · Budget tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 suits buyers who want a sturdy, long-lasting tablet for daily use, but it struggles in direct sun and its camera is blurry.
8.5
geektopia.es
✓ explicit
02/05/2024
Hands-on test · LTE tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 is a balanced everyday tablet with Android 14, LTE and smooth performance, though its 400 nits screen struggles in sunlight.
8.0
tuttoandroid.net
≈ estimated
05/08/2024
Hands-on test · Rugged tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 Active is a solid tablet that turns rugged with its included case, but its photos are poor and its software is cluttered.
8.6
tuttoandroid.net
✓ explicit
22/05/2024
Hands-on test · Home and study tablet
Verdict
The AGM Pad P2 is a solid tablet for home and study, with fast performance and long battery life, but its face unlock is too basic for banking apps.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • Exceptional durability with IP68/IP69K ratings and a robust removable case
  • Smooth 90Hz refresh rate on an 11-inch FHD+ display
  • Great value for money with decent performance for general tasks and light gaming
  • Clean Android 14 operating system with zero bloatware
  • Practical accessories included, such as a 360-degree rotating hand strap and shoulder strap
  • Widevine L1 support allowing for 1080p streaming on platforms like Amazon Prime

What customers don't like about AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB)

  • Awkward charging port access due to the thick protective case
  • Significant weight (approx. 1.08 kg with case), making it tiring for long handheld use
  • Initial software issues with streaming apps like Netflix, though patches have been released
  • Unreliable magnetometer/compass, making it poor for precision navigation
  • Camera sensor placement can lead to fingers accidentally obscuring the lens
  • Limited third-party accessory availability such as custom screen protectors

Verdict

The AGM Pad P2 Active is a rugged 11-inch Android 14 tablet powered by a MediaTek Helio G99 octa-core processor, featuring 8GB of physical RAM (expandable to 16GB via virtual memory) and 256GB of internal storage. Its standout characteristics include a durable, removable protective case meeting IP68, IP69K, and MIL-STD-810H standards for water and shock resistance, a 90Hz FHD+ IPS display with 480 nits brightness, and a quad-speaker system. Key pros are its affordable price point, Widevine L1 certification for HD streaming, and the inclusion of a 360-degree rotating stand and shoulder strap. Notable cons include a bulky weight exceeding 1kg with the case on, a camera sensor placement that is easily obscured by fingers in landscape mode, and a charging port flap that some users find difficult to access.

Compare AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AGM Pad P2 Active WiFi (8GB + 256GB) and other tablets

No results found