OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:16 GBScreen size:7.9 inchesChipset:MediaTek MT8125

Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.1

Overall score

Score
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

90%

4.8

Technical score

10%

7.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 88% of tablets
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.3

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

5.1

Software & Features

5%

6.0

Design

3%

3.9

Audio & Multimedia

â–¼Worse than 93% of tablets
7.6

User score

User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on 207 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 71% of tablets
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
  • acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi
acer-iconia-tab-a1-810-1gb-16gb-wifi

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 16GB1GB + 8GBCheck price
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components:

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

4.8

Display

16%

5.4

Camera

14%

3.3

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

5.1

Software & Features

5%

6.0

Design

3%

3.9

Audio & Multimedia

4.8
User score
User score
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Score components

70%

8.1

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on 207 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.6
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models
Popularity:
Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) has a user popularity of 6.6 points, which is lower than 65% of Tablets.
6.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

60%

5.1

Overall score

40%

9.6

Price

6.4
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
28 nm
Process node
28 nm
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 28 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 64.7% of tablets and equal to the node used in 17.8% of tablets.
Internal storage
16 GB
Internal storage
16 GB
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 16 GB which is smaller than the storage of 78.5% of tablets and equal to that of 15% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
MediaTek MT8125
Chipset
MediaTek MT8125
â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
This tablet uses the MediaTek MT8125 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 94% of tablets and equal to those in 0.5% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1024×768
Screen resolution
1024×768
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1024×768 which is lower than that of 90.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2.3% of tablets.
Refresh rate
?
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
162 ppi
Pixel density
162 ppi
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 162 ppi which is lower than that of 82.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
â–² Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
Main camera megapixels
5 MP
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 5 MP which is lower than that of 63.6% of tablets and equal to that of 26% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 0.3 MP which is lower than in 93% of tablets and equal to that in 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
â–² Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
4,960 mAh
Battery capacity
4,960 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 4,960 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 72.1% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
8 hours
Battery life
8 hours
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 8 hours, which is shorter than that of 72.2% of tablets and equal to that of 11.9% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
â–¼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
â–² Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
â–¼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
â–² Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
â–¼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
410 g
Weight
410 g
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 410 g which is lighter than 74.1% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.1% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
â–¼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
â–² Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
â–¼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
â–¼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
1
N. of speakers
1
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 1 speakers, which is fewer than in 90.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 9.6% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
â–¼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 16.3% lighter
    Weight
    410 g
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (410 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    410 g vs 490 g
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 54.3 mm shorter
    Width
    145.7 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (145.7 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    145.7 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 29.6 mm narrower
    Width
    145.7 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (145.7 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    145.7 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • Supports slow-motion recording
    Slow-motion recording
    yes
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    This tablet supports slow-motion recording, the average tablet does not. 37.5% of tablets offer slow-mo.
  • 16.3% lighter
    Weight
    410 g
    â–² Better than 74% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (410 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    410 g vs 490 g
  • 54.3 mm shorter
    Width
    145.7 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (145.7 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    145.7 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 29.6 mm narrower
    Width
    145.7 mm
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (145.7 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    145.7 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1024×768
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×768 vs 1920×1200
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 116 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    284 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (284 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    284 nits vs 400 nits
  • 10.5% worse value for money
    Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.42 vs 7.1).
    6.42 vs 7.1
  • 4.6% lower user score
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.65 vs 8.000).
    7.65 vs 8
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 40% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.2 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.2 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 75% less storage
    Internal storage
    16 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (16 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    16 GB vs 64 GB
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    PowerVR SGX544
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the PowerVR SGX544 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR SGX544 vs Mali-G51
  • 2x larger process node
    Process node
    28 nm
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (28 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    28 nm vs 14 nm
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • 71.4% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    4.26 GB/s
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (4.3 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    4.26 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 2 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    2
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (2 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    2 vs 4
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1024×768
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1024×768 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1024×768 vs 1920×1200
  • 116 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    285 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (285 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    285 nits vs 401 nits
  • 116 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    284 nits
    â–¼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (284 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    284 nits vs 400 nits
  • 27.7% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    162 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (162 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    162 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 2.2 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7.9 inches
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7.9 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7.9 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 59 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    162 ppi
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (162 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    162 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 3 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    5 MP
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (5 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    5 MP vs 8 MP
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 2 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    8 hours
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (8 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    8 hours vs 10 hours
  • 24.6% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    4,960 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (4960 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    4,960 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This tablet supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average tablet (2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz). The average tablet supports 2.4GHz/5GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4GHz vs 2.4GHz/5GHz
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    7.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi
    the average tablet
    Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 3.1 mm thicker
    Thickness
    11.1 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (11.1 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    11.1 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • 6 older release date
    Release date
    2013
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2013 vs 2019).
    May 2013
    2013 vs 2019
  • 1 fewer speakers
    N. of speakers
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This tablet has less speakers than the average tablet (1 vs 2). The average tablet has 2 speakers.
    1 vs 2

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
thetravelhack.com
14/10/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1 tablet review: A perfect tablet for travelling
T
techradar.com
26/11/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1 review - TechRadar
A
androidheadlines.com
06/07/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Acer Iconia A1-810 Tablet – The 4:3 Tablet You Never Knew You Wanted
K
kitguru.net
19/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810 8 inch Tablet Review
C
coolsmartphone.com
19/08/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810 tablet - Review - Coolsmartphone
E
expertreviews.co.uk
30/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1 Review
T
theregister.com
13/06/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810: The Android tab longing for eight-inch Apple action
P
pocket-lint.com
09/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810 review - Pocket-lint
C
cnet.com
14/10/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810 review: An affordable, forgettable 8-inch tablet
K
kitguru.net
19/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810 8 inch Tablet Review | KitGuru
T
theregister.com
13/06/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810: The Android tab longing for eight-inch Apple ...
C
computerwoche.de
05/11/2013
Summary of the review
Android-Tablet: Acer Iconia Tab A1-810 im Test
(Translated)Show original
N
n-tv.de
27/08/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1 im Test
(Translated)Show original
H
hardwareluxx.de
19/06/2013
Summary of the review
Test: Acer Iconia A1-810 - günstig und schnell
(Translated)Show original
P
pcwelt.de
17/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia Tab A1-810 im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
06/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1: Test des Android-Tablets
(Translated)Show original
N
netzwelt.de
18/06/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1 im Test
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
28/06/2013
Summary of the review
Test Acer Iconia A1-810 Tablet
(Translated)Show original
H
hifitest.de
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Test - technische Daten Tablets - Acer Iconia A1-810
(Translated)Show original
F
frandroid.com
26/05/2014
Summary of the review
Test de la Acer Iconia A1, une tablette d'entrée de gamme
(Translated)Show original
M
minimachines.net
14/05/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810 : première prise en main convaincante pour la tablette 7.9″
(Translated)Show original
L
lemondenumerique.ouest-france.fr
12/05/2013
Summary of the review
Test de la tablette tactile Acer Iconia A1-810 sous Android
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
20/06/2013
Summary of the review
Test : La tablette Iconia A1 d'Acer sous Android offre un rapport qualité-prix bluffant
(Translated)Show original
X
xatakandroid.com
16/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1, análisis
(Translated)Show original
S
smartworld.it
22/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1, la recensione completa
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
05/08/2013
Summary of the review
Acers Iconia Tab A1: vreemde eend in de bijt
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
16/06/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810(www.tabletguide.nl) | 2013 | Acer Iconia Tab A1-810 review en specificaties
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
16/07/2013
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia A1-810 Zwart - Productreview
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 207 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
Based on 5 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

  • Affordable price point offering good value for a budget tablet
  • The 7.9-inch 4:3 aspect ratio screen is well-suited for web browsing and reading PDFs
  • Includes a micro-HDMI port and microSD slot for expandable storage, features often missing in competitors
  • Smooth and 'zippy' performance for general tasks like email and light browsing due to the quad-core processor
  • Stock or near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware
  • Respectable battery life, often lasting 7-8 hours or more depending on usage

What we don't like about Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB)

  • Cameras (both front and rear) produce subpar, blurry, or washed-out images
  • Chunky and heavy design makes it less portable and uncomfortable to hold in one hand for long periods
  • Display resolution (1024x768) is lower than competitors like the Nexus 7, resulting in less sharp text
  • Single rear-facing speaker produces tinny or mediocre sound quality
  • Glossy screen has low maximum brightness, making it difficult to use in bright light
  • The 'Touch WakeApp' gesture feature is reported as unreliable or buggy by some users

Verdict

The Acer Iconia Tab A1-810 is a budget-friendly 7.9-inch tablet featuring a distinctive 4:3 aspect ratio IPS display with a resolution of 1024 x 768 pixels. It is powered by a 1.2GHz quad-core MediaTek MT8125 processor paired with 1GB of RAM and 16GB of internal storage, which is expandable via a dedicated microSD slot. Key characteristics include a 5-megapixel rear camera capable of 1080p video, a VGA front-facing camera, and a 4960mAh battery that typically provides over 8 hours of video playback. Main pros include its affordable price point, the inclusion of a micro-HDMI port for TV output, and a relatively stock Android 4.2 Jelly Bean experience that remains smooth for basic tasks like browsing and reading. However, notable cons include its bulky and plasticky build, a screen with lower pixel density (162 ppi) compared to rivals, and occasional performance struggles in intensive 3D games.

Compare Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Iconia Tab A1 810 WiFi (1GB + 16GB) and other tablets

No results found