OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Robot Vacuums Methodology v1.0

PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10 review: 118 specs compared

Avg. price:~£420Max suction power:2700 PaRuntime:130 minDustbin capacity:380 mLMax threshold height:17 mm

PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Robot Vacuums category and whether it is worth buying.

PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the robot vacuum's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best robot vacuums on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

80%

7.0

Technical score

20%

7.0

User score

▼Worse than 55% of robot vacuums
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

▼Worse than 65%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

30%

6.6

Cleaning

23%

8.2

Navigation

18%

6.6

Mopping

12%

5.1

Battery

10%

8.7

Smart Features

7%

6.7

Design

▼Worse than 52%
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

6.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 88%
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
  • philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
philips-homerun-xu2100-10
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of robot vacuum PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of robot-vacuum performance across cleaning, navigation, mopping, battery life, filtration, brush design, smart features, and dimensions.
When it matters
When you want to compare robot vacuums based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

30%

6.6

Cleaning

23%

8.2

Navigation

18%

6.6

Mopping

12%

5.1

Battery

10%

8.7

Smart Features

7%

6.7

Design

7.0
User score
User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
When it matters
When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 88% of models
Score components

70%

7.4

User ratings

30%

6.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the robot vacuum.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 55% of models
Popularity:
PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10 has a popularity index of 6, lower than that of 54.3% of robot vacuums and equal to that of 1.2% of robot vacuums.
6.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the robot vacuum's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a robot vacuum with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

8.3

Price

7.4
Max suction power
2,700 Pa
Market range: <1.6k Pa – >12k Pa
This robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 2,700 Pa, which is lower than 62.2% of robot vacuums and equal to 5.5% of robot vacuums.
N. of suction power levels
4
Market range: <2 – >4
This robot vacuum has 4 suction power levels, which is more than 49.7% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 43.8% of robot vacuums offer.
Motor type
brushless
This robot vacuum uses a brushless motor, a type that is generally more efficient than those used by 2.7% of robot vacuums and also used by 97.3% of robot vacuums.
Power
?
Cleaning modes
5
Market range: <2 – >5
This robot vacuum offers 5 cleaning modes, which is more than 85.9% of robot vacuums offer and the same number as 6.2% of robot vacuums offer.
Show more
Mopping capability
yes
This robot vacuum can mop floors. 78.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Mopping system type
static pad
This robot vacuum uses static pad for mopping. This system is more effective than those on 20.4% of robot vacuums and as effective as those on 46.3% of robot vacuums.
Mop pad type
semi-circular
Mop pad material
microfiber
Mop pressure
?
Show more
Primary navigation technology
LiDAR
This robot vacuum uses LiDAR as its primary navigation system, which is more capable than the systems in 34.7% of robot vacuums and matched by 60.4% of robot vacuums.
Mapping capability
yes
This robot vacuum maps the floor. 74% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Real-time mapping
yes
This robot vacuum updates its map in real time. 68.5% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Multiple map storage
yes
This robot vacuum stores multiple maps. 56.4% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Map editing
yes
This robot vacuum lets you edit maps. 63.8% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
App control
yes
This robot vacuum supports app control. 5.5% of robot vacuums support app control.
App name
Philips HomeRun Robot App
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 6.3% of robot vacuums support Wi-Fi connectivity.
Supported Wi-Fi bands
dual-band
Bluetooth connectivity
yes
This robot vacuum supports Bluetooth connectivity. 35.5% of robot vacuums support Bluetooth connectivity.
Show more
Battery capacity
2,600 mAh
Market range: <2.4k mAh – >5.2k mAh
This robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 2,600 mAh, which is lower than 59% of robot vacuums and equal to 26.9% of robot vacuums.
Battery type
Li-ion
Battery voltage
14.4 V
Runtime
130 min
Market range: <90 min – >240 min
This robot vacuum runs for 130 min per charge, which is shorter than 55.5% of robot vacuums and equal to 2% of robot vacuums.
Recharge and resume
yes
This robot vacuum resumes cleaning after charging. 83.1% of robot vacuums offer this feature.
Show more
Shape
round
Height
97 mm
Width
350 mm
Length
345 mm
Weight
3.1 kg
Market range: <2.59 kg – >4.76 kg
This robot vacuum weighs 3.1 kg, making it lighter than 71% of robot vacuums and the same weight as 1.9% of robot vacuums.
Show more

PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10 vs the average robot vacuum

246810TotalBatteryDesignSmart FeaturesNavigationCleaningMopping
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • Has a removable battery
    This robot vacuum has a removable battery, while the average robot vacuum has a fixed battery.
  • 1 more cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers more cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (5 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    5 vs 4
  • Dustbin full alert
    This robot vacuum alerts you when its dustbin is full, while the average robot vacuum does not. 19.5% of robot vacuums offer a dustbin full indicator.
  • Dispenses cleaning solution automatically
    This robot vacuum dispenses cleaning solution automatically, while the average robot vacuum does not. 26.4% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Has a child lock
    This robot vacuum has a child lock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.9% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • 13.2% lighter
    This robot vacuum is lighter than the average robot vacuum (3.1 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    3.1 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • Newer model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2024, later than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2024 vs 2023
  • Has a removable battery
    This robot vacuum has a removable battery, while the average robot vacuum has a fixed battery.
  • 0.39 W lower standby power consumption
    This robot vacuum draws less power in standby than the average robot vacuum (1.6 W vs 2 W). The average robot vacuum draws 2 W in standby.
    1.61 W vs 2 W
  • 13.2% lighter
    This robot vacuum is lighter than the average robot vacuum (3.1 kg vs 3.57 kg). The average robot vacuum weighs 3.57 kg.
    3.1 kg vs 3.57 kg
  • Newer model
    This robot vacuum was released in 2024, later than the average robot vacuum in 2023. The average release year for robot vacuums is 2023.
    2024 vs 2023
  • Has a child lock
    This robot vacuum has a child lock, while the average robot vacuum does not. 44.9% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • Empties its dustbin automatically
    This robot vacuum empties its dustbin automatically, while the average robot vacuum requires manual dustbin emptying.
  • 1 more cleaning modes
    This robot vacuum offers more cleaning modes than the average robot vacuum (5 vs 4). The average robot vacuum offers 4 cleaning modes.
    5 vs 4
  • Dustbin full alert
    This robot vacuum alerts you when its dustbin is full, while the average robot vacuum does not. 19.5% of robot vacuums offer a dustbin full indicator.
  • Dispenses cleaning solution automatically
    This robot vacuum dispenses cleaning solution automatically, while the average robot vacuum does not. 26.4% of robot vacuums offer this.
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • 1,300 Pa weaker maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has weaker maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (2,700 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    2,700 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • 3 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (17 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    17 mm vs 20 mm
  • 4 % lower filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has lower filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (95 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    95 % vs 99 %
  • More basic filter
    This robot vacuum uses a EPA 11 filter, while the average robot vacuum uses HEPA.
    EPA 11 vs HEPA
  • Does not support spot cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support spot cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports spot cleaning.
  • 60 m² smaller cleaning area
    This robot vacuum has a smaller maximum cleaning area than the average robot vacuum (120 m² vs 180 m²). The average robot vacuum has a maximum cleaning area of 180 m².
    120 m² vs 180 m²
  • 14.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the robot vacuum
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a robot vacuum handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10
    the average robot vacuum
    PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10 has a lower user score than the average robot vacuum (6.97 vs 8.000).
    6.97 vs 8
  • 61.5% more expensive
    PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10 is more expensive than the average robot vacuum (£420 vs £260).
    £420 vs £260
  • 60 m² smaller cleaning area
    This robot vacuum has a smaller maximum cleaning area than the average robot vacuum (120 m² vs 180 m²). The average robot vacuum has a maximum cleaning area of 180 m².
    120 m² vs 180 m²
  • 600 mAh smaller battery capacity
    This robot vacuum has a smaller battery capacity than the average robot vacuum (2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh). The average robot vacuum has a battery capacity of 3,200 mAh.
    2,600 mAh vs 3,200 mAh
  • 1 h longer charging time
    This robot vacuum takes longer to recharge fully than the average robot vacuum (5.5 h vs 4.5 h). The average robot vacuum takes 4.5 h.
    5.5 h vs 4.5 h
  • 20 min shorter runtime
    This robot vacuum runs for less time per charge than the average robot vacuum (130 min vs 150 min). The average robot vacuum runs for 150 min.
    130 min vs 150 min
  • 3 dB louder
    This robot vacuum has a higher reported cleaning noise level than the average robot vacuum (68 dB vs 65 dB). The average robot vacuum has a reported noise level of 65 dB.
    68 dB vs 65 dB
  • More basic obstacle avoidance
    This robot vacuum uses LiDAR for obstacle avoidance, while the average robot vacuum uses hybrid.
    LiDAR vs hybrid
  • 3 mm lower threshold clearance
    This robot vacuum can only cross lower thresholds than the average robot vacuum (17 mm vs 20 mm). The average robot vacuum can cross thresholds up to 20 mm high.
    17 mm vs 20 mm
  • Does not have a floating main brush
    This robot vacuum does not have a floating main brush, while the average robot vacuum has a floating main brush.
  • 1,300 Pa weaker maximum suction
    This robot vacuum has weaker maximum suction than the average robot vacuum (2,700 Pa vs 4,000 Pa). The average robot vacuum has a maximum suction pressure of 4,000 Pa.
    2,700 Pa vs 4,000 Pa
  • 4 % lower filter efficiency
    This robot vacuum has lower filter efficiency than the average robot vacuum (95 % vs 99 %). The average robot vacuum has a filter efficiency of 99 %.
    95 % vs 99 %
  • More basic filter
    This robot vacuum uses a EPA 11 filter, while the average robot vacuum uses HEPA.
    EPA 11 vs HEPA
  • Does not support spot cleaning
    This robot vacuum does not support spot cleaning, while the average robot vacuum supports spot cleaning.
  • 20 mL smaller dustbin
    This robot vacuum has a smaller onboard dustbin than the average robot vacuum (380 mL vs 400 mL). The average robot vacuum has a dustbin capacity of 400 mL.
    380 mL vs 400 mL

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
consumentenbond.nl
Niet gespecificeerd
Summary of the review
Philips XU2100/10 - Test, Reviews & Prices
(Translated)Show original
R
review.nl
31/07/2024
Summary of the review
Philips Robot Vacuum Cleaner XU2100/20 - Review.nl
(Translated)Show original
I
id.nl
29/03/2025
Summary of the review
Consumer Testing: The Philips 2000 Series Robot Vacuum
(Translated)Show original
K
kieskeurig.nl
15/03/2026
Summary of the review
Philips XU2100/25 reviews | Kieskeurig.nl | Robot vacuums
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10

  • Efficient navigation using 360° laser (LDS) radar technology for accurate mapping
  • Effective mopping and sweeping, particularly on hard floors
  • Good battery life with up to 120 minutes of runtime and auto-recharge/resume functionality
  • Intuitive app control allowing for scheduling, custom cleaning, and virtual no-go zones
  • Compact auto-empty station saves space

What customers don't like about PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10

  • Some users report mapping can be finicky in complex layouts (long hallways/many doors)
  • The main brush may struggle with long hair, causing occasional clogging
  • The robot can sometimes fail to resume or 'sleep' mid-clean
  • Lower suction power (around 2700 Pa) compared to higher-end models in the same series

Verdict

The PHILIPS HomeRun 2000 Series XU2100/10 is a 2-in-1 robot vacuum and mop featuring 2700Pa of suction power, 360-degree LDS radar laser navigation, and a 130-minute runtime capable of covering up to 120 square meters on a single charge. Main characteristics and pros include its compact Auto-Empty station equipped with a 3.0-litre S-bag providing up to 70 days of hands-free dirt disposal, an integrated 280ml electric water tank for light wiping, an automatic carpet boost feature, and multi-floor mapping for up to 5 maps via the HomeRun app. However, notable cons include its lack of a carpet detection sensor to automatically lift the mop, meaning users must manually configure no-mop zones in the app, alongside a station that lacks automated mop washing, hot drying, or water refilling capabilities.

Compare PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10 with other robot vacuums

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of PHILIPS Homerun XU2100/10 and other robot vacuums

No results found