Scored using Routers Methodology v3.0
Routers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Routers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Routers Methodology v3.0

ZTE MC888 review: 77 specs compared

Avg. price:~£200Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi speed:?LAN port speeds:10 GbpsMesh Wi-Fi:?

ZTE MC888 Review: Compare 77 technical specifications and 1 expert and video reviews to see how this product ranks in the Routers category and whether it is worth buying.

ZTE MC888
7.9/10

Overall score

Score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

8.2

Technical score

25%

7.7

Reviews score

25%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.9

Sentiment score

â–²Better than 74% of routers
8.3

Value for money

Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

â–²Better than 65%
8.2

Technical score

Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

26%

7.7

Wireless

20%

7.7

Ports

18%

9.2

Networking

14%

8.7

Security

12%

8.0

Hardware

10%

8.0

Management

â–²Better than 85%
7.7

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.4

Average grade

20%

5.0

Popularity

Grades by review (1)
1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
â–¼Worse than 61%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • zte-mc888
  • zte-mc888
  • zte-mc888
  • zte-mc888
  • zte-mc888
  • zte-mc888
zte-mc888
zte-mc888
zte-mc888
zte-mc888
zte-mc888
zte-mc888
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What owners say about the ZTE MC888

Based on 133 owners sharing their experience in online comments

20%positive24%mixed56%negative

Owners praise the fast downloads, while connection dropouts, weak reception and limited settings cause the most frustration.

What owners dislike

  • Several owners say the router randomly reboots, freezes or drops the connection, sometimes every 40 minutes, and can only be fixed by unplugging power.26
  • Several owners see speeds fall to a few Mbps in the evening or at peak times, and some get only 10 to 35 Mbps on 5G.22
  • Owners report the hack fails on band selection, the EARFCN field rejects 6-digit values, and some band options are missing from the menu.15
  • Several owners find the router does not connect to 5G at all, even with a strong nearby tower, and shows only 4G+ or limited service.13
  • Owners say the admin panel is very limited: no DNS setting, locked developer options, and a password prompt that blocks further settings.13
  • Owners report Wi-Fi that drops for about a minute, takes a long time to turn on after restart, or shows weak coverage compared with older routers.9
  • Owners say UPnP fails, NAT stays closed, and online games, Xbox party chat and remote play disconnect or fail to connect.9
  • Several owners report upload speeds of only 1 to 50 Mbps, far below their download speeds, even with a good 5G signal.5
  • Owners report slow speeds after months of use, locked accounts and support that is hard to reach, and routers that do not activate quickly.4
  • Some owners find the Wi-Fi password printed on the label is rejected, and new devices cannot join the network even with the correct password.3

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of router ZTE MC888

Technical score
Technical score
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

26%

7.7

Wireless

20%

7.7

Ports

18%

9.2

Networking

14%

8.7

Security

12%

8.0

Hardware

10%

8.0

Management

8.2
Reviews score
7.7
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

7.9

Overall score

30%

9.5

Price

8.3
Brand name
ZTE
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
This router uses Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), which is more advanced than 58.5% of routers and equal to 25.9% of routers.
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
This router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are more versatile than 24.2% of routers and equal to 65.6% of routers.
Wi-Fi speed
?
Channel widths supported
?
Show more
Wi-Fi security protocols
?
DoS protection
yes
This router includes DoS protection. 9.8% of routers include DoS protection.
SPI intrusion protection
yes
This router includes SPI-based intrusion protection. 4.7% of routers include SPI-based intrusion protection.
MAC address filtering
yes
This router supports MAC address filtering. 1.7% of routers include MAC address filtering.
URL filter
yes
This router supports URL filtering. 2.6% of routers include URL filtering.
Show more
IPv6 support
yes
This router supports IPv6. 8.8% of routers are IPv6-ready.
Dynamic routing
no
This router does not support dynamic routing. 46.2% of routers support dynamic routing.
Inter-VLAN routing
?
VLAN tagging
?
QoS
yes
This router includes QoS controls. 2.4% of routers include QoS controls.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
?
LAN port speeds
10 Gbps
This router offers 10 Gbps on its LAN ports, which is faster than 96% of routers and on par with 1.5% of routers.
N. of WAN ports
?
N. of USB ports
?
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
This router does not support Power over Ethernet (PoE). 1.7% of routers can be powered over Ethernet.
Show more
Management interface
Web UI, App
This router uses Web UI, App for management, which is more advanced than 29.7% of routers and equal to 60.9% of routers.
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI, App, Automatic
This router supports Web UI, App, Automatic firmware update methods, which are more convenient than 71.9% of routers and equal to 27.2% of routers.
Traffic monitoring
yes
This router includes traffic monitoring. 13.9% of routers include traffic monitoring.
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
This router offers a guest Wi‑Fi network. 7.3% of routers offer a guest Wi‑Fi network.
Captive portal
no
This router does not offer captive portal features. 22.4% of routers offer captive portal features.
Show more
CPU clock speed
?
RAM capacity
?
Internal storage
?
Hardware acceleration
yes
This router offers hardware acceleration. 24.9% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
N. of external antennas
?
Show more

ZTE MC888 vs the average router

246810TotalWirelessSecurityNetworkingPortsManagementHardware
  • Faster LAN ports
    This router has a higher LAN port speed than the average router (10 Gbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    10 Gbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Supports automatic failover
    This router offers automatic failover, while the average router does not. 31.2% of routers offer automatic failover.
  • Newer cellular modem
    This router uses a 5G cellular modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    5G vs none (external modem required)
  • Supports OFDMA
    This router supports OFDMA, while the average router does not. 41.5% of routers support OFDMA.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This router supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Includes SIM slot
    This router has a SIM slot, while the average router does not. 11.5% of routers have a SIM slot.
  • More advanced integrated modem
    This router uses a 5G integrated modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    5G vs none (external modem required)
  • Supports TWT
    This router supports Target Wake Time (TWT), while the average router does not. 42.6% of routers support Target Wake Time (TWT).
  • Supports OFDMA
    This router supports OFDMA, while the average router does not. 41.5% of routers support OFDMA.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This router supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Supports TWT
    This router supports Target Wake Time (TWT), while the average router does not. 42.6% of routers support Target Wake Time (TWT).
  • Supports automatic failover
    This router offers automatic failover, while the average router does not. 31.2% of routers offer automatic failover.
  • Faster LAN ports
    This router has a higher LAN port speed than the average router (10 Gbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    10 Gbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Newer cellular modem
    This router uses a 5G cellular modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    5G vs none (external modem required)
  • Includes SIM slot
    This router has a SIM slot, while the average router does not. 11.5% of routers have a SIM slot.
  • More advanced integrated modem
    This router uses a 5G integrated modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    5G vs none (external modem required)
  • 2 more internal antennas
    This router has more internal antennas than the average router (2 vs 0). The average router has 0 internal antennas.
    2 vs 0
  • No VPN server support
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 68.8% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • 1 fewer spatial streams
    This router has fewer spatial streams than the average router (2 vs 3). The average router has 3 spatial streams.
    2 vs 3
  • 2.11x more expensive
    ZTE MC888 is more expensive than the average router (£200 vs £95).
    £200 vs £95
  • 130.6 mm higher height
    This router is taller than the average router (182 mm vs 51.4 mm). The average router is 51.4 mm tall.
    182 mm vs 51.4 mm
  • Narrower DFS range
    This router has fewer supported DFS channels than the average router (52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144). The average router supports 52-64 + 100-144 DFS channels.
    52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144
  • 51.1% heavier weight
    This router is heavier than the average router (680 g vs 450 g). The average router weighs 450 g.
    680 g vs 450 g
  • 2.11x more expensive
    ZTE MC888 is more expensive than the average router (£200 vs £95).
    £200 vs £95
  • 1 fewer spatial streams
    This router has fewer spatial streams than the average router (2 vs 3). The average router has 3 spatial streams.
    2 vs 3
  • Narrower DFS range
    This router has fewer supported DFS channels than the average router (52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144). The average router supports 52-64 + 100-144 DFS channels.
    52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144
  • No VPN server support
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 68.8% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • 130.6 mm higher height
    This router is taller than the average router (182 mm vs 51.4 mm). The average router is 51.4 mm tall.
    182 mm vs 51.4 mm
  • 51.1% heavier weight
    This router is heavier than the average router (680 g vs 450 g). The average router weighs 450 g.
    680 g vs 450 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
TechTricks Zone
≈ estimated
19/06/2025
Unboxing · quick first look
Verdict
ZTE MC888 is affordable, easy to set up and fast, a strong pick for cord cutters and remote workers.
Not graded
Brand video
Brand video
Hands-on video, no verdict
Shop video
Shop video

Third-party reviews

What customers like about ZTE MC888

  • Snapdragon X62 5G modem, up to 3.8 Gbps downlink
  • Two 10 Gbps Ethernet ports for a NAS or PC
  • Wi-Fi 6 dual-band supports up to 64 devices
  • Automatic failover between 5G and wired broadband
  • Plug-and-play with a nano SIM and a 2-year warranty

What customers don't like about ZTE MC888

  • Wi-Fi 6 only, no Wi-Fi 7 or 6 GHz band
  • Only two built-in antennas
  • Capped at 64 connected devices
  • No VPN server built in
  • Mid-range price and best only with good 5G coverage

Verdict

Qualcomm's Snapdragon X62 modem sits at the heart of the ZTE MC888, a 5G home router aimed at buyers who want fibre-like speed without a fixed line. Combined LTE and 5G downlink is quoted at up to 3.8 Gbps, while uploads peak around 316 Mbps. Wi-Fi 6 on 2.4 and 5 GHz covers up to 64 devices. Two 10 Gbps Ethernet ports are unusually generous for this class and suit a NAS or a workstation. If the mobile signal fails and a wired broadband line is connected, the router switches over automatically. Setup needs only a nano SIM. The trade-offs are Wi-Fi 6 instead of Wi-Fi 7, dual-band operation with no 6 GHz channel, just two internal antennas and no VPN server. It is a mid-range choice for a home or small office with strong 5G coverage.

Compare ZTE MC888 with other routers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of ZTE MC888 and other routers

No results found