OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

Shark UR2650WS review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£410Max suction power:?Runtime:110 minDustbin capacity:220 mLMax threshold height:8 mm

Shark UR2650WS Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

Shark UR2650WS
7.1/10

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models
Score components

80%

6.8

Technical score

20%

8.6

User score

â–²Better than 50% of robot vacuums
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 58%
6.8

Technical score

Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components

30%

6.8

Cleaning

23%

6.9

Navigation

18%

6.6

Mopping

12%

5.8

Battery

10%

8.1

Smart Features

7%

7.1

Design

â–¼Worse than 57%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 87%
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
  • shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
shark-ur2650ws
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum Shark UR2650WS

Technical score
Technical score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 57% of models
Score components:

30%

6.8

Cleaning

23%

6.9

Navigation

18%

6.6

Mopping

12%

5.8

Battery

10%

8.1

Smart Features

7%

7.1

Design

6.8
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 87% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models
Popularity:
Shark UR2650WS has a popularity index of 10, higher than that of 91.5% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 8.5% of robot vacuums.
10
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

70%

7.1

Overall score

30%

8.4

Price

7.5
Max suction power
?
N. of suction power levels
3
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 3 suction power levels, which is fewer than 50.5% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 35.5% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
35 W
Cleaning modes
?
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
vibrating pad
This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 66.9% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 12.5% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
D-shaped
Mop pad material
microfiber and cotton
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
no
This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, although 68.7% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
no
This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, although 56.6% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
yes
This robot vacuum lets you edit maps. 63.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
SharkClean
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
dual-band
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,900 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,900 mAh, which is lower than 57.2% of robot vacuums and equal to 1% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Runtime
110 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 110 min per charge, which is shorter than 77.6% of robot vacuums and equal to 5.2% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
104.1 mm
Width
335.2 mm
Length
340 mm
Weight
?
Show more

Shark UR2650WS vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • 0.97 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (100 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.97 % vs 99 %
  • Vibrating mop
    This robot vacuum has a vibrating mop, while the average robot vacuum does not. 11.3% of robot vacuums have a vibrating mop.
  • Washes the mop with hot water
    This robot vacuum washes its mop with hot water at the base station, while the average robot vacuum does not. 13.4% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Better mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    vibrating pad vs static pad
  • 1.5 h shorter charging time
    This robot vacuum takes less time to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (3 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    3 h vs 4.5 h
  • 80 mL more onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (320 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    320 mL vs 240 mL
  • Supports cleaning solution
    This robot vacuum supports cleaning solution for mopping, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.8% of robot vacuums support this.
  • 53.2% more popular
    Shark UR2650WS is more popular than the average robot vacuum (10 vs 6.5).
    10 vs 6.53
  • 7.4% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Shark UR2650WS
    the average robot vacuum
    Shark UR2650WS has a higher user score than the average robot vacuum (8.59 vs 8).
    8.59 vs 8
  • 1.5 h shorter charging time
    This robot vacuum takes less time to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (3 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    3 h vs 4.5 h
  • 5 dB quieter
    This robot vacuum has a lower reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (60 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    60 dB vs 65 dB
  • Has anti-tangle technology
    This robot vacuum has anti-tangle technology, while the average robot vacuum does not. 42.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
  • 0.97 % higher filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has higher filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (100 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    99.97 % vs 99 %
  • Vibrating mop
    This robot vacuum has a vibrating mop, while the average robot vacuum does not. 11.3% of robot vacuums have a vibrating mop.
  • Washes the mop with hot water
    This robot vacuum washes its mop with hot water at the base station, while the average robot vacuum does not. 13.4% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Better mopping system
    This robot vacuum uses vibrating pad for mopping, while the average robot vacuum uses static pad.
    vibrating pad vs static pad
  • 80 mL more onboard water capacity
    This robot vacuum has a larger onboard water tank than the average robot vacuum (320 mL vs 240 mL). The average robot vacuum's onboard water tank holds 240 mL.
    320 mL vs 240 mL
  • Supports cleaning solution
    This robot vacuum supports cleaning solution for mopping, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.8% of robot vacuums support this.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • 12 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (8 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    8 mm vs 20 mm
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • Does not boost suction automatically on carpets
    This robot vacuum does not boost suction automatically on carpets, while the average robot vacuum boosts suction on carpets automatically.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • 57.7% more expensive
    Shark UR2650WS is more expensive than the average robot vacuum (£410 vs £260).
    £410 vs £260
  • 40 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (110 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    110 min vs 150 min
  • 300 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,900 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 0.28 m shorter power cord
    This robot vacuum has a shorter power cord than the average robot vacuum (1.2 m vs 1.5 m). The average robot vacuum's power cord is 1.5 m long.
    1.22 m vs 1.5 m
  • No maintenance notifications
    This robot vacuum does not provide maintenance notifications, while the average robot vacuum does. 76.8% of robot vacuums offer these.
  • 14 fewer languages supported
    This robot vacuum supports fewer languages than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 17). The average robot vacuum supports 17 languages.
    3 vs 17
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • 12 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (8 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    8 mm vs 20 mm
  • Does not store multiple maps
    This robot vacuum does not store multiple maps, while the average robot vacuum stores multiple maps.
  • Does not update its map in real time
    This robot vacuum does not update its map in real time, while the average robot vacuum updates its map in real time.
  • Does not show its location in real time
    This robot vacuum does not show its location in real time, while the average robot vacuum shows its location in real time.
  • Does not detect carpets automatically
    This robot vacuum does not detect carpets automatically, while the average robot vacuum detects carpets automatically.
  • Does not boost suction automatically on carpets
    This robot vacuum does not boost suction automatically on carpets, while the average robot vacuum boosts suction on carpets automatically.
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • 1 fewer suction power levels
    This robot vacuum offers fewer suction power levels than the average robot vacuum (3 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 suction power levels.
    3 vs 4
  • 180 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (220 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    220 mL vs 400 mL
  • 33 mm narrower main brush
    This robot vacuum has a narrower main brush than the average robot vacuum (145 mm vs 178 mm). The average robot vacuum has a main brush 178 mm wide.
    145 mm vs 178 mm
  • Does not include a cleaning tool
    This robot vacuum does not include a cleaning tool, while the average robot vacuum includes a cleaning tool.
  • 80 rpm slower mop rotation
    This robot vacuum spins its mop pads more slowly than the average robot vacuum (100 rpm vs 180 rpm). The average mop rotation speed among robot vacuums with spinning mops is 180 rpm.
    100 rpm vs 180 rpm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Shark UR2650WS

  • Excellent suction power for lifting dust and pet hair from carpets and hard floors.
  • Intelligent Matrix Clean navigation maps rooms and cleans in even straight lines without missing corners.
  • Effective self-cleaning roller brush that prevents hair tangles.
  • Easy-to-use app for selecting specific rooms, scheduling cleaning and setting no-go zones.
  • Very good battery life, with an automatic return to the charging station when power is low.

What customers don't like about Shark UR2650WS

  • The mobile app can sometimes be buggy or difficult to reconnect during initial setup.
  • The cleaning system and brush require regular maintenance, especially with large amounts of long hair.
  • The mopping water tank is fairly small and needs frequent refilling in large homes.
  • It lacks premium obstacle avoidance and can sometimes bump into objects or get caught on small wires.

Verdict

The Shark Matrix Plus 2-in-1 Robot Vacuum and Mop (UR2650WS) features 360° LiDAR vision for precision home mapping, a self-cleaning anti-hair wrap brushroll, and a bagless, self-emptying base with true HEPA filtration that holds up to 60 days of debris. Key advantages include its Matrix Clean multi-angle grid technology for 30% better carpet cleaning, CleanEdge air blasts for enhanced corner maintenance, and a sonic mopping module that scrubs hard surfaces 100 times per minute. However, notable drawbacks include its lack of a carpet sensor to automatically lift the mop pad, requiring manual attachment and removal of the mopping assembly, alongside a lengthy 6-hour charge time and a loud operating volume of approximately 69 dB.

Compare Shark UR2650WS with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Shark UR2650WS and other robot vacuums

No results found