Scored using Routers Methodology v3.0
Routers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Routers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Routers Methodology v3.0

TP-Link Deco X50 5G review: 77 specs compared

Avg. price:~£260Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)Wi-Fi speed:3000 MbpsLAN port speeds:2.5 Gbps + 1 GbpsMesh Wi-Fi:yes

TP-Link Deco X50 5G Review: Compare 77 technical specifications, 13 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Routers category and whether it is worth buying.

TP-Link Deco X50 5G
8.3/10

Overall score

Score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, expert reviews, best-of lists and owners.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 40%, Reviews score 25%, List score 25%, Sentiment score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

40%

8.0

Technical score

25%

8.5

Reviews score

25%

8.0

List score

10%

9.6

Sentiment score

★Better than 90% of routers
8.5

Value for money

Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

▲Better than 81%
8.0

Technical score

Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

26%

7.6

Wireless

20%

6.8

Ports

18%

8.7

Networking

14%

9.7

Security

12%

7.7

Hardware

10%

7.6

Management

▲Better than 79%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

80%

8.5

Average grade

20%

8.8

Popularity

Grades by review (13)
7 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
▲Better than 77%
8.0

List score

List score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 25% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 84 lists (1%)
▲Better than 70%
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
  • tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
tp-link-deco-x50-5g
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the TP-Link Deco X50 5G

Based on 7 · 6

Reviewers like the dependable 5G connection and quick speeds, but are split on the setup app and Wi-Fi coverage.
Praised
Mixed views
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what

What owners say about the TP-Link Deco X50 5G

Based on 72 owners sharing their experience in online comments

53%positive5%mixed42%negative

Owners value the fast 5G and broad coverage, while recurring dropouts and limited app-based controls frustrate many.

What owners dislike

  • Some owners report the router crashing or dropping the connection after a few days, and one says speeds fell to about 2 Mbps on 5G after roughly 48 hours.16
  • Some owners cannot connect to the SIM at all, or get no IP address, after creating a custom APN or changing settings, and resets did not fix it.6
  • Some owners find 5G speeds far below what they expected, dropping to around 1 Mbps or 30 kbps, and say the router ran slowly even after a reset.5
  • Some owners say there are very few settings, with no way to lock 5G bands or change the Wi-Fi channel, which limits gaming and tuning.5
  • Some owners say setup requires the TP-Link app and an online account, with no local web login, which they find frustrating.4
  • Some devices on the network, including guest Wi-Fi and phones, fail to get an internet connection even though other devices work.4

Points mentioned by at least 3 owners, most mentioned first.

Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Routers model ranking

Ranked #46 of 524 models in Routers (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of router TP-Link Deco X50 5G

Technical score
Technical score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 40% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

26%

7.6

Wireless

20%

6.8

Ports

18%

8.7

Networking

14%

9.7

Security

12%

7.7

Hardware

10%

7.6

Management

8.0
Reviews score
8.5
List score
8.0
Value for money
Value for money
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

8.3

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

8.5
Brand name
TP-Link
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax)
This router uses Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax), which is more advanced than 58.5% of routers and equal to 25.9% of routers.
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
This router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are more versatile than 24.2% of routers and equal to 65.6% of routers.
Wi-Fi speed
3,000 Mbps
This router delivers 3,000 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, which is higher than 65.9% of routers and equal to 6.6% of routers.
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz
This router supports 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz channel width options, which is more than 66.5% of routers and the same as 27.4% of routers.
Show more
What reviewers say
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA3, WPA2, WPA
This router supports WPA3, WPA2, WPA Wi-Fi security protocols, which are more advanced than 85.7% of routers and equal to 14.3% of routers.
DoS protection
yes
This router includes DoS protection. 9.8% of routers include DoS protection.
SPI intrusion protection
yes
This router includes SPI-based intrusion protection. 4.7% of routers include SPI-based intrusion protection.
MAC address filtering
yes
This router supports MAC address filtering. 1.7% of routers include MAC address filtering.
URL filter
yes
This router supports URL filtering. 2.6% of routers include URL filtering.
Show more
What reviewers say
IPv6 support
yes
This router supports IPv6. 8.8% of routers are IPv6-ready.
Dynamic routing
no
This router does not support dynamic routing. 46.2% of routers support dynamic routing.
Inter-VLAN routing
?
VLAN tagging
yes
This router supports VLAN tagging. 33.6% of routers include VLAN tagging.
QoS
yes
This router includes QoS controls. 2.4% of routers include QoS controls.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
2
This router has 2 LAN ports, which is fewer than 84.5% of routers and the same as 5% of routers.
LAN port speeds
2.5 Gbps + 1 Gbps
This router offers 2.5 Gbps + 1 Gbps on its LAN ports, which is faster than 92.2% of routers and on par with 3.5% of routers.
N. of WAN ports
1
This router has 1 WAN ports, which is more than 0.8% of routers and the same as 89.4% of routers.
N. of USB ports
?
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
This router does not support Power over Ethernet (PoE). 1.7% of routers can be powered over Ethernet.
Show more
What reviewers say
Management interface
App
This router uses App for management, which is less advanced than 73% of routers and equal to 5.3% of routers.
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI, App, Automatic
This router supports Web UI, App, Automatic firmware update methods, which are more convenient than 71.9% of routers and equal to 27.2% of routers.
Traffic monitoring
yes
This router includes traffic monitoring. 13.9% of routers include traffic monitoring.
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
This router offers a guest Wi‑Fi network. 7.3% of routers offer a guest Wi‑Fi network.
Captive portal
no
This router does not offer captive portal features. 22.4% of routers offer captive portal features.
Show more
CPU clock speed
?
RAM capacity
512 MB
This router has 512 MB of RAM, which is more than 61.4% of routers and the same as 21.4% of routers.
Internal storage
?
Hardware acceleration
yes
This router offers hardware acceleration. 24.9% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
N. of external antennas
2
This router has 2 external antennas, which is more than 41.2% of routers and the same as 16.5% of routers.
Show more
What reviewers say

TP-Link Deco X50 5G vs the average router

246810TotalWirelessSecurityNetworkingPortsManagementHardware
  • Stronger Wi-Fi security
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA3, WPA2, WPA, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP.
    WPA3, WPA2, WPA vs WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP
  • Faster LAN ports
    This router has a higher LAN port speed than the average router (2.5 Gbps + 1 Gbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    2.5 Gbps + 1 Gbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Supports mesh Wi-Fi
    This router supports mesh Wi-Fi, while the average router does not. 45.2% of routers support mesh Wi-Fi.
  • Newer cellular modem
    This router uses a 5G cellular modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    5G vs none (external modem required)
  • Supports OFDMA
    This router supports OFDMA, while the average router does not. 41.5% of routers support OFDMA.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This router supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Includes SIM slot
    This router has a SIM slot, while the average router does not. 11.5% of routers have a SIM slot.
  • More advanced integrated modem
    This router uses a 5G integrated modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    5G vs none (external modem required)
  • 10.4% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    80%

    8.5

    Average grade

    20%

    8.8

    Popularity

    Grades by review (13)
    7 reviews: 4 with a printed score, 3 estimated from the review. 6 video reviews, each counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 25% of the overall score.
    User ratings collected online are not part of this score.
    8.5 vs 7.7
  • 23.1% higher sentiment score
    9.6 vs 7.8
  • 5.7% better value for money
    TP-Link Deco X50 5G has better value for money than the average router (8.54 vs 8.1).
    8.54 vs 8.08
  • Supports mesh Wi-Fi
    This router supports mesh Wi-Fi, while the average router does not. 45.2% of routers support mesh Wi-Fi.
  • Supports OFDMA
    This router supports OFDMA, while the average router does not. 41.5% of routers support OFDMA.
  • Newer Wi-Fi version
    This router supports a newer Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 71.4% faster Wi-Fi speed
    This router has a higher Wi-Fi speed than the average router (3,000 Mbps vs 1,750 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1,750 Mbps.
    3,000 Mbps vs 1,750 Mbps
  • Wider channel widths
    This router has a higher supported channel width than the average router (20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz). The average router supports channel width of 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz.
    20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz + 160 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
  • Supports TWT
    This router supports Target Wake Time (TWT), while the average router does not. 42.6% of routers support Target Wake Time (TWT).
  • 23.7% wider wireless coverage
    This router has wider wireless coverage than the average router (230 m² vs 186 m²). The average router offers wireless coverage of 186 m².
    230 m² vs 186 m²
  • 1 more spatial streams
    This router has more spatial streams than the average router (4 vs 3). The average router has 3 spatial streams.
    4 vs 3
  • Stronger Wi-Fi security
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA3, WPA2, WPA, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP.
    WPA3, WPA2, WPA vs WPA2, WPA/WPA2, WEP
  • Faster LAN ports
    This router has a higher LAN port speed than the average router (2.5 Gbps + 1 Gbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    2.5 Gbps + 1 Gbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Newer cellular modem
    This router uses a 5G cellular modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    5G vs none (external modem required)
  • Includes SIM slot
    This router has a SIM slot, while the average router does not. 11.5% of routers have a SIM slot.
  • More advanced integrated modem
    This router uses a 5G integrated modem, while the average router uses none (external modem required).
    5G vs none (external modem required)
  • 11 more internal antennas
    This router has more internal antennas than the average router (11 vs 0). The average router has 0 internal antennas.
    11 vs 0
  • 2x more RAM
    This router has more RAM than the average router (512 MB vs 256 MB). The average router has 256 MB of RAM.
    512 MB vs 256 MB
  • 3 years newer release date
    This router was released more recently than the average router (2022 vs 2019). The average router release year is 2019.
    2022 vs 2019
  • 2 fewer LAN ports
    This router has fewer LAN ports than the average router (2 vs 4). The average router has 4 LAN ports.
    2 vs 4
  • Weaker management tools
    This router uses the management interface App, while the average router uses Web UI, App.
    App vs Web UI, App
  • 2.74x more expensive
    TP-Link Deco X50 5G is more expensive than the average router (£260 vs £95).
    £260 vs £95
  • No WPS support
    This router does not support WPS, while the average router does. 89.8% of routers support WPS.
  • 76 mm thicker design
    This router is thicker than the average router (130 mm vs 54 mm). The average router is 54 mm thick.
    130 mm vs 54 mm
  • Narrower DFS range
    This router has fewer supported DFS channels than the average router (52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144). The average router supports 52-64 + 100-144 DFS channels.
    52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144
  • 71.6 mm higher height
    This router is taller than the average router (123 mm vs 51.4 mm). The average router is 51.4 mm tall.
    123 mm vs 51.4 mm
  • 2.74x more expensive
    TP-Link Deco X50 5G is more expensive than the average router (£260 vs £95).
    £260 vs £95
  • No WPS support
    This router does not support WPS, while the average router does. 89.8% of routers support WPS.
  • Narrower DFS range
    This router has fewer supported DFS channels than the average router (52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144). The average router supports 52-64 + 100-144 DFS channels.
    52-64 + 100-140 vs 52-64 + 100-144
  • 2 fewer LAN ports
    This router has fewer LAN ports than the average router (2 vs 4). The average router has 4 LAN ports.
    2 vs 4
  • Weaker management tools
    This router uses the management interface App, while the average router uses Web UI, App.
    App vs Web UI, App
  • 76 mm thicker design
    This router is thicker than the average router (130 mm vs 54 mm). The average router is 54 mm thick.
    130 mm vs 54 mm
  • 71.6 mm higher height
    This router is taller than the average router (123 mm vs 51.4 mm). The average router is 51.4 mm tall.
    123 mm vs 51.4 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Broadband Savvy
≈ estimated
15/03/2026
Hands-on review · speed tests, gaming latency and setup
Verdict
TP-Link Deco X50 5G delivers fast speeds and solid Wi-Fi for the money, but it isn't the cheapest option and setup has a few quirks.
9.0
TechGuru Andrew
≈ estimated
17/12/2023
Hands-on review · 5G speed tests and app settings
Verdict
TP-Link Deco X50 5G delivers strong 5G speeds, but it needs its external antennas installed to work properly.
Not graded
Not graded
Hands-on video, no verdict
Not graded
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
14/08/2023
Hands-on test · 5G backup router
Verdict
The TP-Link Deco X50-5G is simple to set up and can switch to 4G or 5G backup, but its range is limited, so larger homes need Deco satellites.
8.5
blacktubi.com
✓ explicit
27/07/2023
Hands-on test · 5G modem router
Verdict
The TP-Link Deco X50-5G gets more out of a weak mobile signal than a phone does, holding high speeds through long downloads, though advanced parental controls need a subscription.
8.8
chip.de
✓ explicit
09/04/2026
Lab test · Wi-Fi 6 5G router
Verdict
The TP-Link Deco X50-5G is a fast 5G and Wi-Fi 6 router, reaching about 1,040 Mbit/s over Wi-Fi in practice, but it lacks a configurable firewall and USB port.
9.0
digitalrepublic.ch
≈ estimated
31/01/2024
Lab test · 5G home router
Verdict
The TP-Link Deco X50-5G is an easy-to-set-up 5G router for multi-storey homes, but it is large and must stay plugged into mains power.
8.0
tuttoandroid.net
✓ explicit
04/11/2024
Long-term use · 5G router
Verdict
The TP-Link Deco X50-5G is a plug-and-play 5G router with strong reception and band locking, good for homes without fixed broadband, though its web interface is limited.
8.0
mistergadget.tech
≈ estimated
25/03/2024
Hands-on test · 5G modem
Verdict
The TP-Link Deco X50-5G is a good 5G modem for home or office Wi-Fi, reaching about 150 Mbps on Iliad's 5G, but it has only three Ethernet ports.
8.0
techprincess.it
≈ estimated
16/04/2024
Three-week test · 5G Wi-Fi router
Verdict
The TP-Link Deco X50-5G turns a 5G SIM into a stable Wi-Fi network, suiting people who work from home, though data caps on the SIM plan limit large downloads.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about TP-Link Deco X50 5G

  • 5G modem with Nano SIM slot inside a Deco mesh unit
  • AX3000 Wi-Fi 6 with 2402 Mbps on 5 GHz
  • One 2.5 Gbps port plus two gigabit ports
  • Two RP-SMA sockets for external antennas
  • 512 MB of RAM and compatibility with any Deco model
  • Parental controls, VLAN tagging and guest network

What customers don't like about TP-Link Deco X50 5G

  • App-only management with no web interface
  • A TP-Link ID account is required for setup
  • No 6 GHz band, Wi-Fi 6 only
  • Premium price for AX3000 speeds
  • Only three wired ports in total

Verdict

Deco X50 5G combines a 5G modem with TP-Link's Deco mesh system, so it can be the first unit of a whole-home network. Wi-Fi 6 AX3000 gives 2402 Mbps on 5 GHz and 574 Mbps on 2.4 GHz. One port runs at 2.5 Gbps and two at gigabit, and a Nano SIM slot takes the mobile line. Two RP-SMA sockets accept external antennas, which replace part of the eleven internal ones once switched on in the app. The unit has 512 MB of RAM and joins any other Deco model to extend the mesh. Everything is managed in the Deco app, because there is no web page, and a TP-Link ID is required. The price is premium, so it makes most sense for larger homes without a fixed line.

Compare TP-Link Deco X50 5G with other routers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of TP-Link Deco X50 5G and other routers

No results found