OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£60RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:32 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:Intel Atom Z2560

Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.0

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Score components

90%

4.7

Technical score

10%

7.0

User score

▼Worse than 93% of tablets
4.7

Technical score

Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

2.1

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

5.2

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

6.0

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 95% of tablets
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

▼Worse than 85% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £60

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 8GBCheck price1GB + 16GBCheck price
Other versions:
1GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB)

Technical score
Technical score
4.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Score components:

22%

4.7

Performance

20%

5.0

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

2.1

Battery

12%

5.7

Connectivity

8%

5.2

Software & Features

5%

6.1

Design

3%

6.0

Audio & Multimedia

4.7
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

6.1

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

7.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 60% of models
Popularity:
Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) has a user popularity of 6.1 points, which is lower than 60.2% of Tablets.
6.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

60%

5.0

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.5
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
32 nm
Process node
32 nm
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 32 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 82.5% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.2% of tablets.
Internal storage
32 GB
Internal storage
32 GB
▼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 32 GB which is smaller than the storage of 60.5% of tablets and equal to that of 18% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Intel Atom Z2560
Chipset
Intel Atom Z2560
▼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet uses the Intel Atom Z2560 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 83.3% of tablets and equal to those in 0.7% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
Screen resolution
1280×800
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
216 ppi
Pixel density
216 ppi
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 216 ppi which is lower than that of 52.1% of tablets and equal to that of 3.8% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
▲ Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
Main camera megapixels
2 MP
▼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
This tablet has a main camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than that of 93.5% of tablets and equal to that of 5.6% of tablets.
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
0.3 MP
▼ Worse than 93% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 0.3 MP which is lower than in 93% of tablets and equal to that in 7% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
?
Optical zoom
N/A
Show more
Battery capacity
3,680 mAh
Battery capacity
3,680 mAh
▼ Worse than 91% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 3,680 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 91.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
6 hours
Battery life
6 hours
▼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 6 hours, which is shorter than that of 92% of tablets and equal to that of 2.6% of tablets.
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
no
LTE support
no
▼ Worse than 63% of models
This tablet does not support LTE. 63.3% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
▲ Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
no
Direct OS updates
no
▼ Worse than 80% of models
This tablet does not receive direct OS updates. 79.7% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
330 g
Weight
330 g
▲ Better than 87% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 330 g which is lighter than 86.7% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.5% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
no
Keyboard accessory
no
▼ Worse than 84% of models
This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory. 84.3% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
?
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • 32.7% lighter
    Weight
    330 g
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (330 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    330 g vs 490 g
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 55.3 mm narrower
    Width
    120 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (120 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    120 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 4.33x cheaper
    Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£60 vs £260).
    £60 vs £260
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    Repairability score (iFixit)
    8 points
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >10 points
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 4.33x cheaper
    Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) is cheaper than the average tablet (£60 vs £260).
    £60 vs £260
  • Supports multithreading
    Multithreading
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This tablet supports multithreading, the average tablet does not. 0.00% of tablets support multithreading.
  • 32.7% lighter
    Weight
    330 g
    ▲ Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (330 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    330 g vs 490 g
  • 55.3 mm narrower
    Width
    120 mm
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (120 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    120 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • 4 points higher iFixit repairability score
    Repairability score (iFixit)
    8 points
    ▲ Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <0 points – >10 points
    This tablet has a higher repairability score than the average tablet (8 points vs 4 points). The average tablet repairability score is 4 points.
    8 points vs 4 points
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 6 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 44.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,680 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3680 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    3,680 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • 14% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Iconia One 7
    the average tablet
    Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.02 vs 8.000).
    7.02 vs 8
  • 9.8% worse value for money
    Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.47 vs 7.1).
    6.47 vs 7.1
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 2.29x larger process node
    Process node
    32 nm
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (32 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    32 nm vs 14 nm
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    PowerVR SGX544MP2
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    This tablet uses the PowerVR SGX544MP2 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR SGX544MP2 vs Mali-G51
  • 20% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.6 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.6 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • 2 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    4
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (4 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    4 vs 6
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 50% less storage
    Internal storage
    32 GB
    ▼ Worse than 60% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
    This tablet has less internal storage than the average tablet (32 GB vs 64 GB). The average tablet provides 64 GB of internal storage.
    32 GB vs 64 GB
  • 38.5% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    400 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (400 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    400 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7 inches
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1280×800
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 47 nits lower typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    353 nits
    ▼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a lower typical brightness than the average tablet (353 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    353 nits vs 400 nits
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    943:1
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (943:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    943:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 3.6% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    216 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (216 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    216 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 4.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    0.3 MP
    ▼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (0.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    0.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • 6 MP lower main camera megapixels
    Main camera megapixels
    2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <3.15 MP – >13 MP
    This tablet has a lower-resolution main camera than the average tablet (2 MP vs 8 MP). The average tablet has a 8 MP main camera.
    2 MP vs 8 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No burst mode
    Serial shot / Burst mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support burst mode, the average tablet does. 60.5% of tablets support burst mode.
  • 4 hours shorter battery life
    Battery life
    6 hours
    ▼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers shorter battery life than the average tablet (6 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    6 hours vs 10 hours
  • 44.1% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    3,680 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (3680 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    3,680 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • No LTE support
    LTE support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet does not support LTE, the average tablet does. 63.2% of tablets support LTE.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No cellular module
    Cellular module
    no
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    This tablet does not have a cellular module, the average tablet does. 59.3% of tablets include a cellular module.
  • No HDMI output
    HDMI output
    no
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    This tablet does not have an HDMI output, the average tablet does. 50.1% of tablets support HDMI output.
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • No Ethernet support
    Ethernet support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not have Ethernet support, the average tablet does. 76.3% of tablets support Ethernet.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • Does not receive direct OS updates
    Direct OS updates
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not support direct OS updates, the average tablet does. 79.7% of tablets support direct OS updates.
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Acer Iconia One 7
    the average tablet
    Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • 2.2 mm thicker
    Thickness
    10.2 mm
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (10.2 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    10.2 mm vs 8.0 mm
  • No keyboard accessory
    Keyboard accessory
    no
    ▼ Worse than 84% of models
    This tablet does not support a keyboard accessory, the average tablet does. 84.2% of tablets support a keyboard accessory.
  • 5 older release date
    Release date
    2014
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2014 vs 2019).
    June 2014
    2014 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
coolsmartphone.com
06/10/2015
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 - Review - Coolsmartphone
U
uk.pcmag.com
13/06/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 Review - PCMag UK
T
techadvisor.com
30/04/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 hands-on review - Tech Advisor
N
notebookcheck.net
13/05/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Review
T
t3.com
04/08/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 review - T3
U
uk.pcmag.com
15/06/2017
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 (B1-780-K610) - Review 2017 - PCMag UK
E
expertreviews.co.uk
27/05/2015
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 B1-750 review - Expert Reviews
T
techradar.com
24/04/2015
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 review - TechRadar
P
pcmag.com
13/06/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 Review - PCMag
C
cnet.com
18/07/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 review: A cheap and meek 7-inch slate - CNET
T
trustedreviews.com
30/04/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 Review - Trusted Reviews
U
uk.pcmag.com
13/06/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 - PCMag.com
R
recombu.com
17/02/2015
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 (BT-750) Review: In Depth
N
notebookcheck.com
31/07/2014
Summary of the review
Test Acer Iconia One 7 B1-730 Tablet - Notebookcheck
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.com
01/01/2015
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 B1-750 - Notebookcheck.com Externe Tests
(Translated)Show original
W
welt.de
29/06/2014
Summary of the review
Iconia One 7: Wie gut ist das neue 99-Euro-Tablet von Acer? - Die Welt
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
25/06/2014
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7: Test des 99-Euro-Tablets - Computer Bild
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
30/04/2014
Summary of the review
Acer renouvelle ses tablettes 7" avec les Iconia One 7 et Tab 7 HD
(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
27/01/2015
Summary of the review
Video Review - Acer Iconia One 7 | LaptopMedia España
(Translated)Show original
L
laptopmedia.com
27/01/2015
Summary of the review
Video Review - Acer Iconia One 7
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
15/06/2017
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 B1-780 - Test, Reviews & Prijzen
(Translated)Show original
P
portablegear.nl
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 testen - PortableGear
(Translated)Show original
C
consumentenbond.nl
10/11/2015
Summary of the review
Acer Iconia One 7 B1-770 - Test, Reviews & Prijzen
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB)

  • Highly affordable and offers good value for the price
  • Unrestricted access to the Google Play Store, unlike competitors like Amazon Fire tablets
  • Lightweight and compact 7-inch design makes it very portable and easy to hold
  • Features a microSD card slot for expandable storage up to 32GB or 64GB depending on the model
  • Responsive touch screen and satisfactory performance for simple tasks like web browsing or reading
  • Robust parental controls and dedicated 'Kids Center' for child-friendly use

What we don't like about Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB)

  • Poor build quality with a flimsy plastic chassis that often creaks and flexes
  • Extremely subpar cameras that produce grainy, low-quality photos
  • Heavy amount of pre-installed bloatware that cannot be fully uninstalled and consumes storage
  • Mediocre battery life, typically lasting only 6–7 hours under moderate use
  • Sluggish performance and lag during multitasking or when playing demanding games
  • Display suffers from dull colors, poor contrast, and limited viewing angles

Verdict

The Acer Iconia One 7 is a compact 7-inch tablet featuring a 1280 x 800 (or 1024 x 600) IPS display, an Intel Atom Z2560 dual-core 1.6GHz processor (or MediaTek quad-core in later versions), 1GB of RAM, and 32GB of internal storage expandable via a microSD slot. Its main pros include a highly portable, lightweight design (approx. 320g–340g), a textured back for improved grip, and full access to the Google Play Store for a wide range of apps. However, it is frequently criticized for its short battery life (typically 5–7 hours), slow performance during multitasking or high-end gaming, and low-quality 0.3MP front and 2MP/5MP rear cameras.

Compare Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Acer Iconia One 7 (1GB + 32GB) and other tablets

No results found